Web 2.0 Thinking Game

17 Oct 2006 5 am eastern

The most telling detail in The Economist’s coverage of Google and YouTube was the subhead: “Google’s acquisition of YouTube shows that ‘Web 2.0′ has come of age.” A few weeks back, The Economist was calling “Web 2.0″ a trend. Their phrase was, “hot Web 2.0 trend.” The magazine now intends “Web 2.0″ to be understood as a sort of second edition:

This week’s pairing of Google and YouTube may come to be remembered as the moment “Web 2.0″—ie, the web, version two—came of age.

Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying:

Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.
Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.

Put another way:

Web 1.0: New media company buys old media company.
Web 2.0: New media company buys new media company.

If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it. Here’s my new game. I’ll start, you finish:

Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News.
Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes.

Web 1.0: Users create the content (Slashdot).
Web 2.0: Users create the content (Flickr).

Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.
Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace.

Web 1.0: Writing.
Web 2.0: Rating.

Web 1.0: Karma Points.
Web 2.0: Diggs.

Web 1.0: Cool Site of the Day.
Web 2.0: Technorati.com.

Web 1.0: Tags.
Web 2.0: “Tags.”

Web 1.0: Bookmarking.
Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing.

Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets.
Web 2.0: Pointless “Ajax” widgets.

Now you try it!

Tags: web2.0, games, economist

Filed under: Marketing, Memes, industry

670 Responses to “Web 2.0 Thinking Game”

nickpan | web designer, blogger in singapore and web standards supporter said on 29 March 2008 at 3:00 pm:

to a more dynamic Web that is more organized and is based on serving Web applications to users. ~ Webopedia Clearly “Web 2.0? means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. ~Zeldman
jesuisunemarque.com | Blog de Lucas LARROCHE said on 11 February 2008 at 8:27 pm:

En terme d’ergonomie Une navigation simpifiée, plus légère, plus intuitive (par le biais des nuages de tags notamment). Une autre définition sous forme de jeu :le Web 2.0 Thinking Game.Le principe est simple : vous donnez un trait caractéristique du web1.0 et en regard, un autre trait caractéristique du web2.0 Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube Web 1.0: Writing
PartyMenu said on 14 January 2008 at 10:35 pm:

para podermos carregar conteudos sem o flick das páginas à lá web 1.0 …. Mas pronto, entre mortos e feridos algum há de escapar Entretanto deixo-vos com uma engraçada reflexão sobre a actual web que vivemos, pelos senhores dozeldman.com
Folhas Soltas said on 14 December 2007 at 10:38 am:

). Recomendo a visita a estes sítios – e -HAVE FUN! :) Library and Information Science Wiki, que cobre áreas relacionadas com os Wikis e bibliotecas. Library Success: A Best Practices Wiki, uma loja de ideias e de informação para todo o tipo de bibliotecários, onde as pessoas partilham
Scatterism said on 20 August 2007 at 6:29 pm:

that my neighbor was just seeded $1.3M because he manages his family with Basecamp through Bootcamp using Ubuntu installed on his MacBook so he can blog about it all with a pagerank of six. Six! KAAAHN! — Greg Storey, Rumsfeld Gold. PureGold.
Really Simple Social Media - Vox said on 8 August 2007 at 2:12 pm:

be uncertain yet want/need to give the impression that they know what it means. Talking to a Baby Boomer recently who compared Web2.0 to eLearning, I suggested that, imho, this might be a stretch. Btw, there is another group – those who are are open
Book Odiseo said on 19 July 2007 at 1:34 pm:

Web 1.0 was American. Web 2.0 is international. Web 3.0 is Chinese. Web 1.0 was a tool. Web 2.0 is a lifestyle. Web 3.0 is an addiction. Web 1.0 was a tool for the few. Web 2.0 is entertainment for the many. Web 3.0 is an opiate for the many.Jeffrey Zeldman, creador y director creativo de una agencia que diseña páginas web,
WSMY - Creativity with Web's Best Practices said on 7 April 2007 at 5:26 pm:

strong support for this group, from many people we have talked to, including browser makers.” TXP Four Oh Four—the best CMS ever, now even better! ;) Introduction to Microformats—a brief history, and why Microformats are primed for the big time.Web 2.0 Thinking Game—fun with the meaningless Web 2.0 label. The Truth About Prepaid (.com) & (.com.my)—ouh? yawn…—I digg the flash-like-it’s-1999 tho ;D
BestTopSites.com said on 7 February 2007 at 4:13 pm:

*Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game
upsanddowns said on 18 January 2007 at 4:51 am:

2.0″ design. everyone should use pastel colors right? how many people thinking this is a good idea actually went to design school? going light on design doesn’t mean not using tables or building sucky sites that look like zero design went into it.my favorite comments on this ever
We'll catch up to you in Broker — Airbag Industries said on 28 November 2006 at 3:14 am:

Yes, it’s going to be different this time.Way different.Nobody is chasing after the IPO dream today, no sir, we learned our lesson from just six years ago, and never-you-mind that my neighbor was just seeded $1.3M because he manages his family with Basecamp through Bootcamp using Ubuntu installed on his
Tim Makin said on 31 October 2006 at 11:45 pm:

What does web 2.0 means to you? Just been looking on zeldman website at the web 2.0 thinking game article about what web 1.0 and web 2.0 means, some funy answers. Check them outhereWeb 1.0: drop shadows Web 2.0: reflections Web 1.0 – hotmail Web 2.0 – Gmail Web 1.0 terms for clients to use and not understand Web 2.0 terms for clients to use and not understand Web 1.0 Napster
übermüdet - das Väterblog said on 27 October 2006 at 7:01 am:

Web 1.0 gegen Web 2.0, gesammelte Werke. Sehr lustig, aber fast zuviel um alle zu lesen.
Schizoid blog said on 26 October 2006 at 1:27 pm:

a year ago and now you think that it is THE tool – valid markup, accessibility and RSS (yeah!) – all included COOL!!! Ако искате да се позабавлявате от все сърце, прочетете коментарите къмтази
David Hughes - Gentleman Blogger said on 18 October 2006 at 11:56 pm:

Zeldman has agreat poston what Web 2.0 means to different journalists and the wider interwebosphere™. He’s created a great Web 2.0 thinking game to illustrate Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0; here are a few examples: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.
Emily's World said on 18 October 2006 at 8:42 pm:

I was browsing bookmarks on del.icio.us and found an interesting link to a blog article calledWeb 2.0 Thinking Game. This article compares web 1.0 and web 2.0 with examples. I thought it would be neat to compare web 1.0 and web 2.0 in nonprofit technology. Here is what I have come up with: Web 1.0: Nonprofits post links to articles and press releases on their
Ntro's Official Opinion said on 1 November 2006 at 12:10 am:

Domino video whitney music box var. 0 – chromatic – 48 tines CNN is stupid.Web 2.0 Thinking Game
rich said on 17 October 2006 at 5:56 am:

Web 1.0: Zeldman.com without comments
Web 2.0: Zeldman.com with comments

;-)
Emilio said on 17 October 2006 at 6:25 am:

Web 1.0: 12px h2
Web 2.0: 51px h2
Mark said on 17 October 2006 at 6:30 am:

Web 1.0: Animated gif
Web 2.0: Badges

Web 1.0: Arial
Web 2.0: Arial Rounded/Georgia
List of Web 2.0 sites in Australia - Coding & Web - Whirlpool Broadband Forums said on 22 October 2006 at 8:31 am:

[...] Seems Zeldman can be pretty timely with his blog posts :)www.zeldman.com/2006/10/…20-thinking-game [...]
Andrew Faulkner said on 17 October 2006 at 6:32 am:

Web 1.0: Bloated Table Code
Web 2.0: Divitis
digg / All / Upcoming said on 22 October 2006 at 8:36 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
reddit.com: what's new online said on 22 October 2006 at 8:51 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game (zeldman.com) [...]
Le Blog de Julien » Web 2.0 et auto-dérision said on 22 October 2006 at 7:01 am:

[...] Excellent article sur Zeldman.com, qui prenant comme abse un article de The Economist s’amuse à tourner en dérision le web 2.0 avec le fameux jeu avant/aprés. [...]
Jim Whimpey said on 17 October 2006 at 7:09 am:

Web 1.0: Social drinking
Web 2.0: Social bookmarking
dzone.com - upcoming links said on 22 October 2006 at 9:10 am:

[...] Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game (Tags: humor, opinion, trends, web 2.0) [...]
Jim Whimpey » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 22 October 2006 at 7:13 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Adam Osborne said on 17 October 2006 at 7:15 am:

Web 1.0: Webmail 2mb storage
Web 2.0: Webmail 2gb storage
Ben Darlow said on 17 October 2006 at 7:20 am:

Web 1.0: Developers whinging about Netscape users who won’t upgrade to Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Developers whinging about Internet Explorer users who won’t upgrade to Firefox
(O_o) nickpan said on 17 October 2006 at 7:27 am:

Web 1.0 : Deserted blogs on Blogger
Web 2.0 : Deserted blogs on Wordpress

Web 1.0 : The past
Web 2.0 : The present
Web 3.0 : The future
Charlie said on 17 October 2006 at 7:32 am:

Web 1.0: Large expanses of default-white dotted with unformatted text
Web 2.0: Large expanses of white with a gradient at the top dotted with meticulously formatted and precisely positioned text
Stephen Dolphin said on 17 October 2006 at 7:47 am:

Web 1.0: Comic Sans in font tags to give your site that “friendly edge”
Web 2.0: Comic Sans in style sheets with no capitalisation of words to give your site that “friendly edge”
Lance Shields said on 17 October 2006 at 8:01 am:

Web 1.0: Working at the web agency
Web 2.0: Working at your own start-up
Web 3.0: Working on a tropical island
Matt said on 17 October 2006 at 8:05 am:

Web 1.0: “Under Construction”
Web 2.0: “Beta”
JBagley said on 17 October 2006 at 8:07 am:

Web 1.0: Bank loan
Web 2.0: Venture Capital

Web 1.0: Meaningful domain names
Web 2.0: Unpronouncable domain names
Brian said on 17 October 2006 at 8:25 am:

Web 1:0: objects

Web 2.0: theory objects
Shrikant Joshi said on 17 October 2006 at 8:33 am:

Web 1.0: Site under construction
Web 2.0: Beta

Web 1.0: Flashy banners
Web 2.0: Banner flashes

Web 1.0: Communication
Web 2.0: Conversation

Web 1.0: Times New Roman
Web 2.0: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana (and a bit of Georgia, too)

Web 1.0: Geocities
Web 2.0: Google Pages

Web 1.0: Ajax = Football team in Netherlands
Web 2.0: AJAX = well…

On a more serious note:
Web 1.0: You and I
Web 2.0: Us

Regards,
Shri.
JD said on 17 October 2006 at 8:47 am:

Web 1.0: CEOs
Web 2.0: “Thought leaders.”
Rob kirton said on 17 October 2006 at 8:53 am:

Web 1.0 – Dot com bubble
Web 2.0 – Dot com hubble bubble toil and trouble (it runs on witchcraft and other things most folk will never quite understand)
Tatanka said on 17 October 2006 at 8:57 am:

Web 1.0 – text and image
Web 2.0 – image and animation
Web 3.0 – animation and time/space virtual continuum
Filip Salomonsson said on 17 October 2006 at 9:05 am:

Web 1.0: <p><font …>
Web 2.0: <div><div><div><div><span><h3>

(I’m having a drink if this doesn’t display right.)
Web 2.0 said on 22 October 2006 at 9:15 am:

[...] Zeldman’s got some thoughts (and a game) on the subject: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]
Britxbox :: View topic - web2.0 said on 22 October 2006 at 9:18 am:

[...] didn’t know where else to put this but if you’re into web development you’ll find this funny. zeldman’s web2.0 thinking game [...]
sivadeel said on 17 October 2006 at 9:20 am:

Web 1.0: conferences
Web 2.0: conferences

Web 1.0: venture capital
Web 2.0: venture capital

;-)
Online stories » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 - buzzing like a bumble bee said on 17 October 2006 at 9:35 am:

[...] Ultra cool the word/thinking game on Jeffrey Zeldman’s blog on the differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. I liked the comments on it, especially: [...]
Blogmarks.net : Public marks said on 22 October 2006 at 9:42 am:

[...] 17 October 2006 13:30 [...]
sharaf said on 17 October 2006 at 9:53 am:

Web 1.0: Yahoo! launches
Web 2.0: Yahoo! gets acquired…

Web 1.0: IE 5.0
Web 2.0: IE 7.0

Web 1.0: Visting Blogs
Web 2.0: Unbolding RSS Feeds
ben said on 17 October 2006 at 10:00 am:

Web 1.0: Green
Web 2.0: #CCDDAA
Olly Hodgson said on 17 October 2006 at 10:04 am:

Web 1.0: Links
Web 2.0: Relationships
Paul Edmonds said on 17 October 2006 at 10:17 am:

Web 1.0 The bigger the bevel the more important the button
Web 2.0 The shinier the plastic the more important the button
Nick said on 17 October 2006 at 10:17 am:

web 1.0: Inaccessible DHTML
web 2.0: Inaccessible AJAX
Benjamin said on 17 October 2006 at 10:18 am:

Web 1.0: pop-ups
Web 2.0: flash pop-overs
Martin Bekkelund » Web 2.0 og AJAX said on 22 October 2006 at 10:25 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman presenterer i dag en fin sammenligning mellom Web 1.0 og 2.0. Mange sannheter. Historien gjenntar seg. [...]
Ma.gnolia.com - Find Web Sites & Build Community Online said on 22 October 2006 at 10:29 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Nathan Borror said on 17 October 2006 at 10:40 am:

“Web 2.0″ makes my ubiquitous stomach churn.
Ryan Irelan » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 20 October 2006 at 10:56 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – Web 1.0 – Bubble, Web 2.0 – Denial of Bubble. [...]
Mike Cherim said on 17 October 2006 at 11:01 am:

Web 1.0: Spam emails
Web 2.0: Spam emails and spam comments

Web 1.0: Post copyrighted content
Web 2.0: Download and redistribute copyrighted content

Web 1.0: Rounded corners are new and kinda cool
Web 2.0: Rounded corners are confused with Web 2.0
Karl von L. said on 17 October 2006 at 11:01 am:

Web 1.0: Text that wraps to your browser window
Web 2.0: Text that makes you widen your browser window if you want to read it all without horizontal scrolling
Kevin Lamping said on 17 October 2006 at 11:14 am:

Web 1.0 – Bookmark this site!
Web 2.0 – Digg this post!
Ceejbot :: start said on 22 October 2006 at 11:18 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Jeffrey Zeldman invites you to contrast Web 1.0 with Web 2.0. Hee! [...]
coyote dreams » Blog Archive » web 2.0 said on 22 October 2006 at 11:20 am:

[...] You can read it here. [...]
Vincent Pickering said on 17 October 2006 at 11:24 am:

web 1.0: bloated, useless DHTML
web 2.0: bloated, uesless Javascript Libraries

web 1.0: animated gifs
web 2.0: scriptaculous

web 1.0: all talk, no action by the W3C
web 2.0: all talk, no action by the W3C

web 1.0: blue background colour
web 2.0: green background colour
Des Traynor said on 17 October 2006 at 11:32 am:

Web 1.0 Annoying and useless Javascript
Web 2.0 Annoying and useless Javascript that means your app doesn’t work cross anything

Web 1.0 “Bullshit eBusiness Seminars”
Web 2.0 “Blogger conferences, and BlogHer Conferences.”
Paul R. Redmond said on 17 October 2006 at 11:38 am:

Web 1.0 – Meta Tags
Web 2.0 – SEO

Web 1.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus.

Web 2.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS.

Web 1.0 – Google Ninja
Web 2.0 – AJAX/Web Ninja*

Web 1.0 – Actually design websites
Web 2.0 – Attend and host hundreds of conferences

*I never got the whole freaking ninja thing? There are too many geeks on the web.
Jordan Ryan Moore said on 17 October 2006 at 11:47 am:

Web 1.0:
<code><P><FONT COLOR=green SIZE=4>Header</P></FONT></code>

Web 2.0:
<code><h2 class=”sIFR-replaced”><embed style=”width:200px; height:40px;” class=”sIFR-flash” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” sifr=”true” bgcolor=”#FFFFFF” wmode=”" flashvars=”txt=Header&textcolor=#080&w=200&h=40″ quality=”best” src=”/swf/cool-font.swf” height=”40″ width=”200″><span class=”sIFR-alternate”>Header</span></h2></code>
Daring Fireball Linked List: October 2006 said on 20 October 2006 at 11:55 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game ★ [...]
Charlie said on 17 October 2006 at 11:57 am:

Web 1.0: Old folks have no clue.
Web 2.0: My parents just left a comment on my blog.
SimpleBits | Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 20 October 2006 at 12:00 pm:

[...] Fun! Great comments, too. Visit site [...]
Rommel said on 17 October 2006 at 12:02 pm:

Web 1.0: MAC and PC Ads by APPLE

Web 2.0: MAC and PC Ads by TrueNuff TV!
squareman said on 17 October 2006 at 12:13 pm:

web 1.0: Published standards and browsers that don’t support them
web 2.0: “De-facto” standards by browsers that don’t support 10-year old standards.
squareman said on 17 October 2006 at 12:16 pm:

Web 1.x: 3 months = 1 Web year
Web 2.x: 3 years = The last time my personal site was updated
John Winkelman said on 17 October 2006 at 12:18 pm:

Web 1.0 : DynAPI
Web 2.0 : jquery
AJ said on 17 October 2006 at 12:21 pm:

Web 1.0: Having to turn off Java applets so you can actually read someone’s webpage.
Web 2.0: Having to turn off Flash plugin so you can actually read someone’s page.
Dave said on 17 October 2006 at 12:24 pm:

Web 1.0 – I want round corners, nested TABLEs.
Web 2.0 – I want round corners, nested DIVs, Ps, SPANs, DOM manipulations.
Old Beta said on 17 October 2006 at 12:28 pm:

Web 1.0 – You own a webdesign company because you started creating table based websites ten years ago. However, six years ago you understood the purpose of the web standards and website accessibility.

Web 2.0 – You own a webdesign company because you “designed” your first Wordpress blog a year ago and now you think that it is THE tool – valid markup, accessibility and RSS (yeah!) – all included
vjnoone said on 17 October 2006 at 12:39 pm:

Fun!

web 1.0: rounded corners on table driven layouts
web 2.0: squared table-less CSS layouts
Shashwat Nagpal said on 17 October 2006 at 12:45 pm:

Very impresive write up!

Web 1.0: Poor standard support for Browsers
Web 2.0: Poor standard support for Browsers
Andrea Martines said on 17 October 2006 at 12:46 pm:

Web 1.0 – We were not used to laugh about what we were doing
Web 2.0 – We currently laugh about this all stuff
Web 3.0 – Whatever it is… Just start laughing now!
Shashwat Nagpal said on 17 October 2006 at 12:47 pm:

Web 1.0: Keep code light!
Web 2.0: Keep design lighter!
Regnard Raquedan said on 17 October 2006 at 12:52 pm:

Web 1.0: Links
Web 2.0: Blogroll

Web 1.0: 20,000 Hits on my webpage!
Web 2.0: Ive been dugg 1000 times on Digg!

