<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real fonts on the web, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeldman.com/2009/05/28/real-fonts-on-the-web-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2009/05/28/real-fonts-on-the-web-part-2/</link>
	<description>Web design news and insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2009/05/28/real-fonts-on-the-web-part-2/#comment-43215</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=1216#comment-43215</guid>
		<description>In line with discussing services like TypeKit, there is a new and serious proposal regarding a web-specific file format on the table:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.fontembedding.com/post/2009/06/10/New-Web-Fonts-Proposal.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Proposal&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/58922&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New Web Fonts Proposal on Typophile&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readableweb.com/apple-and-microsoft-in-talks-on-web-font-protections/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;In-Depth Analysis: Apple and Microsoft In Talks On Web Font Protections&lt;/a&gt;
Hoping Jeffrey and his readers weigh in on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In line with discussing services like TypeKit, there is a new and serious proposal regarding a web-specific file format on the table:<br />
<a href="http://blog.fontembedding.com/post/2009/06/10/New-Web-Fonts-Proposal.aspx" rel="nofollow">The Proposal</a><br />
<a href="http://typophile.com/node/58922" rel="nofollow">New Web Fonts Proposal on Typophile</a><br />
<a href="http://www.readableweb.com/apple-and-microsoft-in-talks-on-web-font-protections/" rel="nofollow">In-Depth Analysis: Apple and Microsoft In Talks On Web Font Protections</a><br />
Hoping Jeffrey and his readers weigh in on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2009/05/28/real-fonts-on-the-web-part-2/#comment-42905</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=1216#comment-42905</guid>
		<description>Despite a lack of details, it&#039;s now clear to me that Typekit is a real attempt at providing font-linking as a service.
Kudos to those behind it for trying to take the bull by the horns. I&#039;m eager to see how it pans out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite a lack of details, it&#8217;s now clear to me that Typekit is a real attempt at providing font-linking as a service.<br />
Kudos to those behind it for trying to take the bull by the horns. I&#8217;m eager to see how it pans out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real fonts on the web, part 2 - Robb Corbett - FriendFeed</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2009/05/28/real-fonts-on-the-web-part-2/#comment-42888</link>
		<dc:creator>Real fonts on the web, part 2 - Robb Corbett - FriendFeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=1216#comment-42888</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] FriendFeed                  Robb Corbett  Real fonts on the web, part 2 - http://www.zeldman.com/2009...    3 hours ago from Google [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] FriendFeed                  Robb Corbett  Real fonts on the web, part 2 &#8211; <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2009..">http://www.zeldman.com/2009..</a>.    3 hours ago from Google [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2009/05/28/real-fonts-on-the-web-part-2/#comment-42820</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=1216#comment-42820</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see more real type on the web, but I think that the problem is primarily legal and not technical. We should be able to solve for that without adding third parties and another javascript library to the mix.

Richard raises an interesting question. I was party to a conversation recently about just that: Register a domain and put up a splash page with  a newsletter sign-up form to gauge interest in a concept before doing any actual work on it. It&#039;s an interesting strategy from a maker&#039;s standpoint but it seems to me like it would make people angry (and less likely to participate) once it became widely known. However, convincing font foundries that there is a real population of paying customers who want to solve this might be worth the fallout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see more real type on the web, but I think that the problem is primarily legal and not technical. We should be able to solve for that without adding third parties and another javascript library to the mix.</p>
<p>Richard raises an interesting question. I was party to a conversation recently about just that: Register a domain and put up a splash page with  a newsletter sign-up form to gauge interest in a concept before doing any actual work on it. It&#8217;s an interesting strategy from a maker&#8217;s standpoint but it seems to me like it would make people angry (and less likely to participate) once it became widely known. However, convincing font foundries that there is a real population of paying customers who want to solve this might be worth the fallout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2009/05/28/real-fonts-on-the-web-part-2/#comment-42818</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=1216#comment-42818</guid>
		<description>Only one remaining rhetorical question here for me: Is Ascender/Microsoft, Adobe, and Monotype signed on for this? Let me know when they are, then there will be something to talk about. In the meantime, I see typekit as little more than a questionnaire posing as a blog for a new service.
Nice to see a lot of foks interested, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only one remaining rhetorical question here for me: Is Ascender/Microsoft, Adobe, and Monotype signed on for this? Let me know when they are, then there will be something to talk about. In the meantime, I see typekit as little more than a questionnaire posing as a blog for a new service.<br />
Nice to see a lot of foks interested, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSSmeme &#124; Stories Published 1 hours ago with at least 1 shares</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2009/05/28/real-fonts-on-the-web-part-2/#comment-42809</link>
		<dc:creator>RSSmeme &#124; Stories Published 1 hours ago with at least 1 shares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=1216#comment-42809</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Real fonts on the web, part 2 (2)   share digg      12 minutes  ago   permalink      Shared by Peter N (41) Tom Carmony (5)   Comment View comments [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Real fonts on the web, part 2 (2)   share digg      12 minutes  ago   permalink      Shared by Peter N (41) Tom Carmony (5)   Comment View comments [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

