17 Oct 2006 5 am eastern

Web 2.0 Thinking Game

The most telling detail in The Economist‘s coverage of Google and YouTube was the subhead: “Google’s acquisition of YouTube shows that ‘Web 2.0′ has come of age.” A few weeks back, The Economist was calling “Web 2.0″ a trend. Their phrase was, “hot Web 2.0 trend.” The magazine now intends “Web 2.0″ to be understood as a sort of second edition:

This week’s pairing of Google and YouTube may come to be remembered as the moment “Web 2.0″—ie, the web, version two—came of age.

Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying:

Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.
Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.

Put another way:

Web 1.0: New media company buys old media company.
Web 2.0: New media company buys new media company.

If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it. Here’s my new game. I’ll start, you finish:

Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News.
Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes.

Web 1.0: Users create the content (Slashdot).
Web 2.0: Users create the content (Flickr).

Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.
Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace.

Web 1.0: Writing.
Web 2.0: Rating.

Web 1.0: Karma Points.
Web 2.0: Diggs.

Web 1.0: Cool Site of the Day.
Web 2.0: Technorati.com.

Web 1.0: Tags.
Web 2.0: “Tags.”

Web 1.0: Bookmarking.
Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing.

Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets.
Web 2.0: Pointless “Ajax” widgets.

Now you try it!

[tags]web2.0, games, economist[/tags]

Filed under: industry, Marketing, Memes

659 Responses to “Web 2.0 Thinking Game”

  1. rich said on

    Web 1.0: Zeldman.com without comments
    Web 2.0: Zeldman.com with comments

    ;-)

  2. Emilio said on

    Web 1.0: 12px h2
    Web 2.0: 51px h2

  3. Mark said on

    Web 1.0: Animated gif
    Web 2.0: Badges

    Web 1.0: Arial
    Web 2.0: Arial Rounded/Georgia

  4. List of Web 2.0 sites in Australia - Coding & Web - Whirlpool Broadband Forums said on

    [...] Seems Zeldman can be pretty timely with his blog posts :)www.zeldman.com/2006/10/…20-thinking-game [...]

  5. Andrew Faulkner said on

    Web 1.0: Bloated Table Code
    Web 2.0: Divitis

  6. digg / All / Upcoming said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  7. reddit.com: what's new online said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game (zeldman.com) [...]

  8. Le Blog de Julien » Web 2.0 et auto-dérision said on

    [...] Excellent article sur Zeldman.com, qui prenant comme abse un article de The Economist s’amuse à tourner en dérision le web 2.0 avec le fameux jeu avant/aprés. [...]

  9. Jim Whimpey said on

    Web 1.0: Social drinking
    Web 2.0: Social bookmarking

  10. dzone.com - upcoming links said on

    [...] Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game (Tags: humor, opinion, trends, web 2.0) [...]

  11. Jim Whimpey » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  12. Adam Osborne said on

    Web 1.0: Webmail 2mb storage
    Web 2.0: Webmail 2gb storage

  13. Ben Darlow said on

    Web 1.0: Developers whinging about Netscape users who won’t upgrade to Internet Explorer
    Web 2.0: Developers whinging about Internet Explorer users who won’t upgrade to Firefox

  14. (O_o) nickpan said on

    Web 1.0 : Deserted blogs on Blogger
    Web 2.0 : Deserted blogs on WordPress

    Web 1.0 : The past
    Web 2.0 : The present
    Web 3.0 : The future

  15. Charlie said on

    Web 1.0: Large expanses of default-white dotted with unformatted text
    Web 2.0: Large expanses of white with a gradient at the top dotted with meticulously formatted and precisely positioned text

  16. Stephen Dolphin said on

    Web 1.0: Comic Sans in font tags to give your site that “friendly edge”
    Web 2.0: Comic Sans in style sheets with no capitalisation of words to give your site that “friendly edge”

  17. Lance Shields said on

    Web 1.0: Working at the web agency
    Web 2.0: Working at your own start-up
    Web 3.0: Working on a tropical island

  18. Matt said on

    Web 1.0: “Under Construction”
    Web 2.0: “Beta”

  19. JBagley said on

    Web 1.0: Bank loan
    Web 2.0: Venture Capital

    Web 1.0: Meaningful domain names
    Web 2.0: Unpronouncable domain names

  20. Brian said on

    Web 1:0: objects

    Web 2.0: theory objects

  21. Shrikant Joshi said on

    Web 1.0: Site under construction
    Web 2.0: Beta

    Web 1.0: Flashy banners
    Web 2.0: Banner flashes

    Web 1.0: Communication
    Web 2.0: Conversation

    Web 1.0: Times New Roman
    Web 2.0: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana (and a bit of Georgia, too)

    Web 1.0: Geocities
    Web 2.0: Google Pages

    Web 1.0: Ajax = Football team in Netherlands
    Web 2.0: AJAX = well…

    On a more serious note:
    Web 1.0: You and I
    Web 2.0: Us

    Regards,
    Shri.

  22. JD said on

    Web 1.0: CEOs
    Web 2.0: “Thought leaders.”

  23. Rob kirton said on

    Web 1.0 – Dot com bubble
    Web 2.0 – Dot com hubble bubble toil and trouble (it runs on witchcraft and other things most folk will never quite understand)

  24. Tatanka said on

    Web 1.0 – text and image
    Web 2.0 – image and animation
    Web 3.0 – animation and time/space virtual continuum

  25. Filip Salomonsson said on

    Web 1.0: <p><font …>
    Web 2.0: <div><div><div><div><span><h3>

    (I’m having a drink if this doesn’t display right.)

  26. Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Zeldman’s got some thoughts (and a game) on the subject: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]

  27. Britxbox :: View topic - web2.0 said on

    [...] didn’t know where else to put this but if you’re into web development you’ll find this funny. zeldman’s web2.0 thinking game [...]

  28. sivadeel said on

    Web 1.0: conferences
    Web 2.0: conferences

    Web 1.0: venture capital
    Web 2.0: venture capital

    ;-)

  29. Online stories » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 - buzzing like a bumble bee said on

    [...] Ultra cool the word/thinking game on Jeffrey Zeldman’s blog on the differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. I liked the comments on it, especially: [...]

  30. Blogmarks.net : Public marks said on

    [...] 17 October 2006 13:30 [...]

  31. sharaf said on

    Web 1.0: Yahoo! launches
    Web 2.0: Yahoo! gets acquired…

    Web 1.0: IE 5.0
    Web 2.0: IE 7.0

    Web 1.0: Visting Blogs
    Web 2.0: Unbolding RSS Feeds

  32. ben said on

    Web 1.0: Green
    Web 2.0: #CCDDAA

  33. Olly Hodgson said on

    Web 1.0: Links
    Web 2.0: Relationships

  34. Paul Edmonds said on

    Web 1.0 The bigger the bevel the more important the button
    Web 2.0 The shinier the plastic the more important the button

  35. Nick said on

    web 1.0: Inaccessible DHTML
    web 2.0: Inaccessible AJAX

  36. Benjamin said on

    Web 1.0: pop-ups
    Web 2.0: flash pop-overs

  37. Martin Bekkelund » Web 2.0 og AJAX said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman presenterer i dag en fin sammenligning mellom Web 1.0 og 2.0. Mange sannheter. Historien gjenntar seg. [...]

  38. Ma.gnolia.com - Find Web Sites & Build Community Online said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  39. Nathan Borror said on

    “Web 2.0″ makes my ubiquitous stomach churn.

  40. Ryan Irelan » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – Web 1.0 – Bubble, Web 2.0 – Denial of Bubble. [...]

  41. Mike Cherim said on

    Web 1.0: Spam emails
    Web 2.0: Spam emails and spam comments

    Web 1.0: Post copyrighted content
    Web 2.0: Download and redistribute copyrighted content

    Web 1.0: Rounded corners are new and kinda cool
    Web 2.0: Rounded corners are confused with Web 2.0

  42. Karl von L. said on

    Web 1.0: Text that wraps to your browser window
    Web 2.0: Text that makes you widen your browser window if you want to read it all without horizontal scrolling

  43. Kevin Lamping said on

    Web 1.0 – Bookmark this site!
    Web 2.0 – Digg this post!

  44. Ceejbot :: start said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Jeffrey Zeldman invites you to contrast Web 1.0 with Web 2.0. Hee! [...]

  45. coyote dreams » Blog Archive » web 2.0 said on

    [...] You can read it here. [...]

  46. Vincent Pickering said on

    web 1.0: bloated, useless DHTML
    web 2.0: bloated, uesless Javascript Libraries

    web 1.0: animated gifs
    web 2.0: scriptaculous

    web 1.0: all talk, no action by the W3C
    web 2.0: all talk, no action by the W3C

    web 1.0: blue background colour
    web 2.0: green background colour

  47. Des Traynor said on

    Web 1.0 Annoying and useless Javascript
    Web 2.0 Annoying and useless Javascript that means your app doesn’t work cross anything

    Web 1.0 “Bullshit eBusiness Seminars”
    Web 2.0 “Blogger conferences, and BlogHer Conferences.”

  48. Paul R. Redmond said on

    Web 1.0 – Meta Tags
    Web 2.0 – SEO

    Web 1.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus.

    Web 2.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS.

    Web 1.0 – Google Ninja
    Web 2.0 – AJAX/Web Ninja*

    Web 1.0 – Actually design websites
    Web 2.0 – Attend and host hundreds of conferences

    *I never got the whole freaking ninja thing? There are too many geeks on the web.

  49. Jordan Ryan Moore said on

    Web 1.0:
    <code><P><FONT COLOR=green SIZE=4>Header</P></FONT></code>

    Web 2.0:
    <code><h2 class=”sIFR-replaced”><embed style=”width:200px; height:40px;” class=”sIFR-flash” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” sifr=”true” bgcolor=”#FFFFFF” wmode=”” flashvars=”txt=Header&textcolor=#080&w=200&h=40″ quality=”best” src=”/swf/cool-font.swf” height=”40″ width=”200″><span class=”sIFR-alternate”>Header</span></h2></code>

  50. Daring Fireball Linked List: October 2006 said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game ★ [...]

  51. Charlie said on

    Web 1.0: Old folks have no clue.
    Web 2.0: My parents just left a comment on my blog.

  52. SimpleBits | Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Fun! Great comments, too. Visit site [...]

  53. Rommel said on
  54. squareman said on

    web 1.0: Published standards and browsers that don’t support them
    web 2.0: “De-facto” standards by browsers that don’t support 10-year old standards.

  55. squareman said on

    Web 1.x: 3 months = 1 Web year
    Web 2.x: 3 years = The last time my personal site was updated

  56. John Winkelman said on

    Web 1.0 : DynAPI
    Web 2.0 : jquery

  57. AJ said on

    Web 1.0: Having to turn off Java applets so you can actually read someone’s webpage.
    Web 2.0: Having to turn off Flash plugin so you can actually read someone’s page.

  58. Dave said on

    Web 1.0 – I want round corners, nested TABLEs.
    Web 2.0 – I want round corners, nested DIVs, Ps, SPANs, DOM manipulations.

  59. Old Beta said on

    Web 1.0 – You own a webdesign company because you started creating table based websites ten years ago. However, six years ago you understood the purpose of the web standards and website accessibility.

    Web 2.0 – You own a webdesign company because you “designed” your first WordPress blog a year ago and now you think that it is THE tool – valid markup, accessibility and RSS (yeah!) – all included

  60. vjnoone said on

    Fun!

    web 1.0: rounded corners on table driven layouts
    web 2.0: squared table-less CSS layouts

  61. Shashwat Nagpal said on

    Very impresive write up!

    Web 1.0: Poor standard support for Browsers
    Web 2.0: Poor standard support for Browsers

  62. Andrea Martines said on

    Web 1.0 – We were not used to laugh about what we were doing
    Web 2.0 – We currently laugh about this all stuff
    Web 3.0 – Whatever it is… Just start laughing now!

  63. Shashwat Nagpal said on

    Web 1.0: Keep code light!
    Web 2.0: Keep design lighter!

  64. Regnard Raquedan said on

    Web 1.0: Links
    Web 2.0: Blogroll

    Web 1.0: 20,000 Hits on my webpage!
    Web 2.0: Ive been dugg 1000 times on Digg!

    Web 1.0: Javascript Image Rollovers
    Web 2.0: CSS+AJAX Menus

    Web 1.0: “The Edge”
    Web 2.0: “Cool and Smooth”

  65. JeffCroft.com: Five things I’m doing to get better at web design said on

    [...] 0 comments on Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  66. BJ said on

    Web 1.0: Clients who don’t get it
    Web 2.0: Clients who don’t get it

  67. will chatham said on

    Web 1.0: a,e,i,o,u
    Web 2.0:

  68. Newton Wagner » Arquivo » Jeffrey Zeldman e o jogo da Web 2.0 said on

    [...] O autor do livro Desenvolvendo Sites Compatíveis, (citado aqui no blog), divulgou um divertido jogo no seu blog. A idéia é definir Web 1.0 e Web 2.0, como os exemplos abaixo, traduzidos do post do Zeldman e de alguns comentários: [...]

  69. Anton Muraviev said on

    Web 1.0: Making web pages in a word processor.
    Web 2.0: Preparing documents in a web browser.

  70. Kevan Emmott said on

    Web 1.0: IE 3 running quickly with 3 or 4 windows open on a 200 Mhz PII with 128 MB RAM.
    Web 2.0: Firefox 2.0rc2 running slowly with 10-20 tabs open on a 2.4 Ghz P4 with 512 MB RAM.

    Web 1.0: Rational Unified Process implementing J2EE
    Web 2.0: “Getting Real” using RoR

  71. Andrew said on

    Web 1.0: Content is everything
    Web 2.0: Someone else’s content is everything

  72. Vaidas Žilionis » WEB 2.0 žaidimas žodžiais said on

    [...] Dabar kaip žinote yra WEB 2.0 laikotarpis, kadaise buvo WEB 1.0 ir ateis kažkada WEB 3.0 laikotarpis. Kaip atskirti? Zeldman pasistengė apie tai pamastyti [...]

  73. Dustin Diaz said on

    web 1.0: <a onclick="foo();">
    web 2.0: var addListener = function(el, type, fn, o, b) { };

    Sorry I couldn’t help myself. I just wasn’t seeing any nerdy js entries in here.

  74. raphael said on

    Web1.0: print budget
    Web2.0: print budget

    Web1.0: journalist budget
    Web2.0: journalist budget

    Web1.0: TV production budget
    Web2.0: TV production budget

    Web1.0: No budget to strong budget
    Web2.0: No budget to strong budget

    Web1.0: We are the best. Dot.
    Web2.0: We are the best. You know, with RSS, Semantic CSS, Social bookmarks, Ajax, …

    Web1.0: Experience this effect
    web2.0: Experience this content

    Web1.0: Zeldman
    Web2.0: Zeldman

  75. Alek said on

    Web 1.0: Programming languages for real men.
    Web 2.0: Ruby on Rails.

  76. Steven Ametjan said on

    Web 1.0: Perl or PHP
    Web 2.0: Django or Ruby on Rails

    Web 1.0: Overly large DHTML libraries.
    Web 2.0: Overly large AJAX libraries (with DHTML).

  77. Brodo Primordiale: Clueless post said on

    [...] Qua devono aver letto il tuo post. [...]

  78. de.maschine » C.R.E.A.M. said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – from Zeldman (on the money as per usual) [...]

  79. CSS Drive News- Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Design News Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  80. ed said on

    web 1.0: Ah, those were the days
    web 2.0: Ah, those were the days
    web 3.0: Enough reminiscing, back to work…

  81. Ray said on

    Web 1.0: Couldn’t wait to get involved.
    Web 2.0: Can’t wait for 2.0 to pass.

  82. Ray said on

    Web 1.0: Textism.com
    Web 2.0: Whatever

  83. Dave said on

    Web 1.0: HTML markup.
    Web 2.0: HTML with CSS, meaning it has half the bloatedness.

    Web 1.0: NASDAQ.
    Web 2.0: NASDAQ after the bubble burst, meaning it has half the value.

    Web 1.0: Silicon Valley 1999… out of touch with the real world.
    Web 2.0: Silicon Valley 2006… out of touch with the real world.

    Oh, wait a second!

  84. Brian said on

    web 1.0: Completely Flash sites suck.
    web 2.0: Completely Flash sites still suck.

  85. blogpocket 6.0 » Repaso a mi blogroll la locura de los weblogs dentro de uno said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents The Daily Report. Zeldman compara la web 1.0 y la web 2.0 en Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]

  86. Joe Casabona said on

    Web 1.0: Napster to download Music and Video
    Web 2.0: Pure Volume and MySpace for music, YouTube for everything

  87. "To all my freinnnnnnnnnnnds!" said on

    [...] http://snippy.ceejbot.com/wiki/show/start/2006/10/17/001Jeffrey Zeldman invites you to contrast Web 1.0 with Web 2.0. Hee! [...]

  88. karim said on

    web 1.0: sorry we’re still testing
    web 2.0: yay! we’re beta!

  89. J said on

    Web 1.0: target=”_blank”
    Web 2.0: onclick=”window.open(this.href); return false;”

  90. Fascination Place » Blog Archive » Your Tech Snark for the Day said on

    [...] Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 (read the comments for more amusement) [...]

  91. rc3.org: Of Interest said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman on Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 — It’s funny because it’s true. [...]

  92. New Del.icio.us popular sites said on

    [...] New popular sites (Just new in last 24h).   [...]

  93. Martium said on

    Just a few days ago you were pondering your lack of interest ….. now this. Methinks the a-listers are over it.