Web 1.0: Javascript Image Rollovers
Web 2.0: CSS+AJAX Menus

Web 1.0: “The Edge”
Web 2.0: “Cool and Smooth”
JeffCroft.com: Five things I’m doing to get better at web design said on 29 October 2006 at 1:00 pm:

[...] 0 comments on Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
BJ said on 17 October 2006 at 1:11 pm:

Web 1.0: Clients who don’t get it
Web 2.0: Clients who don’t get it
will chatham said on 17 October 2006 at 1:14 pm:

Web 1.0: a,e,i,o,u
Web 2.0:
Newton Wagner » Arquivo » Jeffrey Zeldman e o jogo da Web 2.0 said on 20 October 2006 at 1:45 pm:

[...] O autor do livro Desenvolvendo Sites Compatíveis, (citado aqui no blog), divulgou um divertido jogo no seu blog. A idéia é definir Web 1.0 e Web 2.0, como os exemplos abaixo, traduzidos do post do Zeldman e de alguns comentários: [...]
Anton Muraviev said on 17 October 2006 at 2:21 pm:

Web 1.0: Making web pages in a word processor.
Web 2.0: Preparing documents in a web browser.
Kevan Emmott said on 17 October 2006 at 2:27 pm:

Web 1.0: IE 3 running quickly with 3 or 4 windows open on a 200 Mhz PII with 128 MB RAM.
Web 2.0: Firefox 2.0rc2 running slowly with 10-20 tabs open on a 2.4 Ghz P4 with 512 MB RAM.

Web 1.0: Rational Unified Process implementing J2EE
Web 2.0: “Getting Real” using RoR
Andrew said on 17 October 2006 at 2:59 pm:

Web 1.0: Content is everything
Web 2.0: Someone else’s content is everything
Vaidas Žilionis » WEB 2.0 žaidimas žodžiais said on 20 October 2006 at 3:44 pm:

[...] Dabar kaip žinote yra WEB 2.0 laikotarpis, kadaise buvo WEB 1.0 ir ateis kažkada WEB 3.0 laikotarpis. Kaip atskirti? Zeldman pasistengė apie tai pamastyti [...]
Dustin Diaz said on 17 October 2006 at 3:45 pm:

web 1.0: <a onclick="foo();">
web 2.0: var addListener = function(el, type, fn, o, b) { };

Sorry I couldn’t help myself. I just wasn’t seeing any nerdy js entries in here.
raphael said on 17 October 2006 at 4:00 pm:

Web1.0: print budget
Web2.0: print budget

Web1.0: journalist budget
Web2.0: journalist budget

Web1.0: TV production budget
Web2.0: TV production budget

Web1.0: No budget to strong budget
Web2.0: No budget to strong budget

Web1.0: We are the best. Dot.
Web2.0: We are the best. You know, with RSS, Semantic CSS, Social bookmarks, Ajax, …

Web1.0: Experience this effect
web2.0: Experience this content

Web1.0: Zeldman
Web2.0: Zeldman
Alek said on 17 October 2006 at 4:01 pm:

Web 1.0: Programming languages for real men.
Web 2.0: Ruby on Rails.
Steven Ametjan said on 17 October 2006 at 4:05 pm:

Web 1.0: Perl or PHP
Web 2.0: Django or Ruby on Rails

Web 1.0: Overly large DHTML libraries.
Web 2.0: Overly large AJAX libraries (with DHTML).
Brodo Primordiale: Clueless post said on 20 October 2006 at 4:07 pm:

[...] Qua devono aver letto il tuo post. [...]
de.maschine » C.R.E.A.M. said on 20 October 2006 at 4:14 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – from Zeldman (on the money as per usual) [...]
CSS Drive News- Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 20 October 2006 at 4:36 pm:

[...] Design News Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
ed said on 17 October 2006 at 4:49 pm:

web 1.0: Ah, those were the days
web 2.0: Ah, those were the days
web 3.0: Enough reminiscing, back to work…
Ray said on 17 October 2006 at 4:52 pm:

Web 1.0: Couldn’t wait to get involved.
Web 2.0: Can’t wait for 2.0 to pass.
Ray said on 17 October 2006 at 4:53 pm:

Web 1.0: Textism.com
Web 2.0: Whatever
Dave said on 17 October 2006 at 4:56 pm:

Web 1.0: HTML markup.
Web 2.0: HTML with CSS, meaning it has half the bloatedness.

Web 1.0: NASDAQ.
Web 2.0: NASDAQ after the bubble burst, meaning it has half the value.

Web 1.0: Silicon Valley 1999… out of touch with the real world.
Web 2.0: Silicon Valley 2006… out of touch with the real world.

Oh, wait a second!
Brian said on 17 October 2006 at 5:06 pm:

web 1.0: Completely Flash sites suck.
web 2.0: Completely Flash sites still suck.
blogpocket 6.0 » Repaso a mi blogroll la locura de los weblogs dentro de uno said on 21 October 2006 at 5:16 pm:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents The Daily Report. Zeldman compara la web 1.0 y la web 2.0 en Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
Joe Casabona said on 17 October 2006 at 5:25 pm:

Web 1.0: Napster to download Music and Video
Web 2.0: Pure Volume and MySpace for music, YouTube for everything
"To all my freinnnnnnnnnnnds!" said on 20 October 2006 at 5:32 pm:

[...] http://snippy.ceejbot.com/wiki/show/start/2006/10/17/001Jeffrey Zeldman invites you to contrast Web 1.0 with Web 2.0. Hee! [...]
karim said on 17 October 2006 at 6:01 pm:

web 1.0: sorry we’re still testing
web 2.0: yay! we’re beta!
J said on 17 October 2006 at 6:04 pm:

Web 1.0: target=”_blank”
Web 2.0: onclick=”window.open(this.href); return false;”
Fascination Place » Blog Archive » Your Tech Snark for the Day said on 21 October 2006 at 6:09 pm:

[...] Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 (read the comments for more amusement) [...]
rc3.org: Of Interest said on 20 October 2006 at 6:12 pm:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman on Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 — It’s funny because it’s true. [...]
New Del.icio.us popular sites said on 20 October 2006 at 6:13 pm:

[...] New popular sites (Just new in last 24h). [...]
Martium said on 17 October 2006 at 6:48 pm:

Just a few days ago you were pondering your lack of interest ….. now this. Methinks the a-listers are over it.

Web 1.0: the web is for geeks
Web 2.0: gimme some of that web action
Benjamin Alpert said on 17 October 2006 at 6:48 pm:

Web 1.0: Clutter
Web 2.0: Prettier, more accessible clutter

Thank you, Web 2.0, you are the the Container Store for all our crap.
Beerzie Boy said on 17 October 2006 at 7:00 pm:

Web 1.0: Simple design with vapid content.
Web 2.0: Slick design with vapid content.
Bob Sawyer said on 17 October 2006 at 7:14 pm:

Web 1.0: Zeldman’s “Steal My Icons” on every site*
Web 2.0: Orange RSS Feed icons on every site

*Yes, including mine.
Zeldman 2.0 Thinking Game - Search Engine Optimization - SEO Refugee said on 20 October 2006 at 7:38 pm:

[...] Zeldman 2.0 Thinking Game http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ My some of my favs Quote: [...]
Joey Lesh said on 17 October 2006 at 7:51 pm:

Web 1.0: Boring, abandoned homepages.
Web 2.0: Boring, abandoned blogs.

Web 1.0: Solaris.
Web 2.0: Linux.
Dante said on 17 October 2006 at 7:54 pm:

Web 1.0: Webmonkey/Dr. Web
Web 2.0: A List Apart/Sitepoint

Web 1.0: Netscape
Web 2.0: Mozilla

Web 1.0: “Sign my guestbook!”
Web 2.0: “Submit Comment”
Kevin said on 17 October 2006 at 8:13 pm:

Web 1.0: Flicker
Web 2.0: Flickr
Josh said on 17 October 2006 at 8:17 pm:

Web 1.0: Look what I did in FrontPage
Web 2.0: Look what I did in DreamWeaver

Web 1.0: “Don’t use CSS”
Web 2.0: “Don’t use IE”

Web 1.0: Jolt Cola
Web 2.0: Double caffeinated mocha late slim

Web 1.0: Spell check through Word
Web 2.0: Spell check through Google

Web 1.0: Rubberband
Web 2.0: Broadband
Darren Hoyt said on 17 October 2006 at 8:19 pm:

Web1.0: Making half-assed effort to design for blind and handicapped users
Web2.0: Making three-quarter-assed effort to design for blind and handicapped users
Thumblicious: see the sites - viewing web2.0 said on 20 October 2006 at 8:41 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game | Previews by Thumbshots.com | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it! [...]
Grant Hutchinson said on 17 October 2006 at 9:06 pm:

Web 1.0: All Your Base Are Belong To Us
Web 2.0: Web 2.0 Thinking Game
Francis Shephard said on 17 October 2006 at 9:23 pm:

Web 1.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
Web 2.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
Web 3.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money

Web 1.0: Microsoft Don’t Listen
Web 2.0: Microsoft try to Listen
Web 3.0: Microsoft Actually Listen – but its too late for them

Web 1.0: Web Developers risk all to Create an Experience
Web 2.0: Web Developers Anally follow code guidelines and the experience becomes drained of life, spontaneous ideas are replaced with the html equivalent of keeping up with the Jones’s
Josh said on 17 October 2006 at 9:31 pm:

Web 1.0: Get a Mac already! Geez your doing that the hard way.
Web 2.0: Get Firefox Already! Geez your doing that the hard way.

Web 1.0 I just hooked up my friend’s band site for $300! let’s go see a movie.
Web 2.0 Band borrows computer to check myspace ?

Web 1.0 What’s the easiest way to build a site for cheap?
Web 2.0 How can I build an internet for free?
paulo said on 17 October 2006 at 9:34 pm:

web 1.0: “convergence” and “synergy”
web 2.0: “community”
GUESShimself said on 17 October 2006 at 9:36 pm:

Web 1.0: All Your Base Are Belong To Us!
Web 2.0: What ever’s hot on YouTube.

Web 1.0: Hotmail
Web 2.0: Gmail

Web 1.0: excitement for “web 2.0″
Web 2.0: wish i never heard of “web 2.0″
Patrick Bouchard said on 17 October 2006 at 9:54 pm:

web 1.0: animated gifs
web 2.0: animated javascript
www.gilbertpaquet.com : rédaction et design web said on 21 October 2006 at 10:13 pm:

[...] Dans le même ordre d’idées : “If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it.” [...]
Nick Cowie said on 17 October 2006 at 10:37 pm:

Web 1.0: Content is king!
Web 2.0: Contributed content is king! (ie the comments are more informative than the original post)
Russell Heimlich said on 17 October 2006 at 11:12 pm:

Web 1.0: Underconstruction
Web 2.0 Beta
Agus said on 17 October 2006 at 11:14 pm:

Paul, this happen everywhere:

Web 1.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus.

Web 2.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS, bla.. bla..

“they” need God these days just to make their brochure(whatever) online.
Eric said on 17 October 2006 at 11:18 pm:

web 1.0: The X-Files
web 2.0: Lost

web 1.0: suck.com
web 2.0: Fortean Times

web 1.0: stuffit
web 2.0: zip
Ryan Dewsbury said on 17 October 2006 at 11:19 pm:

Web 1.0: MS Word
Web 2.0: Writely
links for 2006-10-18 « tabula rasa said on 21 October 2006 at 11:22 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Jeffrey Zeldman plays around with Web 2.0. Probably the most entertaining game about Web 2.0 to date. (tags: web2.0 tech blogs personal interesting) [...]
Jon Dale said on 17 October 2006 at 11:22 pm:

Web 1.0: drop shadows
Web 2.0: reflections
Mads Kjaer said on 17 October 2006 at 11:23 pm:

Web 1.0: Whining in table-based messageboards
Web 2.0: Whining with style in shiny ajax messageboards
Darren Hoyt said on 17 October 2006 at 11:26 pm:

Web 1.0: Spiky polygons, moody colors, tiny annoying fonts
Web2.0: Trendy badges, pastel colors, ginormous annoying fonts

Web1.0: Joshua Davis
Web2.0: Thomas Fuchs

Web1.0: Partisan blowhard editorialists with a column in the online WSJ
Web2.0: Partisan blowhard users with a column on Newsvine

Web1.0: Brief, functional footers
Web2.0: Tall, verbose “footers” larger than the actual content region
alan said on 17 October 2006 at 11:27 pm:

Web 1.0: Jerry Yang and David Filo build a list of the coolest websites, and later realise there might be a business model
Web 2.0: Nobody’s got a business model, but everybody’s got a list of the coolest websites
R Flowers said on 17 October 2006 at 11:33 pm:

Web1.0: Web rings
Web2.0: Social bookmarking
Patrick Davis said on 17 October 2006 at 11:33 pm:

Web 1.0: Initial Public Offering
Web 2.0: Venture Capital

Web 1.0 Business Plan: Sell for less than we bought it for.
Web 2.0 Business Plan: Sell ads on stuff we didn’t actually pay for.
Edwin Jose Palathinkal said on 17 October 2006 at 11:40 pm:

Web 1.0: SQL/Javascript Injection
Web 2.0: Cross-Site Scripting

Web 1.0: Move to Unix-like never-crashing ultra-secure Linux.
Web 2.0: Move to Mac.
mikey said on 17 October 2006 at 11:47 pm:

Web 1.0 – online diary
Web 2.0 – blog

Web 1.0 – email
Web 2.0 – Gmail

Web 1.0 – awful background music
Web 2.0 – awful background gradients

Web 1.0 – slashdot
Web 2.0 – Digg
Dave said on 17 October 2006 at 11:47 pm:

Web 1.0: “I go get”
Web 2.0: “Come to me”

http://www.webdirections.org/come-to-me-web/
Eric said on 17 October 2006 at 11:48 pm:

Web 1.0: Dial-up
Web 2.0: Dump Trucks

Web 1.0: Spinny logos
Web 2.0: Reflecty logos
DBK said on 17 October 2006 at 11:53 pm:

web 1.0 – wanking to pictures of Jenna Jameson
web 2.0 – wanking to videos of jenna jameson
Tech 403 » Blog Archive » Zeldman Web 2.0 Game said on 21 October 2006 at 11:53 pm:

[...] Zeldman.com has a pretty interesting list of Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 comparisons. Link below. Zeldman 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Dan Beeston said on 18 October 2006 at 12:00 am:

Web 1.0: Dancing Hampsters
Web 2.0: Dancing on Treadmills
SMD said on 18 October 2006 at 12:07 am:

Web 1.0: Windows
Web 2.0: Linux

Web 1.0: Close Source
Web 2.0: Open Source
Web 2.0 Thinking Game « Digged Stories said on 21 October 2006 at 12:09 am:

[...] read more | digg story [...]
vzx said on 18 October 2006 at 12:12 am:

Web 1.0: Viruses downloading and slowing down computer.
Web 2.0: Automatic Updates downloading and slowing down computer.
Aaron said on 18 October 2006 at 12:16 am:

Web 1.0: Online canned goods stores with outrageous shipping prices
Web 2.0: Online canned goods stores with outrageous amounts of google adsense banners to offset outrageous shipping charges.
TechTxt.Org » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 21 October 2006 at 12:17 am:

[...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]
Ken said on 18 October 2006 at 12:18 am:

Web 1.0: Cleaning your wheel mouse
Web 2.0: Forgetting that your mouse has a wheel and going blind from the laser
[SMD] - 8L0G5RH3R3 » Archives » How Does Web 2.0 Differ From Web 1.0? said on 21 October 2006 at 12:21 am:

[...] = Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
SMD said on 18 October 2006 at 12:29 am:

Web 1.0: Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Firefox

Web 1.0: Yahoo!
Web 2.0: Google
Dave said on 18 October 2006 at 12:32 am:

Web 1.0: experiment, take risks, spinoff.
Web 2.0: see something popular and acquire.

Web 1.0: RealPlayer is abit of a hog, but not too annoying
Web 2.0: RealPlayer is downright Malware.

