Web 2.0 Thinking Game
The most telling detail in The Economist‘s coverage of Google and YouTube was the subhead: “Google’s acquisition of YouTube shows that ‘Web 2.0′ has come of age.” A few weeks back, The Economist was calling “Web 2.0″ a trend. Their phrase was, “hot Web 2.0 trend.” The magazine now intends “Web 2.0″ to be understood as a sort of second edition:
This week’s pairing of Google and YouTube may come to be remembered as the moment “Web 2.0″—ie, the web, version two—came of age.
Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying:
Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.
Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.
Put another way:
Web 1.0: New media company buys old media company.
Web 2.0: New media company buys new media company.
If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it. Here’s my new game. I’ll start, you finish:
Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News.
Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes.
Web 1.0: Users create the content (Slashdot).
Web 2.0: Users create the content (Flickr).
Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.
Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace.
Web 1.0: Writing.
Web 2.0: Rating.
Web 1.0: Karma Points.
Web 2.0: Diggs.
Web 1.0: Cool Site of the Day.
Web 2.0: Technorati.com.
Web 1.0: Tags.
Web 2.0: “Tags.”
Web 1.0: Bookmarking.
Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing.
Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets.
Web 2.0: Pointless “Ajax” widgets.
Now you try it!
[tags]web2.0, games, economist[/tags]
Filed under: industry, Marketing, Memes
659 Responses to “Web 2.0 Thinking Game”
Comments off.
Web 1.0: Zeldman.com without comments
Web 2.0: Zeldman.com with comments
;-)
Web 1.0: 12px h2
Web 2.0: 51px h2
Web 1.0: Animated gif
Web 2.0: Badges
Web 1.0: Arial
Web 2.0: Arial Rounded/Georgia
[...] Seems Zeldman can be pretty timely with his blog posts :)www.zeldman.com/2006/10/…20-thinking-game [...]
Web 1.0: Bloated Table Code
Web 2.0: Divitis
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game (zeldman.com) [...]
[...] Excellent article sur Zeldman.com, qui prenant comme abse un article de The Economist s’amuse à tourner en dérision le web 2.0 avec le fameux jeu avant/aprés. [...]
Web 1.0: Social drinking
Web 2.0: Social bookmarking
[...] Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game (Tags: humor, opinion, trends, web 2.0) [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web 1.0: Webmail 2mb storage
Web 2.0: Webmail 2gb storage
Web 1.0: Developers whinging about Netscape users who won’t upgrade to Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Developers whinging about Internet Explorer users who won’t upgrade to Firefox
Web 1.0 : Deserted blogs on Blogger
Web 2.0 : Deserted blogs on WordPress
Web 1.0 : The past
Web 2.0 : The present
Web 3.0 : The future
Web 1.0: Large expanses of default-white dotted with unformatted text
Web 2.0: Large expanses of white with a gradient at the top dotted with meticulously formatted and precisely positioned text
Web 1.0: Comic Sans in font tags to give your site that “friendly edge”
Web 2.0: Comic Sans in style sheets with no capitalisation of words to give your site that “friendly edge”
Web 1.0: Working at the web agency
Web 2.0: Working at your own start-up
Web 3.0: Working on a tropical island
Web 1.0: “Under Construction”
Web 2.0: “Beta”
Web 1.0: Bank loan
Web 2.0: Venture Capital
Web 1.0: Meaningful domain names
Web 2.0: Unpronouncable domain names
Web 1:0: objects
Web 2.0: theory objects
Web 1.0: Site under construction
Web 2.0: Beta
Web 1.0: Flashy banners
Web 2.0: Banner flashes
Web 1.0: Communication
Web 2.0: Conversation
Web 1.0: Times New Roman
Web 2.0: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana (and a bit of Georgia, too)
Web 1.0: Geocities
Web 2.0: Google Pages
Web 1.0: Ajax = Football team in Netherlands
Web 2.0: AJAX = well…
On a more serious note:
Web 1.0: You and I
Web 2.0: Us
Regards,
Shri.
Web 1.0: CEOs
Web 2.0: “Thought leaders.”
Web 1.0 – Dot com bubble
Web 2.0 – Dot com hubble bubble toil and trouble (it runs on witchcraft and other things most folk will never quite understand)
Web 1.0 – text and image
Web 2.0 – image and animation
Web 3.0 – animation and time/space virtual continuum
Web 1.0: <p><font …>
Web 2.0: <div><div><div><div><span><h3>
(I’m having a drink if this doesn’t display right.)
[...] Zeldman’s got some thoughts (and a game) on the subject: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]
[...] didn’t know where else to put this but if you’re into web development you’ll find this funny. zeldman’s web2.0 thinking game [...]
Web 1.0: conferences
Web 2.0: conferences
Web 1.0: venture capital
Web 2.0: venture capital
;-)
[...] Ultra cool the word/thinking game on Jeffrey Zeldman’s blog on the differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. I liked the comments on it, especially: [...]
[...] 17 October 2006 13:30 [...]
Web 1.0: Yahoo! launches
Web 2.0: Yahoo! gets acquired…
Web 1.0: IE 5.0
Web 2.0: IE 7.0
Web 1.0: Visting Blogs
Web 2.0: Unbolding RSS Feeds
Web 1.0: Green
Web 2.0: #CCDDAA
Web 1.0: Links
Web 2.0: Relationships
Web 1.0 The bigger the bevel the more important the button
Web 2.0 The shinier the plastic the more important the button
web 1.0: Inaccessible DHTML
web 2.0: Inaccessible AJAX
Web 1.0: pop-ups
Web 2.0: flash pop-overs
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman presenterer i dag en fin sammenligning mellom Web 1.0 og 2.0. Mange sannheter. Historien gjenntar seg. [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
“Web 2.0″ makes my ubiquitous stomach churn.
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – Web 1.0 – Bubble, Web 2.0 – Denial of Bubble. [...]
Web 1.0: Spam emails
Web 2.0: Spam emails and spam comments
Web 1.0: Post copyrighted content
Web 2.0: Download and redistribute copyrighted content
Web 1.0: Rounded corners are new and kinda cool
Web 2.0: Rounded corners are confused with Web 2.0
Web 1.0: Text that wraps to your browser window
Web 2.0: Text that makes you widen your browser window if you want to read it all without horizontal scrolling
Web 1.0 – Bookmark this site!
Web 2.0 – Digg this post!
[...] Web 2.0 Jeffrey Zeldman invites you to contrast Web 1.0 with Web 2.0. Hee! [...]
[...] You can read it here. [...]
web 1.0: bloated, useless DHTML
web 2.0: bloated, uesless Javascript Libraries
web 1.0: animated gifs
web 2.0: scriptaculous
web 1.0: all talk, no action by the W3C
web 2.0: all talk, no action by the W3C
web 1.0: blue background colour
web 2.0: green background colour
Web 1.0 Annoying and useless Javascript
Web 2.0 Annoying and useless Javascript that means your app doesn’t work cross anything
Web 1.0 “Bullshit eBusiness Seminars”
Web 2.0 “Blogger conferences, and BlogHer Conferences.”
Web 1.0 – Meta Tags
Web 2.0 – SEO
Web 1.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus.
Web 2.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS.
Web 1.0 – Google Ninja
Web 2.0 – AJAX/Web Ninja*
Web 1.0 – Actually design websites
Web 2.0 – Attend and host hundreds of conferences
*I never got the whole freaking ninja thing? There are too many geeks on the web.
Web 1.0:
<code><P><FONT COLOR=green SIZE=4>Header</P></FONT></code>
Web 2.0:
<code><h2 class=”sIFR-replaced”><embed style=”width:200px; height:40px;” class=”sIFR-flash” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” sifr=”true” bgcolor=”#FFFFFF” wmode=”" flashvars=”txt=Header&textcolor=#080&w=200&h=40″ quality=”best” src=”/swf/cool-font.swf” height=”40″ width=”200″><span class=”sIFR-alternate”>Header</span></h2></code>
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game ★ [...]
Web 1.0: Old folks have no clue.
Web 2.0: My parents just left a comment on my blog.
[...] Fun! Great comments, too. Visit site [...]
Web 1.0: MAC and PC Ads by APPLE
Web 2.0: MAC and PC Ads by TrueNuff TV!
web 1.0: Published standards and browsers that don’t support them
web 2.0: “De-facto” standards by browsers that don’t support 10-year old standards.
Web 1.x: 3 months = 1 Web year
Web 2.x: 3 years = The last time my personal site was updated
Web 1.0 : DynAPI
Web 2.0 : jquery
Web 1.0: Having to turn off Java applets so you can actually read someone’s webpage.
Web 2.0: Having to turn off Flash plugin so you can actually read someone’s page.
Web 1.0 – I want round corners, nested TABLEs.
Web 2.0 – I want round corners, nested DIVs, Ps, SPANs, DOM manipulations.
Web 1.0 – You own a webdesign company because you started creating table based websites ten years ago. However, six years ago you understood the purpose of the web standards and website accessibility.
Web 2.0 – You own a webdesign company because you “designed” your first WordPress blog a year ago and now you think that it is THE tool – valid markup, accessibility and RSS (yeah!) – all included
Fun!
web 1.0: rounded corners on table driven layouts
web 2.0: squared table-less CSS layouts
Very impresive write up!
Web 1.0: Poor standard support for Browsers
Web 2.0: Poor standard support for Browsers
Web 1.0 – We were not used to laugh about what we were doing
Web 2.0 – We currently laugh about this all stuff
Web 3.0 – Whatever it is… Just start laughing now!
Web 1.0: Keep code light!
Web 2.0: Keep design lighter!
Web 1.0: Links
Web 2.0: Blogroll
Web 1.0: 20,000 Hits on my webpage!
Web 2.0: Ive been dugg 1000 times on Digg!
Web 1.0: Javascript Image Rollovers
Web 2.0: CSS+AJAX Menus
Web 1.0: “The Edge”
Web 2.0: “Cool and Smooth”
[...] 0 comments on Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web 1.0: Clients who don’t get it
Web 2.0: Clients who don’t get it
Web 1.0: a,e,i,o,u
Web 2.0:
[...] O autor do livro Desenvolvendo Sites Compatíveis, (citado aqui no blog), divulgou um divertido jogo no seu blog. A idéia é definir Web 1.0 e Web 2.0, como os exemplos abaixo, traduzidos do post do Zeldman e de alguns comentários: [...]
Web 1.0: Making web pages in a word processor.
Web 2.0: Preparing documents in a web browser.
Web 1.0: IE 3 running quickly with 3 or 4 windows open on a 200 Mhz PII with 128 MB RAM.
Web 2.0: Firefox 2.0rc2 running slowly with 10-20 tabs open on a 2.4 Ghz P4 with 512 MB RAM.
Web 1.0: Rational Unified Process implementing J2EE
Web 2.0: “Getting Real” using RoR
Web 1.0: Content is everything
Web 2.0: Someone else’s content is everything
[...] Dabar kaip žinote yra WEB 2.0 laikotarpis, kadaise buvo WEB 1.0 ir ateis kažkada WEB 3.0 laikotarpis. Kaip atskirti? Zeldman pasistengė apie tai pamastyti [...]
web 1.0:
<a onclick="foo();">web 2.0:
var addListener = function(el, type, fn, o, b) { };Sorry I couldn’t help myself. I just wasn’t seeing any nerdy js entries in here.
Web1.0: print budget
Web2.0: print budget
Web1.0: journalist budget
Web2.0: journalist budget
Web1.0: TV production budget
Web2.0: TV production budget
Web1.0: No budget to strong budget
Web2.0: No budget to strong budget
Web1.0: We are the best. Dot.
Web2.0: We are the best. You know, with RSS, Semantic CSS, Social bookmarks, Ajax, …
Web1.0: Experience this effect
web2.0: Experience this content
Web1.0: Zeldman
Web2.0: Zeldman
Web 1.0: Programming languages for real men.
Web 2.0: Ruby on Rails.
Web 1.0: Perl or PHP
Web 2.0: Django or Ruby on Rails
Web 1.0: Overly large DHTML libraries.
Web 2.0: Overly large AJAX libraries (with DHTML).
[...] Qua devono aver letto il tuo post. [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – from Zeldman (on the money as per usual) [...]
[...] Design News Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
web 1.0: Ah, those were the days
web 2.0: Ah, those were the days
web 3.0: Enough reminiscing, back to work…
Web 1.0: Couldn’t wait to get involved.
Web 2.0: Can’t wait for 2.0 to pass.
Web 1.0: Textism.com
Web 2.0: Whatever
Web 1.0: HTML markup.
Web 2.0: HTML with CSS, meaning it has half the bloatedness.
Web 1.0: NASDAQ.
Web 2.0: NASDAQ after the bubble burst, meaning it has half the value.
Web 1.0: Silicon Valley 1999… out of touch with the real world.
Web 2.0: Silicon Valley 2006… out of touch with the real world.
Oh, wait a second!
web 1.0: Completely Flash sites suck.
web 2.0: Completely Flash sites still suck.
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents The Daily Report. Zeldman compara la web 1.0 y la web 2.0 en Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
Web 1.0: Napster to download Music and Video
Web 2.0: Pure Volume and MySpace for music, YouTube for everything
[...] http://snippy.ceejbot.com/wiki/show/start/2006/10/17/001Jeffrey Zeldman invites you to contrast Web 1.0 with Web 2.0. Hee! [...]
web 1.0: sorry we’re still testing
web 2.0: yay! we’re beta!
Web 1.0: target=”_blank”
Web 2.0: onclick=”window.open(this.href); return false;”
[...] Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 (read the comments for more amusement) [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman on Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 — It’s funny because it’s true. [...]
[...] New popular sites (Just new in last 24h). [...]
Just a few days ago you were pondering your lack of interest ….. now this. Methinks the a-listers are over it.