    Web 1.0: the web is for geeks
    Web 2.0: gimme some of that web action

  94. Benjamin Alpert said on

    Web 1.0: Clutter
    Web 2.0: Prettier, more accessible clutter

    Thank you, Web 2.0, you are the the Container Store for all our crap.

  95. Beerzie Boy said on

    Web 1.0: Simple design with vapid content.
    Web 2.0: Slick design with vapid content.

  96. Bob Sawyer said on

    Web 1.0: Zeldman’s “Steal My Icons” on every site*
    Web 2.0: Orange RSS Feed icons on every site

    *Yes, including mine.

  97. Zeldman 2.0 Thinking Game - Search Engine Optimization - SEO Refugee said on

    [...] Zeldman 2.0 Thinking Game http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ My some of my favs Quote: [...]

  98. Joey Lesh said on

    Web 1.0: Boring, abandoned homepages.
    Web 2.0: Boring, abandoned blogs.

    Web 1.0: Solaris.
    Web 2.0: Linux.

  99. Dante said on

    Web 1.0: Webmonkey/Dr. Web
    Web 2.0: A List Apart/Sitepoint

    Web 1.0: Netscape
    Web 2.0: Mozilla

    Web 1.0: “Sign my guestbook!”
    Web 2.0: “Submit Comment”

  100. Kevin said on

    Web 1.0: Flicker
    Web 2.0: Flickr

  101. Josh said on

    Web 1.0: Look what I did in FrontPage
    Web 2.0: Look what I did in DreamWeaver

    Web 1.0: “Don’t use CSS”
    Web 2.0: “Don’t use IE”

    Web 1.0: Jolt Cola
    Web 2.0: Double caffeinated mocha late slim

    Web 1.0: Spell check through Word
    Web 2.0: Spell check through Google

    Web 1.0: Rubberband
    Web 2.0: Broadband

  102. Darren Hoyt said on

    Web1.0: Making half-assed effort to design for blind and handicapped users
    Web2.0: Making three-quarter-assed effort to design for blind and handicapped users

  103. Thumblicious: see the sites - viewing web2.0 said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game  |  Previews by Thumbshots.com  |  Add to del.icio.us  |  Digg it! [...]

  104. Grant Hutchinson said on

    Web 1.0: All Your Base Are Belong To Us
    Web 2.0: Web 2.0 Thinking Game

  105. Francis Shephard said on

    Web 1.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
    Web 2.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
    Web 3.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money

    Web 1.0: Microsoft Don’t Listen
    Web 2.0: Microsoft try to Listen
    Web 3.0: Microsoft Actually Listen – but its too late for them

    Web 1.0: Web Developers risk all to Create an Experience
    Web 2.0: Web Developers Anally follow code guidelines and the experience becomes drained of life, spontaneous ideas are replaced with the html equivalent of keeping up with the Jones’s

  106. Josh said on

    Web 1.0: Get a Mac already! Geez your doing that the hard way.
    Web 2.0: Get Firefox Already! Geez your doing that the hard way.

    Web 1.0 I just hooked up my friend’s band site for $300! let’s go see a movie.
    Web 2.0 Band borrows computer to check myspace ?

    Web 1.0 What’s the easiest way to build a site for cheap?
    Web 2.0 How can I build an internet for free?

  107. paulo said on

    web 1.0: “convergence” and “synergy”
    web 2.0: “community”

  108. GUESShimself said on

    Web 1.0: All Your Base Are Belong To Us!
    Web 2.0: What ever’s hot on YouTube.

    Web 1.0: Hotmail
    Web 2.0: Gmail

    Web 1.0: excitement for “web 2.0″
    Web 2.0: wish i never heard of “web 2.0″

  109. Patrick Bouchard said on

    web 1.0: animated gifs
    web 2.0: animated javascript

  110. www.gilbertpaquet.com : rédaction et design web said on

    [...] Dans le même ordre d’idées : “If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it.” [...]

  111. Nick Cowie said on

    Web 1.0: Content is king!
    Web 2.0: Contributed content is king! (ie the comments are more informative than the original post)

  112. Russell Heimlich said on

    Web 1.0: Underconstruction
    Web 2.0 Beta

  113. Agus said on

    Paul, this happen everywhere:

    Web 1.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus.

    Web 2.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS, bla.. bla..

    “they” need God these days just to make their brochure(whatever) online.

  114. Eric said on

    web 1.0: The X-Files
    web 2.0: Lost

    web 1.0: suck.com
    web 2.0: Fortean Times

    web 1.0: stuffit
    web 2.0: zip

  115. Ryan Dewsbury said on

    Web 1.0: MS Word
    Web 2.0: Writely

  116. links for 2006-10-18 « tabula rasa said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Jeffrey Zeldman plays around with Web 2.0. Probably the most entertaining game about Web 2.0 to date. (tags: web2.0 tech blogs personal interesting) [...]

  117. Jon Dale said on

    Web 1.0: drop shadows
    Web 2.0: reflections

  118. Mads Kjaer said on

    Web 1.0: Whining in table-based messageboards
    Web 2.0: Whining with style in shiny ajax messageboards

  119. Darren Hoyt said on

    Web 1.0: Spiky polygons, moody colors, tiny annoying fonts
    Web2.0: Trendy badges, pastel colors, ginormous annoying fonts

    Web1.0: Joshua Davis
    Web2.0: Thomas Fuchs

    Web1.0: Partisan blowhard editorialists with a column in the online WSJ
    Web2.0: Partisan blowhard users with a column on Newsvine

    Web1.0: Brief, functional footers
    Web2.0: Tall, verbose “footers” larger than the actual content region

  120. alan said on

    Web 1.0: Jerry Yang and David Filo build a list of the coolest websites, and later realise there might be a business model
    Web 2.0: Nobody’s got a business model, but everybody’s got a list of the coolest websites

  121. R Flowers said on

    Web1.0: Web rings
    Web2.0: Social bookmarking

  122. Patrick Davis said on

    Web 1.0: Initial Public Offering
    Web 2.0: Venture Capital

    Web 1.0 Business Plan: Sell for less than we bought it for.
    Web 2.0 Business Plan: Sell ads on stuff we didn’t actually pay for.

  123. Edwin Jose Palathinkal said on

    Web 1.0: SQL/Javascript Injection
    Web 2.0: Cross-Site Scripting

    Web 1.0: Move to Unix-like never-crashing ultra-secure Linux.
    Web 2.0: Move to Mac.

  124. mikey said on

    Web 1.0 – online diary
    Web 2.0 – blog

    Web 1.0 – email
    Web 2.0 – Gmail

    Web 1.0 – awful background music
    Web 2.0 – awful background gradients

    Web 1.0 – slashdot
    Web 2.0 – Digg

  125. Dave said on

    Web 1.0: “I go get”
    Web 2.0: “Come to me”

    http://www.webdirections.org/come-to-me-web/

  126. Eric said on

    Web 1.0: Dial-up
    Web 2.0: Dump Trucks

    Web 1.0: Spinny logos
    Web 2.0: Reflecty logos

  127. DBK said on

    web 1.0 – wanking to pictures of Jenna Jameson
    web 2.0 – wanking to videos of jenna jameson

  128. Tech 403 » Blog Archive » Zeldman Web 2.0 Game said on

    [...] Zeldman.com has a pretty interesting list of Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 comparisons. Link below. Zeldman 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  129. Dan Beeston said on

    Web 1.0: Dancing Hampsters
    Web 2.0: Dancing on Treadmills

  130. SMD said on

    Web 1.0: Windows
    Web 2.0: Linux

    Web 1.0: Close Source
    Web 2.0: Open Source

  131. Web 2.0 Thinking Game « Digged Stories said on

    [...] read more | digg story [...]

  132. vzx said on

    Web 1.0: Viruses downloading and slowing down computer.
    Web 2.0: Automatic Updates downloading and slowing down computer.

  133. Aaron said on

    Web 1.0: Online canned goods stores with outrageous shipping prices
    Web 2.0: Online canned goods stores with outrageous amounts of google adsense banners to offset outrageous shipping charges.

  134. TechTxt.Org » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]

  135. Ken said on

    Web 1.0: Cleaning your wheel mouse
    Web 2.0: Forgetting that your mouse has a wheel and going blind from the laser

  136. [SMD] - 8L0G5RH3R3 » Archives » How Does Web 2.0 Differ From Web 1.0? said on

    [...] = Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  137. SMD said on

    Web 1.0: Internet Explorer
    Web 2.0: Firefox

    Web 1.0: Yahoo!
    Web 2.0: Google

  138. Dave said on

    Web 1.0: experiment, take risks, spinoff.
    Web 2.0: see something popular and acquire.

    Web 1.0: RealPlayer is abit of a hog, but not too annoying
    Web 2.0: RealPlayer is downright Malware.

    Web 1.0: Chat rooms
    Web 2.0: MMORPGs

    Web 1.0: Collections of Matching background and button sets
    Web 2.0: Collections of Skins

  139. Greg said on

    Web 1.0: Boxes with border=”0″
    Web 2.0: Boxes with style=”border: 1px dotted #CCC;”

    :)

  140. Sean said on

    Web 1.0: Text based turn game (Empyrez.com)
    Web 2.0: Full blown 3d

  141. ShaSpleen said on

    Web 1.0: 640×480 Porn
    Web 2.0: 1024×768 Porn

  142. Bradly said on

    Web 1.0: “Site best viewed with Internet Explorer”
    Web 2.0: “Site best viewed with anything but Internet Explorer”

  143. Bradly said on

    Web 1.0: JavaScript Alerts
    Web 2.0: Light YellowDiv’s with Grey Borders

  144. John P said on

    Web 1.0: DrudgeReport.com
    Web 2.0: SundayReader.com

  145. I say 2.0, you say 1.0 « tumbleblog said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]

  146. asklepios said on

    Web 1.0: disable ActiveX for security reason
    Web 2.0: disable ActiveX, java, Javascript, Flash to get the content

  147. Ike said on

    Web 1.0: Site goes down when hosting company upgrades to a better server
    Web 2.0: Site goes down with a reader serves you up to an upgrade on Digg

    Web 1.0: Websites proudly display buttons proclaiming “_______’s Top Site of the Day” or “______’s Coolest on the Web”, where there are hundreds of ranking authorities.
    Web 2.0: Millions of surfers use tags and social bookmarks to place the same sites simultaneously on Digg, Del.icio.us, and Reddit.

  148. Percy said on

    Web 1.0: , and
    Web 2.0: scriptaculous, CSS and DIVs

  149. Percy said on

    Web 1.0: <blink>, <font> and <frameset>
    Web 2.0: scriptaculous, CSS and DIVs

  150. Tim said on

    Web 1.0: Web sites that don’t work on Linux because they use crappy ActiveX controls.
    Web 2.0: Web sites that don’t work on Linux because they use crappy Flash 8 controls.

  151. Ryan said on

    Web 1.0: <html> </html>
    Web 2.0: #css ;

  152. Ramki said on

    Web 1.0: Create Content
    Web 2.0: Link to created content

    Web 1.0: Audience
    Web 2.0: Communities

    Web 1.0: Dial up
    Web 2.0: Broadband

    Web 1.0: Page views and Hits
    Web 2.0: Still searching for the measurement metric

  153. NiKo said on

    Web 1.0: Blink tags
    Web 2.0: Blinking websites

  154. Ivan Minic said on

    Web 1.0: Yahoo buys everything
    Web 2.0: Google buys everything

  155. Rien de bien nouveau sous le soleil - Prendre un Café said on

    [...] web Un billet de Jeffrey Zeldman qui résume parfaitement ma perception du web 2.0. [...]

  156. Yokel said on

    Web 1.0: Internet
    Web 2.0: Web 2.0

  157. Web 2.0 Thinking Game | Stylegala news October 2006 | Stylegala said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  158. Chris said on

    Web 1.0: Perl
    Web 2.0: Ruby
    Web 3.0: Brainfuck

  159. ferdhie said on

    web 1.0: newsletter
    web 2.0: syndicate rss/rdf

  160. Rafa García said on

    Web 1.0: Bookmarks
    Web 2.0: Del.icio.us (God bless it)

  161. HubmaN said on

    Web 1.0: Blue Screens of Death on Windows XP
    Web 2.0: Blue Screens of Death on Windows Vista, followed by a quick reboot, followed by another BSOD, followed by a quick reboot…

  162. Alvin said on

    Web 1.0: Bring the web into our lives
    Web 2.0: Bring our lives into the web

  163. Chase said on

    Web 1.0 Pamela Anderson
    Web 2.0 Paris Hilton

  164. Ronni Dyrholm Petersen said on

    Web 1.0: < HTML > Hello World < /HTML >
    Web 2.0: xhtml, css, php, xml, aspx, cms, templates, streaming, …

  165. Web 2 point (uh-)oh denkspel at XooZ BLOG said on

    [...] Dat er al eindeloos veel artikels geschreven zijn om te lachen of wenen met de Web 2.0 hype/revive/internetzeepbel 2.0 weet ik. Toch wou ik jullie deze Web 2.0 Thinking Game niet onthouden. [...]

  166. Elsi said on

    Online gaming Web 1.0:
    You are in a room. There is a door to the north.
    “Open door”
    I don’t understand.
    “Unlock door”
    I don’t understand.
    “Leave room”
    I don’t understand.
    “**** off!!
    >

    Online gaming Web 2.0:
    Full Prince of Persia online Flash version! oooh, shiny.

  167. fky said on

    Web 1.0 : we didnt’ know that .com bubble will collapse
    Web 2.0 : we didn’t want to know that .com bubble would collapse

  168. anirudh said on

    Web 1.0: Yahoomail
    Web 2.0: Gmail
    Web 3.0: God Knows what mail!

  169. Vaidas Žilionis said on

    Web 1.0 IE
    Web 2.0 FireFox
    Web 3.0 MobilePhone brower

  170. Embruns > journal de bord > octobre 2006 > 17 said on

    [...] Sur le même ton de Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0, je me demande ce que cela donnerait les élections présidentielles: 2002 versus 2007. [...]

  171. aaoi said on

    web 1.0: dirty.ru
    web 2.0: leprosorium.dirty.ru

  172. Комменты рулят « past is dead said on

    [...] отсюда: [...]

  173. grrliz: craquelins riches et croustillants said on

    [...] Liz (grrliz) wrote,@ 2006-10-18 04:16:00 Zeldman’s got the Web 2.0 thinking game, it’s pretty amusing.(Post a new comment) … [...]

  174. Gerd Stodiek said on

    Web 1.0: Computer screens to display content
    Web 2.0: Mobile digital devices for display and production of content

    Web 1.0: Keeping the user on your site
    Web 2.0: Branding your content on any site, device or publication

  175. zro said on

    web 1.0: worked auto-magically (as far a client is concerned)
    web 2.0: works web 2.0-ly (as far as a client is concerned)

  176. Steve Pugh said on

    Web 1.0: “Sponsored By … ” on web sites.
    Web 2.0: “Sponsored By … ” on RSS feeds.

  177. Zeldman sur le Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Voici un petit jeu de comparaison initié par Zeldman dans son dernier billet et suivi par de bon commentaires aussi, c’est par ici. [...]

  178. Eddie said on

    Web 1.0: Opinions
    Web 2.0: Rants

  179. Toupix said on

    Web 1.0 : Microsoft
    Web 2.0 : Google

    Web 1.0 : Slashdot effect
    Web 2.0 : Digg effect

    Web 1.0 : Boards
    Web 2.0 : Blogs

    Web 1.0 : Version numbers
    Web 2.0 : Greek Letters (I mean common, a website “making it to gamma” ?)

    Web 1.0 : “Mail this article to a friend” button
    Web 2.0 : “Digg / Furl / Del.icio.us / Reddit / NewsWine / etc this” buttons

    Web 1.0 : Worrying about privacy
    Web 2.0 : Willing to tell more

  180. kengi said on

    Web 1.0: many window
    Web 2.0: one window

  181. Saga Guild - News Feeds said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Come and play. It’s fun! [...]

  182. Simon said on

    Web 1.0: Grammar.com and.com Spelling.com
    Web 2.0: Grmmr nd Spll.ng

  183. Jacob said on

    Web 1.0: Intelligent Collectives
    Web 2.0: Collective Intelligence

    Web 1.0: Dictionary.com
    Web 2.0: Dictionary.com

    Web 1.0: Web Sites
    Web 2.0: Web Services

  184. Kusor.net: Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]

  185. Simon said on

    Web 1.0: 404 Not Found
    Web 2.0: 503 Resource unavailable

  186. Web2.0 Gedanken-Spiel - blog.der-link.de said on

    [...] Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 Jeffrey Zeldman macht den Anfang eines Gedankenspiels, was jeder fortführen kann.Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]

  187. Giel Berkers said on

    Web 1.0: Square corners
    Web 2.0: Round corners

  188. hype-free: Web 2.0 vs Web 1.0 said on

    [...] Read it here: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Check out also Create your own Web 2.0 Company. Web 1.0: Writing. Web 2.0: Rating. [...]

  189. lemon said on

    Web 1.0: …a list??
    Web 2.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a menu if not a list of links?
    Web 3.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a block of text if not a list of paragraphs?
    Web 4.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a paragraph if not a list of words?

  190. Cyniskt: Web 2.0 thinking game said on

    [...] Kommentarerna är lika roliga som inlägget.Mina favoriter:Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace.Web 1.0: Writing.Web 2.0: Rating.Web 1.0: Under ConstructionWeb 2.0: BetaWeb 1.0 Business Plan: Sell for less than we bought it for.Web 2.0 Business Plan: Sell ads on stuff we didn’t actually pay for. [...]