Web 1.0: Chat rooms
Web 2.0: MMORPGs

Web 1.0: Collections of Matching background and button sets
Web 2.0: Collections of Skins
Greg said on 18 October 2006 at 12:37 am:

Web 1.0: Boxes with border=”0″
Web 2.0: Boxes with style=”border: 1px dotted #CCC;”

:)
Sean said on 18 October 2006 at 12:53 am:

Web 1.0: Text based turn game (Empyrez.com)
Web 2.0: Full blown 3d
ShaSpleen said on 18 October 2006 at 1:13 am:

Web 1.0: 640×480 Porn
Web 2.0: 1024×768 Porn
Bradly said on 18 October 2006 at 1:15 am:

Web 1.0: “Site best viewed with Internet Explorer”
Web 2.0: “Site best viewed with anything but Internet Explorer”
Bradly said on 18 October 2006 at 1:18 am:

Web 1.0: JavaScript Alerts
Web 2.0: Light YellowDiv’s with Grey Borders
John P said on 18 October 2006 at 1:21 am:

Web 1.0: DrudgeReport.com
Web 2.0: SundayReader.com
I say 2.0, you say 1.0 « tumbleblog said on 21 October 2006 at 1:26 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]
asklepios said on 18 October 2006 at 1:28 am:

Web 1.0: disable ActiveX for security reason
Web 2.0: disable ActiveX, java, Javascript, Flash to get the content
Ike said on 18 October 2006 at 1:28 am:

Web 1.0: Site goes down when hosting company upgrades to a better server
Web 2.0: Site goes down with a reader serves you up to an upgrade on Digg

Web 1.0: Websites proudly display buttons proclaiming “_______’s Top Site of the Day” or “______’s Coolest on the Web”, where there are hundreds of ranking authorities.
Web 2.0: Millions of surfers use tags and social bookmarks to place the same sites simultaneously on Digg, Del.icio.us, and Reddit.
Percy said on 18 October 2006 at 1:39 am:

Web 1.0: , and
Web 2.0: scriptaculous, CSS and DIVs
Percy said on 18 October 2006 at 1:40 am:

Web 1.0: <blink>, <font> and <frameset>
Web 2.0: scriptaculous, CSS and DIVs
Tim said on 18 October 2006 at 2:02 am:

Web 1.0: Web sites that don’t work on Linux because they use crappy ActiveX controls.
Web 2.0: Web sites that don’t work on Linux because they use crappy Flash 8 controls.
Ryan said on 18 October 2006 at 2:08 am:

Web 1.0: <html> </html>
Web 2.0: #css ;
Ramki said on 18 October 2006 at 2:10 am:

Web 1.0: Create Content
Web 2.0: Link to created content

Web 1.0: Audience
Web 2.0: Communities

Web 1.0: Dial up
Web 2.0: Broadband

Web 1.0: Page views and Hits
Web 2.0: Still searching for the measurement metric
NiKo said on 18 October 2006 at 2:13 am:

Web 1.0: Blink tags
Web 2.0: Blinking websites
Ivan Minic said on 18 October 2006 at 2:33 am:

Web 1.0: Yahoo buys everything
Web 2.0: Google buys everything
Rien de bien nouveau sous le soleil - Prendre un Café said on 21 October 2006 at 2:37 am:

[...] web Un billet de Jeffrey Zeldman qui résume parfaitement ma perception du web 2.0. [...]
Yokel said on 18 October 2006 at 2:54 am:

Web 1.0: Internet
Web 2.0: Web 2.0
Web 2.0 Thinking Game | Stylegala news October 2006 | Stylegala said on 21 October 2006 at 2:58 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Chris said on 18 October 2006 at 2:59 am:

Web 1.0: Perl
Web 2.0: Ruby
Web 3.0: Brainfuck
ferdhie said on 18 October 2006 at 3:01 am:

web 1.0: newsletter
web 2.0: syndicate rss/rdf
Rafa García said on 18 October 2006 at 3:13 am:

Web 1.0: Bookmarks
Web 2.0: Del.icio.us (God bless it)
HubmaN said on 18 October 2006 at 3:16 am:

Web 1.0: Blue Screens of Death on Windows XP
Web 2.0: Blue Screens of Death on Windows Vista, followed by a quick reboot, followed by another BSOD, followed by a quick reboot…
Alvin said on 18 October 2006 at 3:17 am:

Web 1.0: Bring the web into our lives
Web 2.0: Bring our lives into the web
Chase said on 18 October 2006 at 3:36 am:

Web 1.0 Pamela Anderson
Web 2.0 Paris Hilton
Ronni Dyrholm Petersen said on 18 October 2006 at 3:55 am:

Web 1.0: < HTML > Hello World < /HTML >
Web 2.0: xhtml, css, php, xml, aspx, cms, templates, streaming, …
Web 2 point (uh-)oh denkspel at XooZ BLOG said on 21 October 2006 at 4:05 am:

[...] Dat er al eindeloos veel artikels geschreven zijn om te lachen of wenen met de Web 2.0 hype/revive/internetzeepbel 2.0 weet ik. Toch wou ik jullie deze Web 2.0 Thinking Game niet onthouden. [...]
Elsi said on 18 October 2006 at 4:15 am:

Online gaming Web 1.0:
You are in a room. There is a door to the north.
“Open door”
I don’t understand.
“Unlock door”
I don’t understand.
“Leave room”
I don’t understand.
“**** off!!
>

Online gaming Web 2.0:
Full Prince of Persia online Flash version! oooh, shiny.
fky said on 18 October 2006 at 4:19 am:

Web 1.0 : we didnt’ know that .com bubble will collapse
Web 2.0 : we didn’t want to know that .com bubble would collapse
anirudh said on 18 October 2006 at 4:21 am:

Web 1.0: Yahoomail
Web 2.0: Gmail
Web 3.0: God Knows what mail!
Vaidas Žilionis said on 18 October 2006 at 4:40 am:

Web 1.0 IE
Web 2.0 FireFox
Web 3.0 MobilePhone brower
Embruns > journal de bord > octobre 2006 > 17 said on 21 October 2006 at 4:40 am:

[...] Sur le même ton de Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0, je me demande ce que cela donnerait les élections présidentielles: 2002 versus 2007. [...]
aaoi said on 18 October 2006 at 4:41 am:

web 1.0: dirty.ru
web 2.0: leprosorium.dirty.ru
Комменты рулят « past is dead said on 18 October 2006 at 4:49 am:

[...] отсюда: [...]
grrliz: craquelins riches et croustillants said on 21 October 2006 at 4:50 am:

[...] Liz (grrliz) wrote,@ 2006-10-18 04:16:00 Zeldman’s got the Web 2.0 thinking game, it’s pretty amusing.(Post a new comment) … [...]
Gerd Stodiek said on 18 October 2006 at 4:54 am:

Web 1.0: Computer screens to display content
Web 2.0: Mobile digital devices for display and production of content

Web 1.0: Keeping the user on your site
Web 2.0: Branding your content on any site, device or publication
zro said on 18 October 2006 at 5:07 am:

web 1.0: worked auto-magically (as far a client is concerned)
web 2.0: works web 2.0-ly (as far as a client is concerned)
Steve Pugh said on 18 October 2006 at 5:14 am:

Web 1.0: “Sponsored By … ” on web sites.
Web 2.0: “Sponsored By … ” on RSS feeds.
Zeldman sur le Web 2.0 said on 21 October 2006 at 5:21 am:

[...] Voici un petit jeu de comparaison initié par Zeldman dans son dernier billet et suivi par de bon commentaires aussi, c’est par ici. [...]
Eddie said on 18 October 2006 at 5:25 am:

Web 1.0: Opinions
Web 2.0: Rants
Toupix said on 18 October 2006 at 5:25 am:

Web 1.0 : Microsoft
Web 2.0 : Google

Web 1.0 : Slashdot effect
Web 2.0 : Digg effect

Web 1.0 : Boards
Web 2.0 : Blogs

Web 1.0 : Version numbers
Web 2.0 : Greek Letters (I mean common, a website “making it to gamma” ?)

Web 1.0 : “Mail this article to a friend” button
Web 2.0 : “Digg / Furl / Del.icio.us / Reddit / NewsWine / etc this” buttons

Web 1.0 : Worrying about privacy
Web 2.0 : Willing to tell more
kengi said on 18 October 2006 at 5:45 am:

Web 1.0: many window
Web 2.0: one window
Saga Guild - News Feeds said on 21 October 2006 at 5:56 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Come and play. It’s fun! [...]
Simon said on 18 October 2006 at 5:56 am:

Web 1.0: Grammar.com and.com Spelling.com
Web 2.0: Grmmr nd Spll.ng
Jacob said on 18 October 2006 at 6:00 am:

Web 1.0: Intelligent Collectives
Web 2.0: Collective Intelligence

Web 1.0: Dictionary.com
Web 2.0: Dictionary.com

Web 1.0: Web Sites
Web 2.0: Web Services
Kusor.net: Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 22 October 2006 at 6:00 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
Simon said on 18 October 2006 at 6:01 am:

Web 1.0: 404 Not Found
Web 2.0: 503 Resource unavailable
Web2.0 Gedanken-Spiel - blog.der-link.de said on 21 October 2006 at 6:10 am:

[...] Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 Jeffrey Zeldman macht den Anfang eines Gedankenspiels, was jeder fortführen kann.Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]
Giel Berkers said on 18 October 2006 at 6:32 am:

Web 1.0: Square corners
Web 2.0: Round corners
hype-free: Web 2.0 vs Web 1.0 said on 21 October 2006 at 6:46 am:

[...] Read it here: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Check out also Create your own Web 2.0 Company. Web 1.0: Writing. Web 2.0: Rating. [...]
lemon said on 18 October 2006 at 7:03 am:

Web 1.0: …a list??
Web 2.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a menu if not a list of links?
Web 3.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a block of text if not a list of paragraphs?
Web 4.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a paragraph if not a list of words?
Cyniskt: Web 2.0 thinking game said on 22 October 2006 at 7:15 am:

[...] Kommentarerna är lika roliga som inlägget.Mina favoriter:Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace.Web 1.0: Writing.Web 2.0: Rating.Web 1.0: Under ConstructionWeb 2.0: BetaWeb 1.0 Business Plan: Sell for less than we bought it for.Web 2.0 Business Plan: Sell ads on stuff we didn’t actually pay for. [...]
jRyan said on 18 October 2006 at 7:37 am:

Web 1.0 :: Hubs, switches, routers, servers…
Web 2.0 :: “a series of Tubes”
eCuaderno 3.0: Pistas, noticias y enlaces sobre Cibercultura, Medios, eComunicacion y Blogging por Jose Luis Orihuela y sus invitados said on 23 October 2006 at 7:39 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [vía] [del.icio.us] [menéame] [...]
Ara Pehlivanian said on 18 October 2006 at 8:08 am:

Web 1.0: All kinds of mistakes were made
Web 2.0: Those same mistakes were repeated
chandru said on 18 October 2006 at 8:13 am:

Web 1.0 : <noscript>
Web2.0: <script>
Jerry said on 18 October 2006 at 8:15 am:

Web 1.0: Bad HTML code
Web 2.0: Bad PHP code
patroclus said on 18 October 2006 at 8:16 am:

Web 1.0: Geeks do it.
Web 2.0: Everybody does it.
NiKo said on 18 October 2006 at 8:20 am:

Web 1.0 : http://www.hamsterdance.com/classorig.html
Web 2.0 : http://new.nabaztag.com/en/index.html
Rhys said on 18 October 2006 at 8:24 am:

Web 1.0: Phrase lacking meaning that no-one ever used
Web 2.0: Phrase lacking meaning that everyone’s using
naomi said on 18 October 2006 at 8:52 am:

Web 1.0: tim berners lee gives us the web (for free!)
Web 2.0: tim o’reilly copyrights the term ‘web 2.0′

Web 1.0: emperor’s new clothes
Web 2.0: emperor’s new clothes part 2
Top Jimmy said on 18 October 2006 at 8:53 am:

Web 1.0: Spam
Web 2.0: Blatant identity theft

Web 1.0: Windows
Web 2.0: OSX

Web 1.0: dot com
Web 2.0: dot just-about-everything

Web 1.0: Yahoo!
Web 2.0: Boohoo for Yahoo! (Google)

Web 1.0: Cool!
Web 2.0: Cooler!
Kommunikationsforum - Web 2.0: F�rst med ikke at v�re de sidste said on 23 October 2006 at 8:56 am:

[...] 18-10-06 | af Sebastian Christensen, Udviklingsansvarlig Excellent Thinking game Læs den rutinerede og kvikke Zeldmans kommentarer til Web 2.0 og brugen af ordet. Brandvarmt indlæg fra 17/10:http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Google “Sebastian Christensen” Kommentér artikel [...]
Web 2.0 Thinking Game « Doooh Head said on 23 October 2006 at 8:58 am:

[...] read more | digg story [...]
Jerome said on 18 October 2006 at 9:05 am:

Web 1.0: 10 millions $
Web 2.0: 1 billion $
Ben Ellis said on 18 October 2006 at 9:10 am:

Web 1.0: Geeks with nothing better to do but think up new acronyms
Web 2.0: GWNBTD
Leandro Marcel said on 18 October 2006 at 9:14 am:

Web1.0 :

Web 2.0:
ul {
float:left;
}
li {
list-style-type: none;
}
Simon said on 18 October 2006 at 9:15 am:

Web 1.0: chmod 755 web
Web 2.0: chmod 777 web
f6 said on 18 October 2006 at 9:18 am:

Web 1.0 : Napster copyrights problems
Web 2.0 : YouTube copyrights problems
The Speculist: A Cup of Joe and a Pot of Good News said on 22 October 2006 at 9:23 am:

[...] UPDATE: To put it in terms agreeable to the game: [...]
Dave said on 18 October 2006 at 9:30 am:

web 1.0 – i hate the web
web 2.0 – i still hate the web
Lucian said on 18 October 2006 at 9:30 am:

Web 1.0: Drop shadows
Web 2.0: Reflections

Web 1.0: Tiled background images
Web 2.0: Freakishly huge background images
Struschie said on 18 October 2006 at 9:31 am:

Web 1.0: standard-web-palet-colored content (just text)
Web 2.0: true-color shiny-glossy-3D-beta-badged obtrusive animated links to content (video)
Tim H said on 18 October 2006 at 9:33 am:

Web 1.0: buzzwords
Web 2.0: buzzwords
Diggdot.us - digg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular said on 22 October 2006 at 9:34 am:

[...] Diggdot.us – digg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular [...]
temy said on 18 October 2006 at 9:37 am:

Web 1.0: Tons of useless static pages
Web 2.0: Tons of useless dynamic pages
Ara Pehlivanian said on 18 October 2006 at 9:48 am:

Web 1.0: Sketchy CSS 1 support
Web 2.0: Sketchy CSS 2 support
Web 3.0: Sketchy CSS 3 support
pooly said on 18 October 2006 at 9:50 am:

Web 1.0 Some Paysites
Web 2.0 Lot Of Paysites

Web 1.0 Was very exiting
Web 2.0 Is very boring

Web 1.0 Napster (MP3)
Web 2.0 All kind of P2P (MP3, Videos and Worms)

Web 1.0 Explorer beats Netscape
Web 2.0 Firefox beats Explorer

Web 1.0 Only some cmmercials
Web 2.0 Too much commercials

Web 1.0 Java pop up commercials that sucks
Web 2.0 Flash pop up commercials wich sucks much more

An so on…
Ara Pehlivanian said on 18 October 2006 at 9:52 am:

Web 1.0: Broken accessibility through table abuse
Web 2.0: Broken accessibility through JavaScript abuse
DJosephDesign said on 18 October 2006 at 9:52 am:

Web 1.0: Two spaces between sentences.
Web 2.0: No punctuation.

Web 1.0: Misspellings because of new “computer thing.”
Web 2.0: Misspellings because it’s cool and the .com you wanted is taken.
Annotea.com » Le web 2.0 said on 18 October 2006 at 9:53 am:

[...] Prenez quelques minutes pour lire cet article rafraichissant ! [...]
DJosephDesign said on 18 October 2006 at 9:55 am:

Web 1.0: Don’t talk to strangers.
Web 2.0: “I’m meeting gogoXguy24 tonight.”
Sypholux said on 18 October 2006 at 9:58 am:

Web 1.0: »Sign up to get a FREE e-mail newsletter!«
Web 2.0: »Enter your PIN here to confirm bank details«

E-mail 1.0 subject: MAKE MONEY FAST $$$
E-mail 2.0 subject: Re: Th1s watchh is amazingg
Kommentare - BIS said on 22 October 2006 at 9:59 am:

[...] Auf dieser Seite sind Kommentare und Anregungen rund um das Thema BIS-Vorlesung und BIS-Wiki erwünscht. Achtung – passt vielleicht nicht hier her! http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Web 2.0 – ein vielleicht doch etwas ausgelutscher und somit zu inflationär verwendeter Begriff?? Von „http://main.fbm.fh-koblenz.de/bis/index.php?title=Kommentare“ [...]
Peter said on 18 October 2006 at 10:01 am:

Web 1.0: Dialer
Web 2.0: Phishing
blogoli said on 18 October 2006 at 10:02 am:

Web 1.0: yeah – online!!!
Web 2.0: Can’t go offline :-(
jason said on 18 October 2006 at 10:04 am:

Web 1.0: fonts too small to read
Web 2.0: fonts too big to read

—-

Web 1.0: sitemaps
Web 2.0: huge footers
PTG said on 22 October 2006 at 10:04 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game(Zeldman) [...]
Hans Benschop said on 18 October 2006 at 10:08 am:

web 1.0: content to create you own 15 minutes of fame
web 2.0: endless rehash of of another’s minutes of fame

web 1.0: search based on algorithms
web 2.0: search based on ratings (contextual)

web 1.0: SPAM
web 2.0: SPLOGS

web 1.0: branding and corporate sites
web 2.0 lifestyle sites

web 1.0: web agencies that don’t understand web users
web 2.0: web agencies that don’t understand web users

web 1.0: crackdown on Napster
web 2.0: embracing torrent technology

web 1.0: hassled by spam
web 2.0: hassled by allowing senders in email clients

web 1.0: bands fear music distribution
web 2.0: bands distribute music through youtube
-@^@- said on 18 October 2006 at 10:11 am:

Web 1.0: Page takes 5 minutes to download over a 28.8Kbps connection, and then crashes your browser.
Web 2.0: Page takes 5 minutes to download over an 8Mbps connection, and then crashes your browser.
Carl Max said on 18 October 2006 at 10:12 am:

web1.0: Doing Java – Haven’t tryed jBuilder but wiling to do so soon.
web2.0: doing php – Haven’t tryed joomla but wiling to do so soon.

web1.0: porn
web2.0: alt-porn
FiZ said on 18 October 2006 at 10:14 am:

At least one thing will never change: Opera users griping at IE and Netscape(based) users to get with their standards (^_-)V
1.0 is blinking, 2.0 is gradients at The Blog Herald said on 18 October 2006 at 10:21 am:

[...] This time, however, I think he got it right with the Web 2.0 Thinking Game post, and its comments. A good read in the afternoon, when you really just want it to be dinner time already. [...]
blaZeryl said on 18 October 2006 at 10:29 am:

web1.0: wat the @*&$^#&#
web2.0: wat the *$#*(#*&$(*#@&#$($(*#&$
BJ said on 18 October 2006 at 10:32 am:

Web 1.0: Macromedia
Web 2.0: Adobe
Thorsten Arndt said on 18 October 2006 at 10:33 am:

Web 1.0: Annoying welcome pages asking you to choose between HTML and text versions
Web 2.0: Annoying welcome pages asking you to choose between HTML and Flash versions
Elias said on 18 October 2006 at 10:40 am:

Web 1.0: bubble #1
Web 2.0: bubble #2
EveryDigg » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 22 October 2006 at 10:41 am:

[...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]
LUNA ATTACKS! said on 22 October 2006 at 10:41 am:

[...] Comment? [...]
Antonio Ciccarone said on 18 October 2006 at 10:45 am:

Web 1.0: WebTV
Web 2.0: Wii

Web 1.0: Porn
Web 2.0: Better Porn
Mick Kolby said on 18 October 2006 at 10:48 am:

Web 1.0: Web 2.0
Web 2.0: Web 1.0
Woofy said on 18 October 2006 at 10:48 am:

Web 1.0: Searching for ads with good pricing over Internet between a lot of useless text informations
Web 2.0: Searching for good text informations over Internet surrounded by ads
한RSS said on 21 October 2006 at 10:49 am:

[...] 총 15개 | 최종업데이트: 2006-10-18 23:33 function PrevPage(goto_bottom) {} function NextPage(goto_top) {} Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game ringrocker 2006-10-18 23:00 작성 | business humor web web2.0 zeldman [...]
jason said on 18 October 2006 at 10:53 am:

Web 1.0: windows
Web 2.0: tabs

Web 1.0: click and wait
Web 2.0: no waiting
Davide said on 18 October 2006 at 10:57 am:

Web 1.0: dot-com bubble!!!
Web 2.0: dot-com bubble???
A Blog Apart // Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 21 October 2006 at 11:01 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game Tags: [No Tags] Related Posts: [ ] [...]
Da_Face said on 18 October 2006 at 11:06 am:

Web1.0 : Marketing Manager say : Make contend that everyone needs, and you get rich
Web 2.0 : Marketing Manager say : Make Websites where everyone makes contend, and you get rich
Web 3.0 : Marketing Manager say : Fuck, Im so rich ..
Nemo said on 18 October 2006 at 11:08 am:

Web 1.0: Reading forum entries, posting a reply
Web 2.0: Reading blog entries, trying to reply but getting caught in ads, trackbacks, pings, cross-posts, digg-links and captchas, before finally giving up in disgust
AndreasMatthies.de » Blog Archive » web 1.0 vs. web 2.0 said on 21 October 2006 at 11:10 am:

[...] Was wird eigentlich mit web2.0 assoziiert? Diese Frage stellte sich Jeffrey Zeldman – seine User gaben Antwort… [...]
][ mkhDev ][ مازن بن عبد الله مليباري ] said on 21 October 2006 at 11:12 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game : مقارنات طريفة بين Web 1.0 و Web 2.0 [...]
Steffen said on 18 October 2006 at 11:13 am:

Web 1.0: Palm Pilot
Web 2.0: Moleskine, PocketMod
Sam H said on 18 October 2006 at 11:20 am:

Web 1.0 – IE, Firefox on PC’s and Mac
Web 2.0 – Opera on Nintendo DS
Karsten said on 18 October 2006 at 11:23 am:

Web 1.0: Emoticons
Web 2.0: Dancing smileys all over the place
Dennis Moore said on 18 October 2006 at 11:25 am:

Web 1.0: Unsupported software.
Web 2.0: Perpetual beta.
Web 1.0: Buck’s.
Web 2.0: Stack’s.
oku said on 18 October 2006 at 11:25 am:

Web 1.0: Searching for content
Web 2.0: Searching for people who want to read the content
Tanny O'Haley said on 18 October 2006 at 11:27 am:

Web 1.0: Blocky reflections
Web 2.0: Glassy reflections
Web 2.0 Thinking Game at intaneti said on 21 October 2006 at 11:29 am:

[...] Læs hele posten Web 2.0 Thinking Game + kommentarer her. [...]
mijlee said on 18 October 2006 at 11:35 am:

Web 1.0: Too much to learn, not enough time
Web 2.0: Too much to learn, not enough time

Web 1.0: Promise of a usable web standard around the corner
Web 2.0: Promise of a usable web standard around the corner

Web 1.0: Internet makes claims it will make your life better, then fails to make any real difference apart from spending time deleting spam
Web 2.0: Internet makes claims it will make your life better, then fails to make any real difference apart from becoming addicted to blogging, RSS, Social networking,
Css Globe - Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Zeldman said on 22 October 2006 at 11:44 am:

[...] go visit [...]
Dan said on 18 October 2006 at 11:48 am:

Web 1.0: No gym for home
Web 2.0: Web 1.0: No gym for home
Idiotprogrammer » Blog Archive » Odds and Ends on the Web said on 21 October 2006 at 11:50 am:

[...] Zeldman and commenters have fun doing a compare/contrast on Web 1.0/2.0 [...]
Duluoz said on 18 October 2006 at 11:51 am:

Web 1.0: Al Gore
Web 2.0: What? No crazy dems want to claim it this year?
Gwilym said on 18 October 2006 at 11:52 am:

Web 1.0: Damn! Missed it…
Web 2.0: Damn! Missed it…
Web 3.0: This time…
Tommy said on 18 October 2006 at 11:52 am:

Web 1.0: Read and Read
Web 2.0: Read and Write
newspyle: del.icio.us said on 22 October 2006 at 11:56 am:

[...] How I explained REST to my wife… 16:21:18 [...]
WebFritzi said on 18 October 2006 at 11:58 am:

Web 1.0: Does not exist.
Web 2.0: What’s that?
Dan said on 18 October 2006 at 12:05 pm:

Web 1.0: AOL Chat rooms
Web 2.0: offtopic.com
Smart Dalek said on 18 October 2006 at 12:19 pm:

Web 1.0: RSS/Atom feeds
Web 2.0: “Live” Bookmarks

Web 1.0: Directories
Web 2.0: CMS

Web 1.0: WAP
Web 2.0: Downloadable Ringtones

Web 1.0: FAQs
Web 2.0: Wikis

Web 1.0: Crashing browsers
Web 2.0: Self-closing browsers

Web 1.0: .wav/MP3/OGG-based journals
Web 2.0: Podcasting

Web 1.0: “Punch the Monkey” banner ads
Web 2.0: Pay-per-click ad revenue

Web 1.0: Homepages/mission statements with Flash intros
Web 2.0: Homepages/mission statements with Enhanced Flash intos

Web 1.0: Scroll text and flashing backgrounds
Web 2.0: Removal of the letter e from -er suffixes

Web 1.0: Aeron Chairs, Foozeball tables
Web 2.0: Gmail/Orkut/MySpace invites
Quang said on 18 October 2006 at 12:24 pm:

Web 1.0: Hotmail & Yahoo
Web 2.0: Gmail & Windows Live

Web 1.0: HTML
Web2.0: XHTML & CSS
Steeefan said on 18 October 2006 at 12:33 pm:

Web 1.0: Regards,
Web 2.0: regards
Die interessanteste Website aller Zeiten. Wo gibt.: Web1.0 vs. Web2.0 verständlich erklärt said on 22 October 2006 at 12:33 pm:

[...] Auch wenn’s mal wieder hier über den Spiegel eintrudelt: Lustig ist der direkte Web1.0 und Web2.0-Vergleich allemal! :-) [...]
alter said on 18 October 2006 at 12:34 pm:

Web 1.0 – …
Web 2.0 – … beta
e-klumme: en forskel der gør en forskel - Bateson 2.0 said on 22 October 2006 at 12:40 pm:

[...] 2.0: My parents just left a comment on my blog. skrevet af Søren Johannessen kl. 16:12 Permalink | | postCountTB(’116118219749241911′); 0Kommentarer: [...]
fxplayer said on 18 October 2006 at 1:00 pm:

Web 1.0: VC
Web 2.0: MORE VC

Web 1.0: Yesterday
Web 2.0: Tomorrow

Web 1.0: any site
Web 2.0: ealier less, later any
Web 3.0: none, less, any
foxcharles said on 18 October 2006 at 1:02 pm:

Web 1.0: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Web 2.0: Blindness
Aran said on 18 October 2006 at 1:09 pm:

Web 1.0: sans-serif headlines
Web 2.0: giant Georgia headlines

Web 1.0: “Oolong the rabbit” head performance
Web 2.0: Cute Overload

Web 1.0: downloading Swedish rap from Kazaa
Web 2.0: watching Swedish rap videos on YouTube
Craig said on 18 October 2006 at 1:18 pm:

Web 1.0: NetScape 4.x sucks
Web 2.0: IE sucks, what’s NetScape?
Tchi Keufte said on 18 October 2006 at 1:20 pm:

Web 1.0 : Buggy programs on computers and web servers
Web 2.0 : Buggy programs on computers, web servers and navigators

Web 1.0 : Web servers programmed in Perl
Web 2.0 : Web servers programmed in JavaScript soon ?
ben said on 18 October 2006 at 1:41 pm:

I am so late to this party. See the first comparison for the excuse.

Web 1.0: You can’t use Bloglines because it doesn’t exist
Web 2.0: You can’t use Bloglines because it crashes too much

Web 1.0: Good ideas typically require tons of bandwidth for their execution
Web 2.0: Good ideas typically require tons of bandwidth for their execution

Web 1.0: People ignore CSS
Web 2.0; People complain about CSS

Web 1.0: You need a sound card
Web 2.0: You need a wireless card

Web 1.0: Flash is often abused to publish lame interfaces
Web 2.0: Flash is often abused to publish lame videos

Web 1.0: Microsoft tries to assimilate the Internet
Web 2.0: Google tries to assimilate the Internet

Web 1.0: “Sex” is one of the more pupular keyword searches
Web 2.0: One of the more popular search services publishes a video in wich it is stated that “the Internet is for porn, porn, PORN!”

Web 1.0: The mass media companies wave their proverbial arms and carry on about how their online presence WILL be on the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE
Web 2.0: The mass media companies wave their proverbial arms and carry on about how their online presence WILL be on the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE – only this time with CSS, XML, and video

Jeez, I could p-lay this game all day.
brand said on 18 October 2006 at 1:45 pm:

Web 1.0: Users submit comments and ratings (Amazon.com)
Web 2.0: Users submit comments and ratings (Amazon.com)

Web 1.0: Amazon.com patents one-click purchase
Web 2.0: O’Reilly copyrights “Web 2.0″

Web 1.0: Web 2.0
Web 2.0: Web 2.1
Gwyn's Home said on 21 October 2006 at 1:46 pm:

Web 2.0 is dead, long live Web 3.0?

Jeffrey Zeldman proposes a cute game of “find the differences” between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 using the pretext of Google’s buying YouTube. While this is of marginal interest of us Second Life users and Metaverse wannabes, one should al…
jason said on 18 October 2006 at 1:47 pm:

Web 1.0: Creation
Web 2.0: Evolution
23rd World » Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 said on 20 October 2006 at 1:55 pm:

[...] Zeldman, author of the vastly popular Designing With Web Standards, offers an amusing comparison of Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 trends here are my favorites: Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities. Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. [...]
Hydrogen Whiskey said on 18 October 2006 at 2:00 pm:

Web 1.0: Guestbook
Web2.0: Comments
Cruel.Com: Cruel: Cool Site of the Day said on 21 October 2006 at 2:02 pm:

[...] PREVIOUS MESSAGE | NEXT MESSAGE Cool Site of the DayVisit Site [...]
Vinnie said on 18 October 2006 at 2:09 pm:

web 1.0 : haha lol omg
web 2.0 : ZOMG LIEK ROFL kekekeke !!11111 eins
DEL~UKS Kommunity :: View topic - WEB 2.0 said on 21 October 2006 at 2:13 pm:

[...] Excellent article de Jeffrey Zeldman sur ce que signifie le Web 2.0 pour la presse Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
yes said on 18 October 2006 at 2:17 pm:

web1.0: lobotomy
web2.0: lobotomy
Thomas Kötter said on 18 October 2006 at 2:42 pm:

Web 1.0: ascii
Web 2.0: utf-8

Web 1.0: VRML
Web 2.0: RIA

Web 1.0: discovering
Web 2.0: sifting through
Pretty Tasty! / Web 2.0 vs. Web 1.0 said on 22 October 2006 at 2:58 pm:

[...] Funny stuff, with commentary by our very own mr.b…http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game Offline [...]
Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 22 October 2006 at 3:05 pm:

[...] 17 October 2006 5 am eastern [...]
Dr Rage said on 18 October 2006 at 3:06 pm:

Web 1.0: Mahir
Web 2.0: Borat
Diskusjon.no - Forum -> webkafeen said on 22 October 2006 at 3:08 pm:

[...] Haha, ang. Web 2.0 s� er det mye, mye bra i kommentarene her: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. ——————– Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler [...]
Ranbena said on 18 October 2006 at 3:09 pm:

Web 1.0: “I like this file – I’ll download it.”
Web 2.0: “I like this file – I’ll upload it.”
briant said on 18 October 2006 at 3:39 pm:

web1.0: Companies control the message, don’t really listen effectively.
web2.0: Most companies control the message, a few have learned to tap users for content, and even fewer have learned to listen.
Tim said on 18 October 2006 at 4:03 pm:

Web 1.0: Usenet flames
Web 2.0: Blog rants
steelsphere.com » Blog Archive » What Web 2.0 Really Is said on 23 October 2006 at 4:14 pm:

[...] Consider this a “Feature Comparison” between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. [...]
Fazal said on 18 October 2006 at 4:14 pm:

web 1.0: aaargh my eyes, so much great content what a whack design
web 2.0: aaargh my eyes, i cant find good content, havent i seen that design before?
web 3.0: Spiderman, Spiderman, Does whatever a spider can, Spins a web, any size, Catches thieves just like flies, Look Out! Here comes the Spiderman.
3rdeyepro said on 18 October 2006 at 4:30 pm:

This a terrible explanation of web 2.0

Here is what my company has defined as web 2.0:

1: User Generated Content
2: User control over presentation of content
3: Pervasive feedback (comment/rating) of content
TMDA Users Can Blow Me (by Jeremy Zawodny) said on 22 October 2006 at 4:36 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Gamehaahaha… the comments are priceless. [...]
Jonas Maurus’ maurus.net » The Web 2.0 thinking game said on 22 October 2006 at 4:41 pm:

[...] The comments are priceless! It’d be more funny, if it wasn’t true. Permalink [...]
Druckversion - Netzwelt-Ticker: Apple liefert iPods mit Wurm aus - Netzwelt - SPIEGEL ONLINE - Nachrichten said on 23 October 2006 at 4:52 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 bringt es auf den Punkt: Man kann sich praktisch alles drunter vorstellen, irgendwie sind YouTube und Google dafür typisch und reduziertes Website-Design passt auch ganz gut dazu. Doch was steckt nun wirklich hinter dem Ordnungsbegriff Web 2.0? Jeffrey Zeldman, Webdesigner aus New York, stellt sich selbst diese Frage, gab ein paar Antworten und befragte seine Leserschaft. Heraus kam eine lange, reichlich lustige Liste von Enthüllungen, wie doof doch eigentlich der Web-2.0-Begriff ist… [...]
Mike Birch said on 18 October 2006 at 4:52 pm:

Web 1.0: E-mail newsletter.
Web 2.0: RSS feed.

Web 1.0: $sql = “SELECT * FROM tbl_bookings”;
Web 2.0: $this->set(’bookings’, $this->Booking->findAll());
Ken said on 18 October 2006 at 5:08 pm:

Web 1.0: Groupware
Web 2.0: Semantic Web
Arno Klein » Web 2.0 kurz und prägnant said on 23 October 2006 at 5:08 pm:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman erklärt die Unterschiede zwischen Web 1.0 und Web 2.0. Zum Beispiel: Web 1.0: New media company buys old media company. Web 2.0: New media company buys new media company. [...]
trend sweet trend - SterryIT.com said on 24 October 2006 at 5:16 pm:

[...] 7 List of Physics Games » Fun-Motion10 Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game10 [...]
Web 2.0 Thinking Game - Webdesigner.com.fr said on 24 October 2006 at 5:31 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – Webdesigner.com.fr Aller au contenuAller au menuAller à la rechercheWebdesigner.com.frUne autre vision des standards du Web et du métier de webdesignerMercredi 18 Octobre 2006Web 2.0 Thinking GameActualitésPar Guy-Philippe Uberos à 20:34Quand Jeffrey Zeldman parle du web 2.0 cela donne Web 2.0 Thinking Game.Lien permanent #155 [...]
Josh said on 18 October 2006 at 8:18 pm:

Web 1.0: folders
Web 2.0: tags
Louis Simoneau said on 18 October 2006 at 8:26 pm:

Web 1.0: Tons of annoying animated .gifs.
Web 2.0: Just the one (spinner.gif).
neuwiem said on 18 October 2006 at 9:53 pm:

Web 1.0: CGI
Web2.0: RoR
juque § weblog: Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 25 October 2006 at 10:54 pm:

[...] ¿Qué dice el público? —comente. Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
Michel Leblanc, M.Sc. commerce électronique. Marketing Internet, consultant et conférencier » Web 2.0 vs Web 1.0 said on 26 October 2006 at 2:37 am:

[...] Via zeldman.com [...]
links for 2006-10-19 » Sentido Web said on 25 October 2006 at 3:30 am:

[...] Diferencias y semejanzas entre web 1.0 y we 2.0 | Jeffrey Zeldman | Vía eCuaderno Web 1.0: Writing / Web 2.0: Rating, Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities / Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace, Web 1.0: Bookmarking / Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing… (tags: web2.0 business trends internet) [...]
Fischmarkt said on 25 October 2006 at 3:58 am:

Für Erwachsene

Web 2.0 ist erwachsen geworden. Das meint jedenfalls der Economist in seiner Berichterstattung zu GoogleTube. This week’s pairing of Google and YouTube may come to be remembered as the moment “Web 2.0”—ie, the web, version two—came of age. L. …
Anonymous said on 19 October 2006 at 3:59 am:

Web 1.0 Evil Empire: Microsoft
Web 2.0 Evil Empire: Google
GuyWeb » Blog Archive » links for 2006-10-18 said on 25 October 2006 at 4:15 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Jeffrey Zeldman Presents a wacky look at the buzzwords associated with the ‘web2.0′ hype and matches them to the equivalent web.10 partner. (tags: webdesign web2) [...]
Kommunikationsforum - Web 2.0: F�rst med ikke at v�re de sidste said on 25 October 2006 at 4:33 am:

[...] 18-10-06 | af Sebastian Christensen, Udviklingsansvarlig Excellent Thinking game Læs den rutinerede og kvikke Zeldmans kommentarer til Web 2.0 og brugen af ordet. Brandvarmt indlæg fra 17/10:http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Google “Sebastian Christensen” Kommentér artikel [...]
Noématique - epistolae » Blog Archive » Un matin comme les autres, said on 25 October 2006 at 4:45 am:

[...] j’ai vu des pélerins tibétains abattus par des soldats chinois, j’ai lu un compte-rendu ironique de la credulité du siècle, j’ai suivi, minute par minute, le rapport de gendarmerie. [...]
ETTF.NET said on 25 October 2006 at 4:49 am:

[...] If you’re interested in the whole evolution of the internet you’ll much enjoy this post on Jeffrey Zeldman’s blog. It get’s really interesting once you go through the comments. Here’s a small excerpt: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]
Pragmatick » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 25 October 2006 at 5:42 am:

[...] Aus den Kommentaren vom Eintrag Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
cleoag.ru » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 25 October 2006 at 6:04 am:

[...] Прикольный пост про Web 2.0 [...]
abgeledert.de » Blog Archiv » Endlich - der Launch von Web 3.0 said on 25 October 2006 at 6:14 am:

[...] Übrigens beschäftigen sich zur Zeit mehrere mit dieser Thematik: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]
наблюдаемые ... said on 25 October 2006 at 6:48 am:

[...] cleoagWeb 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. [...]
Alex Wipf said on 19 October 2006 at 7:26 am:

Web 1.0: Hype about a “new” medium which business people and investors didn’t have a clue about, bought into anyway and then killed.

Web 2.0: Hype about the same medium which marketers and brands don’t have a clue about, bought into anyway by spending more and more media dollars on, and will kill.

