Comments on: “Google Bets Big on HTML 5″

By: handbags

handbags — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:37:30 +0000

Brooklyn was always hip. New York is New York. (I can’t vouch for Staten Island, though. The kids there didn’t wear shoes until they started high school.) ;)
I grew up in Sheepshead Bay, Brooklyn and trucked an hour on the subway every day to Stuyvesant High School when it was still on 1st Ave and 15th Street.
No transition – all of a piece.

By: L’evoluzione della specie | Incisiv

L’evoluzione della specie | Incisiv — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:25:48 +0000

[...] sta scalzando l’(x)HTML, cambio di rotta che può contare su un nome come Google tra i suoi principali sostenitori. Tutto sta diventando più semantico, tutto è sempre più [...]

By: Amazon.com: Jeffrey Zeldman: Books, Biography, Blog, Audiobooks, Kindle

Amazon.com: Jeffrey Zeldman: Books, Biography, Blog, Audiobooks, Kindle — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:01:03 +0000

[...] “Google Bets Big on HTML 5″ 12:17 PM PDT, June 19, 2009 While the entire HTML 5 standard is years or more from adoption, there are many powerful features available in browsers today. In fact, five key next-generation features are already available in the latest (sometimes experimental) browser builds from Firefox, Opera, Safari, and Google Chrome. Tim O'Reilly: Google Bets Big on … This is syndicated from Jeffrey Zeldman Presents The Daily Report. [...]

By: Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : “Google Bets Big on HTML 5? | blog.xkid.ro

Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : “Google Bets Big on HTML 5? | blog.xkid.ro — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:06:24 +0000

[...] original here: Jeffrey Zeldman Presents : “Google Bets Big on HTML 5? Posted in HTML, Web [...]

By: ix's Bookmarks on Delicious

ix's Bookmarks on Delicious — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:05:12 +0000

[...] zeldman.com: “Google Bets Big on HTML 5″ SAVE [...]

By: Wayne State Web Communications Blog » Blog Archive » [Friday Links] The HTML5 Edition

Fri, 29 May 2009 18:06:08 +0000

[...] “Google Bets Big on HTML 5″ [...]

By: pd

pd — Fri, 29 May 2009 06:34:11 +0000

Too bad they still are not supporting and yet. What codecs are they going to support? Making this decision public would surely help to synch the almost-released Firefox 3.5?

Regardless, it’s all irrelevant until a) those hacks at MS get up to speed b) Google cranks the marketing up enough for Chrome to get some sort of traction of it’s own, market share wise.

By: J David Eisenberg

J David Eisenberg — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:04:29 +0000

canvas: love it. video: like it. Embedded SVG and MathML: great idea. From what I gather from a quick skim of the spec, if someone comes up with some other great XML markup other than the ones that HTML5 now handles, HTML5 won't integrate it well, as it doesn't yet support namespaces . What disappoints me most is that HTML5 allows tag soup, even if the spec does tell implementers how to handle malformed documents. HTML5 will also bring back "closing tag paranoia" (does this element really need a closing tag or not?)

By: Jeffrey Zeldman

Jeffrey Zeldman — Thu, 28 May 2009 13:52:53 +0000

It would be pretty hard to come up with a more ironic juxtaposition than referring to Tim O’Riley as Bill O’Riley.

Yeah. I’m sorry, Tim.

This is the downside of blogging via iPhone while in a doctor’s office.

By: Jeffrey Zeldman | Web Standards Planet

Jeffrey Zeldman | Web Standards Planet — Thu, 28 May 2009 07:44:14 +0000

[...] “Google Bets Big on HTML 5″ 42 min 59 sec ago While the entire HTML 5 standard is years or more from adoption, there are many powerful features available in browsers today. In fact, five key next-generation features are already available in the latest (sometimes experimental) browser builds from Firefox, Opera, Safari, and Google Chrome. Tim O’Reilly: Google Bets Big on … [...]

By: Michael Kozakewich

Michael Kozakewich — Thu, 28 May 2009 04:39:37 +0000

I wonder how likely it is that there’ll be problems down the road because of browsers implementing unfinished specifications? Does it usually matter, or is the W3C careful enough that their rough drafts are good enough to use? I don’t yet know the finer workings of the specifications.

Your headline has mismatched quotes. Also, when it’s referenced at the start of the comments, it’s got quadruple-quotes, which is hilarious.

By: John Dowdell

John Dowdell — Wed, 27 May 2009 23:46:30 +0000

The comments at Tim’s piece are probably more valuable than the preso regurg.

jd/adobe

By: Tokind

Tokind — Wed, 27 May 2009 22:57:00 +0000

It would be pretty hard to come up with a more ironic juxtaposition than referring to Tim O’Riley as Bill O’Riley. I vote this post number 1 for the Daily Report bloopers short.

By: John Lascurettes

John Lascurettes — Wed, 27 May 2009 22:08:57 +0000

Unsurprisingly missing from that article and the comments is mention of IE and Microsoft’s proven commitment to HTML5. Once again, I see MS dragging their feet on a developing, embraceable and relevant standard. I don’t think that this time they can de-facto kill it through non-action (e.g., never supporting the XHTML mime type). I hope anyway.

Every one of the other major rendering engines are on board.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 27 May 2009 21:41:28 +0000

Bill O’Reilly? I think Tim O’Reilly should be offended.