  191. jRyan said on

    Web 1.0 :: Hubs, switches, routers, servers…
    Web 2.0 :: “a series of Tubes”

  192. eCuaderno 3.0: Pistas, noticias y enlaces sobre Cibercultura, Medios, eComunicacion y Blogging por Jose Luis Orihuela y sus invitados said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [vía] [del.icio.us]  [menéame] [...]

  193. Ara Pehlivanian said on

    Web 1.0: All kinds of mistakes were made
    Web 2.0: Those same mistakes were repeated

  194. chandru said on

    Web 1.0 : <noscript>
    Web2.0: <script>

  195. Jerry said on

    Web 1.0: Bad HTML code
    Web 2.0: Bad PHP code

  196. patroclus said on

    Web 1.0: Geeks do it.
    Web 2.0: Everybody does it.

  197. NiKo said on
  198. Rhys said on

    Web 1.0: Phrase lacking meaning that no-one ever used
    Web 2.0: Phrase lacking meaning that everyone’s using

  199. naomi said on

    Web 1.0: tim berners lee gives us the web (for free!)
    Web 2.0: tim o’reilly copyrights the term ‘web 2.0′

    Web 1.0: emperor’s new clothes
    Web 2.0: emperor’s new clothes part 2

  200. Top Jimmy said on

    Web 1.0: Spam
    Web 2.0: Blatant identity theft

    Web 1.0: Windows
    Web 2.0: OSX

    Web 1.0: dot com
    Web 2.0: dot just-about-everything

    Web 1.0: Yahoo!
    Web 2.0: Boohoo for Yahoo! (Google)

    Web 1.0: Cool!
    Web 2.0: Cooler!

  201. Kommunikationsforum - Web 2.0: F�rst med ikke at v�re de sidste said on

    [...] 18-10-06 | af Sebastian Christensen, Udviklingsansvarlig Excellent Thinking game Læs den rutinerede og kvikke Zeldmans kommentarer til Web 2.0 og brugen af ordet. Brandvarmt indlæg fra 17/10:http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Google “Sebastian Christensen” Kommentér artikel [...]

  202. Web 2.0 Thinking Game « Doooh Head said on

    [...] read more | digg story [...]

  203. Jerome said on

    Web 1.0: 10 millions $
    Web 2.0: 1 billion $

  204. Ben Ellis said on

    Web 1.0: Geeks with nothing better to do but think up new acronyms
    Web 2.0: GWNBTD

  205. Leandro Marcel said on

    Web1.0 :

    Web 2.0:
    ul {
    float:left;
    }
    li {
    list-style-type: none;
    }

  206. Simon said on

    Web 1.0: chmod 755 web
    Web 2.0: chmod 777 web

  207. f6 said on

    Web 1.0 : Napster copyrights problems
    Web 2.0 : YouTube copyrights problems

  208. The Speculist: A Cup of Joe and a Pot of Good News said on

    [...] UPDATE: To put it in terms agreeable to the game: [...]

  209. Dave said on

    web 1.0 – i hate the web
    web 2.0 – i still hate the web

  210. Lucian said on

    Web 1.0: Drop shadows
    Web 2.0: Reflections

    Web 1.0: Tiled background images
    Web 2.0: Freakishly huge background images

  211. Struschie said on

    Web 1.0: standard-web-palet-colored content (just text)
    Web 2.0: true-color shiny-glossy-3D-beta-badged obtrusive animated links to content (video)

  212. Tim H said on

    Web 1.0: buzzwords
    Web 2.0: buzzwords

  213. Diggdot.us - digg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular said on

    [...] Diggdot.us – digg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular [...]

  214. temy said on

    Web 1.0: Tons of useless static pages
    Web 2.0: Tons of useless dynamic pages

  215. Ara Pehlivanian said on

    Web 1.0: Sketchy CSS 1 support
    Web 2.0: Sketchy CSS 2 support
    Web 3.0: Sketchy CSS 3 support

  216. pooly said on

    Web 1.0 Some Paysites
    Web 2.0 Lot Of Paysites

    Web 1.0 Was very exiting
    Web 2.0 Is very boring

    Web 1.0 Napster (MP3)
    Web 2.0 All kind of P2P (MP3, Videos and Worms)

    Web 1.0 Explorer beats Netscape
    Web 2.0 Firefox beats Explorer

    Web 1.0 Only some cmmercials
    Web 2.0 Too much commercials

    Web 1.0 Java pop up commercials that sucks
    Web 2.0 Flash pop up commercials wich sucks much more

    An so on…

  217. Ara Pehlivanian said on

    Web 1.0: Broken accessibility through table abuse
    Web 2.0: Broken accessibility through JavaScript abuse

  218. DJosephDesign said on

    Web 1.0: Two spaces between sentences.
    Web 2.0: No punctuation.

    Web 1.0: Misspellings because of new “computer thing.”
    Web 2.0: Misspellings because it’s cool and the .com you wanted is taken.

  219. Annotea.com » Le web 2.0 said on

    [...] Prenez quelques minutes pour lire cet article rafraichissant !   [...]

  220. DJosephDesign said on

    Web 1.0: Don’t talk to strangers.
    Web 2.0: “I’m meeting gogoXguy24 tonight.”

  221. Sypholux said on

    Web 1.0: »Sign up to get a FREE e-mail newsletter!«
    Web 2.0: »Enter your PIN here to confirm bank details«

    E-mail 1.0 subject: MAKE MONEY FAST $$$
    E-mail 2.0 subject: Re: Th1s watchh is amazingg

  222. Kommentare - BIS said on

    [...] Auf dieser Seite sind Kommentare und Anregungen rund um das Thema BIS-Vorlesung und BIS-Wiki erwünscht. Achtung – passt vielleicht nicht hier her! http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Web 2.0 – ein vielleicht doch etwas ausgelutscher und somit zu inflationär verwendeter Begriff?? Von „http://main.fbm.fh-koblenz.de/bis/index.php?title=Kommentare“ [...]

  223. Peter said on

    Web 1.0: Dialer
    Web 2.0: Phishing

  224. blogoli said on

    Web 1.0: yeah – online!!!
    Web 2.0: Can’t go offline :-(

  225. jason said on

    Web 1.0: fonts too small to read
    Web 2.0: fonts too big to read

    —-

    Web 1.0: sitemaps
    Web 2.0: huge footers

  226. PTG said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game(Zeldman) [...]

  227. Hans Benschop said on

    web 1.0: content to create you own 15 minutes of fame
    web 2.0: endless rehash of of another’s minutes of fame

    web 1.0: search based on algorithms
    web 2.0: search based on ratings (contextual)

    web 1.0: SPAM
    web 2.0: SPLOGS

    web 1.0: branding and corporate sites
    web 2.0 lifestyle sites

    web 1.0: web agencies that don’t understand web users
    web 2.0: web agencies that don’t understand web users

    web 1.0: crackdown on Napster
    web 2.0: embracing torrent technology

    web 1.0: hassled by spam
    web 2.0: hassled by allowing senders in email clients

    web 1.0: bands fear music distribution
    web 2.0: bands distribute music through youtube

  228. -@^@- said on

    Web 1.0: Page takes 5 minutes to download over a 28.8Kbps connection, and then crashes your browser.
    Web 2.0: Page takes 5 minutes to download over an 8Mbps connection, and then crashes your browser.

  229. Carl Max said on

    web1.0: Doing Java – Haven’t tryed jBuilder but wiling to do so soon.
    web2.0: doing php – Haven’t tryed joomla but wiling to do so soon.

    web1.0: porn
    web2.0: alt-porn

  230. FiZ said on

    At least one thing will never change: Opera users griping at IE and Netscape(based) users to get with their standards (^_-)V

  231. 1.0 is blinking, 2.0 is gradients at The Blog Herald said on

    [...] This time, however, I think he got it right with the Web 2.0 Thinking Game post, and its comments. A good read in the afternoon, when you really just want it to be dinner time already. [...]

  232. blaZeryl said on

    web1.0: wat the @*&$^#&#
    web2.0: wat the *$#*(#*&$(*#@&#$($(*#&$

  233. BJ said on

    Web 1.0: Macromedia
    Web 2.0: Adobe

  234. Thorsten Arndt said on

    Web 1.0: Annoying welcome pages asking you to choose between HTML and text versions
    Web 2.0: Annoying welcome pages asking you to choose between HTML and Flash versions

  235. Elias said on

    Web 1.0: bubble #1
    Web 2.0: bubble #2

  236. EveryDigg » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]

  237. LUNA ATTACKS! said on

    [...] Comment? [...]

  238. Antonio Ciccarone said on

    Web 1.0: WebTV
    Web 2.0: Wii

    Web 1.0: Porn
    Web 2.0: Better Porn

  239. Mick Kolby said on

    Web 1.0: Web 2.0
    Web 2.0: Web 1.0

  240. Woofy said on

    Web 1.0: Searching for ads with good pricing over Internet between a lot of useless text informations
    Web 2.0: Searching for good text informations over Internet surrounded by ads

  241. 한RSS said on

    [...] 총 15개  |  최종업데이트: 2006-10-18 23:33 function PrevPage(goto_bottom) {} function NextPage(goto_top) {} Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game ringrocker 2006-10-18 23:00 작성 | business humor web web2.0 zeldman [...]

  242. jason said on

    Web 1.0: windows
    Web 2.0: tabs

    Web 1.0: click and wait
    Web 2.0: no waiting

  243. Davide said on

    Web 1.0: dot-com bubble!!!
    Web 2.0: dot-com bubble???

  244. A Blog Apart // Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game Tags: [No Tags] Related Posts: [ ] [...]

  245. Da_Face said on

    Web1.0 : Marketing Manager say : Make contend that everyone needs, and you get rich
    Web 2.0 : Marketing Manager say : Make Websites where everyone makes contend, and you get rich
    Web 3.0 : Marketing Manager say : Fuck, Im so rich ..

  246. Nemo said on

    Web 1.0: Reading forum entries, posting a reply
    Web 2.0: Reading blog entries, trying to reply but getting caught in ads, trackbacks, pings, cross-posts, digg-links and captchas, before finally giving up in disgust

  247. AndreasMatthies.de » Blog Archive » web 1.0 vs. web 2.0 said on

    [...] Was wird eigentlich mit web2.0 assoziiert? Diese Frage stellte sich Jeffrey Zeldman – seine User gaben Antwort… [...]

  248. ][ mkhDev ][ مازن بن عبد الله مليباري ] said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game : مقارنات طريفة بين Web 1.0 و Web 2.0 [...]

  249. Steffen said on

    Web 1.0: Palm Pilot
    Web 2.0: Moleskine, PocketMod

  250. Sam H said on

    Web 1.0 – IE, Firefox on PC’s and Mac
    Web 2.0 – Opera on Nintendo DS

  251. Karsten said on

    Web 1.0: Emoticons
    Web 2.0: Dancing smileys all over the place

  252. Dennis Moore said on

    Web 1.0: Unsupported software.
    Web 2.0: Perpetual beta.
    Web 1.0: Buck’s.
    Web 2.0: Stack’s.

  253. oku said on

    Web 1.0: Searching for content
    Web 2.0: Searching for people who want to read the content

  254. Tanny O'Haley said on

    Web 1.0: Blocky reflections
    Web 2.0: Glassy reflections

  255. Web 2.0 Thinking Game at intaneti said on

    [...] Læs hele posten Web 2.0 Thinking Game + kommentarer her. [...]

  256. mijlee said on

    Web 1.0: Too much to learn, not enough time
    Web 2.0: Too much to learn, not enough time

    Web 1.0: Promise of a usable web standard around the corner
    Web 2.0: Promise of a usable web standard around the corner

    Web 1.0: Internet makes claims it will make your life better, then fails to make any real difference apart from spending time deleting spam
    Web 2.0: Internet makes claims it will make your life better, then fails to make any real difference apart from becoming addicted to blogging, RSS, Social networking,

  257. Css Globe - Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Zeldman said on

    [...] go visit [...]

  258. Dan said on

    Web 1.0: No gym for home
    Web 2.0: Web 1.0: No gym for home

  259. Idiotprogrammer » Blog Archive » Odds and Ends on the Web said on

    [...] Zeldman and commenters have fun doing a compare/contrast on Web 1.0/2.0  [...]

  260. Duluoz said on

    Web 1.0: Al Gore
    Web 2.0: What? No crazy dems want to claim it this year?

  261. Gwilym said on

    Web 1.0: Damn! Missed it…
    Web 2.0: Damn! Missed it…
    Web 3.0: This time…

  262. Tommy said on

    Web 1.0: Read and Read
    Web 2.0: Read and Write

  263. newspyle: del.icio.us said on

    [...] How I explained REST to my wife… 16:21:18 [...]

  264. WebFritzi said on

    Web 1.0: Does not exist.
    Web 2.0: What’s that?

  265. Dan said on

    Web 1.0: AOL Chat rooms
    Web 2.0: offtopic.com

  266. Smart Dalek said on

    Web 1.0: RSS/Atom feeds
    Web 2.0: “Live” Bookmarks

    Web 1.0: Directories
    Web 2.0: CMS

    Web 1.0: WAP
    Web 2.0: Downloadable Ringtones

    Web 1.0: FAQs
    Web 2.0: Wikis

    Web 1.0: Crashing browsers
    Web 2.0: Self-closing browsers

    Web 1.0: .wav/MP3/OGG-based journals
    Web 2.0: Podcasting

    Web 1.0: “Punch the Monkey” banner ads
    Web 2.0: Pay-per-click ad revenue

    Web 1.0: Homepages/mission statements with Flash intros
    Web 2.0: Homepages/mission statements with Enhanced Flash intos

    Web 1.0: Scroll text and flashing backgrounds
    Web 2.0: Removal of the letter e from -er suffixes

    Web 1.0: Aeron Chairs, Foozeball tables
    Web 2.0: Gmail/Orkut/MySpace invites

  267. Quang said on

    Web 1.0: Hotmail & Yahoo
    Web 2.0: Gmail & Windows Live

    Web 1.0: HTML
    Web2.0: XHTML & CSS

  268. Steeefan said on

    Web 1.0: Regards,
    Web 2.0: regards

  269. Die interessanteste Website aller Zeiten. Wo gibt.: Web1.0 vs. Web2.0 verständlich erklärt said on

    [...] Auch wenn’s mal wieder hier über den Spiegel eintrudelt: Lustig ist der direkte Web1.0 und Web2.0-Vergleich allemal! :-) [...]

  270. alter said on

    Web 1.0 – …
    Web 2.0 – … beta

  271. e-klumme: en forskel der gør en forskel - Bateson 2.0 said on

    [...] 2.0: My parents just left a comment on my blog. skrevet af Søren Johannessen kl. 16:12  Permalink |   | postCountTB(‘116118219749241911′); 0Kommentarer: [...]

  272. fxplayer said on

    Web 1.0: VC
    Web 2.0: MORE VC

    Web 1.0: Yesterday
    Web 2.0: Tomorrow

    Web 1.0: any site
    Web 2.0: ealier less, later any
    Web 3.0: none, less, any

  273. foxcharles said on

    Web 1.0: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
    Web 2.0: Blindness

  274. Aran said on

    Web 1.0: sans-serif headlines
    Web 2.0: giant Georgia headlines

    Web 1.0: “Oolong the rabbit” head performance
    Web 2.0: Cute Overload

    Web 1.0: downloading Swedish rap from Kazaa
    Web 2.0: watching Swedish rap videos on YouTube

  275. Craig said on

    Web 1.0: NetScape 4.x sucks
    Web 2.0: IE sucks, what’s NetScape?

  276. Tchi Keufte said on

    Web 1.0 : Buggy programs on computers and web servers
    Web 2.0 : Buggy programs on computers, web servers and navigators

    Web 1.0 : Web servers programmed in Perl
    Web 2.0 : Web servers programmed in JavaScript soon ?

  277. ben said on

    I am so late to this party. See the first comparison for the excuse.

    Web 1.0: You can’t use Bloglines because it doesn’t exist
    Web 2.0: You can’t use Bloglines because it crashes too much

    Web 1.0: Good ideas typically require tons of bandwidth for their execution
    Web 2.0: Good ideas typically require tons of bandwidth for their execution

    Web 1.0: People ignore CSS
    Web 2.0; People complain about CSS

    Web 1.0: You need a sound card
    Web 2.0: You need a wireless card

    Web 1.0: Flash is often abused to publish lame interfaces
    Web 2.0: Flash is often abused to publish lame videos

    Web 1.0: Microsoft tries to assimilate the Internet
    Web 2.0: Google tries to assimilate the Internet

    Web 1.0: “Sex” is one of the more pupular keyword searches
    Web 2.0: One of the more popular search services publishes a video in wich it is stated that “the Internet is for porn, porn, PORN!”

    Web 1.0: The mass media companies wave their proverbial arms and carry on about how their online presence WILL be on the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE
    Web 2.0: The mass media companies wave their proverbial arms and carry on about how their online presence WILL be on the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE – only this time with CSS, XML, and video

    Jeez, I could p-lay this game all day.

  278. brand said on

    Web 1.0: Users submit comments and ratings (Amazon.com)
    Web 2.0: Users submit comments and ratings (Amazon.com)

    Web 1.0: Amazon.com patents one-click purchase
    Web 2.0: O’Reilly copyrights “Web 2.0″

    Web 1.0: Web 2.0
    Web 2.0: Web 2.1

  279. Gwyn's Home said on

    Web 2.0 is dead, long live Web 3.0?

    Jeffrey Zeldman proposes a cute game of “find the differences” between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 using the pretext of Google’s buying YouTube. While this is of marginal interest of us Second Life users and Metaverse wannabes, one should al…

  280. jason said on

    Web 1.0: Creation
    Web 2.0: Evolution

  281. 23rd World » Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Zeldman, author of the vastly popular Designing With Web Standards, offers an amusing comparison of Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 trends here are my favorites: Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities. Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. [...]