Web 3.0: The end of hype about the medium.
Web 2.0 What Does It Mean? - Profy.Com said on 25 October 2006 at 8:35 am:

[...] Now, what do you think other people say about Web 2.0? Check it out at Zeldman’s blog post Web 2.0 Thinking Game and be amazed….!! [...]
Rhys Thomas said on 19 October 2006 at 8:39 am:

web 1.0 – Lists of comments that are relevant to the post in question followed by nothing.

web 2.0 – Lists of comments that are relevant to the post in question followed by 50 or so trackback comments from Digg etc to tell you just how popular other peoples comments were.
Web 1.0/Web 2.0 - Wissensplattform said on 25 October 2006 at 8:56 am:

[...] Stellen sich etwas signifikant verändert hat. [bearbeiten]Web 1.0 [bearbeiten]Web 2.0 Von “http://wiki.fh-stralsund.de/mediawiki/index.php/Web_1.0/Web_2.0″ Seitenkategorien: Web 2.0 | Soziologische und psychologische Aspekte des Web2.0 [...]
Top Jimmy said on 19 October 2006 at 9:13 am:

Web 1.0: Dunkin’ Donuts
Web 2.0: Starbucks

Web 1.0: NASDAQ
Web 2.0: DJIA

Web 1.0: Floppy disk
Web 2.0: Blu-Ray
Rafael Dohms » Pensando em Web 2.0 - O Jogo said on 25 October 2006 at 9:37 am:

[...] Li recentemente um artigo no Blog do Zeldman muito interessante, com uma proposta reflexiva e divertida, então decide tentar aqui no Brasil e ver o que acontece e entender um pouco mais sobre o que nós brasileiros pensamos sobre a Web 2.0. [...]
tomás pollak said on 19 October 2006 at 9:54 am:

Web 1.0: “spacer.gif”
Web 2.0: “spinner.gif”
3DCenter Forum - Stylischste Website ever... said on 25 October 2006 at 10:21 am:

[...] Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News. Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes. [...]
Info Du Web » links for 2006-10-19 said on 25 October 2006 at 10:21 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game (tags: web2.0 humor web business zeldman trends blog) [...]
Kommunikationsforum - Web 2.0: F�rst med ikke at v�re de sidste said on 25 October 2006 at 10:39 am:

[...] 18-10-06 | af Sebastian Christensen, Udviklingsansvarlig Excellent Thinking game Læs den rutinerede og kvikke Zeldmans kommentarer til Web 2.0 og brugen af ordet. Brandvarmt indlæg fra 17/10:http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Google “Sebastian Christensen” Kommentér artikel [...]
Chris said on 19 October 2006 at 10:49 am:

Web 1.0 – My Site…
Web 2.0 – My Beta Site…

Web 1.0 – Times New Roman, Verdana, Arial…
Web 2.0 – Trebuchet MS, Georgia, Tahoma…
Friends said on 25 October 2006 at 11:03 am:

[...] Ответ: На факультете географии учился Майкл Джордан. [...]
mlarson.org » said on 25 October 2006 at 11:30 am:

[...] Great Zeldman post and excellent comments about Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0. [...]
Matt said on 19 October 2006 at 12:53 pm:

Web 1.0: The Industry Standard
Web 2.0: TechCrunch
Dan said on 19 October 2006 at 1:58 pm:

Web 1.0: Skinny Britney Spears
Web 2.0: Fat Britney Spears
entropie:. » Blog Archive » /Web 2.0!!! said on 25 October 2006 at 2:13 pm:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
outbreak » Web 2.0 Thinking Game (written on October 19th, 2006 by Marko Mrdjenovic) said on 25 October 2006 at 2:37 pm:

[...] Didn’t really think I’d link it at first since I saw it on too many blogs already but this is hillarious. [...]
karen said on 19 October 2006 at 3:06 pm:

Web 1.0 – Boom (and bust)
Web 2.0 – Boom (and bust)
Steve said on 19 October 2006 at 3:26 pm:

web 1.0: script applied to html
web 2.0: script applied to xml

web 1.0: adds
web 2.0: adwords

web 1.0: browser support issues
web 2.0: browser and feed aggregator support issues
danton said on 19 October 2006 at 3:41 pm:

Web 1.0: Outlook
Web 2.0: Google Calendar

Web 1.0: Blue Screen from Hell
Web 2.0: Kernal Panic

Web 1.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 2.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 3.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 4.0: Web Standards not fully supported
……………………………………………….
Web 5000.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Harrison Bergeron said on 19 October 2006 at 3:47 pm:

Web 3.0: attention.xml et. al.

‘off with their heads!’
Dominik Hahn said on 19 October 2006 at 4:12 pm:

Web 1.0: desk calendar
Web 2.0: Google

Web 1.0: Excel
Web 2.0: Google

Web 1.0: newspaper
Web 2.0: Google

Web 1:0: e-Mail me
Web 2.0: Skype me

Web 1.0: junk-market
Web 2.0: eBay

Web 1.0: tables
Web 2.0: no tables

Web 1.0:
Web 2.0:

Web 1.0: my first homepage
Web 2.0: my first homepage 2.0 (beta)

Web 1.0: photo album
Web 2.0: flickr.com
Emil Stenström said on 19 October 2006 at 4:34 pm:

Web 1.0: IE6
Web 2.0: IE6
HM2K said on 19 October 2006 at 4:48 pm:

Web 1.0: Encarta
Web 2.0: Wikipedia
QuirksMode Blogs said on 25 October 2006 at 6:10 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Montoya said on 19 October 2006 at 8:29 pm:

I’m later to this party than everyone above me, and earlier than everyone below me. Go figure.

1.0: zefrank publishes videos of himself dancing on his website, gets famous after a mention in a magazine.
2.0: everyone publishes videos of themselves on YouTube, nobody gets famous

1.0: IRC
2.0: Trillian

1.0: Everyone copies Yahoo!
2.0: Everyone copies Google

1.0: Online publishing by handcoding articles in html pages, uploading, then updating all links
2.0: Blogging by clicking “Publish”

1.0: Subscription fees
2.0: Ad-supported

1.0: Popups and banners
2.0: Pop-in javascript windows, flash adverts that sit “under” the page, talking advertisements, “viral” ads, video ads, on and on…

1.0: Please visit my website :)
2.0: Please read my blog :)
Agus said on 19 October 2006 at 11:24 pm:

Web 1.0:
RESPONSE.BUFFER=TRUE
dev: i do this way its ok right?
browser1: fine, fine… go ahead…
browser2: can u bla bla…
dev: who r u?
RESPONSE.FLUSH

Web 2.0:
DO WHILE (NOT DIE)
dev: i do this way its ok?
browser1: no, it must be bla..bla..
browser2: its ok, no problem
browser3: fine, but..
browser4: anything you do just fine
dev: ok i’ll think about it.
LOOP

Web 3.0:
DO WHILE (?)
Search in progress, please wait…
Search in progress, please wait…
LOOP?
crowd: wait a minute? how about Web 2.0?
cindi said on 19 October 2006 at 11:46 pm:

Web 1.0: img tags
Web 2.0: Flickr tags

Web 1.0: streamed audio and webcams of PopMart Rotterdam
Web 2.0: phonecam video during a show; bootleg torrents 2 days after a show

Web 0.1: Zork
Web 2.0: Secondlife
Ozone said on 20 October 2006 at 2:14 am:

Web 1.0 India and Pakistan, finally getting along, and what great tech.
Web 2.0 NK has a nuke, Japan’s tech starts looking awesome again.
Joachim Niemeier said on 20 October 2006 at 3:40 am:

Web 1.0: Get my presentation from our website
Web 2.0: Get my presentation from flickr/YouTube/Google Video
David said on 20 October 2006 at 6:20 am:

Web 1.0: AOL kills Usenet
Web 2.0: Google Groups kills Usenet
Community Input said on 25 October 2006 at 9:41 am:

[...] Paldies! Jūsuprāt, aktuālā prese (ieteicams, lai būtu arī mājaslapa netā, kur kaut vai tikai virsrakstus var aplūkot), kas atspoguļotu Rietumvalstu mūsdienu politiskās situācijas interpretāciju tb kā Rietumvalstis redz to, kas notiek.p.s. izņemot The Economist. šķīvī ir 3 siermaizes | uzsmērēt siermaizi [...]
patricio said on 22 October 2006 at 9:44 am:

Web 1.0: e-anything you can imagine
Web 2.0: anything you can imagine
Dsus4 said on 22 October 2006 at 10:46 am:

Web 1.0: I am tired of being lonely. I’ll have a blog.
Web 2.0: I am tired of writing. I’ll have a fotolog.
Seamus said on 20 October 2006 at 11:35 am:

Web 1.0: Trying to convince people to send emails
Web 2.0: Trying to convince people to stop sending so many emails
d said on 20 October 2006 at 2:19 pm:

web 1.0: invalid overexpensive nonsense
web 2.0: valid overexpensive nonsense
Phej said on 20 October 2006 at 4:03 pm:

Web 1.0: Arial
Web 2.0: Lucida Grande
Tycho Zzyx said on 20 October 2006 at 7:21 pm:

Web 1.0: Students plagerize information from random websites
Web 2.0: Students plagerize information from Wikipedia
Web 3.0: Students plagerize information from teacher approved source
Тут Хумора.NET » Зельдман о Web 2.0 said on 20 October 2006 at 7:36 pm:

[...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]
Maksim Rossomachin said on 21 October 2006 at 12:19 am:

Web 1.0: XML for describing everything
Web 2.0: Microformats for describing small parts of everything
Knoxtenor said on 21 October 2006 at 12:32 am:

Web 1.0: “Version”
Web 2.0: “Service Release”
friends said on 21 October 2006 at 2:01 am:

[...] alickop[Tags|humor, link, webdev]Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. linkpost comment [...]
Mathias said on 21 October 2006 at 5:02 am:

Web 1.0 Trying to code simple and minimalistic homepages on Geocities
Web 2.0 Realising that Wordpress had already done that and done it better
Pointbarre — Emission Pointbarre - Couleur3 said on 21 October 2006 at 5:05 am:

[...] Sa suite bureautique, son effet web 2.0 et toute sa clique… Google comme on en a jamais autant parlé…Un bon article (en anglais) sur le blog de ZeldmanLa suite bureautique en question, bien chachée sur les pages Google [...]
Детально о... said on 21 October 2006 at 5:10 am:

[...] 21 Окт, 2006 at 3:35 AM alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. Tags: [...]
Web 2.0 « Storyteller said on 21 October 2006 at 5:21 am:

[...] Nå, nu har Jeffrey Zeldman tagit upp skillnaderna mellan Web 1.0 och Web 2.0 i en bloggpost där han ber sina läsare kommentera och redogöra för sin syn på skillnaderna mellan 1.0 och 2.0.Intressant. Min kommentar såg ut så här: [...]
Френдлента said on 21 October 2006 at 5:29 am:

[...] Зельдман о Web 2.0 Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Tags: humor, link, webdev [...]
ТЁМА.ее » Архив » Web1.0 vs. Web2.0 said on 21 October 2006 at 7:31 am:

[...] Забавная игра в комментариях блога Джефри Зельдмана: Различия между Веб1.0 и Веб2.0. Вот некоторые, которые понравились: Web 1.0 – Bookmark this site! Web 2.0 – Digg this post! Web 1.0: Bookmarking. Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing. Web 1.0: Webmail 2mb storage Web 2.0: Webmail 2gb storage [...]
yaph said on 21 October 2006 at 9:55 am:

Web 1.0: Meta Tag Spam
Web 2.0: Comment Spam
Keybarer said on 21 October 2006 at 11:16 am:

Web 1.0: People being pleased with the Web.
Web 2.0: People criticizing everything they see.
Friends said on 21 October 2006 at 12:14 pm:

[...] Link | | Add to MemoriesЗельдман о Web 2.021st Oct, 2006 | 03:35 posted by: alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Tags: humor, link, webdev [...]
yveswilliams.com » Blog Archive » En vrac said on 21 October 2006 at 2:09 pm:

[...] Web 2 point quoi ? et Web 2.0 Thinking Game Google veut optimiser votre site web [...]
\ Imprevizibil » Blog Archive » About web 1.0 and web 2.0 said on 21 October 2006 at 2:15 pm:

[...] Cea mai buna descriere. ;) More fun here [...]
André Achtermeier: Web 2.0 Hype or Bleb? said on 21 October 2006 at 2:20 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Hype or Bleb? [...]
Jim said on 21 October 2006 at 2:35 pm:

Web 1.0: Lots of techies embittered by not getting rich.
Web 2.0: Lots of techies embittered by not getting rich.
Johan said on 21 October 2006 at 3:27 pm:

web 1.0 Internet Explorer and Netscape
web 2.0 Internet Explorer and Firefox
GreenDoor said on 21 October 2006 at 4:02 pm:

[...] Spätestens, seit der Übernahme von YouTube durch Google für eine irrsinnigen Haufen Kohle, ist das Schlagwort Web 2.0 in aller Munde. Der amerikanische Webdesigner Jeffrey Zeldmann hat sich mal die Mühe gemacht, die Web 2.0 Worthülsen mit denen von Web 1.0 früher zu vergleichen. Ausserdem hat er seine Leser befragt, was für sie Web 2.0 bedeutet. Die Liste ist lang und zum Teil echt lustig (vor allem die Leser-Kommentare). [...]
Rade said on 21 October 2006 at 5:37 pm:

Web 1.0: HTML iframes
Web 2.0: PHP include
OrR said on 21 October 2006 at 6:18 pm:

Web 1.0: A truck you dump something on.
Web 2.0: A series of tubes.
Tom Inc said on 21 October 2006 at 6:19 pm:

Web 1.0: a, e, i, o, u
Web 2.0: 4, 3, 1, 0, 8, $, £, &, :), :(, …
Winter Knight said on 21 October 2006 at 7:08 pm:

Web 1.0: Worthless Bloatware 98
Web 2.0: Worthless Bloatware Vista

Web 1.0: Linux for geeks
Web 2.0: Linux for less geeky geeks

Web 1.0: Politicians stay in power with lies
Web 2.0: Politicians stay in power with “faulty” voting machines

Web 1.0: VCRs (VCRs)
Web 2.0: VCRs that crash (DVD/DVR players)

Web 1.0: Apocalypse
Web 2.0: ???

Web 1.0: Cyborgs are cool
Web 2.0: Cyborgs are geeks with new toys

Web 1.0: This game was fun
Web 2.0: Now I’m going to do something else
trez said on 21 October 2006 at 7:14 pm:

1.0 : LOL
2.0 : WTF
Френдлента said on 21 October 2006 at 8:53 pm:

[...] 12 уже естьОтветитьЛинкВ закладки 21-Окт-2006 03:35 am – Зельдман о Web 2.0alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Метки: humor, link, webdev [...]
Tolikfon said on 22 October 2006 at 4:41 am:

Web 1.0: Nobody know about UTF-8
Web 2.0: Nobody care about UTF-8
хуясе каменты на русском
Jeffrey said on 22 October 2006 at 9:03 am:

Web 1.0: Investors see $ in front of every number.
Web 2.0: Programmers see $ in front of every DOM element reference.
readonly said on 22 October 2006 at 10:41 am:

[...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. (comment on this) sply [...]
Basic Thinking Blog » Web 2.0: schön einfach erklärt said on 22 October 2006 at 1:53 pm:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman legt vor: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]
coopLOG: Compil de la semaine [22.10.06] said on 22 October 2006 at 2:58 pm:

[...] Zeldman.com [17.10.06] : un petit jeu satirique sympa qui consiste à démontrer que le Web2.0 existait déjà au temps du Web1.0. [...]
Todd said on 22 October 2006 at 5:50 pm:

“Web 1.0″ – Term never used.
“Web 2.0″ – Overused term/fad/trend.
ben scot said on 22 October 2006 at 6:21 pm:

web 1.0 my arse

yours
7thgroove » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 22 October 2006 at 8:46 pm:

[...] Here’s a bit of levity from Zeldman. Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. But Mostly it means… read more | digg story [...]
bluefacedpixie » Web 2.o said on 23 October 2006 at 12:18 am:

[...] Snigger. But you can play too! Web 1.0: home websites no one reads Web 2.0: blogs no one reads Posted by bfp in Blog This | [...]
мои камрады said on 23 October 2006 at 5:07 am:

[...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]
» Web 2.0 erklärt, Blogpiloten.de - Weblog Update Weekly said on 23 October 2006 at 5:20 am:

[...] Wem das zu viel Text ist, für den gibt es dank Jeffrey Zeldman jetzt die einmalige ‘Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0′-Vergleichsliste, zusammengefasst von Robert Basic. [...]
Vinny Lingham said on 23 October 2006 at 5:55 am:

Funny, when I tried this on my blog earlier this year, I didn’t get this type of response :-)
recurring said on 23 October 2006 at 6:50 am:

Web 1.0: Frontpage results in: “Hi, I’m Jake! Here’s a picture of me on holiday! I had a great time! Here’s a picture of my cat! Isn’t he cute? Welcome to my website!”

Web 2.0: MySpace results in: “My name is Jake and I don’t care what anyone thinks which is why I’m going to write pretentious blurb every day to a whole bunch of people I’ll never meet because it makes me feel good.”
Macaca said on 23 October 2006 at 8:07 am:

Web 1.0: No idea who’s linking me!
Web 2.0: 20.000 zillion Trackbacks spamming a comment-game to death
The Milkman of Human Kindness: Zeldman on Web 2.0 said on 23 October 2006 at 10:11 am:

[...] Nice article on Zeldman, the Web 2.0 Thinking Game…Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News.Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes. [...]
//de/rivat » Schoene Zusammenfassung… said on 23 October 2006 at 10:21 am:

[...] (geklaut von hier) [...]
Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 Roundup » Vinny Lingham’s Blog said on 23 October 2006 at 10:48 am:

[...] Ok – Jeffrey Zeldman got it right [...]
Jayme said on 23 October 2006 at 12:49 pm:

web 1.0 Posted on 2006/08/04 4:51 PM
web 2.0 Posted 3 minutes ago
Ungeblogt - We Do Entertain You. said on 23 October 2006 at 4:06 pm:

[...] Was ist eigentlich Web 2.0? – Jeffrey Zeldman und seine Leser geben zusammenfassend eine vereinfachte Antwort. [...]
Anarchaia: A tumblelog by Christian Neukirchen said on 23 October 2006 at 4:29 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game, so much cynism. I love it! [...]
efesak said on 23 October 2006 at 9:00 pm:

Web 1.0: viagra, cialis,
Web 2.0: vl4lgrA, cl4-ll5
Web 2.0 Nonsense versus Web 1.0 Schwachsinn at kWER? said on 24 October 2006 at 2:39 am:

[...] Quelle und mehr: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Sensation: Schwulsein doch heilbar! at CRISCO CONNECTION said on 24 October 2006 at 2:49 am:

[...] Was ist das eigentlich – 2.0? [...]
Gumbert said on 24 October 2006 at 3:50 am:

Web1.0 http://www.domain.com/index.php?id=3827
Web2.0 http://www.domain.com/how-to-easily-earn-money/

Web1.0 myname.com
Web2.0 myblog.com
Shinoli Blog said on 24 October 2006 at 4:15 am:

[...] Via Classé dans: Web | Aucun commentaire [...]
Friends said on 26 October 2006 at 7:11 am:

[...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]
raul.de » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 ist… said on 26 October 2006 at 7:52 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web1.0 vs. Web2.0 ↵ BETALOG said on 24 October 2006 at 8:07 am:

[...] Worin unterscheiden sich eigentlich noch einmal Web1.0 und Web2.0? Achja, danke! [...]
Jan-Piet Mens / Thinking Game 2.0 said on 24 October 2006 at 8:22 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman has an amusing Web 2.0 Thinking Game going with a huge number of quite amusing comments on the comparison between Web 1.0 and 2.0: [...]
Just Sopivasti: Web 2.0 Game said on 26 October 2006 at 9:01 am:

[...] Web 2.0 Game Web 2.0 Thinking Game.Liza Minelli Suomessa ekaa kertaa. Ovatko liput halpoja vai kalliita? Ja jos, niin kenelle?Äh, ei tää nyt oikein. [...]
500 Words Per Day: A Digg at Web 2.0 - Because 1,000 is just stupid said on 26 October 2006 at 9:58 am:

[...] After surfing around a bit, I checked back in on Jeffrey’s Zeldman’s site and found this humourous tidbit about the Web 2.0 trend. For web design curmurdgeon like myself, it provided a couple good chuckles.Zeldman on Web 2.0 [...]
DouDa said on 24 October 2006 at 11:28 am:

web 1.0 : NTIC
web 2.0 : NBIC

:)
only a blog » Webmontag in Wien said on 24 October 2006 at 12:37 pm:

[...] Nachdem wir den Vortrag (ohne es zu bemerken – sorry an dieser Stelle) durch Händeschütteln aller Beteiligten unterbrochen hatten, amüsierten wir uns noch über Zeldmans Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Dabei ist mir nebenbei erwähnt aufgefallen, dass auch zeldman.com mal einen Relaunch vertragen würde. [...]
Sascha Goebels WebLog » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 26 October 2006 at 1:44 pm:

[...] Check out the Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Jeffrey Zeldman. [...]
[yoschi]s BLOG » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 said on 24 October 2006 at 4:14 pm:

[...] Auf heute.org (übrigens einer Web 1.0 Seite) gab es heute für diejenigen unter euch, die der englischen Sprache mächtig sind und für die, die AJAX nicht nur mit einer holländischen Fussballmannschaft verbinden, einen wirklich köstlichen Hinweis auf den Zeldman Blog. Jeffrey Zeldman erklärt den Begriff “Web 2.0″ auf seine Art – wirklich lustig sind die mittlerweile 456 Kommentare zu seinem Beitrag, frei nach dem Motto: [...]
GViper said on 24 October 2006 at 8:45 pm:

Web 1.0 – Goths having depressings rants via blogs
Web 2.0 – Emo kids having depressing rants on YouTube

You know it to be true.
Kristjan Heinaste said on 25 October 2006 at 2:15 am:

Web 1.0 : functions
Web 2.0 : functional
Un juego : Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0 « divagame said on 25 October 2006 at 5:17 am:

[...] v í a zeldman.com. [...]
Web 2.0 erklärt « Glück auf! - Andreas sein Weblog said on 25 October 2006 at 6:23 am:

[...] [Die Originalliste von Zeldman hier, Best-of Comments bei Wo-gibt via Felix seine Bookmarks via Robert] [...]
node3000 said on 25 October 2006 at 7:12 am:

[...] Big thanks to Martin for the link to the Web 2.0 thinking game. [...]
OneThreeForum :: View topic - Random things that are good said on 25 October 2006 at 7:55 am:

[...] Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game: [...]
librarian.net : NELA : 24oct06 said on 25 October 2006 at 8:58 am:

[...] Web 2.0 – “a popular (though ill-defined and often criticized) buzzword amongst certain technical and marketing communities.” [cite] Further reading: O’Reilly’s definition of Web 2.0; The New Shape of Knowledge by David Weinberger; Top Ten Web 2.0 Moments of 2005 by Richard MacManus; Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Jeffrey Zeldman. [next] « other buzzwords and terms » w2 and l2 [...]
La bulle 2.0 Internet par rapport à la bulle 1.0 at Rien de spécial said on 25 October 2006 at 1:47 pm:

[...] Le terme de “web 2.0″ est devenu un vértiable buzz word — j’espère d’ailleurs attirer un grand nombre de visiteurs en l’utilisant sur cet article. Au point que ça en agace certains, et moi le premier. J’aime beaucoup cet article de Zeldman qui propose de recenser les fausses différences, comme par exemple: [...]
Johan said on 25 October 2006 at 4:01 pm:

web 1.0 Tetris in Java
web 2.0 Tetris YUI Dustin Diaz Style

web 1.0 HTML
web 2.0 XHTML

web 1.0 JavaScript
web 2.0 DOM, Prototype and Jquery

web 1.0 Tag Soup
web 2.0 Semantic markup
Vorsprung durch Webstandards | Spiele der nächsten Generation said on 25 October 2006 at 4:41 pm:

[...] 1) Spielen mit Wörtern – Inspiriert von reißerischen Web-2.0-Hype-Schlagzeilen des Economist spielt Jeffrey Zeldman eine neue Art zynisches Wort-Memory: Web 2.0 Thinking Game und viele spielen mit. [...]
Mr. Bop said on 25 October 2006 at 6:44 pm:

Web 1.0: Egotrips at high provider costs, or just textbased university site.

Web 2.0: This really long tail of cool comments, design and freedom of speech.
Luka’s easy Flash blog said on 25 October 2006 at 10:46 pm:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman recently posted a great article on Web 2.0 on his blog. It’s hilarious! Just look at some samples from it: [...]
Аз, света и сметачите » блонди-млонди said on 26 October 2006 at 1:54 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Michel Bozgounov said on 26 October 2006 at 7:47 am:

web 1.0 A List Apart magazine: nothing too fancy, but works, great content!
web 2.0 A List Apart magazine: fancier, great content again, but links to discussions on older articles don’t work anymore :-(

(examples: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/ – the article;
http://www.alistapart.com/comments/slidingdoors/ – the comments’ page)

I’ve contacted the List Apart editors more than once, but the issue wasn’t fixed… Maybe it’s unfixable :(
tommi said on 26 October 2006 at 10:32 am:

web 1.0: pot smoking
web 2.0: pod casting
gerhard said on 26 October 2006 at 10:57 am:

web 1.0: male
web 2.0: female

web 1.0: cash burning
web 2.0: cash burning or cash earning?

web 1.0: Windows
web 2.0: Mac
Falco said on 26 October 2006 at 12:01 pm:

web 1.0: type “web 1.0: -content-” and “web 2.0: -content-” by yourself
web 2.0: copy & paste

web 1.0: made for nerds
web 2.0: made by nerds

web 1.0: made by nerds
web 2.0: made for nerds

web 1.0: sucks.
web 2.0: sucks. but if you say it does, it’s on technorati

web 1.0: Web 1.0
web 2.0: web 2.0

web 1.0: I would have never found this page
web 2.0: Damn Blogroll!
Brian said on 26 October 2006 at 3:43 pm:

Found on ShitCrunch:

9Rules to Web 2.0

#1 – Overdesign a simple page with two input fields where people can leave their name and e-mail to get spammed when the site is online. Although that won’t happen the next upcoming months

#2 – Closed Alpha, Closed Beta, Closed Online, Closed Down

#3 – Use tags even though they are not necessary or just misused. Tag your content, tag your posts, tag your dog

#4 – Use rounded edges, font shadows, bevel and emboss everything, use font-size: 20pt – you don’t want to miss out the 2.0-blind people

#5 – Tell everybody you are using Ajax, although you are just cleaning the house

#6 – Delete all white space from your source code and don’t code in XHTML . Read why

#7 – Use ruby on rails, c on sea, python on road, perl in the sky, php on moon, Basecamp, Backback, eh Backbone, Tadaaaa

#8 – Generate a name, generate ideas . Use this

Done everything?

#9 – Send an E-Mail to Mike Arrington, TechCrunch
Marc Aguilera said on 26 October 2006 at 5:40 pm:

Web 1.0 Streaming Audio
Web 2.0 Podcast
Web 2.1 Netcast
Définition du Web2.0 said on 27 October 2006 at 2:06 am:

[...] C’est Jeffrey Zeldman qui s’y colle cette fois avec une définition sous forme de jeu : le Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Le principe est simple : vous donnez un trait caractéristique du web1.0 et en regard, un autre trait caractéristique du web2.0 : Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]
Penalty Deathmatch: 1 : 2 - Brand Evangelist said on 27 October 2006 at 5:32 am:

[...] Schöner hätten wir es auch nicht formulieren können. Deshalb hier in Auszügen das “Web 2.0 Thinking Game” von Jeffrey Zeldman: Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]
::: eselkult.tk: Blog, abseits vom Mainstream! ::: » links for 2006-10-27 said on 27 October 2006 at 6:24 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game sehr cool! – unbedingt auch Kommentare lesen (tags: Blogs Netzkultur) [...]
Jeffrey Zeldman said on 27 October 2006 at 7:03 am:

web 2.0 A List Apart magazine: fancier, great content again, but links to discussions on older articles don’t work anymore :-(

I’ve contacted the List Apart editors more than once, but the issue wasn’t fixed… Maybe it’s unfixable :(

Our replies must have gotten caught in your spam traps.

The problem will be fixed in the next (from-scratch) update to the ALA publishing engine, coming very soon.
dusoft said on 27 October 2006 at 9:36 am:

Web 1.0: homepages
Web 2.0: blogs
Michel Bozgounov said on 27 October 2006 at 9:38 am:

@Zeldman:

Thank you, Jeffrey, for your reply! Good news that this issue will be fixed soon!:)

[ I actually check my INBOX and my JUNK MAIL, always, just in case, but maybe somehow I overlooked your replies; coule be this:) Would ve really nice to be able to read older discussions again:) ]

OK, now a more serious entry from me:

Web 1.0: Macromedia Buys Allaire (2001)
Web 2.0: Adobe buys Macromedia (2005/6)
Web 3.0: Microsoft buys Adobe (2011?)
Web 4.0: Google buys Microsoft (2016?)
Web 5.0: End of the Internet? :-D

:-)
Christophe said on 27 October 2006 at 10:26 am:

Web 1.0: _
Web 2.0: -
blob said on 27 October 2006 at 12:15 pm:

Why don’t people get it? Its not meant to be anything more than “the same only better”, and who can deny the web is getting better? Hell my browser is doing a spell check for me right now as i type, if thats not better than what came before then maybe I don’t get it.
Danny-T said on 27 October 2006 at 12:44 pm:

Web 1.0 = “Have you seen the Peeing Monkey?”
Web 2.0 = “Do you remember when the peeing monkey was cool?”
Web 2.0 Thinking Game « Trash Log Blog Archive said on 27 October 2006 at 6:24 pm:

[...] …ist ein lustiges Spiel, mit dem sich Jeffrey Zeldman über den Web 2.0-Hype lustig macht. Und jeder kann mitmachen! [...]
RoRy said on 27 October 2006 at 8:52 pm:

Web 1.0 = “Rate my poo”
Web 2.0 = “Rate my comment”
Hotrocket - An Interactive Agency » Blog Archive » IPL: Day 2….and the word of the day is…. said on 27 October 2006 at 10:36 pm:

[...] So I guess that kind of answers my question, however, if you want to get in on the comparison game between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, check this out. [...]
K10k / News said on 27 October 2006 at 10:40 pm:

[...] Submit Link/News To someone who feels like jabbing a sharp pencil into his eyes whenever a client mentions “Web 2.0″, Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game was a very amusing read. Don’t miss the comments, either. [...]
Chris N said on 27 October 2006 at 11:05 pm:

web 1.0 = online banking
web 2.0 = online dating
Lenzz said on 28 October 2006 at 7:22 am:

Web 1.0: Subscribe to this newsletter.
Web 2.0: Subscribe to this feed.

Web 1.0: Loading…
Web 2.0: Initializing…
Event Horizon said on 28 October 2006 at 12:51 pm:

Web 1.0: “I searched the web for information …”
Web 2.0: “I googled the web for information …”
IPL: Day 2….and the term of the day is….. « Suriano Consulting Inc. said on 28 October 2006 at 6:36 pm:

[...] So I guess that kind of answers my question, however, if you want to get in on the comparison game between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, <a href=”http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/”>check this out</a>. [...]
Guillaume said on 29 October 2006 at 7:07 am:

web 1.0: Web is the next big thing !
web 2.0: Web is the next big thing !
Still waiting…
AndreasMatthies.de » Blog Archive » web 1.0 vs. web 2.0 said on 29 October 2006 at 10:15 am:

[...] Was wird eigentlich mit web2.0 assoziiert? Diese Frage stellte sich Jeffrey Zeldman – seine User gaben Antwort… [...]
*puertoriko said on 29 October 2006 at 10:22 am:

web 1.0: Identity
web 2.0: Image
Zeldman ve web 2.0 oyunu ( Web 2.0 Thinking Game ) at AntiFit said on 29 October 2006 at 6:35 pm:

[...] Link : Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
Ted Forbes said on 29 October 2006 at 7:51 pm:

Web 1.0 blink tag
Web 2.0 myspace banner ads

Web 1.0 Yahoo – Mark Cuban
Web 2.0 Google – YouTube

Web 1.0 kioken on CNN (inflated fish story)
Web 2.0 blog watch on CNN (inflated fish stories)

Web 1.0 terms for clients to use and not understand
Web 2.0 terms for clients to use and not understand

Web 1.0 Napster
Web 2.0 Youtube
gradient dropshadow curve // by Henry Tapia » 2006 » February said on 29 October 2006 at 8:59 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking game Web 1.0 vs 2.0… [...]
s/earch/ · Zeldmans web1.0 vs web2.0 said on 29 October 2006 at 10:40 pm:

[...] Zeldman.com posts a funny article about what Web 2.0 concept may mean in different days, like in the case of The Economist’s coverage of Google and YouTube. [...]
K10k / News said on 29 October 2006 at 10:52 pm:

[...] I think Paul Redmond says it best: Web 1.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus. Web 2.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS. [...]
Search Enignes WEB said on 29 October 2006 at 11:54 pm:

_____________________________________________

Web 1.0: Search Engine Results

Web 2.0: Search Engine Results – BASED ON PERSONALIZATION & USER INFO
Serge said on 30 October 2006 at 1:16 am:

web 1.0: this is too easy to get in
web 2.0: I can’t get enough of this

web 1.0: porn makes it float
web 2.0: old enough for a relationship
João Craveiro said on 30 October 2006 at 9:55 am:

Web 1.0: beware of passing too much time online
Web 2.0: beware of passing too much time offline

Web 1.0: irc channel
Web 2.0: ~~Windows~~ MSN Live Messenger window with 30 friends

(slight correction on a previous one:)
Web 1.0: 12px h2
Web 2.0: 3em h2

Web 1.0: “Get Internet Explorer, NOW!”
Web 2.0: Get rid of Internet Explorer, NOW!
leobard said on 30 October 2006 at 10:00 am:

web 1.0: hamsterdance
web 2.0: ytmnd.com
James said on 30 October 2006 at 11:43 am:

Web 1.0 : Nerds
Web 2.0 : Nerds + Photoshop tutorial on gradients and shiny buttons
Jordan Dobson said on 30 October 2006 at 12:51 pm:

Web 1.0: News
Web 2.0: Blog

Web 1.0: Version Numbers
Web 2.0: Weekly Releases ( I think its funny Web 2.0 has a version number. Seems like it would just be “New Web” or something. Ha! )
mark said on 30 October 2006 at 12:52 pm:

web 1.0: 3D pointless objects in crazy future design
web 2.0: Deer Antlers

seriously what is the point of all of the deer antlers anyways?
PI Forum: Contrappunti/ Chi naviga davvero su Web? said on 31 October 2006 at 12:55 pm:

[...] vi linko un interessante pezzo di Jeff Zeldman sulle possibili differenze tra web 1.0 e web 2.0E’ molto istruttivo [...]
getbockedup said on 30 October 2006 at 2:51 pm:

Web 1.0: Username and Password
Web 2.0: Username, Password, Password again, City, State, Zip, Avatar, Nickname, Nickname again, Email Offers?, Platform, Browser, Flash/ No-Flash?, Interests, tc…
Marc said on 30 October 2006 at 11:03 pm:

Web 1.0 : This is 1.0?
Web 2.0 : When is 3.0 coming?
The Creative Posts and Ramblings of Richard Thomas - » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 31 October 2006 at 10:10 am:

[...] I’ll be honest, while I understand the whole web 2.0 thing, I’ve found it hard to define. Thankfully now I don’t have to because I can just refer to how several hundred other people define it in a recent post at zeldman.com – http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game [...]
Mi otro blog… » Blog Archive » ¿Qué es web 2.0? (II) said on 31 October 2006 at 2:08 pm:

[...] Por otro lado, para los que no acabéis de ver las diferencias entre web 2.0 y web 1.0 (yo sigo teniendo mis dudas al respecto), en el blog de Jeffrey Zeldman podéis encontrar una lista de diferencias (que aunque puede que no sea del todo útil, si que es divertida ), entre las que se incluyen las siguientes: Web 1.0: Bookmarking. Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing. [...]
tribalogical said on 31 October 2006 at 2:17 pm:

Web 1.0 : Personal “home page”
Web 2.0 : Blog

Web 1.0 : Linklists
Web 2.0 : Syndicated Blogrolls

Web 1.0 : American Diner Coffee
Web 2.0 : Starbucks “Latte”

Web 1.0 : Yours/Mine
Web 2.0 : Ours

Web 1.0 : Distributed
Web 2.0 : Consolidated Distribution

Web 1.0 : Where’s my dog?
Web 2.0 : Where’s my dongle?
Web 3.0 : Inside the dog.

Web 1.0 : Fresh ideas
Web 2.0 : Fresh out of ideas…………………….

peace,
tribalogical
Rick Blalock said on 31 October 2006 at 3:39 pm:

Web 1.0 : Never would have wasted time reading 10,000 comments about “the web”

Web 2.0 : I just read every comment on this stupid page and I am laughing about it.
Alex said on 31 October 2006 at 7:41 pm:

Web 1.0 : Microsoft’s WebTV – Internet on your TV
Web 2.0 : Apple’s iTunes – TV and movies on the internet
MayDay said on 31 October 2006 at 9:43 pm:

Web 1.0 : Readers rate books on Amazon
Web 2.0 : Readers rate reviewers on Amazon

Web 1.0 : Reviewers on Amazon work for publishing companies
Web 2.0 : Reviewers on Amazon have their own ad-supported websites
Erkan Yılmaz said on 31 October 2006 at 11:18 pm:

web 1.0: XMLHTTP
web 2.0: AJAX
Blogging 2.0 › Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 1 November 2006 at 10:36 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
mcgyver SEO said on 2 November 2006 at 3:11 am:

web 1.0: Me (I can do it)
web 2.0: We (We are doing it)

web 1.0: Linked
web 2.0: Linking

web 1.0: Only for Music
web 2.0: More than Music

web 1.0: Walkman
Web 2.0: iPod

web 1.0: did
web 2.0: doing

web 1.0: earphone
web 2.0: Speaker

web 1.0: Battery
web 2.0: Plug-in
Morran2k said on 2 November 2006 at 6:47 am:

Web 1.0: Creating workarounds for nested tables to work
Web 2.0: Creating workarounds for CSS to work across platform, OS and browser.