Web 1.0: the web is for geeks
Web 2.0: gimme some of that web action
Web 1.0: Clutter
Web 2.0: Prettier, more accessible clutter
Thank you, Web 2.0, you are the the Container Store for all our crap.
Web 1.0: Simple design with vapid content.
Web 2.0: Slick design with vapid content.
Web 1.0: Zeldman’s “Steal My Icons” on every site*
Web 2.0: Orange RSS Feed icons on every site
*Yes, including mine.
[...] Zeldman 2.0 Thinking Game http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ My some of my favs Quote: [...]
Web 1.0: Boring, abandoned homepages.
Web 2.0: Boring, abandoned blogs.
Web 1.0: Solaris.
Web 2.0: Linux.
Web 1.0: Webmonkey/Dr. Web
Web 2.0: A List Apart/Sitepoint
Web 1.0: Netscape
Web 2.0: Mozilla
Web 1.0: “Sign my guestbook!”
Web 2.0: “Submit Comment”
Web 1.0: Flicker
Web 2.0: Flickr
Web 1.0: Look what I did in FrontPage
Web 2.0: Look what I did in DreamWeaver
Web 1.0: “Don’t use CSS”
Web 2.0: “Don’t use IE”
Web 1.0: Jolt Cola
Web 2.0: Double caffeinated mocha late slim
Web 1.0: Spell check through Word
Web 2.0: Spell check through Google
Web 1.0: Rubberband
Web 2.0: Broadband
Web1.0: Making half-assed effort to design for blind and handicapped users
Web2.0: Making three-quarter-assed effort to design for blind and handicapped users
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game | Previews by Thumbshots.com | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it! [...]
Web 1.0: All Your Base Are Belong To Us
Web 2.0: Web 2.0 Thinking Game
Web 1.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
Web 2.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
Web 3.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
Web 1.0: Microsoft Don’t Listen
Web 2.0: Microsoft try to Listen
Web 3.0: Microsoft Actually Listen – but its too late for them
Web 1.0: Web Developers risk all to Create an Experience
Web 2.0: Web Developers Anally follow code guidelines and the experience becomes drained of life, spontaneous ideas are replaced with the html equivalent of keeping up with the Jones’s
Web 1.0: Get a Mac already! Geez your doing that the hard way.
Web 2.0: Get Firefox Already! Geez your doing that the hard way.
Web 1.0 I just hooked up my friend’s band site for $300! let’s go see a movie.
Web 2.0 Band borrows computer to check myspace ?
Web 1.0 What’s the easiest way to build a site for cheap?
Web 2.0 How can I build an internet for free?
web 1.0: “convergence” and “synergy”
web 2.0: “community”
Web 1.0: All Your Base Are Belong To Us!
Web 2.0: What ever’s hot on YouTube.
Web 1.0: Hotmail
Web 2.0: Gmail
Web 1.0: excitement for “web 2.0″
Web 2.0: wish i never heard of “web 2.0″
web 1.0: animated gifs
web 2.0: animated javascript
[...] Dans le même ordre d’idées : “If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it.” [...]
Web 1.0: Content is king!
Web 2.0: Contributed content is king! (ie the comments are more informative than the original post)
Web 1.0: Underconstruction
Web 2.0 Beta
Paul, this happen everywhere:
Web 1.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus.
Web 2.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS, bla.. bla..
“they” need God these days just to make their brochure(whatever) online.
web 1.0: The X-Files
web 2.0: Lost
web 1.0: suck.com
web 2.0: Fortean Times
web 1.0: stuffit
web 2.0: zip
Web 1.0: MS Word
Web 2.0: Writely
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Jeffrey Zeldman plays around with Web 2.0. Probably the most entertaining game about Web 2.0 to date. (tags: web2.0 tech blogs personal interesting) [...]
Web 1.0: drop shadows
Web 2.0: reflections
Web 1.0: Whining in table-based messageboards
Web 2.0: Whining with style in shiny ajax messageboards
Web 1.0: Spiky polygons, moody colors, tiny annoying fonts
Web2.0: Trendy badges, pastel colors, ginormous annoying fonts
Web1.0: Joshua Davis
Web2.0: Thomas Fuchs
Web1.0: Partisan blowhard editorialists with a column in the online WSJ
Web2.0: Partisan blowhard users with a column on Newsvine
Web1.0: Brief, functional footers
Web2.0: Tall, verbose “footers” larger than the actual content region
Web 1.0: Jerry Yang and David Filo build a list of the coolest websites, and later realise there might be a business model
Web 2.0: Nobody’s got a business model, but everybody’s got a list of the coolest websites
Web1.0: Web rings
Web2.0: Social bookmarking
Web 1.0: Initial Public Offering
Web 2.0: Venture Capital
Web 1.0 Business Plan: Sell for less than we bought it for.
Web 2.0 Business Plan: Sell ads on stuff we didn’t actually pay for.
Web 1.0: SQL/Javascript Injection
Web 2.0: Cross-Site Scripting
Web 1.0: Move to Unix-like never-crashing ultra-secure Linux.
Web 2.0: Move to Mac.
Web 1.0 – online diary
Web 2.0 – blog
Web 1.0 – email
Web 2.0 – Gmail
Web 1.0 – awful background music
Web 2.0 – awful background gradients
Web 1.0 – slashdot
Web 2.0 – Digg
Web 1.0: “I go get”
Web 2.0: “Come to me”
http://www.webdirections.org/come-to-me-web/
Web 1.0: Dial-up
Web 2.0: Dump Trucks
Web 1.0: Spinny logos
Web 2.0: Reflecty logos
web 1.0 – wanking to pictures of Jenna Jameson
web 2.0 – wanking to videos of jenna jameson
[...] Zeldman.com has a pretty interesting list of Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 comparisons. Link below. Zeldman 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web 1.0: Dancing Hampsters
Web 2.0: Dancing on Treadmills
Web 1.0: Windows
Web 2.0: Linux
Web 1.0: Close Source
Web 2.0: Open Source
[...] read more | digg story [...]
Web 1.0: Viruses downloading and slowing down computer.
Web 2.0: Automatic Updates downloading and slowing down computer.
Web 1.0: Online canned goods stores with outrageous shipping prices
Web 2.0: Online canned goods stores with outrageous amounts of google adsense banners to offset outrageous shipping charges.
[...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]
Web 1.0: Cleaning your wheel mouse
Web 2.0: Forgetting that your mouse has a wheel and going blind from the laser
[...] = Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web 1.0: Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Firefox
Web 1.0: Yahoo!
Web 2.0: Google
Web 1.0: experiment, take risks, spinoff.
Web 2.0: see something popular and acquire.
Web 1.0: RealPlayer is abit of a hog, but not too annoying
Web 2.0: RealPlayer is downright Malware.
Web 1.0: Chat rooms
Web 2.0: MMORPGs
Web 1.0: Collections of Matching background and button sets
Web 2.0: Collections of Skins
Web 1.0: Boxes with border=”0″
Web 2.0: Boxes with style=”border: 1px dotted #CCC;”
:)
Web 1.0: Text based turn game (Empyrez.com)
Web 2.0: Full blown 3d
Web 1.0: 640×480 Porn
Web 2.0: 1024×768 Porn
Web 1.0: “Site best viewed with Internet Explorer”
Web 2.0: “Site best viewed with anything but Internet Explorer”
Web 1.0: JavaScript Alerts
Web 2.0: Light YellowDiv’s with Grey Borders
Web 1.0: DrudgeReport.com
Web 2.0: SundayReader.com
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]
Web 1.0: disable ActiveX for security reason
Web 2.0: disable ActiveX, java, Javascript, Flash to get the content
Web 1.0: Site goes down when hosting company upgrades to a better server
Web 2.0: Site goes down with a reader serves you up to an upgrade on Digg
Web 1.0: Websites proudly display buttons proclaiming “_______’s Top Site of the Day” or “______’s Coolest on the Web”, where there are hundreds of ranking authorities.
Web 2.0: Millions of surfers use tags and social bookmarks to place the same sites simultaneously on Digg, Del.icio.us, and Reddit.
Web 1.0: , and
Web 2.0: scriptaculous, CSS and DIVs
Web 1.0: <blink>, <font> and <frameset>
Web 2.0: scriptaculous, CSS and DIVs
Web 1.0: Web sites that don’t work on Linux because they use crappy ActiveX controls.
Web 2.0: Web sites that don’t work on Linux because they use crappy Flash 8 controls.
Web 1.0: <html> </html>
Web 2.0: #css ;
Web 1.0: Create Content
Web 2.0: Link to created content
Web 1.0: Audience
Web 2.0: Communities
Web 1.0: Dial up
Web 2.0: Broadband
Web 1.0: Page views and Hits
Web 2.0: Still searching for the measurement metric
Web 1.0: Blink tags
Web 2.0: Blinking websites
Web 1.0: Yahoo buys everything
Web 2.0: Google buys everything
[...] web Un billet de Jeffrey Zeldman qui résume parfaitement ma perception du web 2.0. [...]
Web 1.0: Internet
Web 2.0: Web 2.0
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web 1.0: Perl
Web 2.0: Ruby
Web 3.0: Brainfuck
web 1.0: newsletter
web 2.0: syndicate rss/rdf
Web 1.0: Bookmarks
Web 2.0: Del.icio.us (God bless it)
Web 1.0: Blue Screens of Death on Windows XP
Web 2.0: Blue Screens of Death on Windows Vista, followed by a quick reboot, followed by another BSOD, followed by a quick reboot…
Web 1.0: Bring the web into our lives
Web 2.0: Bring our lives into the web
Web 1.0 Pamela Anderson
Web 2.0 Paris Hilton
Web 1.0: < HTML > Hello World < /HTML >
Web 2.0: xhtml, css, php, xml, aspx, cms, templates, streaming, …
[...] Dat er al eindeloos veel artikels geschreven zijn om te lachen of wenen met de Web 2.0 hype/revive/internetzeepbel 2.0 weet ik. Toch wou ik jullie deze Web 2.0 Thinking Game niet onthouden. [...]
Online gaming Web 1.0:
You are in a room. There is a door to the north.
“Open door”
I don’t understand.
“Unlock door”
I don’t understand.
“Leave room”
I don’t understand.
“**** off!!
>
Online gaming Web 2.0:
Full Prince of Persia online Flash version! oooh, shiny.
Web 1.0 : we didnt’ know that .com bubble will collapse
Web 2.0 : we didn’t want to know that .com bubble would collapse
Web 1.0: Yahoomail
Web 2.0: Gmail
Web 3.0: God Knows what mail!
Web 1.0 IE
Web 2.0 FireFox
Web 3.0 MobilePhone brower
[...] Sur le même ton de Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0, je me demande ce que cela donnerait les élections présidentielles: 2002 versus 2007. [...]
web 1.0: dirty.ru
web 2.0: leprosorium.dirty.ru
[...] отсюда: [...]
[...] Liz (grrliz) wrote,@ 2006-10-18 04:16:00 Zeldman’s got the Web 2.0 thinking game, it’s pretty amusing.(Post a new comment) … [...]
Web 1.0: Computer screens to display content
Web 2.0: Mobile digital devices for display and production of content
Web 1.0: Keeping the user on your site
Web 2.0: Branding your content on any site, device or publication
web 1.0: worked auto-magically (as far a client is concerned)
web 2.0: works web 2.0-ly (as far as a client is concerned)
Web 1.0: “Sponsored By … ” on web sites.
Web 2.0: “Sponsored By … ” on RSS feeds.
[...] Voici un petit jeu de comparaison initié par Zeldman dans son dernier billet et suivi par de bon commentaires aussi, c’est par ici. [...]
Web 1.0: Opinions
Web 2.0: Rants
Web 1.0 : Microsoft
Web 2.0 : Google
Web 1.0 : Slashdot effect
Web 2.0 : Digg effect
Web 1.0 : Boards
Web 2.0 : Blogs
Web 1.0 : Version numbers
Web 2.0 : Greek Letters (I mean common, a website “making it to gamma” ?)
Web 1.0 : “Mail this article to a friend” button
Web 2.0 : “Digg / Furl / Del.icio.us / Reddit / NewsWine / etc this” buttons
Web 1.0 : Worrying about privacy
Web 2.0 : Willing to tell more
Web 1.0: many window
Web 2.0: one window
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Come and play. It’s fun! [...]
Web 1.0: Grammar.com and.com Spelling.com
Web 2.0: Grmmr nd Spll.ng
Web 1.0: Intelligent Collectives
Web 2.0: Collective Intelligence
Web 1.0: Dictionary.com
Web 2.0: Dictionary.com
Web 1.0: Web Sites
Web 2.0: Web Services
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
Web 1.0: 404 Not Found
Web 2.0: 503 Resource unavailable
[...] Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 Jeffrey Zeldman macht den Anfang eines Gedankenspiels, was jeder fortführen kann.Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]
Web 1.0: Square corners
Web 2.0: Round corners
[...] Read it here: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Check out also Create your own Web 2.0 Company. Web 1.0: Writing. Web 2.0: Rating. [...]
Web 1.0: …a list??
Web 2.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a menu if not a list of links?
Web 3.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a block of text if not a list of paragraphs?
Web 4.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a paragraph if not a list of words?
[...] Kommentarerna är lika roliga som inlägget.Mina favoriter:Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace.Web 1.0: Writing.Web 2.0: Rating.Web 1.0: Under ConstructionWeb 2.0: BetaWeb 1.0 Business Plan: Sell for less than we bought it for.Web 2.0 Business Plan: Sell ads on stuff we didn’t actually pay for. [...]
Web 1.0 :: Hubs, switches, routers, servers…
Web 2.0 :: “a series of Tubes”
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [vía] [del.icio.us] [menéame] [...]