  282. Hydrogen Whiskey said on

    Web 1.0: Guestbook
    Web2.0: Comments

  283. Cruel.Com: Cruel: Cool Site of the Day said on

    [...] PREVIOUS MESSAGE | NEXT MESSAGE Cool Site of the DayVisit Site [...]

  284. Vinnie said on

    web 1.0 : haha lol omg
    web 2.0 : ZOMG LIEK ROFL kekekeke !!11111 eins

  285. DEL~UKS Kommunity :: View topic - WEB 2.0 said on

    [...] Excellent article de Jeffrey Zeldman sur ce que signifie le Web 2.0 pour la presse Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  286. yes said on

    web1.0: lobotomy
    web2.0: lobotomy

  287. Thomas Kötter said on

    Web 1.0: ascii
    Web 2.0: utf-8

    Web 1.0: VRML
    Web 2.0: RIA

    Web 1.0: discovering
    Web 2.0: sifting through

  288. Pretty Tasty! / Web 2.0 vs. Web 1.0 said on

    [...] Funny stuff, with commentary by our very own mr.b…http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game Offline   [...]

  289. Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] 17 October 2006 5 am eastern [...]

  290. Dr Rage said on

    Web 1.0: Mahir
    Web 2.0: Borat

  291. Diskusjon.no - Forum -> webkafeen said on

    [...] Haha, ang. Web 2.0 s� er det mye, mye bra i kommentarene her: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. ——————– Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler [...]

  292. Ranbena said on

    Web 1.0: “I like this file – I’ll download it.”
    Web 2.0: “I like this file – I’ll upload it.”

  293. briant said on

    web1.0: Companies control the message, don’t really listen effectively.
    web2.0: Most companies control the message, a few have learned to tap users for content, and even fewer have learned to listen.

  294. Tim said on

    Web 1.0: Usenet flames
    Web 2.0: Blog rants

  295. steelsphere.com » Blog Archive » What Web 2.0 Really Is said on

    [...] Consider this a “Feature Comparison” between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. [...]

  296. Fazal said on

    web 1.0: aaargh my eyes, so much great content what a whack design
    web 2.0: aaargh my eyes, i cant find good content, havent i seen that design before?
    web 3.0: Spiderman, Spiderman, Does whatever a spider can, Spins a web, any size, Catches thieves just like flies, Look Out! Here comes the Spiderman.

  297. 3rdeyepro said on

    This a terrible explanation of web 2.0

    Here is what my company has defined as web 2.0:

    1: User Generated Content
    2: User control over presentation of content
    3: Pervasive feedback (comment/rating) of content

  298. TMDA Users Can Blow Me (by Jeremy Zawodny) said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Gamehaahaha… the comments are priceless. [...]

  299. Jonas Maurus’ maurus.net » The Web 2.0 thinking game said on

    [...] The comments are priceless! It’d be more funny, if it wasn’t true. Permalink [...]

  300. Druckversion - Netzwelt-Ticker: Apple liefert iPods mit Wurm aus - Netzwelt - SPIEGEL ONLINE - Nachrichten said on

    [...] Web 2.0 bringt es auf den Punkt: Man kann sich praktisch alles drunter vorstellen, irgendwie sind YouTube und Google dafür typisch und reduziertes Website-Design passt auch ganz gut dazu. Doch was steckt nun wirklich hinter dem Ordnungsbegriff Web 2.0? Jeffrey Zeldman, Webdesigner aus New York, stellt sich selbst diese Frage, gab ein paar Antworten und befragte seine Leserschaft. Heraus kam eine lange, reichlich lustige Liste von Enthüllungen, wie doof doch eigentlich der Web-2.0-Begriff ist… [...]

  301. Mike Birch said on

    Web 1.0: E-mail newsletter.
    Web 2.0: RSS feed.

    Web 1.0: $sql = “SELECT * FROM tbl_bookings”;
    Web 2.0: $this->set(‘bookings’, $this->Booking->findAll());

  302. Ken said on

    Web 1.0: Groupware
    Web 2.0: Semantic Web

  303. Arno Klein » Web 2.0 kurz und prägnant said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman erklärt die Unterschiede zwischen Web 1.0 und Web 2.0. Zum Beispiel: Web 1.0: New media company buys old media company. Web 2.0: New media company buys new media company. [...]

  304. trend sweet trend - SterryIT.com said on

    [...] 7 List of Physics Games » Fun-Motion10 Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game10 [...]

  305. Web 2.0 Thinking Game - Webdesigner.com.fr said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – Webdesigner.com.fr Aller au contenuAller au menuAller à la rechercheWebdesigner.com.frUne autre vision des standards du Web et du métier de webdesignerMercredi 18 Octobre 2006Web 2.0 Thinking GameActualitésPar Guy-Philippe Uberos à 20:34Quand Jeffrey Zeldman parle du web 2.0 cela donne Web 2.0 Thinking Game.Lien permanent #155 [...]

  306. Josh said on

    Web 1.0: folders
    Web 2.0: tags

  307. Louis Simoneau said on

    Web 1.0: Tons of annoying animated .gifs.
    Web 2.0: Just the one (spinner.gif).

  308. Erin said on

    Web 1.0: Tim Berners-Lee’s gift to the world.
    Web 2.0: © O’Reilly.

  309. neuwiem said on

    Web 1.0: CGI
    Web2.0: RoR

  310. juque § weblog: Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] ¿Qué dice el público? —comente. Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]

  311. Michel Leblanc, M.Sc. commerce électronique. Marketing Internet, consultant et conférencier » Web 2.0 vs Web 1.0 said on

    [...] Via zeldman.com [...]

  312. links for 2006-10-19 » Sentido Web said on

    [...] Diferencias y semejanzas entre web 1.0 y we 2.0 | Jeffrey Zeldman | Vía eCuaderno Web 1.0: Writing / Web 2.0: Rating, Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities / Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace, Web 1.0: Bookmarking / Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing… (tags: web2.0 business trends internet) [...]

  313. Fischmarkt said on

    Für Erwachsene

    Web 2.0 ist erwachsen geworden. Das meint jedenfalls der Economist in seiner Berichterstattung zu GoogleTube. This week’s pairing of Google and YouTube may come to be remembered as the moment “Web 2.0”—ie, the web, version two—came of age. L. …

  314. Anonymous said on

    Web 1.0 Evil Empire: Microsoft
    Web 2.0 Evil Empire: Google

  315. GuyWeb » Blog Archive » links for 2006-10-18 said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Jeffrey Zeldman Presents a wacky look at the buzzwords associated with the ‘web2.0′ hype and matches them to the equivalent web.10 partner. (tags: webdesign web2) [...]

  316. Kommunikationsforum - Web 2.0: F�rst med ikke at v�re de sidste said on

    [...] 18-10-06 | af Sebastian Christensen, Udviklingsansvarlig Excellent Thinking game Læs den rutinerede og kvikke Zeldmans kommentarer til Web 2.0 og brugen af ordet. Brandvarmt indlæg fra 17/10:http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Google “Sebastian Christensen” Kommentér artikel [...]

  317. Noématique - epistolae » Blog Archive » Un matin comme les autres, said on

    [...] j’ai vu des pélerins tibétains abattus par des soldats chinois, j’ai lu un compte-rendu ironique de la credulité du siècle, j’ai suivi, minute par minute, le rapport de gendarmerie. [...]

  318. ETTF.NET said on

    [...] If you’re interested in the whole evolution of the internet you’ll much enjoy this post on Jeffrey Zeldman’s blog. It get’s really interesting once you go through the comments. Here’s a small excerpt: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]

  319. Pragmatick » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Aus den Kommentaren vom Eintrag Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  320. cleoag.ru » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Прикольный пост про Web 2.0 [...]

  321. abgeledert.de » Blog Archiv » Endlich - der Launch von Web 3.0 said on

    [...] Übrigens beschäftigen sich zur Zeit mehrere mit dieser Thematik: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]

  322. наблюдаемые ... said on

    [...] cleoagWeb 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. [...]

  323. Alex Wipf said on

    Web 1.0: Hype about a “new” medium which business people and investors didn’t have a clue about, bought into anyway and then killed.

    Web 2.0: Hype about the same medium which marketers and brands don’t have a clue about, bought into anyway by spending more and more media dollars on, and will kill.

    Web 3.0: The end of hype about the medium.

  324. Web 2.0 What Does It Mean? - Profy.Com said on

    [...] Now, what do you think other people say about Web 2.0? Check it out at Zeldman’s blog post Web 2.0 Thinking Game and be amazed….!! [...]

  325. Rhys Thomas said on

    web 1.0 – Lists of comments that are relevant to the post in question followed by nothing.

    web 2.0 – Lists of comments that are relevant to the post in question followed by 50 or so trackback comments from Digg etc to tell you just how popular other peoples comments were.

  326. Web 1.0/Web 2.0 - Wissensplattform said on

    [...] Stellen sich etwas signifikant verändert hat. [bearbeiten]Web 1.0 [bearbeiten]Web 2.0 Von “http://wiki.fh-stralsund.de/mediawiki/index.php/Web_1.0/Web_2.0″ Seitenkategorien: Web 2.0 | Soziologische und psychologische Aspekte des Web2.0 [...]

  327. Top Jimmy said on

    Web 1.0: Dunkin’ Donuts
    Web 2.0: Starbucks

    Web 1.0: NASDAQ
    Web 2.0: DJIA

    Web 1.0: Floppy disk
    Web 2.0: Blu-Ray

  328. Rafael Dohms » Pensando em Web 2.0 - O Jogo said on

    [...] Li recentemente um artigo no Blog do Zeldman muito interessante, com uma proposta reflexiva e divertida, então decide tentar aqui no Brasil e ver o que acontece e entender um pouco mais sobre o que nós brasileiros pensamos sobre a Web 2.0. [...]

  329. tomás pollak said on

    Web 1.0: “spacer.gif”
    Web 2.0: “spinner.gif”

  330. 3DCenter Forum - Stylischste Website ever... said on

    [...] Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News. Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes. [...]

  331. Info Du Web » links for 2006-10-19 said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game (tags: web2.0 humor web business zeldman trends blog) [...]

  332. Kommunikationsforum - Web 2.0: F�rst med ikke at v�re de sidste said on

    [...] 18-10-06 | af Sebastian Christensen, Udviklingsansvarlig Excellent Thinking game Læs den rutinerede og kvikke Zeldmans kommentarer til Web 2.0 og brugen af ordet. Brandvarmt indlæg fra 17/10:http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Google “Sebastian Christensen” Kommentér artikel [...]

  333. Chris said on

    Web 1.0 – My Site…
    Web 2.0 – My Beta Site…

    Web 1.0 – Times New Roman, Verdana, Arial…
    Web 2.0 – Trebuchet MS, Georgia, Tahoma…

  334. Friends said on

    [...] Ответ: На факультете географии учился Майкл Джордан. [...]

  335. mlarson.org » said on

    [...] Great Zeldman post and excellent comments about Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0. [...]

  336. Matt said on

    Web 1.0: The Industry Standard
    Web 2.0: TechCrunch

  337. Dan said on

    Web 1.0: Skinny Britney Spears
    Web 2.0: Fat Britney Spears

  338. entropie:. » Blog Archive » /Web 2.0!!! said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  339. outbreak » Web 2.0 Thinking Game (written on October 19th, 2006 by Marko Mrdjenovic) said on

    [...] Didn’t really think I’d link it at first since I saw it on too many blogs already but this is hillarious. [...]

  340. karen said on

    Web 1.0 – Boom (and bust)
    Web 2.0 – Boom (and bust)

  341. Steve said on

    web 1.0: script applied to html
    web 2.0: script applied to xml

    web 1.0: adds
    web 2.0: adwords

    web 1.0: browser support issues
    web 2.0: browser and feed aggregator support issues

  342. danton said on

    Web 1.0: Outlook
    Web 2.0: Google Calendar

    Web 1.0: Blue Screen from Hell
    Web 2.0: Kernal Panic

    Web 1.0: Web Standards not fully supported
    Web 2.0: Web Standards not fully supported
    Web 3.0: Web Standards not fully supported
    Web 4.0: Web Standards not fully supported
    ……………………………………………….
    Web 5000.0: Web Standards not fully supported

  343. Harrison Bergeron said on

    Web 3.0: attention.xml et. al.

    ‘off with their heads!’

  344. Dominik Hahn said on

    Web 1.0: desk calendar
    Web 2.0: Google

    Web 1.0: Excel
    Web 2.0: Google

    Web 1.0: newspaper
    Web 2.0: Google

    Web 1:0: e-Mail me
    Web 2.0: Skype me

    Web 1.0: junk-market
    Web 2.0: eBay

    Web 1.0: tables
    Web 2.0: no tables

    Web 1.0:
    Web 2.0:

    Web 1.0: my first homepage
    Web 2.0: my first homepage 2.0 (beta)

    Web 1.0: photo album
    Web 2.0: flickr.com

  345. Emil Stenström said on

    Web 1.0: IE6
    Web 2.0: IE6

  346. HM2K said on

    Web 1.0: Encarta
    Web 2.0: Wikipedia

  347. QuirksMode Blogs said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  348. Montoya said on

    I’m later to this party than everyone above me, and earlier than everyone below me. Go figure.

    1.0: zefrank publishes videos of himself dancing on his website, gets famous after a mention in a magazine.
    2.0: everyone publishes videos of themselves on YouTube, nobody gets famous

    1.0: IRC
    2.0: Trillian

    1.0: Everyone copies Yahoo!
    2.0: Everyone copies Google

    1.0: Online publishing by handcoding articles in html pages, uploading, then updating all links
    2.0: Blogging by clicking “Publish”

    1.0: Subscription fees
    2.0: Ad-supported

    1.0: Popups and banners
    2.0: Pop-in javascript windows, flash adverts that sit “under” the page, talking advertisements, “viral” ads, video ads, on and on…

    1.0: Please visit my website :)
    2.0: Please read my blog :)

  349. Agus said on

    Web 1.0:
    RESPONSE.BUFFER=TRUE
    dev: i do this way its ok right?
    browser1: fine, fine… go ahead…
    browser2: can u bla bla…
    dev: who r u?
    RESPONSE.FLUSH

    Web 2.0:
    DO WHILE (NOT DIE)
    dev: i do this way its ok?
    browser1: no, it must be bla..bla..
    browser2: its ok, no problem
    browser3: fine, but..
    browser4: anything you do just fine
    dev: ok i’ll think about it.
    LOOP

    Web 3.0:
    DO WHILE (?)
    Search in progress, please wait…
    Search in progress, please wait…
    LOOP?
    crowd: wait a minute? how about Web 2.0?

  350. cindi said on

    Web 1.0: img tags
    Web 2.0: Flickr tags

    Web 1.0: streamed audio and webcams of PopMart Rotterdam
    Web 2.0: phonecam video during a show; bootleg torrents 2 days after a show

    Web 0.1: Zork
    Web 2.0: Secondlife

  351. Ozone said on

    Web 1.0 India and Pakistan, finally getting along, and what great tech.
    Web 2.0 NK has a nuke, Japan’s tech starts looking awesome again.

  352. Joachim Niemeier said on

    Web 1.0: Get my presentation from our website
    Web 2.0: Get my presentation from flickr/YouTube/Google Video

  353. David said on

    Web 1.0: AOL kills Usenet
    Web 2.0: Google Groups kills Usenet

  354. Community Input said on

    [...] Paldies! Jūsuprāt, aktuālā prese (ieteicams, lai būtu arī mājaslapa netā, kur kaut vai tikai virsrakstus var aplūkot), kas atspoguļotu Rietumvalstu mūsdienu politiskās situācijas interpretāciju tb kā Rietumvalstis redz to, kas notiek.p.s. izņemot The Economist.   šķīvī ir 3 siermaizes | uzsmērēt siermaizi [...]

  355. patricio said on

    Web 1.0: e-anything you can imagine
    Web 2.0: anything you can imagine

  356. Dsus4 said on

    Web 1.0: I am tired of being lonely. I’ll have a blog.
    Web 2.0: I am tired of writing. I’ll have a fotolog.

  357. Seamus said on

    Web 1.0: Trying to convince people to send emails
    Web 2.0: Trying to convince people to stop sending so many emails

  358. d said on

    web 1.0: invalid overexpensive nonsense
    web 2.0: valid overexpensive nonsense

  359. Phej said on

    Web 1.0: Arial
    Web 2.0: Lucida Grande

  360. Tycho Zzyx said on

    Web 1.0: Students plagerize information from random websites
    Web 2.0: Students plagerize information from Wikipedia
    Web 3.0: Students plagerize information from teacher approved source

  361. Тут Хумора.NET » Зельдман о Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]

  362. Maksim Rossomachin said on

    Web 1.0: XML for describing everything
    Web 2.0: Microformats for describing small parts of everything

  363. Knoxtenor said on

    Web 1.0: “Version”
    Web 2.0: “Service Release”

  364. friends said on

    [...] alickop[Tags|humor, link, webdev]Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. linkpost comment [...]

  365. Mathias said on

    Web 1.0 Trying to code simple and minimalistic homepages on Geocities
    Web 2.0 Realising that WordPress had already done that and done it better

  366. Pointbarre — Emission Pointbarre - Couleur3 said on

    [...] Sa suite bureautique, son effet web 2.0 et toute sa clique… Google comme on en a jamais autant parlé…Un bon article (en anglais) sur le blog de ZeldmanLa suite bureautique en question, bien chachée sur les pages Google [...]