Web 1.0: Dropshadows
Web 2.0: Dropshadows and gradients

Web 1.0: Beating the crap out of my Nintendo 8bit to work.
Web 2.0: Still beating the crap out of my Nintendo 8bit to work
Medical-Wei said on 2 November 2006 at 10:02 am:

Web 1.0: “IE only”
Web 2.0: XHTML+CSS

Web 1.0: Flashy
Web 2.0: AJAXy

Web 1.0: Difficult for disabled
Web 2.0: Difficult for IE users

Web 1.0: <b>
Web 2.0: <strong>

Web 1.0: Simple
Web 2.0: Complex
deric said on 2 November 2006 at 10:50 am:

Web 1.0: You’re using Netscape? Eat shit.

Web 2.0: You’re using IE? Eat shit.
New Economy war Web 1.0 - Webworkblogger said on 2 November 2006 at 1:52 pm:

[...] New Economy war Web 1.0 Jetzt ist Web 2.0. Jeder spricht darüber, jeder schreibt darüber. Aber was steckt schon dahinter? Hat sich da so viel geändert? Oder ist alles immer noch beim alten, nur mit neuem Namen? Eine Übersicht schafft Klarheit. [...]
noko said on 2 November 2006 at 4:38 pm:

Web 1.0: HTML, PERL, CGI
Web 2.0: XHTML CSS, JavaScript, PHP, MySQL, ORACLE, Ruby On Rails, JAVA, AJAX, XML, XUL, ColdFusion, ASP.NET, etc.

Web 1.0: What is that?
Web 2.0: WTF?
Ron Jones said on 2 November 2006 at 4:54 pm:

Construction – 1.0

Beta – 2.0

(i know this wasn’t me joke!)
James said on 3 November 2006 at 1:50 am:

Web 1.0: spam email for male enhancment
Web 2.0: spam email quoting Mark Twain
callie said on 3 November 2006 at 12:39 pm:

Web 1.0: Go to a concert, come home, spend weeks searching message boards and guestbooks for someone willing to trade or sell a bootleg tape of the show.

Web 2.0: Go to a concert, come home, watch the whole thing again on YouTube the next day.
mediabistro.com: UnBeige said on 3 November 2006 at 4:59 pm:

[...] And, to close out the day for this writer, we thought we’d share with you Zeldman’s funny piece, “Web 2.0 Thinking Game.” It’s in response to the big media outlets labeling the buyout of YouTube by Google as “Web 2.0 has come of age.” So he plays around a bit, showing the difference between Web 1.0 (boo, hiss) and Web 2.0 (hooray, and, oh, wait, I have to do all this extra work and share stuff?). But the real fun gets going when he asks for readers’ takes on the game. If you haven’t already spent the good portion of a day looking at this sometime this week, it’ll provide you with a good way to get both your humor and geek-ery intake in at the same time. And kill some hours. Posted by Steve | 11:04 AM | web | Email this post [...]
Jas said on 4 November 2006 at 7:49 am:

Web 1.0: Ads
Web 2.0: Google Ads
JUSTmag - Schade, dass du nicht mehr da bist: Web 1.0. said on 4 November 2006 at 11:06 am:

[...] JUSTmag – Schade, dass du nicht mehr da bist: Web 1.0. Ansprechbar [...]
Quinquireme: What Is Web 2.0? said on 5 November 2006 at 2:21 pm:

[...] In the old days (1996-2003), I used to waste time at work reading stuff on the internet.Now I waste time at work writing stuff on the internet.And as far as I’m concerned, that’s the difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0.UPDATE: Then LC drew my attention to this, which, together with its 200+ comments, explains it all much better. [...]
Michael said on 5 November 2006 at 6:19 pm:

Web 1.0: Sleazy Dating site
Web 2.0: Sleazy Dating site (using AJAX)

Web 1.0: .COM landrush
Web 2.0: .MOBI landrush
Il progresso del web, la costanza del monopolio said on 6 November 2006 at 4:24 am:

[...] Nonostante la mia perplessità intorno all’incredibile massificazione semantica indotta dal “web 2.0” (pur riconoscendo i pregi delle nuove tecnologie), mi sembra molto interessante questo articolo di Jeffrey Zeldman ispirato, a sua volta, da un articolo dell’economist, secondo il quale, l’acquisizione di you-tube da parte di google segna il definitivo passaggio da “trend” a “era” del web2.0 .Per dare ancora di più un senso all’etichetta web 2.0, zeldman (e tutti i commenti a seguire), hanno comparato web1.0 con web2.0. Esemplare:Web 1.0: AOL compra Time Warner.Web 2.0: Google compra YouTube.Non è cambiato nulla se non il nome delle multinazionali. PUBBLICITÀ PUBBLICITÀ postato da terotero.com il lunedì 06 novembre 2006 in: [...]
Heiko Eckert - Blog - » Zeldman Web2.0 Thinking game said on 6 November 2006 at 7:58 am:

[...] Bei Jeffrey Zeldman wird gerade Web2.0 Thinking Game gespielt und das geht ungefähr so: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube [...]
Alcator said on 6 November 2006 at 8:02 am:

Web 1.0: Internet Explorer 5 considered good browser.
Web 2.0: Internet Explorer 7 considered good browser.

Web 1.0: table layout authors mock frame layout authors: “You’re so old fashioned!”
Web 2.0: fixed-width div layout authors mock table layout authors: “You’re so old fashioned!”
Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 said on 6 November 2006 at 4:33 pm:

Web 1.0: Spam
Web 2.0: Spam
Web 3.0: Spam

Web 1.0: Content
Web 2.0: Our Content
Web 3.0: Where is the Content?

Web 1.0: Websites with animatet GIFs
Web. 2.0: Websites with Flash, Javascript, Ajax, PHP, Perl, ASP, and nothing Works

Web 1.0: Internet
Web 2.0: THE Internet XXXXXXXXXL (another form of Porn)

Web 1.0: A Good Idea
Web 2.0: A Good Idea with Bad Taste
Web 3.0: It was a great time still with Web1.0
webthreads.de » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 7 November 2006 at 5:11 am:

[...] Einen wirklich sehr interessanten und auch lustigen Artikel liefert uns Jeffrey Zeldman der in verschiedenen Beispielen auflistet was Web 1.0 und das dazugehörige Gegenstück im Web 2.0 ist. Zwei Fundstücke die ihn auf die Idee brachten: let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]
restatemedia.net » Zeldman with comments said on 7 November 2006 at 2:21 pm:

[...] Zeldman again. [...]
Discodestroyer said on 7 November 2006 at 3:54 pm:

Web 1.0: No licence
Web 2.0: Creative Commons Licence

Web 1.0: Pop-ups
Web 2.0: Flash pop-ups (I love them!)
Max said on 7 November 2006 at 5:37 pm:

Web 1.0 Dreamweaver
Web 2.0 TextPad

Web 1.0 WebTV
Web 2.0 YouTube
Blogging 2.0 » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 7 November 2006 at 10:42 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Binny V A said on 8 November 2006 at 1:55 am:

Web 1.0 : Keywords
Web 2.0 : Tags
The Digg Effect - Search for Diggs or get Dugg » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on 8 November 2006 at 2:41 am:

[...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]
blogue 2.0 | www.sashque.de » die zeit hat mich überholt said on 8 November 2006 at 8:10 am:

[...] mehr davon hier. -tschebursaschka Keine Kommentare Sende diesem Beitrag einen Trackback. kommentiere diesen Beitrag [...]
theory.isthereason » Today’s Links: Threadless + SecondLife + Muji = Crowdsourcing? said on 8 November 2006 at 2:17 pm:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman presents Web 2.0 Thinking Game When The Economist referred to Google’s acquisition of YouTube as a "hot Web 2.0 trend", Zeldman decided to have some fun with it. Just look at the hilarious responses he got! Keywords: funny, web2.0 [...]
schlumps said on 9 November 2006 at 8:05 am:

Web 1.0:
starting browser, reading web page

Web 2.0:
starting browser, installing plugin, installing plugin, deactivating security options, try another browser, reading web page(hopefully)
stealthunit.net said on 9 November 2006 at 10:12 am:

[...] Sori mä haluisin mielellään kiistellä täst asiast jonkun kans [...]
jluix.com » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Defined said on 9 November 2006 at 6:42 pm:

[...] Finally, a precise (and hilarious) definition of “Web 2.0.” [...]
static07 said on 11 November 2006 at 5:37 am:

Web 1.0: Reading trough hundreds of Photoshop tutorials making a grungy design with plastic buttons and pixelborders.

Web 2.0: Reading trough few AJAX tutorials writing a blog that don’t refresh with animated shelfs, tooltips and loading .gifs
Andy said on 11 November 2006 at 10:10 pm:

Web 1.0: Frontpage
Web 2.0: Dreamweaver
Het slowchat/blog topic said on 13 November 2006 at 9:10 am:

[...] Web 2.0: Da’s een goede samenvatting. [...]
pauldwaite said on 13 November 2006 at 5:52 pm:

Web 1.0: annoying geeks on forums
Web 2.0: annoying non-geeks commenting on your blog
helge said on 14 November 2006 at 5:41 pm:

1.0 content without design
2.0 design without content, but designed to get content from whereever
Tony said on 16 November 2006 at 6:32 am:

Web 1.0: Clip art
Web 2.0: Retro backgrounds
eskapism.se » Blog Archive » Fler än jag som tycker myspace är junk said on 16 November 2006 at 12:17 pm:

[...] Ända sedan jag var inne på min första myspace-sida (som faktiskt inte var för så länge sedan) så har jag avskytt allt som har med den sajten att göra. Så fort jag (av misstag!) kommit in på en sida där så tänker jag “Geocities“. Och det finns få saker som glädjer mig så mycket som när jag på Jeffrey Zeldmans blogg läser att web 1.0 = Crap sites on Geocities och web 2.0 = Crap sites on MySpace. [...]
Websites Made Simple Blog » Blog Archive » Webmasters now Brands New Name - Sharing simple website design, ideas, practices with Malaysia. said on 17 November 2006 at 9:41 pm:

[...] The humorous part about this is that instead of calling personnel who manage websites; webmasters, any more. We are now branding them as Web Managers instead. This instantly reminded me of Zeldman’s article; Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
Almad.NET [Zápisník ] said on 19 November 2006 at 12:55 pm:

[...] Web 1.0: “Under Construction” Web 2.0: “Beta” Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets. Web 2.0: Pointless “Ajax” widgets. Komentáře ke krásnému pokusu popsat Web 2.0 [...]
An�lise de Sistemas III: Identificando Requisitos said on 19 November 2006 at 3:05 pm:

[...] Zeldman.com: Web 2.0 Thinking Game http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game [...]
Jan Hagge said on 20 November 2006 at 9:54 am:

Web 1.0: (Point)Endless Browserdiscussions
Web 2.0: ~~Point~~Endless Web2.0discussions
⊗ gebe, nehme, erhalte und habe ⊗ said on 21 November 2006 at 1:25 pm:

[...] Link (0 Kommentare) meldung machen web 2.0 thinking game [...]
Kevin said on 21 November 2006 at 4:20 pm:

Web 1.0: getting frustrated trying to explain the importance of MP3s
Web 2.0: getting frustrated trying to explain the importance of RSS
Cyril said on 22 November 2006 at 9:38 pm:

Web 1.0: cables
Web 2.0: tubes
..::blueeyes|inthemirror::.. » Blog Archive » Verfolgung2.0 said on 23 November 2006 at 12:27 pm:

[...] Dieses Thinking Game sollte sich übrigens jeder mal ansehen…. besonders gut gefallen hat mir: Web 1.0: “Under Construction” Web 2.0: “Beta” Do, 23. November 2006, 19:25 •blue|eyes • Alltag, Webdesign, Genööle [...]
Bookmark web design | <edit> - Il blog di HTML.it said on 24 November 2006 at 3:55 am:

[...] Web 2.0? Zeldman circa un mese fa ha pubblicato un post dal titolo Web 2.0 thinking game in cui mette a confronto il Web1.0 e il Web2.0 e che ha raccolto molti commenti, alcuni molto divertenti. C’è poi chi lamenta il fatto che il Web2.0 sia lento: in Don’t be part of the Web 2.SLOW un interessante studio dei tempi di risposta di Digg e le possibili strategie di ottimizzazione. Ma mentre siamo nel pieno del Web 2.0 c’è già chi guarda avanti al Web3.0, su questo blog ad esempio. Sinceramente non sono riuscito ad afferrare appieno il concetto, e credo ci vorrà del tempo prima che il Web 3.0 diventi un tormentone come ora lo è il Web2.0.Concludo con alcuni articoli in ordine sparso dedicati a ottimizzazione e buone pratiche di sviluppo. Contenuti e SEO per blog, titoli, media CSS, test crossbrowser e ottimizzazione CSS, nell’ordine: [...]
IB/NEWS said on 25 November 2006 at 2:01 pm:

[...] �� Web 1.0 � Web 2.0. � �� :) 19/10/2006 02:25 Frog e-mail www [...]
just___xTc said on 25 November 2006 at 11:35 pm:

PHP time.

Web 1.0:
Web 2.0:
(So damn complicated…)

Web 1.0: Parse Error, Expected “;” on line 14
Web 2.0: Parse Error, Expected “;” on line 3465457586
(Scripts are waaaay too big)

Web 1.0: Look at me, I know HTML.
Web 2.0: Please look at me, I know XHTML, CSS, PHP, MySQL, JavaScript and RSS.
(HTML is simply not enough anymore)

Web 1.0: Coming soon: Internet2
Web 2.0: Coming soon: Web 3.0
(Yeah I bet none of you heard of Internet2. I read about it in Wired and didn’t get it)

Web 1.0:
Web 2.0:
(OMGZORZ WE MUST MAKE OUR FILEZ 546 GB SO THAT THEY ARE XHTML STANDARD AND WORK IN MSIE 3.0 OKOKOK!!!1111)

Web 1.0: ♥
Web 2.0:
mobile9 Forum -> Digg said on 26 November 2006 at 2:37 am:

[...] Email this entry | Print this entry Oct 18 2006, 09:00 PM Web 1.0: Thread bumpingWeb 2.0: Digg*ingAs a follow up of the Web 2.0 Thinking Game Yup, 4 months elapsed since my last blog entry. How cool is this place (bookstore in Beijing), if i have the money and the space, will definately build one in my future home. [...]
Stadtwiki-Treffen from Wilhelm Buehler on 2006-11-07 (Karlsruher Stadtwiki) said on 26 November 2006 at 4:40 am:

[...] Quelle: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Received on Tue Nov 07 2006 – 12:19:46 CET [...]
Linkage ~ Cameron Moll said on 26 November 2006 at 9:39 pm:

[...] Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. “Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets. Web 2.0: Pointless ‘Ajax’ widgets. Now you try it!” [...]
Welcome to the Club / Jeff Zeldman explains Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 said on 27 November 2006 at 4:39 pm:

[...] Here is a good read from Jeff Zeldman that explores the web 1.0 and web 2.0 differences and how they relate to business and even the stock market. Enjoy! -I agree with Jeff on this one. [...]
Airbag - Rumsfeld. said on 27 November 2006 at 10:40 pm:

[...] Rumsfeld.27 November 06 Yes, it’s going to be different this time. Way different. Nobody is chasing after the IPO dream today, we learned our lesson from just six years ago, and never-you-mind that my neighbor was just seeded $1.3M because he manages his family with Basecamp through Bootcamp using Ubuntu installed on his MacBook so he can blog about it all with a pagerank of six. Six! KAAAHN! [...]
DM Strong said on 28 November 2006 at 11:58 am:

web 1.0: entrepreneurs use the internet to make money.

web 2.0: corporate monoliths use the internet to take entrepreneurs’ money.
Anonymous said on 28 November 2006 at 12:01 pm:

Web 1.0 – Animated GIF’s

Web 2.0 – Flash
CoolR.de - Web2 vs. Fake2 said on 28 November 2006 at 1:26 pm:

[...] CommentTimeOct 26th 2006 permalink Anonymer Accountlasst uns eine definition bauen!!! :D ich hab ja oben schon angefangen. einfach weitermachen.internet neu erfunden? hmm, so würde ich das nicht sehen. ich habe vor kurzem etwas witziges gelesen. Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. Web 1.0 – Bookmark this site!Web 2.0 – Digg this post! Quelle: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]
jujav4ik Blog « links for 2006-11-28 said on 28 November 2006 at 4:22 pm:

[...] Tired of Web 2.0? (tags: humor web2.0) [...]
<< mediadonis » Please Update your Version of the Web to 2.0 said on 28 November 2006 at 5:27 pm:

[...] http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]
Web 2.0 - University of Virginia Media Studies Program said on 28 November 2006 at 10:14 pm:

[...] Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game [edit]Anecdotes [edit]Sites AIGA Polling Place Photo Project BlackPlanet Cyworld (Most popular in South Korea) (Homepage; Wikipedia entry) orkut (Most popular in Brazil) (Homepage; Wikipedia entry) Video The Vote [edit]Pages A particularly funny livejournal page(Kim_Jong_Il) [edit]On Wikis [...]
Linkit tagille 2.0 | Unessa.net Linkkilista said on 28 November 2006 at 11:18 pm:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
joebarone said on 29 November 2006 at 1:06 am:

Web 1.0: stupid pictures of your dog
Web 2.0: stupid videos of your dog

Web 1.0: AOL
Web 2.0: not AOL

Web 1.0: Microsoft Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Mozilla Firefox

Web 1.0: Wow! this place has wireless internet?!?!
Web 2.0: WTF?!?! This place doesn’t having any fucking wireless internet?!?!