Web 1.0: All kinds of mistakes were made
Web 2.0: Those same mistakes were repeated
Web 1.0 : <noscript>
Web2.0: <script>
Web 1.0: Bad HTML code
Web 2.0: Bad PHP code
Web 1.0: Geeks do it.
Web 2.0: Everybody does it.
Web 1.0 : http://www.hamsterdance.com/classorig.html
Web 2.0 : http://new.nabaztag.com/en/index.html
Web 1.0: Phrase lacking meaning that no-one ever used
Web 2.0: Phrase lacking meaning that everyone’s using
Web 1.0: tim berners lee gives us the web (for free!)
Web 2.0: tim o’reilly copyrights the term ‘web 2.0′
Web 1.0: emperor’s new clothes
Web 2.0: emperor’s new clothes part 2
Web 1.0: Spam
Web 2.0: Blatant identity theft
Web 1.0: Windows
Web 2.0: OSX
Web 1.0: dot com
Web 2.0: dot just-about-everything
Web 1.0: Yahoo!
Web 2.0: Boohoo for Yahoo! (Google)
Web 1.0: Cool!
Web 2.0: Cooler!
[...] 18-10-06 | af Sebastian Christensen, Udviklingsansvarlig Excellent Thinking game Læs den rutinerede og kvikke Zeldmans kommentarer til Web 2.0 og brugen af ordet. Brandvarmt indlæg fra 17/10:http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Google “Sebastian Christensen” Kommentér artikel [...]
[...] read more | digg story [...]
Web 1.0: 10 millions $
Web 2.0: 1 billion $
Web 1.0: Geeks with nothing better to do but think up new acronyms
Web 2.0: GWNBTD
Web1.0 :
Web 2.0:
ul {
float:left;
}
li {
list-style-type: none;
}
Web 1.0: chmod 755 web
Web 2.0: chmod 777 web
Web 1.0 : Napster copyrights problems
Web 2.0 : YouTube copyrights problems
[...] UPDATE: To put it in terms agreeable to the game: [...]
web 1.0 – i hate the web
web 2.0 – i still hate the web
Web 1.0: Drop shadows
Web 2.0: Reflections
Web 1.0: Tiled background images
Web 2.0: Freakishly huge background images
Web 1.0: standard-web-palet-colored content (just text)
Web 2.0: true-color shiny-glossy-3D-beta-badged obtrusive animated links to content (video)
Web 1.0: buzzwords
Web 2.0: buzzwords
[...] Diggdot.us – digg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular [...]
Web 1.0: Tons of useless static pages
Web 2.0: Tons of useless dynamic pages
Web 1.0: Sketchy CSS 1 support
Web 2.0: Sketchy CSS 2 support
Web 3.0: Sketchy CSS 3 support
Web 1.0 Some Paysites
Web 2.0 Lot Of Paysites
Web 1.0 Was very exiting
Web 2.0 Is very boring
Web 1.0 Napster (MP3)
Web 2.0 All kind of P2P (MP3, Videos and Worms)
Web 1.0 Explorer beats Netscape
Web 2.0 Firefox beats Explorer
Web 1.0 Only some cmmercials
Web 2.0 Too much commercials
Web 1.0 Java pop up commercials that sucks
Web 2.0 Flash pop up commercials wich sucks much more
An so on…
Web 1.0: Broken accessibility through table abuse
Web 2.0: Broken accessibility through JavaScript abuse
Web 1.0: Two spaces between sentences.
Web 2.0: No punctuation.
Web 1.0: Misspellings because of new “computer thing.”
Web 2.0: Misspellings because it’s cool and the .com you wanted is taken.
[...] Prenez quelques minutes pour lire cet article rafraichissant ! [...]
Web 1.0: Don’t talk to strangers.
Web 2.0: “I’m meeting gogoXguy24 tonight.”
Web 1.0: »Sign up to get a FREE e-mail newsletter!«
Web 2.0: »Enter your PIN here to confirm bank details«
E-mail 1.0 subject: MAKE MONEY FAST $$$
E-mail 2.0 subject: Re: Th1s watchh is amazingg
[...] Auf dieser Seite sind Kommentare und Anregungen rund um das Thema BIS-Vorlesung und BIS-Wiki erwünscht. Achtung – passt vielleicht nicht hier her! http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Web 2.0 – ein vielleicht doch etwas ausgelutscher und somit zu inflationär verwendeter Begriff?? Von „http://main.fbm.fh-koblenz.de/bis/index.php?title=Kommentare“ [...]
Web 1.0: Dialer
Web 2.0: Phishing
Web 1.0: yeah – online!!!
Web 2.0: Can’t go offline :-(
Web 1.0: fonts too small to read
Web 2.0: fonts too big to read
—-
Web 1.0: sitemaps
Web 2.0: huge footers
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game(Zeldman) [...]
web 1.0: content to create you own 15 minutes of fame
web 2.0: endless rehash of of another’s minutes of fame
web 1.0: search based on algorithms
web 2.0: search based on ratings (contextual)
web 1.0: SPAM
web 2.0: SPLOGS
web 1.0: branding and corporate sites
web 2.0 lifestyle sites
web 1.0: web agencies that don’t understand web users
web 2.0: web agencies that don’t understand web users
web 1.0: crackdown on Napster
web 2.0: embracing torrent technology
web 1.0: hassled by spam
web 2.0: hassled by allowing senders in email clients
web 1.0: bands fear music distribution
web 2.0: bands distribute music through youtube
Web 1.0: Page takes 5 minutes to download over a 28.8Kbps connection, and then crashes your browser.
Web 2.0: Page takes 5 minutes to download over an 8Mbps connection, and then crashes your browser.
web1.0: Doing Java – Haven’t tryed jBuilder but wiling to do so soon.
web2.0: doing php – Haven’t tryed joomla but wiling to do so soon.
web1.0: porn
web2.0: alt-porn
At least one thing will never change: Opera users griping at IE and Netscape(based) users to get with their standards (^_-)V
[...] This time, however, I think he got it right with the Web 2.0 Thinking Game post, and its comments. A good read in the afternoon, when you really just want it to be dinner time already. [...]
web1.0: wat the @*&$^#&#
web2.0: wat the *$#*(#*&$(*#@&#$($(*#&$
Web 1.0: Macromedia
Web 2.0: Adobe
Web 1.0: Annoying welcome pages asking you to choose between HTML and text versions
Web 2.0: Annoying welcome pages asking you to choose between HTML and Flash versions
Web 1.0: bubble #1
Web 2.0: bubble #2
[...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]
[...] Comment? [...]
Web 1.0: WebTV
Web 2.0: Wii
Web 1.0: Porn
Web 2.0: Better Porn
Web 1.0: Web 2.0
Web 2.0: Web 1.0
Web 1.0: Searching for ads with good pricing over Internet between a lot of useless text informations
Web 2.0: Searching for good text informations over Internet surrounded by ads
[...] 총 15개 | 최종업데이트: 2006-10-18 23:33 function PrevPage(goto_bottom) {} function NextPage(goto_top) {} Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game ringrocker 2006-10-18 23:00 작성 | business humor web web2.0 zeldman [...]
Web 1.0: windows
Web 2.0: tabs
Web 1.0: click and wait
Web 2.0: no waiting
Web 1.0: dot-com bubble!!!
Web 2.0: dot-com bubble???
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game Tags: [No Tags] Related Posts: [ ] [...]
Web1.0 : Marketing Manager say : Make contend that everyone needs, and you get rich
Web 2.0 : Marketing Manager say : Make Websites where everyone makes contend, and you get rich
Web 3.0 : Marketing Manager say : Fuck, Im so rich ..
Web 1.0: Reading forum entries, posting a reply
Web 2.0: Reading blog entries, trying to reply but getting caught in ads, trackbacks, pings, cross-posts, digg-links and captchas, before finally giving up in disgust
[...] Was wird eigentlich mit web2.0 assoziiert? Diese Frage stellte sich Jeffrey Zeldman – seine User gaben Antwort… [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game : مقارنات طريفة بين Web 1.0 و Web 2.0 [...]
Web 1.0: Palm Pilot
Web 2.0: Moleskine, PocketMod
Web 1.0 – IE, Firefox on PC’s and Mac
Web 2.0 – Opera on Nintendo DS
Web 1.0: Emoticons
Web 2.0: Dancing smileys all over the place
Web 1.0: Unsupported software.
Web 2.0: Perpetual beta.
Web 1.0: Buck’s.
Web 2.0: Stack’s.
Web 1.0: Searching for content
Web 2.0: Searching for people who want to read the content
Web 1.0: Blocky reflections
Web 2.0: Glassy reflections
[...] Læs hele posten Web 2.0 Thinking Game + kommentarer her. [...]
Web 1.0: Too much to learn, not enough time
Web 2.0: Too much to learn, not enough time
Web 1.0: Promise of a usable web standard around the corner
Web 2.0: Promise of a usable web standard around the corner
Web 1.0: Internet makes claims it will make your life better, then fails to make any real difference apart from spending time deleting spam
Web 2.0: Internet makes claims it will make your life better, then fails to make any real difference apart from becoming addicted to blogging, RSS, Social networking,
[...] go visit [...]
Web 1.0: No gym for home
Web 2.0: Web 1.0: No gym for home
[...] Zeldman and commenters have fun doing a compare/contrast on Web 1.0/2.0 [...]
Web 1.0: Al Gore
Web 2.0: What? No crazy dems want to claim it this year?
Web 1.0: Damn! Missed it…
Web 2.0: Damn! Missed it…
Web 3.0: This time…
Web 1.0: Read and Read
Web 2.0: Read and Write
[...] How I explained REST to my wife… 16:21:18 [...]
Web 1.0: Does not exist.
Web 2.0: What’s that?
Web 1.0: AOL Chat rooms
Web 2.0: offtopic.com
Web 1.0: RSS/Atom feeds
Web 2.0: “Live” Bookmarks
Web 1.0: Directories
Web 2.0: CMS
Web 1.0: WAP
Web 2.0: Downloadable Ringtones
Web 1.0: FAQs
Web 2.0: Wikis
Web 1.0: Crashing browsers
Web 2.0: Self-closing browsers
Web 1.0: .wav/MP3/OGG-based journals
Web 2.0: Podcasting
Web 1.0: “Punch the Monkey” banner ads
Web 2.0: Pay-per-click ad revenue
Web 1.0: Homepages/mission statements with Flash intros
Web 2.0: Homepages/mission statements with Enhanced Flash intos
Web 1.0: Scroll text and flashing backgrounds
Web 2.0: Removal of the letter e from -er suffixes
Web 1.0: Aeron Chairs, Foozeball tables
Web 2.0: Gmail/Orkut/MySpace invites
Web 1.0: Hotmail & Yahoo
Web 2.0: Gmail & Windows Live
Web 1.0: HTML
Web2.0: XHTML & CSS
Web 1.0: Regards,
Web 2.0: regards
[...] Auch wenn’s mal wieder hier über den Spiegel eintrudelt: Lustig ist der direkte Web1.0 und Web2.0-Vergleich allemal! :-) [...]
Web 1.0 – …
Web 2.0 – … beta
[...] 2.0: My parents just left a comment on my blog. skrevet af Søren Johannessen kl. 16:12 Permalink | | postCountTB(’116118219749241911′); 0Kommentarer: [...]
Web 1.0: VC
Web 2.0: MORE VC
Web 1.0: Yesterday
Web 2.0: Tomorrow
Web 1.0: any site
Web 2.0: ealier less, later any
Web 3.0: none, less, any
Web 1.0: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Web 2.0: Blindness
Web 1.0: sans-serif headlines
Web 2.0: giant Georgia headlines
Web 1.0: “Oolong the rabbit” head performance
Web 2.0: Cute Overload
Web 1.0: downloading Swedish rap from Kazaa
Web 2.0: watching Swedish rap videos on YouTube
Web 1.0: NetScape 4.x sucks
Web 2.0: IE sucks, what’s NetScape?
Web 1.0 : Buggy programs on computers and web servers
Web 2.0 : Buggy programs on computers, web servers and navigators
Web 1.0 : Web servers programmed in Perl
Web 2.0 : Web servers programmed in JavaScript soon ?
I am so late to this party. See the first comparison for the excuse.
Web 1.0: You can’t use Bloglines because it doesn’t exist
Web 2.0: You can’t use Bloglines because it crashes too much
Web 1.0: Good ideas typically require tons of bandwidth for their execution
Web 2.0: Good ideas typically require tons of bandwidth for their execution
Web 1.0: People ignore CSS
Web 2.0; People complain about CSS
Web 1.0: You need a sound card
Web 2.0: You need a wireless card
Web 1.0: Flash is often abused to publish lame interfaces
Web 2.0: Flash is often abused to publish lame videos
Web 1.0: Microsoft tries to assimilate the Internet
Web 2.0: Google tries to assimilate the Internet
Web 1.0: “Sex” is one of the more pupular keyword searches
Web 2.0: One of the more popular search services publishes a video in wich it is stated that “the Internet is for porn, porn, PORN!”
Web 1.0: The mass media companies wave their proverbial arms and carry on about how their online presence WILL be on the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE
Web 2.0: The mass media companies wave their proverbial arms and carry on about how their online presence WILL be on the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE – only this time with CSS, XML, and video
Jeez, I could p-lay this game all day.
Web 1.0: Users submit comments and ratings (Amazon.com)
Web 2.0: Users submit comments and ratings (Amazon.com)
Web 1.0: Amazon.com patents one-click purchase
Web 2.0: O’Reilly copyrights “Web 2.0″
Web 1.0: Web 2.0
Web 2.0: Web 2.1
Web 2.0 is dead, long live Web 3.0?
Jeffrey Zeldman proposes a cute game of “find the differences” between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 using the pretext of Google’s buying YouTube. While this is of marginal interest of us Second Life users and Metaverse wannabes, one should al…
Web 1.0: Creation
Web 2.0: Evolution
[...] Zeldman, author of the vastly popular Designing With Web Standards, offers an amusing comparison of Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 trends here are my favorites: Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities. Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. [...]