  367. Детально о... said on

    [...] 21 Окт, 2006 at 3:35 AM alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. Tags: [...]

  368. Web 2.0 « Storyteller said on

    [...] Nå, nu har Jeffrey Zeldman tagit upp skillnaderna mellan Web 1.0 och Web 2.0 i en bloggpost där han ber sina läsare kommentera och redogöra för sin syn på skillnaderna mellan 1.0 och 2.0.Intressant. Min kommentar såg ut så här: [...]

  369. Френдлента said on

    [...] Зельдман о Web 2.0 Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Tags: humor, link, webdev [...]

  370. ТЁМА.ее » Архив » Web1.0 vs. Web2.0 said on

    [...] Забавная игра в комментариях блога Джефри Зельдмана: Различия между Веб1.0 и Веб2.0. Вот некоторые, которые понравились: Web 1.0 – Bookmark this site! Web 2.0 – Digg this post! Web 1.0: Bookmarking. Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing. Web 1.0: Webmail 2mb storage Web 2.0: Webmail 2gb storage [...]

  371. yaph said on

    Web 1.0: Meta Tag Spam
    Web 2.0: Comment Spam

  372. Keybarer said on

    Web 1.0: People being pleased with the Web.
    Web 2.0: People criticizing everything they see.

  373. Friends said on

    [...] Link | | Add to MemoriesЗельдман о Web 2.021st Oct, 2006 | 03:35 posted by: alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Tags: humor, link, webdev [...]

  374. yveswilliams.com » Blog Archive » En vrac said on

    [...] Web 2 point quoi ? et Web 2.0 Thinking Game Google veut optimiser votre site web [...]

  375. \ Imprevizibil » Blog Archive » About web 1.0 and web 2.0 said on

    [...] Cea mai buna descriere. ;) More fun here [...]

  376. André Achtermeier: Web 2.0 Hype or Bleb? said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Hype or Bleb? [...]

  377. Jim said on

    Web 1.0: Lots of techies embittered by not getting rich.
    Web 2.0: Lots of techies embittered by not getting rich.

  378. Johan said on

    web 1.0 Internet Explorer and Netscape
    web 2.0 Internet Explorer and Firefox

  379. GreenDoor said on

    [...] Spätestens, seit der Übernahme von YouTube durch Google für eine irrsinnigen Haufen Kohle, ist das Schlagwort Web 2.0 in aller Munde. Der amerikanische Webdesigner Jeffrey Zeldmann hat sich mal die Mühe gemacht, die Web 2.0 Worthülsen mit denen von Web 1.0 früher zu vergleichen. Ausserdem hat er seine Leser befragt, was für sie Web 2.0 bedeutet. Die Liste ist lang und zum Teil echt lustig (vor allem die Leser-Kommentare). [...]

  380. Rade said on

    Web 1.0: HTML iframes
    Web 2.0: PHP include

  381. OrR said on

    Web 1.0: A truck you dump something on.
    Web 2.0: A series of tubes.

  382. Tom Inc said on

    Web 1.0: a, e, i, o, u
    Web 2.0: 4, 3, 1, 0, 8, $, £, &, :), :(, …

  383. Winter Knight said on

    Web 1.0: Worthless Bloatware 98
    Web 2.0: Worthless Bloatware Vista

    Web 1.0: Linux for geeks
    Web 2.0: Linux for less geeky geeks

    Web 1.0: Politicians stay in power with lies
    Web 2.0: Politicians stay in power with “faulty” voting machines

    Web 1.0: VCRs (VCRs)
    Web 2.0: VCRs that crash (DVD/DVR players)

    Web 1.0: Apocalypse
    Web 2.0: ???

    Web 1.0: Cyborgs are cool
    Web 2.0: Cyborgs are geeks with new toys

    Web 1.0: This game was fun
    Web 2.0: Now I’m going to do something else

  384. trez said on

    1.0 : LOL
    2.0 : WTF

  385. Френдлента said on

    [...] 12 уже естьОтветитьЛинкВ закладки 21-Окт-2006 03:35 am – Зельдман о Web 2.0alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Метки: humor, link, webdev [...]

  386. Tolikfon said on

    Web 1.0: Nobody know about UTF-8
    Web 2.0: Nobody care about UTF-8
    хуясе каменты на русском

  387. Jeffrey said on

    Web 1.0: Investors see $ in front of every number.
    Web 2.0: Programmers see $ in front of every DOM element reference.

  388. readonly said on

    [...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. (comment on this) sply [...]

  389. Basic Thinking Blog » Web 2.0: schön einfach erklärt said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman legt vor: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]

  390. coopLOG: Compil de la semaine [22.10.06] said on

    [...] Zeldman.com [17.10.06] : un petit jeu satirique sympa qui consiste à démontrer que le Web2.0 existait déjà au temps du Web1.0. [...]

  391. Todd said on

    “Web 1.0″ – Term never used.
    “Web 2.0″ – Overused term/fad/trend.

  392. ben scot said on

    web 1.0 my arse

    yours

  393. 7thgroove » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Here’s a bit of levity from Zeldman. Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. But Mostly it means… read more | digg story [...]

  394. bluefacedpixie » Web 2.o said on

    [...] Snigger. But you can play too! Web 1.0: home websites no one reads Web 2.0: blogs no one reads Posted by bfp in Blog This |  [...]

  395. мои камрады said on

    [...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]

  396. » Web 2.0 erklärt, Blogpiloten.de - Weblog Update Weekly said on

    [...] Wem das zu viel Text ist, für den gibt es dank Jeffrey Zeldman jetzt die einmalige ‘Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0′-Vergleichsliste, zusammengefasst von Robert Basic. [...]

  397. Vinny Lingham said on

    Funny, when I tried this on my blog earlier this year, I didn’t get this type of response :-)

  398. recurring said on

    Web 1.0: Frontpage results in: “Hi, I’m Jake! Here’s a picture of me on holiday! I had a great time! Here’s a picture of my cat! Isn’t he cute? Welcome to my website!”

    Web 2.0: MySpace results in: “My name is Jake and I don’t care what anyone thinks which is why I’m going to write pretentious blurb every day to a whole bunch of people I’ll never meet because it makes me feel good.”

  399. Macaca said on

    Web 1.0: No idea who’s linking me!
    Web 2.0: 20.000 zillion Trackbacks spamming a comment-game to death

  400. The Milkman of Human Kindness: Zeldman on Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Nice article on Zeldman, the Web 2.0 Thinking Game…Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News.Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes. [...]

  401. //de/rivat » Schoene Zusammenfassung… said on

    [...] (geklaut von hier) [...]

  402. Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 Roundup » Vinny Lingham’s Blog said on

    [...] Ok – Jeffrey Zeldman got it right [...]

  403. Jayme said on

    web 1.0 Posted on 2006/08/04 4:51 PM
    web 2.0 Posted 3 minutes ago

  404. Ungeblogt - We Do Entertain You. said on

    [...] Was ist eigentlich Web 2.0? – Jeffrey Zeldman und seine Leser geben zusammenfassend eine vereinfachte Antwort. [...]

  405. Anarchaia: A tumblelog by Christian Neukirchen said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game, so much cynism. I love it! [...]

  406. efesak said on

    Web 1.0: viagra, cialis,
    Web 2.0: vl4lgrA, cl4-ll5

  407. Web 2.0 Nonsense versus Web 1.0 Schwachsinn at kWER? said on

    [...] Quelle und mehr: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  408. Sensation: Schwulsein doch heilbar! at CRISCO CONNECTION said on

    [...] Was ist das eigentlich – 2.0? [...]

  409. Gumbert said on
  410. Shinoli Blog said on

    [...] Via  Classé dans: Web   |  Aucun commentaire [...]

  411. Friends said on

    [...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]

  412. raul.de » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 ist… said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  413. Web1.0 vs. Web2.0 ↵ BETALOG said on

    [...] Worin unterscheiden sich eigentlich noch einmal Web1.0 und Web2.0? Achja, danke! [...]

  414. Jan-Piet Mens / Thinking Game 2.0 said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman has an amusing Web 2.0 Thinking Game going with a huge number of quite amusing comments on the comparison between Web 1.0 and 2.0: [...]

  415. Just Sopivasti: Web 2.0 Game said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Game Web 2.0 Thinking Game.Liza Minelli Suomessa ekaa kertaa. Ovatko liput halpoja vai kalliita? Ja jos, niin kenelle?Äh, ei tää nyt oikein. [...]

  416. 500 Words Per Day: A Digg at Web 2.0 - Because 1,000 is just stupid said on

    [...] After surfing around a bit, I checked back in on Jeffrey’s Zeldman’s site and found this humourous tidbit about the Web 2.0 trend. For web design curmurdgeon like myself, it provided a couple good chuckles.Zeldman on Web 2.0 [...]

  417. DouDa said on

    web 1.0 : NTIC
    web 2.0 : NBIC

    :)

  418. only a blog » Webmontag in Wien said on

    [...] Nachdem wir den Vortrag (ohne es zu bemerken – sorry an dieser Stelle) durch Händeschütteln aller Beteiligten unterbrochen hatten, amüsierten wir uns noch über Zeldmans Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Dabei ist mir nebenbei erwähnt aufgefallen, dass auch zeldman.com mal einen Relaunch vertragen würde. [...]

  419. Sascha Goebels WebLog » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Check out the Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Jeffrey Zeldman. [...]

  420. [yoschi]s BLOG » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Auf heute.org (übrigens einer Web 1.0 Seite) gab es heute für diejenigen unter euch, die der englischen Sprache mächtig sind und für die, die AJAX nicht nur mit einer holländischen Fussballmannschaft verbinden, einen wirklich köstlichen Hinweis auf den Zeldman Blog. Jeffrey Zeldman erklärt den Begriff “Web 2.0″ auf seine Art – wirklich lustig sind die mittlerweile 456 Kommentare zu seinem Beitrag, frei nach dem Motto: [...]

  421. GViper said on

    Web 1.0 – Goths having depressings rants via blogs
    Web 2.0 – Emo kids having depressing rants on YouTube

    You know it to be true.

  422. Kristjan Heinaste said on

    Web 1.0 : functions
    Web 2.0 : functional

  423. Un juego : Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0 « divagame said on

    [...] v í a zeldman.com. [...]

  424. Web 2.0 erklärt « Glück auf! - Andreas sein Weblog said on

    [...] [Die Originalliste von Zeldman hier, Best-of Comments bei Wo-gibt via Felix seine Bookmarks via Robert] [...]

  425. node3000 said on

    [...] Big thanks to Martin for the link to the Web 2.0 thinking game. [...]

  426. OneThreeForum :: View topic - Random things that are good said on

    [...] Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game: [...]

  427. librarian.net : NELA : 24oct06 said on

    [...] Web 2.0 – “a popular (though ill-defined and often criticized) buzzword amongst certain technical and marketing communities.” [cite] Further reading: O’Reilly’s definition of Web 2.0; The New Shape of Knowledge by David Weinberger; Top Ten Web 2.0 Moments of 2005 by Richard MacManus; Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Jeffrey Zeldman. [next] «  other buzzwords and terms  » w2 and l2 [...]

  428. La bulle 2.0 Internet par rapport à la bulle 1.0 at Rien de spécial said on

    [...] Le terme de “web 2.0″ est devenu un vértiable buzz word — j’espère d’ailleurs attirer un grand nombre de visiteurs en l’utilisant sur cet article. Au point que ça en agace certains, et moi le premier. J’aime beaucoup cet article de Zeldman qui propose de recenser les fausses différences, comme par exemple: [...]

  429. Johan said on

    web 1.0 Tetris in Java
    web 2.0 Tetris YUI Dustin Diaz Style

    web 1.0 HTML
    web 2.0 XHTML

    web 1.0 JavaScript
    web 2.0 DOM, Prototype and Jquery

    web 1.0 Tag Soup
    web 2.0 Semantic markup

  430. Vorsprung durch Webstandards | Spiele der nächsten Generation said on

    [...] 1) Spielen mit Wörtern – Inspiriert von reißerischen Web-2.0-Hype-Schlagzeilen des Economist spielt Jeffrey Zeldman eine neue Art zynisches Wort-Memory: Web 2.0 Thinking Game und viele spielen mit. [...]

  431. Mr. Bop said on

    Web 1.0: Egotrips at high provider costs, or just textbased university site.

    Web 2.0: This really long tail of cool comments, design and freedom of speech.

  432. Luka’s easy Flash blog said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman recently posted a great article on Web 2.0 on his blog. It’s hilarious! Just look at some samples from it: [...]

  433. Аз, света и сметачите » блонди-млонди said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  434. Michel Bozgounov said on

    web 1.0 A List Apart magazine: nothing too fancy, but works, great content!
    web 2.0 A List Apart magazine: fancier, great content again, but links to discussions on older articles don’t work anymore :-(

    (examples: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/ – the article;
    http://www.alistapart.com/comments/slidingdoors/ – the comments’ page)

    I’ve contacted the List Apart editors more than once, but the issue wasn’t fixed… Maybe it’s unfixable :(

  435. tommi said on

    web 1.0: pot smoking
    web 2.0: pod casting

  436. gerhard said on

    web 1.0: male
    web 2.0: female

    web 1.0: cash burning
    web 2.0: cash burning or cash earning?

    web 1.0: Windows
    web 2.0: Mac

  437. Falco said on

    web 1.0: type “web 1.0: -content-” and “web 2.0: -content-” by yourself
    web 2.0: copy & paste

    web 1.0: made for nerds
    web 2.0: made by nerds

    web 1.0: made by nerds
    web 2.0: made for nerds

    web 1.0: sucks.
    web 2.0: sucks. but if you say it does, it’s on technorati

    web 1.0: Web 1.0
    web 2.0: web 2.0

    web 1.0: I would have never found this page
    web 2.0: Damn Blogroll!

  438. Brian said on

    Found on ShitCrunch:

    9Rules to Web 2.0

    #1 – Overdesign a simple page with two input fields where people can leave their name and e-mail to get spammed when the site is online. Although that won’t happen the next upcoming months

    #2 – Closed Alpha, Closed Beta, Closed Online, Closed Down

    #3 – Use tags even though they are not necessary or just misused. Tag your content, tag your posts, tag your dog

    #4 – Use rounded edges, font shadows, bevel and emboss everything, use font-size: 20pt – you don’t want to miss out the 2.0-blind people

    #5 – Tell everybody you are using Ajax, although you are just cleaning the house

    #6 – Delete all white space from your source code and don’t code in XHTML . Read why

    #7 – Use ruby on rails, c on sea, python on road, perl in the sky, php on moon, Basecamp, Backback, eh Backbone, Tadaaaa

    #8 – Generate a name, generate ideas . Use this

    Done everything?

    #9 – Send an E-Mail to Mike Arrington, TechCrunch

  439. Marc Aguilera said on

    Web 1.0 Streaming Audio
    Web 2.0 Podcast
    Web 2.1 Netcast

  440. Définition du Web2.0 said on

    [...] C’est Jeffrey Zeldman qui s’y colle cette fois avec une définition sous forme de jeu : le Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Le principe est simple : vous donnez un trait caractéristique du web1.0 et en regard, un autre trait caractéristique du web2.0 : Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]

  441. Penalty Deathmatch: 1 : 2 - Brand Evangelist said on

    [...] Schöner hätten wir es auch nicht formulieren können. Deshalb hier in Auszügen das “Web 2.0 Thinking Game” von Jeffrey Zeldman: Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]

  442. ::: eselkult.tk: Blog, abseits vom Mainstream! ::: » links for 2006-10-27 said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game sehr cool! – unbedingt auch Kommentare lesen (tags: Blogs Netzkultur) [...]

  443. Jeffrey Zeldman said on

    web 2.0 A List Apart magazine: fancier, great content again, but links to discussions on older articles don’t work anymore :-(

    I’ve contacted the List Apart editors more than once, but the issue wasn’t fixed… Maybe it’s unfixable :(

    Our replies must have gotten caught in your spam traps.

    The problem will be fixed in the next (from-scratch) update to the ALA publishing engine, coming very soon.

  444. dusoft said on

    Web 1.0: homepages
    Web 2.0: blogs

  445. Michel Bozgounov said on

    @Zeldman:

    Thank you, Jeffrey, for your reply! Good news that this issue will be fixed soon!:)

    [ I actually check my INBOX and my JUNK MAIL, always, just in case, but maybe somehow I overlooked your replies; coule be this:) Would ve really nice to be able to read older discussions again:) ]

    OK, now a more serious entry from me:

    Web 1.0: Macromedia Buys Allaire (2001)
    Web 2.0: Adobe buys Macromedia (2005/6)
    Web 3.0: Microsoft buys Adobe (2011?)
    Web 4.0: Google buys Microsoft (2016?)
    Web 5.0: End of the Internet? :-D

    :-)

  446. Christophe said on

    Web 1.0: _
    Web 2.0: -

  447. Chris Buckley said on

    Web 1.0: ©
    Web 2.0: &copy;
    Web 3.0: ©

  448. blob said on

    Why don’t people get it? Its not meant to be anything more than “the same only better”, and who can deny the web is getting better? Hell my browser is doing a spell check for me right now as i type, if thats not better than what came before then maybe I don’t get it.

  449. Danny-T said on

    Web 1.0 = “Have you seen the Peeing Monkey?”
    Web 2.0 = “Do you remember when the peeing monkey was cool?”

  450. Web 2.0 Thinking Game « Trash Log Blog Archive said on

    [...] …ist ein lustiges Spiel, mit dem sich Jeffrey Zeldman über den Web 2.0-Hype lustig macht. Und jeder kann mitmachen! [...]