Web 1.0: lame
Web 2.0: lamx0r

Web 1.0: :)
Web 2.0: XD

Web 1.0: other people have some pretty good podcasts out there
Web 2.0: you have some pretty good podcasts out there
Schalkefan said on 1 December 2006 at 9:57 am:

[...] Was ist eigentlich Web 2.0? Um zu verstehen was sich hinter der Wortblase “Web 2.0″ verbirgt, lohnt es sich, den augenzwinkernden Vergleich zum “Web 1.0″ zu ziehen. Jeffery Zeldman hat es getan [und Spreeblick hat's entedeckt]. [...]
Yumiyum! - etiket: web 2.0 said on 1 December 2006 at 11:13 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game kaydet örneklerle web 2.0 makine | 18 Ekim, 2006 | 1 üyede | yorum yaz | güncene yaz etiketler: web 2.0 [...]
katamay: нотка абсурда said on 3 December 2006 at 10:05 am:

[...] 2006-11-27 07:38 pm UTC (link) а до тебя сообщения не доходят.(Reply to this) (Thread) katamay 2006-11-27 07:55 pm UTC (link) у меня новый(здесь вообще комменты рулят)(Reply to this) kefafarafudej 2006-11-30 06:21 pm UTC (link) Блин, не могу не показатьтебе :-)http://absurdopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Windows_XP(Reply to this) [...]
Netdiver NEWS archive -> November 2006 said on 4 December 2006 at 2:44 pm:

[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Jeffrey Zeldman. [...]
Hal! said on 4 December 2006 at 4:54 pm:

Web 1.0 – “We’re IPO”
Web 2.0 – “We’re 2.0″
Jérémie Moritz - Mon Blog: Bonnes idées said on 7 December 2006 at 9:05 am:

[...] Ca y est je m’y colle, cloué dans mon siège avec Ipod, ordi, télé, bouquins, je vais avoir le temps de poster un peu plus longuement.On va commencer par tous les liens que j’ai reçus et qui méritent le détour cette semaine et en illustration la dernière pub Playboy vue sur Adverbox : Jeffrey Zeldman présente le Web 2.0 : Petit jeu d’associations d’idée entre le Web 1.0 et le Web 2.0, très bon ! [...]
Doggdot.us - d*gg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular said on 7 December 2006 at 9:30 am:

[...] Doggdot.us – d*gg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular [...]
Scribblings of the Metropolitician: Web 2.0 and Korean Media said on 7 December 2006 at 11:46 pm:

[...] Web 1.0 was about hardware costs, Web 2.0 is about bandwidth costs Here’s a site worth going to and reading not only the post, but the many comments that come under it, lampooning what many rightfully consider to be an artificially-hyped perceived division between two ages of Internet. For true reference, however, you must read the Tim O’Reilly article that started it all, with the original comparison chart that many make fun of. Here’s the money chart: If you really want to get down and learn what this is all about, Programmableweb has a nice site with links to all the major Web 2.0 theory. [...]
Web 2 point (uh-)oh denkspel at XooZ BLOG said on 8 December 2006 at 9:10 am:

[...] Dat er al eindeloos veel artikels geschreven zijn om te lachen of wenen met de Web 2.0 hype/revive/internetzeepbel 2.0 weet ik. Toch wou ik jullie deze Web 2.0 Thinking Game niet onthouden. [...]
Ray said on 8 December 2006 at 10:16 am:

Web 1.0 – Palm
Web 2.0 – Windows Mobile

Web 1.0 – Infra Red
Web 2.0 – BlueTooth (When it works)
Jay said on 8 December 2006 at 10:31 am:

Web 1.0 = a/s/l
Web 2.0 = World of Warcraft Porn
Matias said on 8 December 2006 at 12:13 pm:

Web 1.0: Marketing
Web 2.0: PR 2.0
Samuel Cotterall said on 8 December 2006 at 3:16 pm:

Web 1.0: “Macs suck!”
Web 2.0: “Check out my MacBook!”

Web 1.0: javascript.com
Web 2.0: script.aculo.us

Web 1.0: ASP
Web 2.0: Ruby On Rails
Oskar Krawczyk - blog.olicio.us » Archiwum » Zabawa w 2.0 said on 8 December 2006 at 6:28 pm:

[...] Jakiś czas temu Zeldman na swoim blogu rozpoczą zabawę w porównywanie Web-owości starej i nowej szkoły. Właśnie przeglądnąłem jego porównania oraz wszystkich komentujących i muszę przyznać, że kilka jest naprawdę trafnych i kilka mocno zabawnych. Moje ulubione: Web 1.0: Inaccessible DHTML Web 2.0: Inaccessible AJAX Web 1.0: Meaningful domain names Web 2.0: Unpronouncable domain names Web 1.0 The bigger the bevel the more important the button Web 2.0 The shinier the plastic the more important the button [...]
CSS hacks pour Internet Explorer 6 et 7 at Mindenigma said on 8 December 2006 at 11:49 pm:

[...] Jeux de pensé Web 2.0 Zeldman compare le Web 1.0 au Web 2.0. Très comique, mais aussi très réaliste. [...]
Fernando Lins said on 10 December 2006 at 12:34 am:

Web 1.0: Badly engineered sites.
Web 2.0: Badly engineered sites, but that’s ok, cause they’re endlessly “Beta”.
Anna said on 11 December 2006 at 9:37 am:

Web 1.0: Allmusic.com
Web 2.0: WikiMusicGuide.com
deadstenographer said on 12 December 2006 at 1:18 pm:

Web 1.0 – eFillintheblank
Web 2.0 – iFillintheblank
Login | mister-wong.de | Social Bookmarking Tool said on 13 December 2006 at 7:12 pm:

[...] Bookmark hinzufügen Du möchtest folgenden Link zu Mister Wong hinzufügen: Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game (http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/)Um diesen Link zu speichern musst du dich entweder einloggen sofern du schon einen Account hast oder dich unten kostenlos registrieren. Registrieren [...]
AndreasMatthies.de » Blog Archive » web 1.0 vs. web 2.0 said on 17 December 2006 at 2:16 pm:

[...] Was wird eigentlich mit web2.0 assoziiert? Diese Frage stellte sich Jeffrey Zeldman – seine User gaben Antwort… [...]
Gumbert said on 18 December 2006 at 10:01 am:

Web 1.0: [center][h1][/h2][/center][hr][p][font size="10"][/font] (stupid layout)
Web 1.5: [div style="font: 11px Verdana"][/div](smart colourful design with menu items)
Web2.0: primitive design with smart rounded corners and stupid fonts ;)

Web 1.0: login: “gumbert”, pass: “password”
Web 2.0: login: “gumbert”, pass: “password1″
Giel Berkers dot com said on 18 December 2006 at 4:54 pm:

[...] Heel veel sites en personen hebben verschillende opvattingen over wat web 2.0 eigenlijk is. Volgens O’Reilly is web 2.0 het makkelijker mogelijk maken van het delen van informatie. Volgens Web Design from Scratch is web 2.0 het meer trechteren van je informatie naar de gebruiker toe: Geef de gebruiker wat hij wil, en niet wat hij niet wil. Volgens Jeffrey Zeldman is web 2.0 een hype om vernieuwing aan te tonen. Maar wat is web 2.0 nu echt? [...]
matthias said on 19 December 2006 at 4:05 am:

Web 1.0: Companies make money through wasting our money
Web 2.0: Companies make money through wasting our time
dennis said on 22 December 2006 at 10:58 am:

Web1.0: Images with drop shadows
Web 2.0: Images with reflections
helgepage > blog said on 22 December 2006 at 8:47 pm:

[...] Mashupr | November 13th 2006I wrote my first article for the t8d blog introducing the new project mashupr.net. Mashupr is going to be an API-wrapper for Web-APIs.Oh, I should mention that the article is written in german. Try google’s translation if you don’t know german and/or for a good laugh about the resulting grammar ;) Web 2.0 beta | October 18th 2006Kinda says it all: Web 1.0: Dot.com Bubble Web 2.0: Dot.com Bubble Does anyone want to buy this blog for (please enter price in billions here)? Call me! I’ll throw in an extra nasty old-school font-tag ;) More comparisms here. Be-zier | August 22nd 2006 After seeing this example of a bezier tween I thought about programming an animated continous curve with bezier splines. Here it is: not really that complicated I just had to make sure that every point, and the two controlpoints around it make up a straight line, so that the gradient is equal. This way you get a smooth continous curve… not rocket science, but nice to look at ;) flash++ | July 1st 2006 I used to use Mike Haller’s Jupload for simple serveruploads in t8d’s mini-cms quaax. With Flash8’s new Filereference Class that finally allows multiple file selections, there is an alternative now and users with java OR flash plugin can work with it. Hooray! Don’t get me wrong, I’m not anti Java, I just don’t like it that much in webinterfaces. Try my example. archive » i 2:45 am _uacct = “UA-295200-5″; urchinTracker(); [...]
Adactio: Journal - The language of accessibility said on 23 December 2006 at 10:35 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
kaliban.org: archiv.log said on 28 December 2006 at 1:14 pm:

[...] Quelle: zeldman.com (jaja, kennt schon jeder) [GUNNAR] um 16:00 :: 4 Kommentare [...]
Gmail. Opera :: �� :: IMfO.ru said on 31 December 2006 at 4:38 pm:

[...] It’s not that simple. Gmail uses a feature that exists in Mozilla or ActiveX in IE to make HTTP GET requests from Javascript. The only reasonable way to get Opera work with Gmail is for Opera to implement something compatible to Mozilla’s Javascript functions. And there is a second issue: Opera crashes right after logon. I guess this is some bug in Opera’s Javascript. [...]
suckafree said on 2 January 2007 at 5:55 pm:

web 1.0 : $150 100mb zip drive

web 2.0: $150 200gb hard drive
sdf said on 3 January 2007 at 7:18 pm:

web 1.0: explain what you mean

web 2.0:overly-explain what you mean
Andreas said on 4 January 2007 at 5:07 am:

Web 1.0: More useful than cool.

Web 2.0: More cool than useful.
eskapism.se » 2006 » November said on 4 January 2007 at 9:49 am:

[...] Ända sedan jag var inne på min första myspace-sida (som faktiskt inte var för så länge sedan) så har jag avskytt allt som har med den sajten att göra. Så fort jag (av misstag!) kommit in på en sida där så tänker jag “Geocities“. Och det finns få saker som glädjer mig så mycket som när jag på Jeffrey Zeldmans blogg läser att web 1.0 = Crap sites on Geocities och web 2.0 = Crap sites on MySpace. [...]
Web 3.0: A Smarter, Spookier Internet » Silicon Valley Blog About Money said on 4 January 2007 at 11:28 am:

[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Leave aReply [...]
Paul Decowski said on 9 January 2007 at 5:40 pm:

Web 1.0: Link’s colour changes on rollover
Web 2.0: Link’s background changes on rollover
NetzKult.com said on 11 January 2007 at 11:38 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman hat auf seiner Website ein Spiel gestartet, bei dem es darum geht, Vergleiche zwischen Web 1.0 und Web 2.0 zu ziehen. User können ihren Beitrag zum Spiel einfach in die Kommentare eintragen. [...]
Bienvenue sur j*a*m, http://www.lets-jam.com said on 12 January 2007 at 2:37 am:

[...] par Juju Web Tags: web1.0, web2.0 Grande question existentielle que de définir le web 2.0, concept fumeux pour certains qui y voient une façon de décrire la nouvelle bulle. Il est pourtant clair que le nouveau web est plus social, plus réseau, plus partage, plus communautaire, plus media, plus interactif… Ma définition du Web 2.0, c’est qu’il s’agit d’un Web Plus. Jeffrey Zeldman propose une vision comparée de l’évolution: [...]
Brian Gray said on 13 January 2007 at 9:04 am:

Web 1.0: Sadaam found in a hole.
Web 2.0: Sadaam found in a hole, in a box.
Tim Berners-Lee on Web 2.0: "nobody even knows what it means" - Web Design Forums.net said on 17 January 2007 at 9:49 am:

[...] Tim Berners-Lee on Web 2.0: “nobody even knows what it means” The short story is web 2.0 advocates explain it as web 1.0 was about connecting computers, web 2.0 is about connecting people. And Berners-Lee insists web 1.0 was also about connecting people, and web 2.0 doesn’t really mean anything. For more you can also read Jeffrey Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking game. [...]
Kayo said on 17 January 2007 at 9:56 pm:

web 1.0: I made something new :D
web 2.0: while (true){ c.copyWork (”Google”); }

web 1.0: web designers hate Netscape
web 2.0: Everyone hates IE
web 3.0: Everyone hates CSS2
web 4.0: Google kills windows, replaced by Googlinux
Web 2.0 » Blog Archives » The buzzword of 2006 is Web 2.0. … said on 27 January 2007 at 11:38 am:

[...] Web 2.0: Text that makes you widen your browser window if you want to read it … Web 2.0: Searching for good text informations over Internet surrounded by ads … Read This [...]
blog.perldude.de » 2006 » October said on 28 January 2007 at 10:45 am:

[...] Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities. Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ By Jens | Posted in General | Comments Off [...]
Telcoms Consultant said on 7 February 2007 at 8:46 am:

I still remain unconvinced whether Google owning YouTube is a good thing in the long run. I reckon the editing of Vids will just get tighter and tighter due to copy right etc. I just hope I’m wrong I love YouTube!
Newton Wagner » Arquivo » Jeffrey Zeldman e o jogo da Web 2.0 said on 10 February 2007 at 10:04 am:

[...] O autor do livro Desenvolvendo Sites Compatíveis, (citado aqui no blog), divulgou um divertido jogo no seu blog. A idéia é definir Web 1.0 e Web 2.0, como os exemplos abaixo, traduzidos do post do Zeldman e de alguns comentários: [...]
www.gilbertpaquet.com : rédaction et design web said on 11 February 2007 at 7:30 am:

[...] Dans le même ordre d’idées : “If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it.” [...]
Rhys Thom said on 11 February 2007 at 11:28 pm:

web 1.0: remix
web 2.0: mashup
PixelPerfect Web » Blog Archive » Web2.0? …in English?! said on 16 February 2007 at 8:21 pm:

[...] For an other diagram of what Web2.0 is and the applications that make it so here is a great link: Web2.0 And Beyond or Web2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Ben Wallis said on 19 February 2007 at 6:54 am:

Web 1.0: SOS
Web 2.0: SEO
Kermit said on 19 February 2007 at 6:41 pm:

Web 1.0: a bunch of people writing, a lot of people reading
Web 2.0: a lot of people writing, a lot of people reading

Web 1.0: I offered a pizza to my fifteen years old neighbour’s son and now I got a ugly but cheap website. Everybody could do websites!
Web 2.0: I paid 15 dollars to a professional web design agency to get a wonderful web-standard site and now I have a “web 2.0-looking” and cheap website. Everybody DOES do website!

;) cheers
Spyrte said on 20 February 2007 at 7:16 pm:

Web 1.0: http://www.partytentcity.com“
Web 2.0: Google Adwords
Web 3.0: craigslist
Ted Roche’s weblog - Mission: Interoperable. Competition breeds Innovation. Monopolies breed stagnation. Working Well with Others is Good. » 2006 » October said on 21 February 2007 at 2:05 am:

[...] Jeffrey Zeldman smacks down the hype well in his Web 2.0 Thinking Game: “Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing — except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying… (more) [...]
stabgrabber said on 2 March 2007 at 9:30 pm:

Web 1.0: CRT
Web 2.0: LCD

Web 1.0: making your desktop look like the old 98 did
Web 2.0: making your desktop look like the old XP did

Web 1.0: online for 4 hours a day
Web 2.0: online for 14 hours a day

Web 1.0: finally winamp at work
Web 2.0: finally unlimited browsing at work

Web 1.0: webcam
Web 2.0: living room cam

Web 1.0: making 1 computer out of 3 old ones
Web 2.0: making 1 computers out of 1 new one

Web 1.0: Favorites
Web 2.0: Feeds

:)
stabgrabber said on 2 March 2007 at 9:36 pm:

Web 1.0: dim var1 = 1 as boolean
Web 2.0: $var1 = 1;
Phil v. Sassen said on 5 March 2007 at 6:44 am:

Web 1.0: friends vs. Web 2.0: contacts
Desenlog » Blog Archive » As diferenças com o surgimento da Web 2.0 said on 20 March 2007 at 12:14 pm:

[...] Um interessante artigo no Zeldman mostrou certas diferenças com o surgimento da Web 2.0 e eu trago algumas listadas e algumas contribuições. [...]
Fluxsoap said on 30 March 2007 at 8:40 am:

web1.0 “geocites home page”
web2.0 “blogger blog”

web1.0 “portal with news”
web2.0 “strange blog with community functions”

web1.0 “webmaster is the best”
web2.0 “seo is the best”

web1.0 “MSdos”
web2.0 “vista”

web1.0 “old-school”
web2.0 “rmb”

web1.0 wap
web2.0 3G

web1.0 web1.0
web2.0 web2.0

web1.0 “sign guestbook”
web2.0 “submit comment”

web1.0 “spedia.com”
web2.0 “adsense”

web1.0 “hard”
web2.0 “simple”

web1.0 is like cd-r
web2.0 is like Lightscribe
Defining Web 2.0 - Dev Shed said on 2 April 2007 at 12:48 pm:

[...] There’s a lot of amusing definitions here… [...]
Giel Berkers dot com said on 4 April 2007 at 5:47 am:

[...] En wanneer kunnen jullie deze nieuwe browse-ervaring verwachten? Naar mijn schatting hoop ik de nieuwe website half november te voltooien. Ik moet hem dan ook nog vullen met eerdere weblog-artikelen en portfolio-items en uiteraard nog debuggen en fine-tunen, dus het zou kunnen dat het daardoor iets uit zou kunnen lopen, maar dat hoor je dan snel genoeg.Reacties Nick / 17 Oktober 2006Ik ben erg benieuwd naar deze nieuwe Web2.0 experience bij Giel! Trouwens ook wel fijn om te weten dat je nog leeft ja. Check even zeldman.com voor een post over de web2.0 hype (die inderdaad nogal wat verwarring veroorzaakt) trouwens: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Succes met het afronden van je site!Deze reactie is 5 maanden geleden geplaatst.Giel / 30 Oktober 2006De deadline gaat waarschijnlijk iets later worden. Aangezien ik over een week thuis een verbouwing heb en daardoor een week niet aan mijn site kan werken, en ik sowieso nog mijn nieuwe site nog met content moet vullen, verwacht ik dat het eerder eind november gaat worden in plaats van half november.Deze reactie is 5 maanden geleden geplaatst.Geef een reactie [...]
Das private Blog von Arthur Khessin » Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 said on 10 April 2007 at 5:09 pm:

[...] Einen sehr interessanten Vergleich hat Jeffrey Zeldman in seinem Blog angestellt. Er hat sich nicht in die ewige rhetorische Frage vertieft was nun dieses Web 2.0 ist, sondern er hat einfach mal verglichen was sich im Vergleich zu Web 1.0 (quasi dem Web wie es vorher mal war) unterscheidet. [...]
Ben Wallis said on 24 April 2007 at 6:53 am:

Web 1.0: Diet
Web 2.0: Organic
Seo Expert said on 24 April 2007 at 9:19 pm:

Thnxxx for the information
seo said on 27 April 2007 at 8:04 am:

This is very good.I have try and I like it.Thanks for information.
Eugen "E2daZ" Wirz said on 7 May 2007 at 10:48 am:

Web 1.0 = Crap sites from the webdesigner.
Web 2.0 = Crap sites from everyone.
Whazziz said on 16 May 2007 at 7:00 am:

Web 1.0: ALT + TAB
Web 2.0: Hotspot corners , mutilple desktops
Manzor said on 18 May 2007 at 11:06 am:

Web 1.0: Jakob Nielsen moaning
Web 2.0: Jakob Nielson moaning
David Behan said on 18 May 2007 at 11:08 am:

Web 1.0: You have 1 new message(s)
Web 2.0: You have 1 new message
Bryan King said on 14 June 2007 at 11:30 am:

Web 1.0: LOLCats Pictures
Web 2.0: LOLCats Pictures every five(5) minutes (CatCam)
Denny said on 10 September 2007 at 7:33 am:

Web 1.0 Dreamweaver
Web 2.0 Notepad
Rene Glembotzky said on 12 September 2007 at 5:11 am:

Hahaha, what a cool thread :-)

Web 1.0: Sabrina (my ex)
Web 2.0: Inka (my wife)
Alex said on