Web 1.0: Guestbook
Web2.0: Comments
[...] PREVIOUS MESSAGE | NEXT MESSAGE Cool Site of the DayVisit Site [...]
web 1.0 : haha lol omg
web 2.0 : ZOMG LIEK ROFL kekekeke !!11111 eins
[...] Excellent article de Jeffrey Zeldman sur ce que signifie le Web 2.0 pour la presse Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
web1.0: lobotomy
web2.0: lobotomy
Web 1.0: ascii
Web 2.0: utf-8
Web 1.0: VRML
Web 2.0: RIA
Web 1.0: discovering
Web 2.0: sifting through
[...] Funny stuff, with commentary by our very own mr.b…http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game Offline [...]
[...] 17 October 2006 5 am eastern [...]
Web 1.0: Mahir
Web 2.0: Borat
[...] Haha, ang. Web 2.0 s� er det mye, mye bra i kommentarene her: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. ——————– Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler [...]
Web 1.0: “I like this file – I’ll download it.”
Web 2.0: “I like this file – I’ll upload it.”
web1.0: Companies control the message, don’t really listen effectively.
web2.0: Most companies control the message, a few have learned to tap users for content, and even fewer have learned to listen.
Web 1.0: Usenet flames
Web 2.0: Blog rants
[...] Consider this a “Feature Comparison” between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. [...]
web 1.0: aaargh my eyes, so much great content what a whack design
web 2.0: aaargh my eyes, i cant find good content, havent i seen that design before?
web 3.0: Spiderman, Spiderman, Does whatever a spider can, Spins a web, any size, Catches thieves just like flies, Look Out! Here comes the Spiderman.
This a terrible explanation of web 2.0
Here is what my company has defined as web 2.0:
1: User Generated Content
2: User control over presentation of content
3: Pervasive feedback (comment/rating) of content
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Gamehaahaha… the comments are priceless. [...]
[...] The comments are priceless! It’d be more funny, if it wasn’t true. Permalink [...]
[...] Web 2.0 bringt es auf den Punkt: Man kann sich praktisch alles drunter vorstellen, irgendwie sind YouTube und Google dafür typisch und reduziertes Website-Design passt auch ganz gut dazu. Doch was steckt nun wirklich hinter dem Ordnungsbegriff Web 2.0? Jeffrey Zeldman, Webdesigner aus New York, stellt sich selbst diese Frage, gab ein paar Antworten und befragte seine Leserschaft. Heraus kam eine lange, reichlich lustige Liste von Enthüllungen, wie doof doch eigentlich der Web-2.0-Begriff ist… [...]
Web 1.0: E-mail newsletter.
Web 2.0: RSS feed.
Web 1.0: $sql = “SELECT * FROM tbl_bookings”;
Web 2.0: $this->set(‘bookings’, $this->Booking->findAll());
Web 1.0: Groupware
Web 2.0: Semantic Web
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman erklärt die Unterschiede zwischen Web 1.0 und Web 2.0. Zum Beispiel: Web 1.0: New media company buys old media company. Web 2.0: New media company buys new media company. [...]
[...] 7 List of Physics Games » Fun-Motion10 Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game10 [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – Webdesigner.com.fr Aller au contenuAller au menuAller à la rechercheWebdesigner.com.frUne autre vision des standards du Web et du métier de webdesignerMercredi 18 Octobre 2006Web 2.0 Thinking GameActualitésPar Guy-Philippe Uberos à 20:34Quand Jeffrey Zeldman parle du web 2.0 cela donne Web 2.0 Thinking Game.Lien permanent #155 [...]
Web 1.0: folders
Web 2.0: tags
Web 1.0: Tons of annoying animated .gifs.
Web 2.0: Just the one (spinner.gif).
Web 1.0: Tim Berners-Lee’s gift to the world.
Web 2.0: © O’Reilly.
Web 1.0: CGI
Web2.0: RoR
[...] ¿Qué dice el público? —comente. Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
[...] Via zeldman.com [...]
[...] Diferencias y semejanzas entre web 1.0 y we 2.0 | Jeffrey Zeldman | Vía eCuaderno Web 1.0: Writing / Web 2.0: Rating, Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities / Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace, Web 1.0: Bookmarking / Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing… (tags: web2.0 business trends internet) [...]
Für Erwachsene
Web 2.0 ist erwachsen geworden. Das meint jedenfalls der Economist in seiner Berichterstattung zu GoogleTube. This week’s pairing of Google and YouTube may come to be remembered as the moment “Web 2.0”—ie, the web, version two—came of age. L. …
Web 1.0 Evil Empire: Microsoft
Web 2.0 Evil Empire: Google
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Jeffrey Zeldman Presents a wacky look at the buzzwords associated with the ‘web2.0′ hype and matches them to the equivalent web.10 partner. (tags: webdesign web2) [...]
[...] 18-10-06 | af Sebastian Christensen, Udviklingsansvarlig Excellent Thinking game Læs den rutinerede og kvikke Zeldmans kommentarer til Web 2.0 og brugen af ordet. Brandvarmt indlæg fra 17/10:http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Google “Sebastian Christensen” Kommentér artikel [...]
[...] j’ai vu des pélerins tibétains abattus par des soldats chinois, j’ai lu un compte-rendu ironique de la credulité du siècle, j’ai suivi, minute par minute, le rapport de gendarmerie. [...]
[...] If you’re interested in the whole evolution of the internet you’ll much enjoy this post on Jeffrey Zeldman’s blog. It get’s really interesting once you go through the comments. Here’s a small excerpt: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]
[...] Aus den Kommentaren vom Eintrag Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] Прикольный пост про Web 2.0 [...]
[...] Übrigens beschäftigen sich zur Zeit mehrere mit dieser Thematik: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]
[...] cleoagWeb 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. [...]
Web 1.0: Hype about a “new” medium which business people and investors didn’t have a clue about, bought into anyway and then killed.
Web 2.0: Hype about the same medium which marketers and brands don’t have a clue about, bought into anyway by spending more and more media dollars on, and will kill.
Web 3.0: The end of hype about the medium.
[...] Now, what do you think other people say about Web 2.0? Check it out at Zeldman’s blog post Web 2.0 Thinking Game and be amazed….!! [...]
web 1.0 – Lists of comments that are relevant to the post in question followed by nothing.
web 2.0 – Lists of comments that are relevant to the post in question followed by 50 or so trackback comments from Digg etc to tell you just how popular other peoples comments were.
[...] Stellen sich etwas signifikant verändert hat. [bearbeiten]Web 1.0 [bearbeiten]Web 2.0 Von “http://wiki.fh-stralsund.de/mediawiki/index.php/Web_1.0/Web_2.0″ Seitenkategorien: Web 2.0 | Soziologische und psychologische Aspekte des Web2.0 [...]
Web 1.0: Dunkin’ Donuts
Web 2.0: Starbucks
Web 1.0: NASDAQ
Web 2.0: DJIA
Web 1.0: Floppy disk
Web 2.0: Blu-Ray
[...] Li recentemente um artigo no Blog do Zeldman muito interessante, com uma proposta reflexiva e divertida, então decide tentar aqui no Brasil e ver o que acontece e entender um pouco mais sobre o que nós brasileiros pensamos sobre a Web 2.0. [...]
Web 1.0: “spacer.gif”
Web 2.0: “spinner.gif”
[...] Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News. Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes. [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game (tags: web2.0 humor web business zeldman trends blog) [...]
[...] 18-10-06 | af Sebastian Christensen, Udviklingsansvarlig Excellent Thinking game Læs den rutinerede og kvikke Zeldmans kommentarer til Web 2.0 og brugen af ordet. Brandvarmt indlæg fra 17/10:http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Google “Sebastian Christensen” Kommentér artikel [...]
Web 1.0 – My Site…
Web 2.0 – My Beta Site…
Web 1.0 – Times New Roman, Verdana, Arial…
Web 2.0 – Trebuchet MS, Georgia, Tahoma…
[...] Ответ: На факультете географии учился Майкл Джордан. [...]
[...] Great Zeldman post and excellent comments about Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0. [...]
Web 1.0: The Industry Standard
Web 2.0: TechCrunch
Web 1.0: Skinny Britney Spears
Web 2.0: Fat Britney Spears
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] Didn’t really think I’d link it at first since I saw it on too many blogs already but this is hillarious. [...]
Web 1.0 – Boom (and bust)
Web 2.0 – Boom (and bust)
web 1.0: script applied to html
web 2.0: script applied to xml
web 1.0: adds
web 2.0: adwords
web 1.0: browser support issues
web 2.0: browser and feed aggregator support issues
Web 1.0: Outlook
Web 2.0: Google Calendar
Web 1.0: Blue Screen from Hell
Web 2.0: Kernal Panic
Web 1.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 2.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 3.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 4.0: Web Standards not fully supported
……………………………………………….
Web 5000.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 3.0: attention.xml et. al.
‘off with their heads!’
Web 1.0: desk calendar
Web 2.0: Google
Web 1.0: Excel
Web 2.0: Google
Web 1.0: newspaper
Web 2.0: Google
Web 1:0: e-Mail me
Web 2.0: Skype me
Web 1.0: junk-market
Web 2.0: eBay
Web 1.0: tables
Web 2.0: no tables
Web 1.0:
Web 2.0:
Web 1.0: my first homepage
Web 2.0: my first homepage 2.0 (beta)
Web 1.0: photo album
Web 2.0: flickr.com
Web 1.0: IE6
Web 2.0: IE6
Web 1.0: Encarta
Web 2.0: Wikipedia
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
I’m later to this party than everyone above me, and earlier than everyone below me. Go figure.
1.0: zefrank publishes videos of himself dancing on his website, gets famous after a mention in a magazine.
2.0: everyone publishes videos of themselves on YouTube, nobody gets famous
1.0: IRC
2.0: Trillian
1.0: Everyone copies Yahoo!
2.0: Everyone copies Google
1.0: Online publishing by handcoding articles in html pages, uploading, then updating all links
2.0: Blogging by clicking “Publish”
1.0: Subscription fees
2.0: Ad-supported
1.0: Popups and banners
2.0: Pop-in javascript windows, flash adverts that sit “under” the page, talking advertisements, “viral” ads, video ads, on and on…
1.0: Please visit my website :)
2.0: Please read my blog :)
Web 1.0:
RESPONSE.BUFFER=TRUE
dev: i do this way its ok right?
browser1: fine, fine… go ahead…
browser2: can u bla bla…
dev: who r u?
RESPONSE.FLUSH
Web 2.0:
DO WHILE (NOT DIE)
dev: i do this way its ok?
browser1: no, it must be bla..bla..
browser2: its ok, no problem
browser3: fine, but..
browser4: anything you do just fine
dev: ok i’ll think about it.
LOOP
Web 3.0:
DO WHILE (?)
Search in progress, please wait…
Search in progress, please wait…
LOOP?
crowd: wait a minute? how about Web 2.0?
Web 1.0: img tags
Web 2.0: Flickr tags
Web 1.0: streamed audio and webcams of PopMart Rotterdam
Web 2.0: phonecam video during a show; bootleg torrents 2 days after a show
Web 0.1: Zork
Web 2.0: Secondlife
Web 1.0 India and Pakistan, finally getting along, and what great tech.
Web 2.0 NK has a nuke, Japan’s tech starts looking awesome again.
Web 1.0: Get my presentation from our website
Web 2.0: Get my presentation from flickr/YouTube/Google Video
Web 1.0: AOL kills Usenet
Web 2.0: Google Groups kills Usenet
[...] Paldies! Jūsuprāt, aktuālā prese (ieteicams, lai būtu arī mājaslapa netā, kur kaut vai tikai virsrakstus var aplūkot), kas atspoguļotu Rietumvalstu mūsdienu politiskās situācijas interpretāciju tb kā Rietumvalstis redz to, kas notiek.p.s. izņemot The Economist. šķīvī ir 3 siermaizes | uzsmērēt siermaizi [...]
Web 1.0: e-anything you can imagine
Web 2.0: anything you can imagine
Web 1.0: I am tired of being lonely. I’ll have a blog.
Web 2.0: I am tired of writing. I’ll have a fotolog.
Web 1.0: Trying to convince people to send emails
Web 2.0: Trying to convince people to stop sending so many emails
web 1.0: invalid overexpensive nonsense
web 2.0: valid overexpensive nonsense
Web 1.0: Arial
Web 2.0: Lucida Grande
Web 1.0: Students plagerize information from random websites
Web 2.0: Students plagerize information from Wikipedia
Web 3.0: Students plagerize information from teacher approved source
[...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]
Web 1.0: XML for describing everything
Web 2.0: Microformats for describing small parts of everything
Web 1.0: “Version”
Web 2.0: “Service Release”
[...] alickop[Tags|humor, link, webdev]Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. linkpost comment [...]
Web 1.0 Trying to code simple and minimalistic homepages on Geocities
Web 2.0 Realising that WordPress had already done that and done it better
[...] Sa suite bureautique, son effet web 2.0 et toute sa clique… Google comme on en a jamais autant parlé…Un bon article (en anglais) sur le blog de ZeldmanLa suite bureautique en question, bien chachée sur les pages Google [...]
[...] 21 Окт, 2006 at 3:35 AM alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. Tags: [...]
[...] Nå, nu har Jeffrey Zeldman tagit upp skillnaderna mellan Web 1.0 och Web 2.0 i en bloggpost där han ber sina läsare kommentera och redogöra för sin syn på skillnaderna mellan 1.0 och 2.0.Intressant. Min kommentar såg ut så här: [...]
[...] Зельдман о Web 2.0 Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Tags: humor, link, webdev [...]