  451. RoRy said on

    Web 1.0 = “Rate my poo”
    Web 2.0 = “Rate my comment”

  452. Hotrocket - An Interactive Agency » Blog Archive » IPL: Day 2….and the word of the day is…. said on

    [...] So I guess that kind of answers my question, however, if you want to get in on the comparison game between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, check this out. [...]

  453. K10k / News said on

    [...] Submit Link/News To someone who feels like jabbing a sharp pencil into his eyes whenever a client mentions “Web 2.0″, Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game was a very amusing read. Don’t miss the comments, either. [...]

  454. Chris N said on

    web 1.0 = online banking
    web 2.0 = online dating

  455. Lenzz said on

    Web 1.0: Subscribe to this newsletter.
    Web 2.0: Subscribe to this feed.

    Web 1.0: Loading…
    Web 2.0: Initializing…

  456. Event Horizon said on

    Web 1.0: “I searched the web for information …”
    Web 2.0: “I googled the web for information …”

  457. IPL: Day 2….and the term of the day is….. « Suriano Consulting Inc. said on

    [...] So I guess that kind of answers my question, however, if you want to get in on the comparison game between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, <a href=”http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/”>check this out</a>. [...]

  458. Guillaume said on

    web 1.0: Web is the next big thing !
    web 2.0: Web is the next big thing !
    Still waiting…

  459. AndreasMatthies.de » Blog Archive » web 1.0 vs. web 2.0 said on

    [...] Was wird eigentlich mit web2.0 assoziiert? Diese Frage stellte sich Jeffrey Zeldman – seine User gaben Antwort… [...]

  460. *puertoriko said on

    web 1.0: Identity
    web 2.0: Image

  461. Zeldman ve web 2.0 oyunu ( Web 2.0 Thinking Game ) at AntiFit said on

    [...] Link : Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]

  462. Ted Forbes said on

    Web 1.0 blink tag
    Web 2.0 myspace banner ads

    Web 1.0 Yahoo – Mark Cuban
    Web 2.0 Google – YouTube

    Web 1.0 kioken on CNN (inflated fish story)
    Web 2.0 blog watch on CNN (inflated fish stories)

    Web 1.0 terms for clients to use and not understand
    Web 2.0 terms for clients to use and not understand

    Web 1.0 Napster
    Web 2.0 Youtube

  463. gradient dropshadow curve // by Henry Tapia » 2006 » February said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking game Web 1.0 vs 2.0… [...]

  464. s/earch/ · Zeldmans web1.0 vs web2.0 said on

    [...] Zeldman.com posts a funny article about what Web 2.0 concept may mean in different days, like in the case of The Economist’s coverage of Google and YouTube. [...]

  465. K10k / News said on

    [...] I think Paul Redmond says it best: Web 1.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus. Web 2.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS. [...]

  466. Search Enignes WEB said on

    _____________________________________________

    Web 1.0: Search Engine Results

    Web 2.0: Search Engine Results – BASED ON PERSONALIZATION & USER INFO

  467. Serge said on

    web 1.0: this is too easy to get in
    web 2.0: I can’t get enough of this

    web 1.0: porn makes it float
    web 2.0: old enough for a relationship

  468. João Craveiro said on

    Web 1.0: beware of passing too much time online
    Web 2.0: beware of passing too much time offline

    Web 1.0: irc channel
    Web 2.0: Windows MSN Live Messenger window with 30 friends

    (slight correction on a previous one:)
    Web 1.0: 12px h2
    Web 2.0: 3em h2

    Web 1.0: “Get Internet Explorer, NOW!”
    Web 2.0: Get rid of Internet Explorer, NOW!

  469. leobard said on

    web 1.0: hamsterdance
    web 2.0: ytmnd.com

  470. James said on

    Web 1.0 : Nerds
    Web 2.0 : Nerds + Photoshop tutorial on gradients and shiny buttons

  471. Jordan Dobson said on

    Web 1.0: News
    Web 2.0: Blog

    Web 1.0: Version Numbers
    Web 2.0: Weekly Releases ( I think its funny Web 2.0 has a version number. Seems like it would just be “New Web” or something. Ha! )

  472. mark said on

    web 1.0: 3D pointless objects in crazy future design
    web 2.0: Deer Antlers

    seriously what is the point of all of the deer antlers anyways?

  473. PI Forum: Contrappunti/ Chi naviga davvero su Web? said on

    [...] vi linko un interessante pezzo di Jeff Zeldman sulle possibili differenze tra web 1.0 e web 2.0E’ molto istruttivo [...]

  474. getbockedup said on

    Web 1.0: Username and Password
    Web 2.0: Username, Password, Password again, City, State, Zip, Avatar, Nickname, Nickname again, Email Offers?, Platform, Browser, Flash/ No-Flash?, Interests, tc…

  475. Marc said on

    Web 1.0 : This is 1.0?
    Web 2.0 : When is 3.0 coming?

  476. The Creative Posts and Ramblings of Richard Thomas - » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] I’ll be honest, while I understand the whole web 2.0 thing, I’ve found it hard to define. Thankfully now I don’t have to because I can just refer to how several hundred other people define it in a recent post at zeldman.com – http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game [...]

  477. Mi otro blog… » Blog Archive » ¿Qué es web 2.0? (II) said on

    [...] Por otro lado, para los que no acabéis de ver las diferencias entre web 2.0 y web 1.0 (yo sigo teniendo mis dudas al respecto), en el blog de Jeffrey Zeldman podéis encontrar una lista de diferencias (que aunque puede que no sea del todo útil, si que es divertida ), entre las que se incluyen las siguientes: Web 1.0: Bookmarking. Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing. [...]

  478. tribalogical said on

    Web 1.0 : Personal “home page”
    Web 2.0 : Blog

    Web 1.0 : Linklists
    Web 2.0 : Syndicated Blogrolls

    Web 1.0 : American Diner Coffee
    Web 2.0 : Starbucks “Latte”

    Web 1.0 : Yours/Mine
    Web 2.0 : Ours

    Web 1.0 : Distributed
    Web 2.0 : Consolidated Distribution

    Web 1.0 : Where’s my dog?
    Web 2.0 : Where’s my dongle?
    Web 3.0 : Inside the dog.

    Web 1.0 : Fresh ideas
    Web 2.0 : Fresh out of ideas…………………….

    peace,
    tribalogical

  479. Rick Blalock said on

    Web 1.0 : Never would have wasted time reading 10,000 comments about “the web”

    Web 2.0 : I just read every comment on this stupid page and I am laughing about it.

  480. Alex said on

    Web 1.0 : Microsoft’s WebTV – Internet on your TV
    Web 2.0 : Apple’s iTunes – TV and movies on the internet

  481. MayDay said on

    Web 1.0 : Readers rate books on Amazon
    Web 2.0 : Readers rate reviewers on Amazon

    Web 1.0 : Reviewers on Amazon work for publishing companies
    Web 2.0 : Reviewers on Amazon have their own ad-supported websites

  482. Erkan Yılmaz said on

    web 1.0: XMLHTTP
    web 2.0: AJAX

  483. Blogging 2.0 › Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  484. mcgyver SEO said on

    web 1.0: Me (I can do it)
    web 2.0: We (We are doing it)

    web 1.0: Linked
    web 2.0: Linking

    web 1.0: Only for Music
    web 2.0: More than Music

    web 1.0: Walkman
    Web 2.0: iPod

    web 1.0: did
    web 2.0: doing

    web 1.0: earphone
    web 2.0: Speaker

    web 1.0: Battery
    web 2.0: Plug-in

  485. Morran2k said on

    Web 1.0: Creating workarounds for nested tables to work
    Web 2.0: Creating workarounds for CSS to work across platform, OS and browser.

    Web 1.0: Dropshadows
    Web 2.0: Dropshadows and gradients

    Web 1.0: Beating the crap out of my Nintendo 8bit to work.
    Web 2.0: Still beating the crap out of my Nintendo 8bit to work

  486. Medical-Wei said on

    Web 1.0: “IE only”
    Web 2.0: XHTML+CSS

    Web 1.0: Flashy
    Web 2.0: AJAXy

    Web 1.0: Difficult for disabled
    Web 2.0: Difficult for IE users

    Web 1.0: <b>
    Web 2.0: <strong>

    Web 1.0: Simple
    Web 2.0: Complex

  487. deric said on

    Web 1.0: You’re using Netscape? Eat shit.

    Web 2.0: You’re using IE? Eat shit.

  488. New Economy war Web 1.0 - Webworkblogger said on

    [...] New Economy war Web 1.0 Jetzt ist Web 2.0. Jeder spricht darüber, jeder schreibt darüber. Aber was steckt schon dahinter? Hat sich da so viel geändert? Oder ist alles immer noch beim alten, nur mit neuem Namen? Eine Übersicht schafft Klarheit. [...]

  489. noko said on

    Web 1.0: HTML, PERL, CGI
    Web 2.0: XHTML CSS, JavaScript, PHP, MySQL, ORACLE, Ruby On Rails, JAVA, AJAX, XML, XUL, ColdFusion, ASP.NET, etc.

    Web 1.0: What is that?
    Web 2.0: WTF?

  490. Ron Jones said on

    Construction – 1.0

    Beta – 2.0

    (i know this wasn’t me joke!)

  491. James said on

    Web 1.0: spam email for male enhancment
    Web 2.0: spam email quoting Mark Twain

  492. callie said on

    Web 1.0: Go to a concert, come home, spend weeks searching message boards and guestbooks for someone willing to trade or sell a bootleg tape of the show.

    Web 2.0: Go to a concert, come home, watch the whole thing again on YouTube the next day.

  493. mediabistro.com: UnBeige said on

    [...] And, to close out the day for this writer, we thought we’d share with you Zeldman’s funny piece, “Web 2.0 Thinking Game.” It’s in response to the big media outlets labeling the buyout of YouTube by Google as “Web 2.0 has come of age.” So he plays around a bit, showing the difference between Web 1.0 (boo, hiss) and Web 2.0 (hooray, and, oh, wait, I have to do all this extra work and share stuff?). But the real fun gets going when he asks for readers’ takes on the game. If you haven’t already spent the good portion of a day looking at this sometime this week, it’ll provide you with a good way to get both your humor and geek-ery intake in at the same time. And kill some hours. Posted by Steve | 11:04 AM | web | Email this post [...]

  494. Jas said on

    Web 1.0: Ads
    Web 2.0: Google Ads

  495. JUSTmag - Schade, dass du nicht mehr da bist: Web 1.0. said on

    [...] JUSTmag – Schade, dass du nicht mehr da bist: Web 1.0. Ansprechbar [...]

  496. Quinquireme: What Is Web 2.0? said on

    [...] In the old days (1996-2003), I used to waste time at work reading stuff on the internet.Now I waste time at work writing stuff on the internet.And as far as I’m concerned, that’s the difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0.UPDATE: Then LC drew my attention to this, which, together with its 200+ comments, explains it all much better. [...]

  497. Michael said on

    Web 1.0: Sleazy Dating site
    Web 2.0: Sleazy Dating site (using AJAX)

    Web 1.0: .COM landrush
    Web 2.0: .MOBI landrush

  498. Il progresso del web, la costanza del monopolio said on

    [...] Nonostante la mia perplessità intorno all’incredibile massificazione semantica indotta dal “web 2.0” (pur riconoscendo i pregi delle nuove tecnologie), mi sembra molto interessante questo articolo di Jeffrey Zeldman ispirato, a sua volta, da un articolo dell’economist, secondo il quale, l’acquisizione di you-tube da parte di google segna il definitivo passaggio da “trend” a “era” del web2.0 .Per dare ancora di più un senso all’etichetta web 2.0, zeldman (e tutti i commenti a seguire), hanno comparato web1.0 con web2.0. Esemplare:Web 1.0: AOL compra Time Warner.Web 2.0: Google compra YouTube.Non è cambiato nulla se non il nome delle multinazionali. PUBBLICITÀ PUBBLICITÀ postato da terotero.com il lunedì 06 novembre 2006 in: [...]

  499. Heiko Eckert - Blog - » Zeldman Web2.0 Thinking game said on

    [...] Bei Jeffrey Zeldman wird gerade Web2.0 Thinking Game gespielt und das geht ungefähr so: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube [...]

  500. Alcator said on

    Web 1.0: Internet Explorer 5 considered good browser.
    Web 2.0: Internet Explorer 7 considered good browser.

    Web 1.0: table layout authors mock frame layout authors: “You’re so old fashioned!”
    Web 2.0: fixed-width div layout authors mock table layout authors: “You’re so old fashioned!”

  501. Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 said on

    Web 1.0: Spam
    Web 2.0: Spam
    Web 3.0: Spam

    Web 1.0: Content
    Web 2.0: Our Content
    Web 3.0: Where is the Content?

    Web 1.0: Websites with animatet GIFs
    Web. 2.0: Websites with Flash, Javascript, Ajax, PHP, Perl, ASP, and nothing Works

    Web 1.0: Internet
    Web 2.0: THE Internet XXXXXXXXXL (another form of Porn)

    Web 1.0: A Good Idea
    Web 2.0: A Good Idea with Bad Taste
    Web 3.0: It was a great time still with Web1.0

  502. webthreads.de » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Einen wirklich sehr interessanten und auch lustigen Artikel liefert uns Jeffrey Zeldman der in verschiedenen Beispielen auflistet was Web 1.0 und das dazugehörige Gegenstück im Web 2.0 ist. Zwei Fundstücke die ihn auf die Idee brachten: let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]

  503. restatemedia.net » Zeldman with comments said on

    [...] Zeldman again. [...]

  504. Discodestroyer said on

    Web 1.0: No licence
    Web 2.0: Creative Commons Licence

    Web 1.0: Pop-ups
    Web 2.0: Flash pop-ups (I love them!)

  505. Max said on

    Web 1.0 Dreamweaver
    Web 2.0 TextPad

    Web 1.0 WebTV
    Web 2.0 YouTube

  506. Blogging 2.0 » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  507. Binny V A said on

    Web 1.0 : Keywords
    Web 2.0 : Tags

  508. The Digg Effect - Search for Diggs or get Dugg » Web 2.0 Thinking Game said on

    [...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]

  509. blogue 2.0 | www.sashque.de » die zeit hat mich überholt said on

    [...] mehr davon hier. -tschebursaschka Keine Kommentare Sende diesem Beitrag einen Trackback. kommentiere diesen Beitrag [...]

  510. theory.isthereason » Today’s Links: Threadless + SecondLife + Muji = Crowdsourcing? said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman presents Web 2.0 Thinking Game When The Economist referred to Google’s acquisition of YouTube as a "hot Web 2.0 trend", Zeldman decided to have some fun with it. Just look at the hilarious responses he got! Keywords: funny, web2.0 [...]

  511. schlumps said on

    Web 1.0:
    starting browser, reading web page

    Web 2.0:
    starting browser, installing plugin, installing plugin, deactivating security options, try another browser, reading web page(hopefully)

  512. stealthunit.net said on

    [...] Sori mä haluisin mielellään kiistellä täst asiast jonkun kans [...]

  513. jluix.com » Blog Archive » Web 2.0 Defined said on

    [...] Finally, a precise (and hilarious) definition of “Web 2.0.” [...]

  514. static07 said on

    Web 1.0: Reading trough hundreds of Photoshop tutorials making a grungy design with plastic buttons and pixelborders.

    Web 2.0: Reading trough few AJAX tutorials writing a blog that don’t refresh with animated shelfs, tooltips and loading .gifs

  515. Andy said on

    Web 1.0: Frontpage
    Web 2.0: Dreamweaver

  516. Het slowchat/blog topic said on

    [...] Web 2.0: Da’s een goede samenvatting. [...]

  517. pauldwaite said on

    Web 1.0: annoying geeks on forums
    Web 2.0: annoying non-geeks commenting on your blog

  518. helge said on

    1.0 content without design
    2.0 design without content, but designed to get content from whereever

  519. Tony said on

    Web 1.0: Clip art
    Web 2.0: Retro backgrounds

  520. eskapism.se » Blog Archive » Fler än jag som tycker myspace är junk said on

    [...] Ända sedan jag var inne på min första myspace-sida (som faktiskt inte var för så länge sedan) så har jag avskytt allt som har med den sajten att göra. Så fort jag (av misstag!) kommit in på en sida där så tänker jag “Geocities“. Och det finns få saker som glädjer mig så mycket som när jag på Jeffrey Zeldmans blogg läser att web 1.0 = Crap sites on Geocities och web 2.0 = Crap sites on MySpace. [...]

  521. Websites Made Simple Blog » Blog Archive » Webmasters now Brands New Name - Sharing simple website design, ideas, practices with Malaysia. said on

    [...] The humorous part about this is that instead of calling personnel who manage websites; webmasters, any more. We are now branding them as Web Managers instead. This instantly reminded me of Zeldman’s article; Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]

  522. Almad.NET [Zápisník ] said on

    [...] Web 1.0: “Under Construction” Web 2.0: “Beta” Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets. Web 2.0: Pointless “Ajax” widgets. Komentáře ke krásnému pokusu popsat Web 2.0 [...]

  523. Anlise de Sistemas III: Identificando Requisitos said on

    [...] Zeldman.com: Web 2.0 Thinking Game http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game [...]

  524. Jan Hagge said on

    Web 1.0: (Point)Endless Browserdiscussions
    Web 2.0: PointEndless Web2.0discussions

  525. ⊗ gebe, nehme, erhalte und habe ⊗ said on

    [...]    Link  (0 Kommentare)   meldung machen     web 2.0 thinking game [...]