[...] Забавная игра в комментариях блога Джефри Зельдмана: Различия между Веб1.0 и Веб2.0. Вот некоторые, которые понравились: Web 1.0 – Bookmark this site! Web 2.0 – Digg this post! Web 1.0: Bookmarking. Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing. Web 1.0: Webmail 2mb storage Web 2.0: Webmail 2gb storage [...]
Web 1.0: Meta Tag Spam
Web 2.0: Comment Spam
Web 1.0: People being pleased with the Web.
Web 2.0: People criticizing everything they see.
[...] Link | | Add to MemoriesЗельдман о Web 2.021st Oct, 2006 | 03:35 posted by: alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Tags: humor, link, webdev [...]
[...] Web 2 point quoi ? et Web 2.0 Thinking Game Google veut optimiser votre site web [...]
[...] Cea mai buna descriere. ;) More fun here [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Hype or Bleb? [...]
Web 1.0: Lots of techies embittered by not getting rich.
Web 2.0: Lots of techies embittered by not getting rich.
web 1.0 Internet Explorer and Netscape
web 2.0 Internet Explorer and Firefox
[...] Spätestens, seit der Übernahme von YouTube durch Google für eine irrsinnigen Haufen Kohle, ist das Schlagwort Web 2.0 in aller Munde. Der amerikanische Webdesigner Jeffrey Zeldmann hat sich mal die Mühe gemacht, die Web 2.0 Worthülsen mit denen von Web 1.0 früher zu vergleichen. Ausserdem hat er seine Leser befragt, was für sie Web 2.0 bedeutet. Die Liste ist lang und zum Teil echt lustig (vor allem die Leser-Kommentare). [...]
Web 1.0: HTML iframes
Web 2.0: PHP include
Web 1.0: A truck you dump something on.
Web 2.0: A series of tubes.
Web 1.0: a, e, i, o, u
Web 2.0: 4, 3, 1, 0, 8, $, £, &, :), :(, …
Web 1.0: Worthless Bloatware 98
Web 2.0: Worthless Bloatware Vista
Web 1.0: Linux for geeks
Web 2.0: Linux for less geeky geeks
Web 1.0: Politicians stay in power with lies
Web 2.0: Politicians stay in power with “faulty” voting machines
Web 1.0: VCRs (VCRs)
Web 2.0: VCRs that crash (DVD/DVR players)
Web 1.0: Apocalypse
Web 2.0: ???
Web 1.0: Cyborgs are cool
Web 2.0: Cyborgs are geeks with new toys
Web 1.0: This game was fun
Web 2.0: Now I’m going to do something else
1.0 : LOL
2.0 : WTF
[...] 12 уже естьОтветитьЛинкВ закладки 21-Окт-2006 03:35 am – Зельдман о Web 2.0alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Метки: humor, link, webdev [...]
Web 1.0: Nobody know about UTF-8
Web 2.0: Nobody care about UTF-8
хуясе каменты на русском
Web 1.0: Investors see $ in front of every number.
Web 2.0: Programmers see $ in front of every DOM element reference.
[...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. (comment on this) sply [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman legt vor: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]
[...] Zeldman.com [17.10.06] : un petit jeu satirique sympa qui consiste à démontrer que le Web2.0 existait déjà au temps du Web1.0. [...]
“Web 1.0″ – Term never used.
“Web 2.0″ – Overused term/fad/trend.
web 1.0 my arse
yours
[...] Here’s a bit of levity from Zeldman. Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. But Mostly it means… read more | digg story [...]
[...] Snigger. But you can play too! Web 1.0: home websites no one reads Web 2.0: blogs no one reads Posted by bfp in Blog This | [...]
[...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]
[...] Wem das zu viel Text ist, für den gibt es dank Jeffrey Zeldman jetzt die einmalige ‘Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0′-Vergleichsliste, zusammengefasst von Robert Basic. [...]
Funny, when I tried this on my blog earlier this year, I didn’t get this type of response :-)
Web 1.0: Frontpage results in: “Hi, I’m Jake! Here’s a picture of me on holiday! I had a great time! Here’s a picture of my cat! Isn’t he cute? Welcome to my website!”
Web 2.0: MySpace results in: “My name is Jake and I don’t care what anyone thinks which is why I’m going to write pretentious blurb every day to a whole bunch of people I’ll never meet because it makes me feel good.”
Web 1.0: No idea who’s linking me!
Web 2.0: 20.000 zillion Trackbacks spamming a comment-game to death
[...] Nice article on Zeldman, the Web 2.0 Thinking Game…Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News.Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes. [...]
[...] (geklaut von hier) [...]
[...] Ok – Jeffrey Zeldman got it right [...]
web 1.0 Posted on 2006/08/04 4:51 PM
web 2.0 Posted 3 minutes ago
[...] Was ist eigentlich Web 2.0? – Jeffrey Zeldman und seine Leser geben zusammenfassend eine vereinfachte Antwort. [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game, so much cynism. I love it! [...]
Web 1.0: viagra, cialis,
Web 2.0: vl4lgrA, cl4-ll5
[...] Quelle und mehr: Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] Was ist das eigentlich – 2.0? [...]
Web1.0 http://www.domain.com/index.php?id=3827
Web2.0 http://www.domain.com/how-to-easily-earn-money/
Web1.0 myname.com
Web2.0 myblog.com
[...] Via Classé dans: Web | Aucun commentaire [...]
[...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] Worin unterscheiden sich eigentlich noch einmal Web1.0 und Web2.0? Achja, danke! [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman has an amusing Web 2.0 Thinking Game going with a huge number of quite amusing comments on the comparison between Web 1.0 and 2.0: [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Game Web 2.0 Thinking Game.Liza Minelli Suomessa ekaa kertaa. Ovatko liput halpoja vai kalliita? Ja jos, niin kenelle?Äh, ei tää nyt oikein. [...]
[...] After surfing around a bit, I checked back in on Jeffrey’s Zeldman’s site and found this humourous tidbit about the Web 2.0 trend. For web design curmurdgeon like myself, it provided a couple good chuckles.Zeldman on Web 2.0 [...]
web 1.0 : NTIC
web 2.0 : NBIC
:)
[...] Nachdem wir den Vortrag (ohne es zu bemerken – sorry an dieser Stelle) durch Händeschütteln aller Beteiligten unterbrochen hatten, amüsierten wir uns noch über Zeldmans Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Dabei ist mir nebenbei erwähnt aufgefallen, dass auch zeldman.com mal einen Relaunch vertragen würde. [...]
[...] Check out the Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Jeffrey Zeldman. [...]
[...] Auf heute.org (übrigens einer Web 1.0 Seite) gab es heute für diejenigen unter euch, die der englischen Sprache mächtig sind und für die, die AJAX nicht nur mit einer holländischen Fussballmannschaft verbinden, einen wirklich köstlichen Hinweis auf den Zeldman Blog. Jeffrey Zeldman erklärt den Begriff “Web 2.0″ auf seine Art – wirklich lustig sind die mittlerweile 456 Kommentare zu seinem Beitrag, frei nach dem Motto: [...]
Web 1.0 – Goths having depressings rants via blogs
Web 2.0 – Emo kids having depressing rants on YouTube
You know it to be true.
Web 1.0 : functions
Web 2.0 : functional
[...] v í a zeldman.com. [...]
[...] [Die Originalliste von Zeldman hier, Best-of Comments bei Wo-gibt via Felix seine Bookmarks via Robert] [...]
[...] Big thanks to Martin for the link to the Web 2.0 thinking game. [...]
[...] Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game: [...]
[...] Web 2.0 – “a popular (though ill-defined and often criticized) buzzword amongst certain technical and marketing communities.” [cite] Further reading: O’Reilly’s definition of Web 2.0; The New Shape of Knowledge by David Weinberger; Top Ten Web 2.0 Moments of 2005 by Richard MacManus; Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Jeffrey Zeldman. [next] « other buzzwords and terms » w2 and l2 [...]
[...] Le terme de “web 2.0″ est devenu un vértiable buzz word — j’espère d’ailleurs attirer un grand nombre de visiteurs en l’utilisant sur cet article. Au point que ça en agace certains, et moi le premier. J’aime beaucoup cet article de Zeldman qui propose de recenser les fausses différences, comme par exemple: [...]
web 1.0 Tetris in Java
web 2.0 Tetris YUI Dustin Diaz Style
web 1.0 HTML
web 2.0 XHTML
web 1.0 JavaScript
web 2.0 DOM, Prototype and Jquery
web 1.0 Tag Soup
web 2.0 Semantic markup
[...] 1) Spielen mit Wörtern – Inspiriert von reißerischen Web-2.0-Hype-Schlagzeilen des Economist spielt Jeffrey Zeldman eine neue Art zynisches Wort-Memory: Web 2.0 Thinking Game und viele spielen mit. [...]
Web 1.0: Egotrips at high provider costs, or just textbased university site.
Web 2.0: This really long tail of cool comments, design and freedom of speech.
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman recently posted a great article on Web 2.0 on his blog. It’s hilarious! Just look at some samples from it: [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
web 1.0 A List Apart magazine: nothing too fancy, but works, great content!
web 2.0 A List Apart magazine: fancier, great content again, but links to discussions on older articles don’t work anymore :-(
(examples: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/ – the article;
http://www.alistapart.com/comments/slidingdoors/ – the comments’ page)
I’ve contacted the List Apart editors more than once, but the issue wasn’t fixed… Maybe it’s unfixable :(
web 1.0: pot smoking
web 2.0: pod casting
web 1.0: male
web 2.0: female
web 1.0: cash burning
web 2.0: cash burning or cash earning?
web 1.0: Windows
web 2.0: Mac
web 1.0: type “web 1.0: -content-” and “web 2.0: -content-” by yourself
web 2.0: copy & paste
web 1.0: made for nerds
web 2.0: made by nerds
web 1.0: made by nerds
web 2.0: made for nerds
web 1.0: sucks.
web 2.0: sucks. but if you say it does, it’s on technorati
web 1.0: Web 1.0
web 2.0: web 2.0
web 1.0: I would have never found this page
web 2.0: Damn Blogroll!
Found on ShitCrunch:
9Rules to Web 2.0
#1 – Overdesign a simple page with two input fields where people can leave their name and e-mail to get spammed when the site is online. Although that won’t happen the next upcoming months
#2 – Closed Alpha, Closed Beta, Closed Online, Closed Down
#3 – Use tags even though they are not necessary or just misused. Tag your content, tag your posts, tag your dog
#4 – Use rounded edges, font shadows, bevel and emboss everything, use font-size: 20pt – you don’t want to miss out the 2.0-blind people
#5 – Tell everybody you are using Ajax, although you are just cleaning the house
#6 – Delete all white space from your source code and don’t code in XHTML . Read why
#7 – Use ruby on rails, c on sea, python on road, perl in the sky, php on moon, Basecamp, Backback, eh Backbone, Tadaaaa
#8 – Generate a name, generate ideas . Use this
Done everything?
#9 – Send an E-Mail to Mike Arrington, TechCrunch
Web 1.0 Streaming Audio
Web 2.0 Podcast
Web 2.1 Netcast
[...] C’est Jeffrey Zeldman qui s’y colle cette fois avec une définition sous forme de jeu : le Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Le principe est simple : vous donnez un trait caractéristique du web1.0 et en regard, un autre trait caractéristique du web2.0 : Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]
[...] Schöner hätten wir es auch nicht formulieren können. Deshalb hier in Auszügen das “Web 2.0 Thinking Game” von Jeffrey Zeldman: Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game sehr cool! – unbedingt auch Kommentare lesen (tags: Blogs Netzkultur) [...]
Our replies must have gotten caught in your spam traps.
The problem will be fixed in the next (from-scratch) update to the ALA publishing engine, coming very soon.
Web 1.0: homepages
Web 2.0: blogs
@Zeldman:
Thank you, Jeffrey, for your reply! Good news that this issue will be fixed soon!:)
[ I actually check my INBOX and my JUNK MAIL, always, just in case, but maybe somehow I overlooked your replies; coule be this:) Would ve really nice to be able to read older discussions again:) ]
OK, now a more serious entry from me:
Web 1.0: Macromedia Buys Allaire (2001)
Web 2.0: Adobe buys Macromedia (2005/6)
Web 3.0: Microsoft buys Adobe (2011?)
Web 4.0: Google buys Microsoft (2016?)
Web 5.0: End of the Internet? :-D
:-)
Web 1.0: _
Web 2.0: -
Web 1.0: ©
Web 2.0:
©Web 3.0:
©Why don’t people get it? Its not meant to be anything more than “the same only better”, and who can deny the web is getting better? Hell my browser is doing a spell check for me right now as i type, if thats not better than what came before then maybe I don’t get it.
Web 1.0 = “Have you seen the Peeing Monkey?”
Web 2.0 = “Do you remember when the peeing monkey was cool?”
[...] …ist ein lustiges Spiel, mit dem sich Jeffrey Zeldman über den Web 2.0-Hype lustig macht. Und jeder kann mitmachen! [...]
Web 1.0 = “Rate my poo”
Web 2.0 = “Rate my comment”
[...] So I guess that kind of answers my question, however, if you want to get in on the comparison game between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, check this out. [...]
[...] Submit Link/News To someone who feels like jabbing a sharp pencil into his eyes whenever a client mentions “Web 2.0″, Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game was a very amusing read. Don’t miss the comments, either. [...]
web 1.0 = online banking
web 2.0 = online dating
Web 1.0: Subscribe to this newsletter.
Web 2.0: Subscribe to this feed.
Web 1.0: Loading…
Web 2.0: Initializing…
Web 1.0: “I searched the web for information …”
Web 2.0: “I googled the web for information …”
[...] So I guess that kind of answers my question, however, if you want to get in on the comparison game between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, <a href=”http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/”>check this out</a>. [...]
web 1.0: Web is the next big thing !
web 2.0: Web is the next big thing !
Still waiting…
[...] Was wird eigentlich mit web2.0 assoziiert? Diese Frage stellte sich Jeffrey Zeldman – seine User gaben Antwort… [...]
web 1.0: Identity
web 2.0: Image
[...] Link : Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
Web 1.0 blink tag
Web 2.0 myspace banner ads
Web 1.0 Yahoo – Mark Cuban
Web 2.0 Google – YouTube
Web 1.0 kioken on CNN (inflated fish story)
Web 2.0 blog watch on CNN (inflated fish stories)
Web 1.0 terms for clients to use and not understand
Web 2.0 terms for clients to use and not understand
Web 1.0 Napster
Web 2.0 Youtube
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking game Web 1.0 vs 2.0… [...]
[...] Zeldman.com posts a funny article about what Web 2.0 concept may mean in different days, like in the case of The Economist’s coverage of Google and YouTube. [...]
[...] I think Paul Redmond says it best: Web 1.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus. Web 2.0 – Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS. [...]
_____________________________________________
Web 1.0: Search Engine Results
Web 2.0: Search Engine Results – BASED ON PERSONALIZATION & USER INFO
web 1.0: this is too easy to get in
web 2.0: I can’t get enough of this
web 1.0: porn makes it float
web 2.0: old enough for a relationship
Web 1.0: beware of passing too much time online
Web 2.0: beware of passing too much time offline
Web 1.0: irc channel
Web 2.0:
WindowsMSN Live Messenger window with 30 friends(slight correction on a previous one:)
Web 1.0: 12px h2
Web 2.0: 3em h2
Web 1.0: “Get Internet Explorer, NOW!”
Web 2.0: Get rid of Internet Explorer, NOW!
web 1.0: hamsterdance
web 2.0: ytmnd.com
Web 1.0 : Nerds
Web 2.0 : Nerds + Photoshop tutorial on gradients and shiny buttons
Web 1.0: News
Web 2.0: Blog
Web 1.0: Version Numbers
Web 2.0: Weekly Releases ( I think its funny Web 2.0 has a version number. Seems like it would just be “New Web” or something. Ha! )
web 1.0: 3D pointless objects in crazy future design
web 2.0: Deer Antlers
seriously what is the point of all of the deer antlers anyways?
[...] vi linko un interessante pezzo di Jeff Zeldman sulle possibili differenze tra web 1.0 e web 2.0E’ molto istruttivo [...]
Web 1.0: Username and Password
Web 2.0: Username, Password, Password again, City, State, Zip, Avatar, Nickname, Nickname again, Email Offers?, Platform, Browser, Flash/ No-Flash?, Interests, tc…
Web 1.0 : This is 1.0?
Web 2.0 : When is 3.0 coming?
[...] I’ll be honest, while I understand the whole web 2.0 thing, I’ve found it hard to define. Thankfully now I don’t have to because I can just refer to how several hundred other people define it in a recent post at zeldman.com – http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game [...]
[...] Por otro lado, para los que no acabéis de ver las diferencias entre web 2.0 y web 1.0 (yo sigo teniendo mis dudas al respecto), en el blog de Jeffrey Zeldman podéis encontrar una lista de diferencias (que aunque puede que no sea del todo útil, si que es divertida ), entre las que se incluyen las siguientes: Web 1.0: Bookmarking. Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing. [...]
Web 1.0 : Personal “home page”
Web 2.0 : Blog
Web 1.0 : Linklists
Web 2.0 : Syndicated Blogrolls
Web 1.0 : American Diner Coffee
Web 2.0 : Starbucks “Latte”
Web 1.0 : Yours/Mine
Web 2.0 : Ours
Web 1.0 : Distributed
Web 2.0 : Consolidated Distribution
Web 1.0 : Where’s my dog?
Web 2.0 : Where’s my dongle?
Web 3.0 : Inside the dog.
Web 1.0 : Fresh ideas
Web 2.0 : Fresh out of ideas…………………….
peace,
tribalogical
Web 1.0 : Never would have wasted time reading 10,000 comments about “the web”
Web 2.0 : I just read every comment on this stupid page and I am laughing about it.
Web 1.0 : Microsoft’s WebTV – Internet on your TV
Web 2.0 : Apple’s iTunes – TV and movies on the internet
Web 1.0 : Readers rate books on Amazon
Web 2.0 : Readers rate reviewers on Amazon
Web 1.0 : Reviewers on Amazon work for publishing companies
Web 2.0 : Reviewers on Amazon have their own ad-supported websites
web 1.0: XMLHTTP
web 2.0: AJAX
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
web 1.0: Me (I can do it)
web 2.0: We (We are doing it)
web 1.0: Linked
web 2.0: Linking
web 1.0: Only for Music
web 2.0: More than Music
web 1.0: Walkman
Web 2.0: iPod
web 1.0: did
web 2.0: doing
web 1.0: earphone
web 2.0: Speaker
web 1.0: Battery
web 2.0: Plug-in
Web 1.0: Creating workarounds for nested tables to work
Web 2.0: Creating workarounds for CSS to work across platform, OS and browser.
Web 1.0: Dropshadows
Web 2.0: Dropshadows and gradients
Web 1.0: Beating the crap out of my Nintendo 8bit to work.
Web 2.0: Still beating the crap out of my Nintendo 8bit to work
Web 1.0: “IE only”
Web 2.0: XHTML+CSS
Web 1.0: Flashy
Web 2.0: AJAXy
Web 1.0: Difficult for disabled
Web 2.0: Difficult for IE users
Web 1.0: <b>
Web 2.0: <strong>
Web 1.0: Simple
Web 2.0: Complex
Web 1.0: You’re using Netscape? Eat shit.
Web 2.0: You’re using IE? Eat shit.
[...] New Economy war Web 1.0 Jetzt ist Web 2.0. Jeder spricht darüber, jeder schreibt darüber. Aber was steckt schon dahinter? Hat sich da so viel geändert? Oder ist alles immer noch beim alten, nur mit neuem Namen? Eine Übersicht schafft Klarheit. [...]
Web 1.0: HTML, PERL, CGI
Web 2.0: XHTML CSS, JavaScript, PHP, MySQL, ORACLE, Ruby On Rails, JAVA, AJAX, XML, XUL, ColdFusion, ASP.NET, etc.
Web 1.0: What is that?
Web 2.0: WTF?
Construction – 1.0
Beta – 2.0
(i know this wasn’t me joke!)
Web 1.0: spam email for male enhancment
Web 2.0: spam email quoting Mark Twain
Web 1.0: Go to a concert, come home, spend weeks searching message boards and guestbooks for someone willing to trade or sell a bootleg tape of the show.
Web 2.0: Go to a concert, come home, watch the whole thing again on YouTube the next day.
[...] And, to close out the day for this writer, we thought we’d share with you Zeldman’s funny piece, “Web 2.0 Thinking Game.” It’s in response to the big media outlets labeling the buyout of YouTube by Google as “Web 2.0 has come of age.” So he plays around a bit, showing the difference between Web 1.0 (boo, hiss) and Web 2.0 (hooray, and, oh, wait, I have to do all this extra work and share stuff?). But the real fun gets going when he asks for readers’ takes on the game. If you haven’t already spent the good portion of a day looking at this sometime this week, it’ll provide you with a good way to get both your humor and geek-ery intake in at the same time. And kill some hours. Posted by Steve | 11:04 AM | web | Email this post [...]
Web 1.0: Ads
Web 2.0: Google Ads
[...] JUSTmag – Schade, dass du nicht mehr da bist: Web 1.0. Ansprechbar [...]
[...] In the old days (1996-2003), I used to waste time at work reading stuff on the internet.Now I waste time at work writing stuff on the internet.And as far as I’m concerned, that’s the difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0.UPDATE: Then LC drew my attention to this, which, together with its 200+ comments, explains it all much better. [...]
Web 1.0: Sleazy Dating site
Web 2.0: Sleazy Dating site (using AJAX)
Web 1.0: .COM landrush
Web 2.0: .MOBI landrush
[...] Nonostante la mia perplessità intorno all’incredibile massificazione semantica indotta dal “web 2.0” (pur riconoscendo i pregi delle nuove tecnologie), mi sembra molto interessante questo articolo di Jeffrey Zeldman ispirato, a sua volta, da un articolo dell’economist, secondo il quale, l’acquisizione di you-tube da parte di google segna il definitivo passaggio da “trend” a “era” del web2.0 .Per dare ancora di più un senso all’etichetta web 2.0, zeldman (e tutti i commenti a seguire), hanno comparato web1.0 con web2.0. Esemplare:Web 1.0: AOL compra Time Warner.Web 2.0: Google compra YouTube.Non è cambiato nulla se non il nome delle multinazionali. PUBBLICITÀ PUBBLICITÀ postato da terotero.com il lunedì 06 novembre 2006 in: [...]
[...] Bei Jeffrey Zeldman wird gerade Web2.0 Thinking Game gespielt und das geht ungefähr so: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube [...]
Web 1.0: Internet Explorer 5 considered good browser.
Web 2.0: Internet Explorer 7 considered good browser.
Web 1.0: table layout authors mock frame layout authors: “You’re so old fashioned!”
Web 2.0: fixed-width div layout authors mock table layout authors: “You’re so old fashioned!”
Web 1.0: Spam
Web 2.0: Spam
Web 3.0: Spam
Web 1.0: Content
Web 2.0: Our Content
Web 3.0: Where is the Content?
Web 1.0: Websites with animatet GIFs
Web. 2.0: Websites with Flash, Javascript, Ajax, PHP, Perl, ASP, and nothing Works
Web 1.0: Internet
Web 2.0: THE Internet XXXXXXXXXL (another form of Porn)
Web 1.0: A Good Idea
Web 2.0: A Good Idea with Bad Taste
Web 3.0: It was a great time still with Web1.0
[...] Einen wirklich sehr interessanten und auch lustigen Artikel liefert uns Jeffrey Zeldman der in verschiedenen Beispielen auflistet was Web 1.0 und das dazugehörige Gegenstück im Web 2.0 ist. Zwei Fundstücke die ihn auf die Idee brachten: let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]
[...] Zeldman again. [...]
Web 1.0: No licence
Web 2.0: Creative Commons Licence
Web 1.0: Pop-ups
Web 2.0: Flash pop-ups (I love them!)
Web 1.0 Dreamweaver
Web 2.0 TextPad
Web 1.0 WebTV
Web 2.0 YouTube
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web 1.0 : Keywords
Web 2.0 : Tags
[...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]
[...] mehr davon hier. -tschebursaschka Keine Kommentare Sende diesem Beitrag einen Trackback. kommentiere diesen Beitrag [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman presents Web 2.0 Thinking Game When The Economist referred to Google’s acquisition of YouTube as a "hot Web 2.0 trend", Zeldman decided to have some fun with it. Just look at the hilarious responses he got! Keywords: funny, web2.0 [...]
Web 1.0:
starting browser, reading web page
Web 2.0:
starting browser, installing plugin, installing plugin, deactivating security options, try another browser, reading web page(hopefully)
[...] Sori mä haluisin mielellään kiistellä täst asiast jonkun kans [...]
[...] Finally, a precise (and hilarious) definition of “Web 2.0.” [...]
Web 1.0: Reading trough hundreds of Photoshop tutorials making a grungy design with plastic buttons and pixelborders.
Web 2.0: Reading trough few AJAX tutorials writing a blog that don’t refresh with animated shelfs, tooltips and loading .gifs
Web 1.0: Frontpage
Web 2.0: Dreamweaver
[...] Web 2.0: Da’s een goede samenvatting. [...]
Web 1.0: annoying geeks on forums
Web 2.0: annoying non-geeks commenting on your blog
1.0 content without design
2.0 design without content, but designed to get content from whereever
Web 1.0: Clip art
Web 2.0: Retro backgrounds
[...] Ända sedan jag var inne på min första myspace-sida (som faktiskt inte var för så länge sedan) så har jag avskytt allt som har med den sajten att göra. Så fort jag (av misstag!) kommit in på en sida där så tänker jag “Geocities“. Och det finns få saker som glädjer mig så mycket som när jag på Jeffrey Zeldmans blogg läser att web 1.0 = Crap sites on Geocities och web 2.0 = Crap sites on MySpace. [...]
[...] The humorous part about this is that instead of calling personnel who manage websites; webmasters, any more. We are now branding them as Web Managers instead. This instantly reminded me of Zeldman’s article; Web 2.0 Thinking Game. [...]
[...] Web 1.0: “Under Construction” Web 2.0: “Beta” Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets. Web 2.0: Pointless “Ajax” widgets. Komentáře ke krásnému pokusu popsat Web 2.0 [...]
[...] Zeldman.com: Web 2.0 Thinking Game http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game [...]
Web 1.0: (Point)Endless Browserdiscussions
Web 2.0:
PointEndless Web2.0discussions[...] Link (0 Kommentare) meldung machen web 2.0 thinking game [...]
Web 1.0: getting frustrated trying to explain the importance of MP3s
Web 2.0: getting frustrated trying to explain the importance of RSS
Web 1.0: cables
Web 2.0: tubes
[...] Dieses Thinking Game sollte sich übrigens jeder mal ansehen…. besonders gut gefallen hat mir: Web 1.0: “Under Construction” Web 2.0: “Beta” Do, 23. November 2006, 19:25 •blue|eyes • Alltag, Webdesign, Genööle [...]