  526. Kevin said on

    Web 1.0: getting frustrated trying to explain the importance of MP3s
    Web 2.0: getting frustrated trying to explain the importance of RSS

  527. Cyril said on

    Web 1.0: cables
    Web 2.0: tubes

  528. ..::blueeyes|inthemirror::.. » Blog Archive » Verfolgung2.0 said on

    [...] Dieses Thinking Game sollte sich übrigens jeder mal ansehen…. besonders gut gefallen hat mir: Web 1.0: “Under Construction” Web 2.0: “Beta” Do, 23. November 2006, 19:25 •blue|eyes • Alltag, Webdesign, Genööle [...]

  529. Bookmark web design | <edit> - Il blog di HTML.it said on

    [...] Web 2.0? Zeldman circa un mese fa ha pubblicato un post dal titolo Web 2.0 thinking game in cui mette a confronto il Web1.0 e il Web2.0 e che ha raccolto molti commenti, alcuni molto divertenti. C’è poi chi lamenta il fatto che il Web2.0 sia lento: in Don’t be part of the Web 2.SLOW un interessante studio dei tempi di risposta di Digg e le possibili strategie di ottimizzazione. Ma mentre siamo nel pieno del Web 2.0 c’è già chi guarda avanti al Web3.0, su questo blog ad esempio. Sinceramente non sono riuscito ad afferrare appieno il concetto, e credo ci vorrà del tempo prima che il Web 3.0 diventi un tormentone come ora lo è il Web2.0.Concludo con alcuni articoli in ordine sparso dedicati a ottimizzazione e buone pratiche di sviluppo. Contenuti e SEO per blog, titoli, media CSS, test crossbrowser e ottimizzazione CSS, nell’ordine: [...]

  530. IB/NEWS said on

    [...] Web 1.0 Web 2.0. :) 19/10/2006 02:25 Frog e-mail www [...]

  531. just___xTc said on

    PHP time.

    Web 1.0:
    Web 2.0:
    (So damn complicated…)

    Web 1.0: Parse Error, Expected “;” on line 14
    Web 2.0: Parse Error, Expected “;” on line 3465457586
    (Scripts are waaaay too big)

    Web 1.0: Look at me, I know HTML.
    Web 2.0: Please look at me, I know XHTML, CSS, PHP, MySQL, JavaScript and RSS.
    (HTML is simply not enough anymore)

    Web 1.0: Coming soon: Internet2
    Web 2.0: Coming soon: Web 3.0
    (Yeah I bet none of you heard of Internet2. I read about it in Wired and didn’t get it)

    Web 1.0:
    Web 2.0:
    (OMGZORZ WE MUST MAKE OUR FILEZ 546 GB SO THAT THEY ARE XHTML STANDARD AND WORK IN MSIE 3.0 OKOKOK!!!1111)

    Web 1.0: ♥
    Web 2.0:

  532. mobile9 Forum -> Digg said on

    [...] Email this entry | Print this entry Oct 18 2006, 09:00 PM Web 1.0: Thread bumpingWeb 2.0: Digg*ingAs a follow up of the Web 2.0 Thinking Game Yup, 4 months elapsed since my last blog entry. How cool is this place (bookstore in Beijing), if i have the money and the space, will definately build one in my future home. [...]

  533. Stadtwiki-Treffen from Wilhelm Buehler on 2006-11-07 (Karlsruher Stadtwiki) said on

    [...] Quelle: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Received on Tue Nov 07 2006 – 12:19:46 CET [...]

  534. Linkage ~ Cameron Moll said on

    [...] Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. “Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets. Web 2.0: Pointless ‘Ajax’ widgets. Now you try it!” [...]

  535. Welcome to the Club / Jeff Zeldman explains Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Here is a good read from Jeff Zeldman that explores the web 1.0 and web 2.0 differences and how they relate to business and even the stock market.  Enjoy! -I agree with Jeff on this one. [...]

  536. Airbag - Rumsfeld. said on

    [...] Rumsfeld.27 November 06 Yes, it’s going to be different this time. Way different. Nobody is chasing after the IPO dream today, we learned our lesson from just six years ago, and never-you-mind that my neighbor was just seeded $1.3M because he manages his family with Basecamp through Bootcamp using Ubuntu installed on his MacBook so he can blog about it all with a pagerank of six. Six! KAAAHN! [...]

  537. DM Strong said on

    web 1.0: entrepreneurs use the internet to make money.

    web 2.0: corporate monoliths use the internet to take entrepreneurs’ money.

  538. Anonymous said on

    Web 1.0 – Animated GIF’s

    Web 2.0 – Flash

  539. CoolR.de - Web2 vs. Fake2 said on

    [...] CommentTimeOct 26th 2006  permalink Anonymer Accountlasst uns eine definition bauen!!! :D ich hab ja oben schon angefangen. einfach weitermachen.internet neu erfunden? hmm, so würde ich das nicht sehen. ich habe vor kurzem etwas witziges gelesen. Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. Web 1.0 – Bookmark this site!Web 2.0 – Digg this post! Quelle: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]

  540. jujav4ik Blog « links for 2006-11-28 said on

    [...] Tired of Web 2.0? (tags: humor web2.0) [...]

  541. << mediadonis » Please Update your Version of the Web to 2.0 said on
  542. Web 2.0 - University of Virginia Media Studies Program said on

    [...] Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game [edit]Anecdotes [edit]Sites AIGA Polling Place Photo Project BlackPlanet Cyworld (Most popular in South Korea) (Homepage; Wikipedia entry) orkut (Most popular in Brazil) (Homepage; Wikipedia entry) Video The Vote [edit]Pages A particularly funny livejournal page(Kim_Jong_Il) [edit]On Wikis [...]

  543. Linkit tagille 2.0 | Unessa.net Linkkilista said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  544. joebarone said on

    Web 1.0: stupid pictures of your dog
    Web 2.0: stupid videos of your dog

    Web 1.0: AOL
    Web 2.0: not AOL

    Web 1.0: Microsoft Internet Explorer
    Web 2.0: Mozilla Firefox

    Web 1.0: Wow! this place has wireless internet?!?!
    Web 2.0: WTF?!?! This place doesn’t having any fucking wireless internet?!?!

    Web 1.0: lame
    Web 2.0: lamx0r

    Web 1.0: :)
    Web 2.0: XD

    Web 1.0: other people have some pretty good podcasts out there
    Web 2.0: you have some pretty good podcasts out there

  545. Schalkefan said on

    [...] Was ist eigentlich Web 2.0? Um zu verstehen was sich hinter der Wortblase “Web 2.0″ verbirgt, lohnt es sich, den augenzwinkernden Vergleich zum “Web 1.0″ zu ziehen. Jeffery Zeldman hat es getan [und Spreeblick hat's entedeckt]. [...]

  546. Yumiyum! - etiket: web 2.0 said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game  kaydet   örneklerle web 2.0 makine  |  18 Ekim, 2006  |   1 üyede  |   yorum yaz  |  güncene yaz etiketler:  web 2.0 [...]

  547. katamay: нотка абсурда said on

    [...] 2006-11-27 07:38 pm UTC (link) а до тебя сообщения не доходят.(Reply to this) (Thread) katamay 2006-11-27 07:55 pm UTC (link) у меня новый(здесь вообще комменты рулят)(Reply to this) kefafarafudej 2006-11-30 06:21 pm UTC (link) Блин, не могу не показатьтебе :-)http://absurdopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Windows_XP(Reply to this) [...]

  548. Netdiver NEWS archive -> November 2006 said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Jeffrey Zeldman. [...]

  549. Hal! said on

    Web 1.0 – “We’re IPO”
    Web 2.0 – “We’re 2.0″

  550. Jérémie Moritz - Mon Blog: Bonnes idées said on

    [...] Ca y est je m’y colle, cloué dans mon siège avec Ipod, ordi, télé, bouquins, je vais avoir le temps de poster un peu plus longuement.On va commencer par tous les liens que j’ai reçus et qui méritent le détour cette semaine et en illustration la dernière pub Playboy vue sur Adverbox : Jeffrey Zeldman présente le Web 2.0 : Petit jeu d’associations d’idée entre le Web 1.0 et le Web 2.0, très bon ! [...]

  551. Doggdot.us - d*gg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular said on

    [...] Doggdot.us – d*gg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular [...]

  552. Scribblings of the Metropolitician: Web 2.0 and Korean Media said on

    [...] Web 1.0 was about hardware costs, Web 2.0 is about bandwidth costs Here’s a site worth going to and reading not only the post, but the many comments that come under it, lampooning what many rightfully consider to be an artificially-hyped perceived division between two ages of Internet. For true reference, however, you must read the Tim O’Reilly article that started it all, with the original comparison chart that many make fun of. Here’s the money chart: If you really want to get down and learn what this is all about, Programmableweb has a nice site with links to all the major Web 2.0 theory. [...]

  553. Web 2 point (uh-)oh denkspel at XooZ BLOG said on

    [...] Dat er al eindeloos veel artikels geschreven zijn om te lachen of wenen met de Web 2.0 hype/revive/internetzeepbel 2.0 weet ik. Toch wou ik jullie deze Web 2.0 Thinking Game niet onthouden. [...]

  554. Ray said on

    Web 1.0 – Palm
    Web 2.0 – Windows Mobile

    Web 1.0 – Infra Red
    Web 2.0 – BlueTooth (When it works)

  555. Jay said on

    Web 1.0 = a/s/l
    Web 2.0 = World of Warcraft Porn

  556. Samuel Cotterall said on

    Web 1.0: “Macs suck!”
    Web 2.0: “Check out my MacBook!”

    Web 1.0: javascript.com
    Web 2.0: script.aculo.us

    Web 1.0: ASP
    Web 2.0: Ruby On Rails

  557. Oskar Krawczyk - blog.olicio.us » Archiwum » Zabawa w 2.0 said on

    [...] Jakiś czas temu Zeldman na swoim blogu rozpoczą zabawę w porównywanie Web-owości starej i nowej szkoły. Właśnie przeglądnąłem jego porównania oraz wszystkich komentujących i muszę przyznać, że kilka jest naprawdę trafnych i kilka mocno zabawnych. Moje ulubione: Web 1.0: Inaccessible DHTML Web 2.0: Inaccessible AJAX Web 1.0: Meaningful domain names Web 2.0: Unpronouncable domain names Web 1.0 The bigger the bevel the more important the button Web 2.0 The shinier the plastic the more important the button [...]

  558. CSS hacks pour Internet Explorer 6 et 7 at Mindenigma said on

    [...] Jeux de pensé Web 2.0 Zeldman compare le Web 1.0 au Web 2.0. Très comique, mais aussi très réaliste. [...]

  559. Fernando Lins said on

    Web 1.0: Badly engineered sites.
    Web 2.0: Badly engineered sites, but that’s ok, cause they’re endlessly “Beta”.

  560. Anna said on

    Web 1.0: Allmusic.com
    Web 2.0: WikiMusicGuide.com

  561. deadstenographer said on

    Web 1.0 – eFillintheblank
    Web 2.0 – iFillintheblank

  562. Login | mister-wong.de | Social Bookmarking Tool said on

    [...] Bookmark hinzufügen Du möchtest folgenden Link zu Mister Wong hinzufügen: Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game (http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/)Um diesen Link zu speichern musst du dich entweder einloggen sofern du schon einen Account hast oder dich unten kostenlos registrieren. Registrieren [...]

  563. AndreasMatthies.de » Blog Archive » web 1.0 vs. web 2.0 said on

    [...] Was wird eigentlich mit web2.0 assoziiert? Diese Frage stellte sich Jeffrey Zeldman – seine User gaben Antwort… [...]

  564. Gumbert said on

    Web 1.0: [center][h1][/h2][/center][hr][p][font size="10"][/font] (stupid layout)
    Web 1.5: [div style="font: 11px Verdana"][/div](smart colourful design with menu items)
    Web2.0: primitive design with smart rounded corners and stupid fonts ;)

    Web 1.0: login: “gumbert”, pass: “password”
    Web 2.0: login: “gumbert”, pass: “password1″

  565. Giel Berkers dot com said on

    [...] Heel veel sites en personen hebben verschillende opvattingen over wat web 2.0 eigenlijk is. Volgens O’Reilly is web 2.0 het makkelijker mogelijk maken van het delen van informatie. Volgens Web Design from Scratch is web 2.0 het meer trechteren van je informatie naar de gebruiker toe: Geef de gebruiker wat hij wil, en niet wat hij niet wil. Volgens Jeffrey Zeldman is web 2.0 een hype om vernieuwing aan te tonen. Maar wat is web 2.0 nu echt? [...]

  566. matthias said on

    Web 1.0: Companies make money through wasting our money
    Web 2.0: Companies make money through wasting our time

  567. dennis said on

    Web1.0: Images with drop shadows
    Web 2.0: Images with reflections

  568. helgepage > blog said on

    [...] Mashupr  | November 13th 2006I wrote my first article for the t8d blog introducing the new project mashupr.net. Mashupr is going to be an API-wrapper for Web-APIs.Oh, I should mention that the article is written in german. Try google’s translation if you don’t know german and/or for a good laugh about the resulting grammar ;) Web 2.0 beta  | October 18th 2006Kinda says it all: Web 1.0: Dot.com Bubble Web 2.0: Dot.com Bubble Does anyone want to buy this blog for (please enter price in billions here)? Call me! I’ll throw in an extra nasty old-school font-tag ;) More comparisms here. Be-zier  | August 22nd 2006 After seeing this example of a bezier tween I thought about programming an animated continous curve with bezier splines. Here it is: not really that complicated I just had to make sure that every point, and the two controlpoints around it make up a straight line, so that the gradient is equal. This way you get a smooth continous curve… not rocket science, but nice to look at ;) flash++  | July 1st 2006 I used to use Mike Haller’s Jupload for simple serveruploads in t8d’s mini-cms quaax. With Flash8’s new Filereference Class that finally allows multiple file selections, there is an alternative now and users with java OR flash plugin can work with it. Hooray! Don’t get me wrong, I’m not anti Java, I just don’t like it that much in webinterfaces. Try my example. archive » i 2:45 am  _uacct = “UA-295200-5″; urchinTracker(); [...]

  569. Adactio: Journal - The language of accessibility said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  570. kaliban.org: archiv.log said on

    [...] Quelle: zeldman.com (jaja, kennt schon jeder) [GUNNAR] um 16:00 :: 4 Kommentare [...]

  571. Gmail. Opera :: ���� �������� :: IMfO.ru said on

    [...] It’s not that simple. Gmail uses a feature that exists in Mozilla or ActiveX in IE to make HTTP GET requests from Javascript. The only reasonable way to get Opera work with Gmail is for Opera to implement something compatible to Mozilla’s Javascript functions. And there is a second issue: Opera crashes right after logon. I guess this is some bug in Opera’s Javascript. [...]

  572. suckafree said on

    web 1.0 : $150 100mb zip drive

    web 2.0: $150 200gb hard drive

  573. sdf said on

    web 1.0: explain what you mean

    web 2.0:overly-explain what you mean

  574. Andreas said on

    Web 1.0: More useful than cool.

    Web 2.0: More cool than useful.

  575. eskapism.se » 2006 » November said on

    [...] Ända sedan jag var inne på min första myspace-sida (som faktiskt inte var för så länge sedan) så har jag avskytt allt som har med den sajten att göra. Så fort jag (av misstag!) kommit in på en sida där så tänker jag “Geocities“. Och det finns få saker som glädjer mig så mycket som när jag på Jeffrey Zeldmans blogg läser att web 1.0 = Crap sites on Geocities och web 2.0 = Crap sites on MySpace. [...]

  576. Web 3.0: A Smarter, Spookier Internet » Silicon Valley Blog About Money said on

    [...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Leave aReply [...]

  577. Paul Decowski said on

    Web 1.0: Link’s colour changes on rollover
    Web 2.0: Link’s background changes on rollover

  578. NetzKult.com said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman hat auf seiner Website ein Spiel gestartet, bei dem es darum geht, Vergleiche zwischen Web 1.0 und Web 2.0 zu ziehen. User können ihren Beitrag zum Spiel einfach in die Kommentare eintragen. [...]

  579. Bienvenue sur j*a*m, http://www.lets-jam.com said on

    [...] par Juju Web Tags: web1.0, web2.0 Grande question existentielle que de définir le web 2.0, concept fumeux pour certains qui y voient une façon de décrire la nouvelle bulle. Il est pourtant clair que le nouveau web est plus social, plus réseau, plus partage, plus communautaire, plus media, plus interactif… Ma définition du Web 2.0, c’est qu’il s’agit d’un Web Plus. Jeffrey Zeldman propose une vision comparée de l’évolution: [...]

  580. Brian Gray said on

    Web 1.0: Sadaam found in a hole.
    Web 2.0: Sadaam found in a hole, in a box.

  581. Tim Berners-Lee on Web 2.0: "nobody even knows what it means" - Web Design Forums.net said on

    [...] Tim Berners-Lee on Web 2.0: “nobody even knows what it means” The short story is web 2.0 advocates explain it as web 1.0 was about connecting computers, web 2.0 is about connecting people. And Berners-Lee insists web 1.0 was also about connecting people, and web 2.0 doesn’t really mean anything. For more you can also read Jeffrey Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking game. [...]

  582. Kayo said on

    web 1.0: I made something new :D
    web 2.0: while (true){ c.copyWork (“Google”); }

    web 1.0: web designers hate Netscape
    web 2.0: Everyone hates IE
    web 3.0: Everyone hates CSS2
    web 4.0: Google kills windows, replaced by Googlinux

  583. Web 2.0 » Blog Archives » The buzzword of 2006 is Web 2.0. … said on

    [...] Web 2.0: Text that makes you widen your browser window if you want to read it … Web 2.0: Searching for good text informations over Internet surrounded by ads … Read This [...]