[...] Web 2.0? Zeldman circa un mese fa ha pubblicato un post dal titolo Web 2.0 thinking game in cui mette a confronto il Web1.0 e il Web2.0 e che ha raccolto molti commenti, alcuni molto divertenti. C’è poi chi lamenta il fatto che il Web2.0 sia lento: in Don’t be part of the Web 2.SLOW un interessante studio dei tempi di risposta di Digg e le possibili strategie di ottimizzazione. Ma mentre siamo nel pieno del Web 2.0 c’è già chi guarda avanti al Web3.0, su questo blog ad esempio. Sinceramente non sono riuscito ad afferrare appieno il concetto, e credo ci vorrà del tempo prima che il Web 3.0 diventi un tormentone come ora lo è il Web2.0.Concludo con alcuni articoli in ordine sparso dedicati a ottimizzazione e buone pratiche di sviluppo. Contenuti e SEO per blog, titoli, media CSS, test crossbrowser e ottimizzazione CSS, nell’ordine: [...]
[...] Web 1.0 Web 2.0. :) 19/10/2006 02:25 Frog e-mail www [...]
PHP time.
Web 1.0:
Web 2.0:
(So damn complicated…)
Web 1.0: Parse Error, Expected “;” on line 14
Web 2.0: Parse Error, Expected “;” on line 3465457586
(Scripts are waaaay too big)
Web 1.0: Look at me, I know HTML.
Web 2.0: Please look at me, I know XHTML, CSS, PHP, MySQL, JavaScript and RSS.
(HTML is simply not enough anymore)
Web 1.0: Coming soon: Internet2
Web 2.0: Coming soon: Web 3.0
(Yeah I bet none of you heard of Internet2. I read about it in Wired and didn’t get it)
Web 1.0:
Web 2.0:
(OMGZORZ WE MUST MAKE OUR FILEZ 546 GB SO THAT THEY ARE XHTML STANDARD AND WORK IN MSIE 3.0 OKOKOK!!!1111)
Web 1.0: ♥
Web 2.0:
[...] Email this entry | Print this entry Oct 18 2006, 09:00 PM Web 1.0: Thread bumpingWeb 2.0: Digg*ingAs a follow up of the Web 2.0 Thinking Game Yup, 4 months elapsed since my last blog entry. How cool is this place (bookstore in Beijing), if i have the money and the space, will definately build one in my future home. [...]
[...] Quelle: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Received on Tue Nov 07 2006 – 12:19:46 CET [...]
[...] Zeldman: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. “Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets. Web 2.0: Pointless ‘Ajax’ widgets. Now you try it!” [...]
[...] Here is a good read from Jeff Zeldman that explores the web 1.0 and web 2.0 differences and how they relate to business and even the stock market. Enjoy! -I agree with Jeff on this one. [...]
[...] Rumsfeld.27 November 06 Yes, it’s going to be different this time. Way different. Nobody is chasing after the IPO dream today, we learned our lesson from just six years ago, and never-you-mind that my neighbor was just seeded $1.3M because he manages his family with Basecamp through Bootcamp using Ubuntu installed on his MacBook so he can blog about it all with a pagerank of six. Six! KAAAHN! [...]
web 1.0: entrepreneurs use the internet to make money.
web 2.0: corporate monoliths use the internet to take entrepreneurs’ money.
Web 1.0 – Animated GIF’s
Web 2.0 – Flash
[...] CommentTimeOct 26th 2006 permalink Anonymer Accountlasst uns eine definition bauen!!! :D ich hab ja oben schon angefangen. einfach weitermachen.internet neu erfunden? hmm, so würde ich das nicht sehen. ich habe vor kurzem etwas witziges gelesen. Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. Web 1.0 – Bookmark this site!Web 2.0 – Digg this post! Quelle: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]
[...] Tired of Web 2.0? (tags: humor web2.0) [...]
[...] http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ [...]
[...] Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game [edit]Anecdotes [edit]Sites AIGA Polling Place Photo Project BlackPlanet Cyworld (Most popular in South Korea) (Homepage; Wikipedia entry) orkut (Most popular in Brazil) (Homepage; Wikipedia entry) Video The Vote [edit]Pages A particularly funny livejournal page(Kim_Jong_Il) [edit]On Wikis [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web 1.0: stupid pictures of your dog
Web 2.0: stupid videos of your dog
Web 1.0: AOL
Web 2.0: not AOL
Web 1.0: Microsoft Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Mozilla Firefox
Web 1.0: Wow! this place has wireless internet?!?!
Web 2.0: WTF?!?! This place doesn’t having any fucking wireless internet?!?!
Web 1.0: lame
Web 2.0: lamx0r
Web 1.0: :)
Web 2.0: XD
Web 1.0: other people have some pretty good podcasts out there
Web 2.0: you have some pretty good podcasts out there
[...] Was ist eigentlich Web 2.0? Um zu verstehen was sich hinter der Wortblase “Web 2.0″ verbirgt, lohnt es sich, den augenzwinkernden Vergleich zum “Web 1.0″ zu ziehen. Jeffery Zeldman hat es getan [und Spreeblick hat's entedeckt]. [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game kaydet örneklerle web 2.0 makine | 18 Ekim, 2006 | 1 üyede | yorum yaz | güncene yaz etiketler: web 2.0 [...]
[...] 2006-11-27 07:38 pm UTC (link) а до тебя сообщения не доходят.(Reply to this) (Thread) katamay 2006-11-27 07:55 pm UTC (link) у меня новый(здесь вообще комменты рулят)(Reply to this) kefafarafudej 2006-11-30 06:21 pm UTC (link) Блин, не могу не показатьтебе :-)http://absurdopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Windows_XP(Reply to this) [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game by Jeffrey Zeldman. [...]
Web 1.0 – “We’re IPO”
Web 2.0 – “We’re 2.0″
[...] Ca y est je m’y colle, cloué dans mon siège avec Ipod, ordi, télé, bouquins, je vais avoir le temps de poster un peu plus longuement.On va commencer par tous les liens que j’ai reçus et qui méritent le détour cette semaine et en illustration la dernière pub Playboy vue sur Adverbox : Jeffrey Zeldman présente le Web 2.0 : Petit jeu d’associations d’idée entre le Web 1.0 et le Web 2.0, très bon ! [...]
[...] Doggdot.us – d*gg / slashdot / del.icio.us popular [...]
[...] Web 1.0 was about hardware costs, Web 2.0 is about bandwidth costs Here’s a site worth going to and reading not only the post, but the many comments that come under it, lampooning what many rightfully consider to be an artificially-hyped perceived division between two ages of Internet. For true reference, however, you must read the Tim O’Reilly article that started it all, with the original comparison chart that many make fun of. Here’s the money chart: If you really want to get down and learn what this is all about, Programmableweb has a nice site with links to all the major Web 2.0 theory. [...]
[...] Dat er al eindeloos veel artikels geschreven zijn om te lachen of wenen met de Web 2.0 hype/revive/internetzeepbel 2.0 weet ik. Toch wou ik jullie deze Web 2.0 Thinking Game niet onthouden. [...]
Web 1.0 – Palm
Web 2.0 – Windows Mobile
Web 1.0 – Infra Red
Web 2.0 – BlueTooth (When it works)
Web 1.0 = a/s/l
Web 2.0 = World of Warcraft Porn
Web 1.0: “Macs suck!”
Web 2.0: “Check out my MacBook!”
Web 1.0: javascript.com
Web 2.0: script.aculo.us
Web 1.0: ASP
Web 2.0: Ruby On Rails
[...] Jakiś czas temu Zeldman na swoim blogu rozpoczą zabawę w porównywanie Web-owości starej i nowej szkoły. Właśnie przeglądnąłem jego porównania oraz wszystkich komentujących i muszę przyznać, że kilka jest naprawdę trafnych i kilka mocno zabawnych. Moje ulubione: Web 1.0: Inaccessible DHTML Web 2.0: Inaccessible AJAX Web 1.0: Meaningful domain names Web 2.0: Unpronouncable domain names Web 1.0 The bigger the bevel the more important the button Web 2.0 The shinier the plastic the more important the button [...]
[...] Jeux de pensé Web 2.0 Zeldman compare le Web 1.0 au Web 2.0. Très comique, mais aussi très réaliste. [...]
Web 1.0: Badly engineered sites.
Web 2.0: Badly engineered sites, but that’s ok, cause they’re endlessly “Beta”.
Web 1.0: Allmusic.com
Web 2.0: WikiMusicGuide.com
Web 1.0 – eFillintheblank
Web 2.0 – iFillintheblank
[...] Bookmark hinzufügen Du möchtest folgenden Link zu Mister Wong hinzufügen: Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game (http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/)Um diesen Link zu speichern musst du dich entweder einloggen sofern du schon einen Account hast oder dich unten kostenlos registrieren. Registrieren [...]
[...] Was wird eigentlich mit web2.0 assoziiert? Diese Frage stellte sich Jeffrey Zeldman – seine User gaben Antwort… [...]
Web 1.0: [center][h1][/h2][/center][hr][p][font size="10"][/font] (stupid layout)
Web 1.5: [div style="font: 11px Verdana"][/div](smart colourful design with menu items)
Web2.0: primitive design with smart rounded corners and stupid fonts ;)
Web 1.0: login: “gumbert”, pass: “password”
Web 2.0: login: “gumbert”, pass: “password1″
[...] Heel veel sites en personen hebben verschillende opvattingen over wat web 2.0 eigenlijk is. Volgens O’Reilly is web 2.0 het makkelijker mogelijk maken van het delen van informatie. Volgens Web Design from Scratch is web 2.0 het meer trechteren van je informatie naar de gebruiker toe: Geef de gebruiker wat hij wil, en niet wat hij niet wil. Volgens Jeffrey Zeldman is web 2.0 een hype om vernieuwing aan te tonen. Maar wat is web 2.0 nu echt? [...]
Web 1.0: Companies make money through wasting our money
Web 2.0: Companies make money through wasting our time
Web1.0: Images with drop shadows
Web 2.0: Images with reflections
[...] Mashupr | November 13th 2006I wrote my first article for the t8d blog introducing the new project mashupr.net. Mashupr is going to be an API-wrapper for Web-APIs.Oh, I should mention that the article is written in german. Try google’s translation if you don’t know german and/or for a good laugh about the resulting grammar ;) Web 2.0 beta | October 18th 2006Kinda says it all: Web 1.0: Dot.com Bubble Web 2.0: Dot.com Bubble Does anyone want to buy this blog for (please enter price in billions here)? Call me! I’ll throw in an extra nasty old-school font-tag ;) More comparisms here. Be-zier | August 22nd 2006 After seeing this example of a bezier tween I thought about programming an animated continous curve with bezier splines. Here it is: not really that complicated I just had to make sure that every point, and the two controlpoints around it make up a straight line, so that the gradient is equal. This way you get a smooth continous curve… not rocket science, but nice to look at ;) flash++ | July 1st 2006 I used to use Mike Haller’s Jupload for simple serveruploads in t8d’s mini-cms quaax. With Flash8′s new Filereference Class that finally allows multiple file selections, there is an alternative now and users with java OR flash plugin can work with it. Hooray! Don’t get me wrong, I’m not anti Java, I just don’t like it that much in webinterfaces. Try my example. archive » i 2:45 am _uacct = “UA-295200-5″; urchinTracker(); [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] Quelle: zeldman.com (jaja, kennt schon jeder) [GUNNAR] um 16:00 :: 4 Kommentare [...]
[...] It’s not that simple. Gmail uses a feature that exists in Mozilla or ActiveX in IE to make HTTP GET requests from Javascript. The only reasonable way to get Opera work with Gmail is for Opera to implement something compatible to Mozilla’s Javascript functions. And there is a second issue: Opera crashes right after logon. I guess this is some bug in Opera’s Javascript. [...]
web 1.0 : $150 100mb zip drive
web 2.0: $150 200gb hard drive
web 1.0: explain what you mean
web 2.0:overly-explain what you mean
Web 1.0: More useful than cool.
Web 2.0: More cool than useful.
[...] Ända sedan jag var inne på min första myspace-sida (som faktiskt inte var för så länge sedan) så har jag avskytt allt som har med den sajten att göra. Så fort jag (av misstag!) kommit in på en sida där så tänker jag “Geocities“. Och det finns få saker som glädjer mig så mycket som när jag på Jeffrey Zeldmans blogg läser att web 1.0 = Crap sites on Geocities och web 2.0 = Crap sites on MySpace. [...]
[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Leave aReply [...]
Web 1.0: Link’s colour changes on rollover
Web 2.0: Link’s background changes on rollover
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman hat auf seiner Website ein Spiel gestartet, bei dem es darum geht, Vergleiche zwischen Web 1.0 und Web 2.0 zu ziehen. User können ihren Beitrag zum Spiel einfach in die Kommentare eintragen. [...]
[...] par Juju Web Tags: web1.0, web2.0 Grande question existentielle que de définir le web 2.0, concept fumeux pour certains qui y voient une façon de décrire la nouvelle bulle. Il est pourtant clair que le nouveau web est plus social, plus réseau, plus partage, plus communautaire, plus media, plus interactif… Ma définition du Web 2.0, c’est qu’il s’agit d’un Web Plus. Jeffrey Zeldman propose une vision comparée de l’évolution: [...]
Web 1.0: Sadaam found in a hole.
Web 2.0: Sadaam found in a hole, in a box.
[...] Tim Berners-Lee on Web 2.0: “nobody even knows what it means” The short story is web 2.0 advocates explain it as web 1.0 was about connecting computers, web 2.0 is about connecting people. And Berners-Lee insists web 1.0 was also about connecting people, and web 2.0 doesn’t really mean anything. For more you can also read Jeffrey Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking game. [...]
web 1.0: I made something new :D
web 2.0: while (true){ c.copyWork (“Google”); }
web 1.0: web designers hate Netscape
web 2.0: Everyone hates IE
web 3.0: Everyone hates CSS2
web 4.0: Google kills windows, replaced by Googlinux
[...] Web 2.0: Text that makes you widen your browser window if you want to read it … Web 2.0: Searching for good text informations over Internet surrounded by ads … Read This [...]
[...] Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities. Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ By Jens | Posted in General | Comments Off [...]
I still remain unconvinced whether Google owning YouTube is a good thing in the long run. I reckon the editing of Vids will just get tighter and tighter due to copy right etc. I just hope I’m wrong I love YouTube!
[...] O autor do livro Desenvolvendo Sites Compatíveis, (citado aqui no blog), divulgou um divertido jogo no seu blog. A idéia é definir Web 1.0 e Web 2.0, como os exemplos abaixo, traduzidos do post do Zeldman e de alguns comentários: [...]
[...] Dans le même ordre d’idées : “If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it.” [...]
web 1.0: remix
web 2.0: mashup
[...] For an other diagram of what Web2.0 is and the applications that make it so here is a great link: Web2.0 And Beyond or Web2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web 1.0: SOS
Web 2.0: SEO
Web 1.0: a bunch of people writing, a lot of people reading
Web 2.0: a lot of people writing, a lot of people reading
Web 1.0: I offered a pizza to my fifteen years old neighbour’s son and now I got a ugly but cheap website. Everybody could do websites!
Web 2.0: I paid 15 dollars to a professional web design agency to get a wonderful web-standard site and now I have a “web 2.0-looking” and cheap website. Everybody DOES do website!
;) cheers
Web 1.0: http://www.partytentcity.com“
Web 2.0: Google Adwords
Web 3.0: craigslist
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman smacks down the hype well in his Web 2.0 Thinking Game: “Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing — except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying… (more) [...]
Web 1.0: CRT
Web 2.0: LCD
Web 1.0: making your desktop look like the old 98 did
Web 2.0: making your desktop look like the old XP did
Web 1.0: online for 4 hours a day
Web 2.0: online for 14 hours a day
Web 1.0: finally winamp at work
Web 2.0: finally unlimited browsing at work
Web 1.0: webcam
Web 2.0: living room cam
Web 1.0: making 1 computer out of 3 old ones
Web 2.0: making 1 computers out of 1 new one
Web 1.0: Favorites
Web 2.0: Feeds
:)
Web 1.0: dim var1 = 1 as boolean
Web 2.0: $var1 = 1;
Web 1.0: friends vs. Web 2.0: contacts
[...] Um interessante artigo no Zeldman mostrou certas diferenças com o surgimento da Web 2.0 e eu trago algumas listadas e algumas contribuições. [...]
web1.0 “geocites home page”
web2.0 “blogger blog”
web1.0 “portal with news”
web2.0 “strange blog with community functions”
web1.0 “webmaster is the best”
web2.0 “seo is the best”
web1.0 “MSdos”
web2.0 “vista”
web1.0 “old-school”
web2.0 “rmb”
web1.0 wap
web2.0 3G
web1.0 web1.0
web2.0 web2.0
web1.0 “sign guestbook”
web2.0 “submit comment”
web1.0 “spedia.com”
web2.0 “adsense”
web1.0 “hard”
web2.0 “simple”
web1.0 is like cd-r
web2.0 is like Lightscribe
[...] There’s a lot of amusing definitions here… [...]
[...] En wanneer kunnen jullie deze nieuwe browse-ervaring verwachten? Naar mijn schatting hoop ik de nieuwe website half november te voltooien. Ik moet hem dan ook nog vullen met eerdere weblog-artikelen en portfolio-items en uiteraard nog debuggen en fine-tunen, dus het zou kunnen dat het daardoor iets uit zou kunnen lopen, maar dat hoor je dan snel genoeg.Reacties Nick / 17 Oktober 2006Ik ben erg benieuwd naar deze nieuwe Web2.0 experience bij Giel! Trouwens ook wel fijn om te weten dat je nog leeft ja. Check even zeldman.com voor een post over de web2.0 hype (die inderdaad nogal wat verwarring veroorzaakt) trouwens: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Succes met het afronden van je site!Deze reactie is 5 maanden geleden geplaatst.Giel / 30 Oktober 2006De deadline gaat waarschijnlijk iets later worden. Aangezien ik over een week thuis een verbouwing heb en daardoor een week niet aan mijn site kan werken, en ik sowieso nog mijn nieuwe site nog met content moet vullen, verwacht ik dat het eerder eind november gaat worden in plaats van half november.Deze reactie is 5 maanden geleden geplaatst.Geef een reactie [...]
[...] Einen sehr interessanten Vergleich hat Jeffrey Zeldman in seinem Blog angestellt. Er hat sich nicht in die ewige rhetorische Frage vertieft was nun dieses Web 2.0 ist, sondern er hat einfach mal verglichen was sich im Vergleich zu Web 1.0 (quasi dem Web wie es vorher mal war) unterscheidet. [...]
Web 1.0: Diet
Web 2.0: Organic
Thnxxx for the information
This is very good.I have try and I like it.Thanks for information.
Web 1.0 = Crap sites from the webdesigner.
Web 2.0 = Crap sites from everyone.
Web 1.0: ALT + TAB
Web 2.0: Hotspot corners , mutilple desktops
Web 1.0: Jakob Nielsen moaning
Web 2.0: Jakob Nielson moaning
Web 1.0: You have 1 new message(s)
Web 2.0: You have 1 new message
Web 1.0: LOLCats Pictures
Web 2.0: LOLCats Pictures every five(5) minutes (CatCam)
Web 1.0 Dreamweaver
Web 2.0 Notepad
Hahaha, what a cool thread :-)
Web 1.0: Sabrina (my ex)
Web 2.0: Inka (my wife)
Web 1.0 Doom
Web 2.0 WOW
Web 1.0 Modem
Web 2.0 Lan
for n00bis:
Web 1.0 : “oohh!! What does this button do?”
*click*
“uhh.. what just happened?”
Web 2.0 : “oohh!! shiny..”
*click*
“uhh.. what just happened?”
Web 1.0 : n00b users don’t know what spywares are..
Web 2.0 : n00b users are scared of spywares..
Web 1.0 : click something and you get infected
Web 2.0 : just move the mouse and you get infected
Web 1.0 1.44Mb Floppy Disks
Web 2.0 8 Gb USB Flash Drives
Why Web 2.0 only 8 Gb? :)
Max
web1.0 “MSdos”
web2.0 “vista”
web1.0 “old-school”
web2.0 “rmb”
web1.0 wap
web2.0 3G
web1.0 web1.0
web2.0 web2.0
Web 1.0 Dreamweaver
Web 2.0 Notepad
Thanks, very very nice article…
Web 1.0 : skiing
Web 2.0 :snowboarding
Web 1.0 : msn new hotmail
Web 2.0 : hotmail
Web 1.0: left align
Web 2.0: centre align
Web 1.0: not much theory
Web 2.0: with lot of theory
Web 1.0: no discussion
Web 2.0: lot of discussion
Web 1.0: fatty
Web 2.0: slim
Web 1.0: un-mature
Web 2.0: enough mature to handle content
Web 1.0: father
Web 2.0: son
Web 1.0: yestesday
Web 2.0: today
Web 1.0: without peers
Web 2.0: with peers
Web 1.0: table
Web 2.0: div
Web 1.0: past
Web 2.0: future
Web 1.0: bellbottom
Web 2.0: jeans
Web 1.0: _
Web 2.0: glassy mirror
Web 1.0: not specfic in jobs
Web 2.0: specific in jobs
Web 1.0: designers are free
Web 2.0: designers have boundaries
Finally design is design simply the things matters is Beautiful….whether its web1.0 or web2.0…difference we have created……….what u think
Web 1.0: not specfic in jobs
Web 2.0: specific in jobs
Web 1.0: designers are free
Web 2.0: designers have boundaries
Finally design is design simply the things matters is Beautiful….whether its web1.0 or web2.0…difference we have created……….what u think
Very nice article, thank you
Web 1.0: no discussion
Web 2.0: lot of discussion
Web 1.0: fatty
Web 2.0: slim
Web 1.0: “This site best viewed in IE.”
Web 2.0: “This site best viewed with
XMLHttpRequest.”Web 1.0: Non-semantic nested
tables.Web 2.0: Non-semantic nested “wrapper”
divs.Web 1.0: Pop-ups.
Web 2.0: Pop-overs.
(Web 3D: Pop-outs.)
Web 1.0: “WOW THIS INTERNET THING IS GREAT”
Web 2.0: “someone stole my caps lock key back in web 1.0 now i do web design”
Web 1.0: URLs are unpronounceable, and often unreadable (“www.example.com/cgi-bin/script.pl?pageID=52″).
Web 2.0: URLs are supposedly pronounceable, but you feel itchy missing out the dots (“del.icio.us”, “script.aculo.us”).
Web 1.0: Your CEO is twice your age.
Web 2.0: Your CEO dropped out of university two years ago.
Web 1.0: Blond jokes.
Web 2.0: LOLCATS!!!
And, if I may be a little PG-13:
Web 1.0: People pay money to download porn.
Web 2.0: People make their own porn and post it on “my.big.co.ck”.
While I remember, another one I thought of a couple of days back:
Web 1.0: Pages are mostly text, with a few flash ads.
Web 2.0: Pages are mostly flashy, with a few text ads.
From the opinions here, it seems we had better start dreaming of Web 3.0
Surely next is web 3.0
web 1.0- Yahoo mail
web 2.0- Google mail
Web 1.0: Startups
Web 2.0: Rampups
Web 3.0: Stealth modes
Web 1.0: Spam
Web 2.0: Spam
Web 3.0: Spam
[...] Anmerkung noch: Ich habe mich von Jeff Zeldmans Blog und den Kommentaren inspirieren lassen, aber auch viel dazu geschrieben und abgeändert. Ich wollte [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game… JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0),… http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-… – – http://www.zeldman.com [...]
[...] Zeldman’s started something. [...]
[...] for 3G, a honest price and Sim…" 2 hours ago bookmarked a page on del.icio.us Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : Web 2.0 Thinking Game 2 hours ago posted an item on Tumblr Futurefarmers~Project Propigation House 7 hours ago [...]
I love the way people talk as if “Web 2.0″ is a new version of the web, “Yeah man I have web 2.0 installed on my machine”. It’s an evolvement not an upgrade!
[...] 3.0 (Web animation and time/space virtual continuum…Don’t worry we will get to that later. (See http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ for more fun interpretations)But let’s try and define Web 2.0 a little more clearly?One definition [...]
Web 2.0: Gradients
Web 3.0: Yet to be determined
Web 4.0: Where it all began. Like ball parks. Sometimes the original is good. Look at Google. Simple. Solid.
[...] Quirky Japan Home Page Nihongo o Shiete! Mash squidfingers dafont 24media listal furuba_manga thinking game number book webcreations rasterbator projectzen schedualman scheduals japtranslater awesome [...]
Web 1.0: GPRS
Web 2.0: EDGE
[...] compléter, je recommande la (re)lecture du post de Jeffrey Zeldman, Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Morceaux choisis [...]
I think web 2.0 is a big thing and it will be around for years to come. It’s been a success for many not for profit user communities but businesses or the corporate world don’t know how to build web 2.0 business websites to take advantage of the web 2.0 tools. Some are just afraid of it. Many books are now available on how to build web 2.0 business websites.
[...] Web 2.0 thing I can do no better than to recommend Jeffrey Zeldman’s great comparison:”Web 2.0 thinking game” and its ensuing comments section still going strong 2 years later. There is also a very [...]
Dobar članak.Svidja mi se i definitivno zaslužuje bookmark.
[...] another interesting article that puts a funny yet interesting spin on web 2.0. A web 2.0 Thinking Game! [...]
[...] Koryphäe Zeldman gibt eine Steilvorlage zu den Unterschieden zwischen Web 1.0 und 2.0, und zahllose Kommentatoren machen mit. Wer also genau wissen will, wie sich die Web-Generationen [...]
[...] Game (flash) Nov 15 ’06: People Playing Games Oct 20 ’06: Web 2.0 Game Oct 18 ’06: Hex Color Game Sep 1 ’06: Apple II Games [...]
666
Discount Cigars
Web 2.0 has way too much weight on it. Google trusts this too much and it’s a big cause of spam.
I think Web 3.0 is a system where actual humans evaluate sites given various unbiased data.
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game – Jeffrey Zeldman Presents The Daily Report [...]
[...] 20:00 Eric Eggert beginnt mit Die Geschichte des Webmontags und Webstandards 2006 – What happened to the tables? http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game [...]
Digital Scales
“Web 2.0 has way too much weight on it. Google trusts this too much and it’s a big cause of spam.
I think Web 3.0 is a system where actual humans evaluate sites given various unbiased data.”
It’s going to take quite a bit of human power to be able to evaluate the 1 trilliion websites out there. Hopefully this would eliminate spam though.
Brian Braggs
[...] Zeldman has a blog post entitled Web 2.0 Thinking Game where he writes A few weeks back, The Economist was calling “Web 2.0″ a trend. Their phrase [...]
[...] a sharp pencil into his eyes whenever a client mentions “Web 2.0″, Zeldman’s Web 2.0 Thinking Game was a very amusing read. Don’t miss the comments, [...]
[...] To get more descriptions and to have a good laugh, visit Jeffrey Zeldman.com – The Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] For anyone wondering what this web 2.0 thing is all about here is a short description.Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.To get more descriptions and to have a good laugh, visit Jeffrey Zeldman.com – The Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] Für mehr: Gucksch du hier! [...]
[...] http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ This page looks attrative on the first view, because of fantastic design. The use of color is very [...]
[...] Das Original mit viel mehr Begriffen findet ihr hier: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. (1.65) Web 1.0: New media company [...]
[...] 08:49:00 Entry tags:fun, links Шутки про Web 2.0 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-gameWeb 1.0: Content is everythingWeb 2.0: Someone else’s content is everythingWeb 1.0: Crap sites on [...]
Web 1.0: HTML markup.
Web 2.0: HTML with CSS, meaning it has half the bloatedness.