  584. blog.perldude.de » 2006 » October said on

    [...] Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities. Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ By Jens | Posted in General | Comments Off [...]

  585. Telcoms Consultant said on

    I still remain unconvinced whether Google owning YouTube is a good thing in the long run. I reckon the editing of Vids will just get tighter and tighter due to copy right etc. I just hope I’m wrong I love YouTube!

  586. Newton Wagner » Arquivo » Jeffrey Zeldman e o jogo da Web 2.0 said on

    [...] O autor do livro Desenvolvendo Sites Compatíveis, (citado aqui no blog), divulgou um divertido jogo no seu blog. A idéia é definir Web 1.0 e Web 2.0, como os exemplos abaixo, traduzidos do post do Zeldman e de alguns comentários: [...]

  587. www.gilbertpaquet.com : rédaction et design web said on

    [...] Dans le même ordre d’idées : “If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it.” [...]

  588. Rhys Thom said on

    web 1.0: remix
    web 2.0: mashup

  589. PixelPerfect Web » Blog Archive » Web2.0? …in English?! said on

    [...] For an other diagram of what Web2.0 is and the applications that make it so here is a great link: Web2.0 And Beyond or Web2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  590. Ben Wallis said on

    Web 1.0: SOS
    Web 2.0: SEO

  591. Kermit said on

    Web 1.0: a bunch of people writing, a lot of people reading
    Web 2.0: a lot of people writing, a lot of people reading

    Web 1.0: I offered a pizza to my fifteen years old neighbour’s son and now I got a ugly but cheap website. Everybody could do websites!
    Web 2.0: I paid 15 dollars to a professional web design agency to get a wonderful web-standard site and now I have a “web 2.0-looking” and cheap website. Everybody DOES do website!

    ;) cheers

  592. Spyrte said on

    Web 1.0: http://www.partytentcity.com
    Web 2.0: Google Adwords
    Web 3.0: craigslist

  593. Ted Roche’s weblog - Mission: Interoperable. Competition breeds Innovation. Monopolies breed stagnation. Working Well with Others is Good. » 2006 » October said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman smacks down the hype well in his Web 2.0 Thinking Game: “Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing — except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying… (more) [...]

  594. stabgrabber said on

    Web 1.0: CRT
    Web 2.0: LCD

    Web 1.0: making your desktop look like the old 98 did
    Web 2.0: making your desktop look like the old XP did

    Web 1.0: online for 4 hours a day
    Web 2.0: online for 14 hours a day

    Web 1.0: finally winamp at work
    Web 2.0: finally unlimited browsing at work

    Web 1.0: webcam
    Web 2.0: living room cam

    Web 1.0: making 1 computer out of 3 old ones
    Web 2.0: making 1 computers out of 1 new one

    Web 1.0: Favorites
    Web 2.0: Feeds

    :)

  595. stabgrabber said on

    Web 1.0: dim var1 = 1 as boolean
    Web 2.0: $var1 = 1;

  596. Phil v. Sassen said on

    Web 1.0: friends vs. Web 2.0: contacts

  597. Desenlog » Blog Archive » As diferenças com o surgimento da Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Um interessante artigo no Zeldman mostrou certas diferenças com o surgimento da Web 2.0 e eu trago algumas listadas e algumas contribuições. [...]

  598. Fluxsoap said on

    web1.0 “geocites home page”
    web2.0 “blogger blog”

    web1.0 “portal with news”
    web2.0 “strange blog with community functions”

    web1.0 “webmaster is the best”
    web2.0 “seo is the best”

    web1.0 “MSdos”
    web2.0 “vista”

    web1.0 “old-school”
    web2.0 “rmb”

    web1.0 wap
    web2.0 3G

    web1.0 web1.0
    web2.0 web2.0

    web1.0 “sign guestbook”
    web2.0 “submit comment”

    web1.0 “spedia.com”
    web2.0 “adsense”

    web1.0 “hard”
    web2.0 “simple”

    web1.0 is like cd-r
    web2.0 is like Lightscribe

  599. Defining Web 2.0 - Dev Shed said on

    [...] There’s a lot of amusing definitions here… [...]

  600. Giel Berkers dot com said on

    [...] En wanneer kunnen jullie deze nieuwe browse-ervaring verwachten? Naar mijn schatting hoop ik de nieuwe website half november te voltooien. Ik moet hem dan ook nog vullen met eerdere weblog-artikelen en portfolio-items en uiteraard nog debuggen en fine-tunen, dus het zou kunnen dat het daardoor iets uit zou kunnen lopen, maar dat hoor je dan snel genoeg.Reacties Nick / 17 Oktober 2006Ik ben erg benieuwd naar deze nieuwe Web2.0 experience bij Giel! Trouwens ook wel fijn om te weten dat je nog leeft ja. Check even zeldman.com voor een post over de web2.0 hype (die inderdaad nogal wat verwarring veroorzaakt) trouwens: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Succes met het afronden van je site!Deze reactie is 5 maanden geleden geplaatst.Giel / 30 Oktober 2006De deadline gaat waarschijnlijk iets later worden. Aangezien ik over een week thuis een verbouwing heb en daardoor een week niet aan mijn site kan werken, en ik sowieso nog mijn nieuwe site nog met content moet vullen, verwacht ik dat het eerder eind november gaat worden in plaats van half november.Deze reactie is 5 maanden geleden geplaatst.Geef een reactie [...]

  601. Das private Blog von Arthur Khessin » Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Einen sehr interessanten Vergleich hat Jeffrey Zeldman in seinem Blog angestellt. Er hat sich nicht in die ewige rhetorische Frage vertieft was nun dieses Web 2.0 ist, sondern er hat einfach mal verglichen was sich im Vergleich zu Web 1.0 (quasi dem Web wie es vorher mal war) unterscheidet. [...]

  602. Ben Wallis said on

    Web 1.0: Diet
    Web 2.0: Organic

  603. Seo Expert said on

    Thnxxx for the information

  604. seo said on

    This is very good.I have try and I like it.Thanks for information.

  605. Eugen "E2daZ" Wirz said on

    Web 1.0 = Crap sites from the webdesigner.
    Web 2.0 = Crap sites from everyone.

  606. Whazziz said on

    Web 1.0: ALT + TAB
    Web 2.0: Hotspot corners , mutilple desktops

  607. Manzor said on

    Web 1.0: Jakob Nielsen moaning
    Web 2.0: Jakob Nielson moaning

  608. David Behan said on

    Web 1.0: You have 1 new message(s)
    Web 2.0: You have 1 new message

  609. Bryan King said on

    Web 1.0: LOLCats Pictures
    Web 2.0: LOLCats Pictures every five(5) minutes (CatCam)

  610. Denny said on

    Web 1.0 Dreamweaver
    Web 2.0 Notepad

  611. Rene Glembotzky said on

    Hahaha, what a cool thread :-)

    Web 1.0: Sabrina (my ex)
    Web 2.0: Inka (my wife)

  612. Alex said on

    Web 1.0 Doom
    Web 2.0 WOW

    Web 1.0 Modem
    Web 2.0 Lan

  613. ponchan said on

    for n00bis:
    Web 1.0 : “oohh!! What does this button do?”
    *click*
    “uhh.. what just happened?”
    Web 2.0 : “oohh!! shiny..”
    *click*
    “uhh.. what just happened?”

    Web 1.0 : n00b users don’t know what spywares are..
    Web 2.0 : n00b users are scared of spywares..

    Web 1.0 : click something and you get infected
    Web 2.0 : just move the mouse and you get infected

  614. Alfred Sant said on

    Web 1.0 1.44Mb Floppy Disks
    Web 2.0 8 Gb USB Flash Drives

  615. TMaxim said on

    Why Web 2.0 only 8 Gb? :)

    Max

  616. Andrey said on

    web1.0 “MSdos”
    web2.0 “vista”

    web1.0 “old-school”
    web2.0 “rmb”

    web1.0 wap
    web2.0 3G

    web1.0 web1.0
    web2.0 web2.0

  617. steve said on

    Web 1.0 Dreamweaver
    Web 2.0 Notepad

  618. BaltikS said on

    Thanks, very very nice article…

  619. Ski Master said on

    Web 1.0 : skiing
    Web 2.0 :snowboarding

    Web 1.0 : msn new hotmail
    Web 2.0 : hotmail

  620. mukesh marwah said on

    Web 1.0: left align
    Web 2.0: centre align

    Web 1.0: not much theory
    Web 2.0: with lot of theory

    Web 1.0: no discussion
    Web 2.0: lot of discussion

    Web 1.0: fatty
    Web 2.0: slim

    Web 1.0: un-mature
    Web 2.0: enough mature to handle content

    Web 1.0: father
    Web 2.0: son

    Web 1.0: yestesday
    Web 2.0: today

    Web 1.0: without peers
    Web 2.0: with peers

    Web 1.0: table
    Web 2.0: div

    Web 1.0: past
    Web 2.0: future

    Web 1.0: bellbottom
    Web 2.0: jeans

    Web 1.0: _
    Web 2.0: glassy mirror

    Web 1.0: not specfic in jobs
    Web 2.0: specific in jobs

    Web 1.0: designers are free
    Web 2.0: designers have boundaries

    Finally design is design simply the things matters is Beautiful….whether its web1.0 or web2.0…difference we have created……….what u think

  621. Salman said on

    Web 1.0: not specfic in jobs
    Web 2.0: specific in jobs

    Web 1.0: designers are free
    Web 2.0: designers have boundaries

    Finally design is design simply the things matters is Beautiful….whether its web1.0 or web2.0…difference we have created……….what u think

  622. sepl said on

    Very nice article, thank you

  623. Mike said on

    Web 1.0: no discussion
    Web 2.0: lot of discussion

    Web 1.0: fatty
    Web 2.0: slim

  624. Jordan said on

    Web 1.0: “This site best viewed in IE.”
    Web 2.0: “This site best viewed with XMLHttpRequest.”

    Web 1.0: Non-semantic nested tables.
    Web 2.0: Non-semantic nested “wrapper” divs.

    Web 1.0: Pop-ups.
    Web 2.0: Pop-overs.
    (Web 3D: Pop-outs.)

    Web 1.0: “WOW THIS INTERNET THING IS GREAT”
    Web 2.0: “someone stole my caps lock key back in web 1.0 now i do web design”

    Web 1.0: URLs are unpronounceable, and often unreadable (“www.example.com/cgi-bin/script.pl?pageID=52″).
    Web 2.0: URLs are supposedly pronounceable, but you feel itchy missing out the dots (“del.icio.us”, “script.aculo.us”).

    Web 1.0: Your CEO is twice your age.
    Web 2.0: Your CEO dropped out of university two years ago.

    Web 1.0: Blond jokes.
    Web 2.0: LOLCATS!!!

    And, if I may be a little PG-13:

    Web 1.0: People pay money to download porn.
    Web 2.0: People make their own porn and post it on “my.big.co.ck”.

  625. Jordan said on

    While I remember, another one I thought of a couple of days back:

    Web 1.0: Pages are mostly text, with a few flash ads.
    Web 2.0: Pages are mostly flashy, with a few text ads.

  626. A Key said on

    From the opinions here, it seems we had better start dreaming of Web 3.0

  627. Abi said on

    Surely next is web 3.0

  628. stan, the play games man said on

    web 1.0- Yahoo mail
    web 2.0- Google mail

  629. Anthony Ettinger said on

    Web 1.0: Startups
    Web 2.0: Rampups
    Web 3.0: Stealth modes

    Web 1.0: Spam
    Web 2.0: Spam
    Web 3.0: Spam

  630. New Economy war Web 1.0 : WebWorkBlogger said on

    [...] Anmerkung noch: Ich habe mich von Jeff Zeldmans Blog und den Kommentaren inspirieren lassen, aber auch viel dazu geschrieben und abgeändert. Ich wollte [...]

  631. Rambler: 'XML actionscript 2' (: 14860) said on

    [...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game… JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0),… http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-… – – http://www.zeldman.com [...]

  632. 1.0 vs 2.0 : Surfing : Brand Spanking New said on

    [...] Zeldman’s started something. [...]

  633. michele mondora - FriendFeed said on

    [...] for 3G, a honest price and Sim…" 2 hours ago bookmarked a page on del.icio.us Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game 2 hours ago posted an item on Tumblr Futurefarmers~Project Propigation House 7 hours ago [...]

  634. Gaz said on

    I love the way people talk as if “Web 2.0″ is a new version of the web, “Yeah man I have web 2.0 installed on my machine”. It’s an evolvement not an upgrade!

  635. RMIT University Library 2.0 - 21 Lunges: 1) Web 1.0 - Let's start here said on

    [...] 3.0 (Web animation and time/space virtual continuum…Don’t worry we will get to that later. (See http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ for more fun interpretations)But let’s try and define Web 2.0 a little more clearly?One definition [...]

  636. Stan, the free thinking games man said on

    Web 2.0: Gradients

    Web 3.0: Yet to be determined

    Web 4.0: Where it all began. Like ball parks. Sometimes the original is good. Look at Google. Simple. Solid.

  637. Blissfully Innocent; v2: said on

    [...] Quirky Japan Home Page Nihongo o Shiete! Mash squidfingers dafont 24media listal furuba_manga thinking game number book webcreations rasterbator projectzen schedualman scheduals japtranslater awesome [...]

  638. Webnk said on

    Web 1.0: GPRS
    Web 2.0: EDGE

  639. "Le Web 2.0 est un mythe, le web 2.0 n'existe pas." - fiat xul ! said on

    [...] compléter, je recommande la (re)lecture du post de Jeffrey Zeldman, Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Morceaux choisis [...]

  640. Frank Pot said on

    I think web 2.0 is a big thing and it will be around for years to come. It’s been a success for many not for profit user communities but businesses or the corporate world don’t know how to build web 2.0 business websites to take advantage of the web 2.0 tools. Some are just afraid of it. Many books are now available on how to build web 2.0 business websites.

  641. Conclusions… « Richpageant said on

    [...] Web 2.0 thing I can do no better than to recommend Jeffrey Zeldman’s great comparison:”Web 2.0 thinking game” and its ensuing comments section still going strong 2 years later. There is also a very [...]

  642. Nikola said on

    Dobar članak.Svidja mi se i definitivno zaslužuje bookmark.

  643. Web 2.0? What is it? « Melissa’s Blog said on

    [...] another interesting article that puts a funny yet interesting spin on web 2.0. A web 2.0 Thinking Game! [...]

  644. ConnectedMarketing.de: Web 1.0 und Web 2.0: Lustiges bei Jeffrey Zeldman said on

    [...] Koryphäe Zeldman gibt eine Steilvorlage zu den Unterschieden zwischen Web 1.0 und 2.0, und zahllose Kommentatoren machen mit. Wer also genau wissen will, wie sich die Web-Generationen [...]

  645. BBspot - Satire for Smart People; The Truth for You said on

    [...] Game (flash)   Nov 15 ’06: People Playing Games    Oct 20 ’06: Web 2.0 Game    Oct 18 ’06: Hex Color Game    Sep 1 ’06: Apple II Games  [...]

  646. crutex said on

    666

  647. John Simmas said on

    Discount Cigars

    Web 2.0 has way too much weight on it. Google trusts this too much and it’s a big cause of spam.

    I think Web 3.0 is a system where actual humans evaluate sites given various unbiased data.

  648. ø Free Worldofwarcraft Gold - World of Warcraft | World of Warcraft Info ø said on

    [...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – Jeffrey Zeldman Presents The Daily Report [...]

  649. archive/January 2007 said on

    [...] 20:00 Eric Eggert beginnt mit Die Geschichte des Webmontags und Webstandards 2006 – What happened to the tables? http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game [...]

  650. Mr Braggs said on

    Digital Scales

    “Web 2.0 has way too much weight on it. Google trusts this too much and it’s a big cause of spam.

    I think Web 3.0 is a system where actual humans evaluate sites given various unbiased data.”

    It’s going to take quite a bit of human power to be able to evaluate the 1 trilliion websites out there. Hopefully this would eliminate spam though.

    Brian Braggs

  651. Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - The Difference Between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 said on

    [...] Zeldman has a blog post entitled Web 2.0 Thinking Game where he writes A few weeks back, The Economist was calling “Web 2.0″ a trend. Their phrase [...]

  652. Schkit! Schkit! 2.0 | jodybrewster.net::blog said on

    [...] a sharp pencil into his eyes whenever a client mentions “Web 2.0″, Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game was a very amusing read. Don’t miss the comments, [...]

  653. What is Web 2.0 « 325studio said on

    [...] To get more descriptions and to have a good laugh, visit Jeffrey Zeldman.com – The Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  654. design journal_325studio said on

    [...] For anyone wondering what this web 2.0 thing is all about here is a short description.Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.To get more descriptions and to have a good laugh, visit Jeffrey Zeldman.com – The Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]

  655. ToMi » WEB ZWEI PUNKT NULL :) said on

    [...] Für mehr: Gucksch du hier! [...]

  656. 12-E-tivity 1.c - Engwiki said on

    [...] http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ This page looks attrative on the first view, because of fantastic design. The use of color is very [...]

  657. Internet Basic - Thinking Game said on

    [...] Das Original mit viel mehr Begriffen findet ihr hier:  http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. (1.65) Web 1.0: New media company [...]

  658. gynter: Шутки про Web 2.0 said on

    [...] 08:49:00        Entry tags:fun, links Шутки про Web 2.0 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-gameWeb 1.0: Content is everythingWeb 2.0: Someone else’s content is everythingWeb 1.0: Crap sites on [...]

  659. vesti srbija said on

    Web 1.0: HTML markup.
    Web 2.0: HTML with CSS, meaning it has half the bloatedness.

Comments off.