<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ALA 266: next generation sprites, metaphors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeldman.com/2008/08/25/ala-266-next-generation-sprites-metaphors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2008/08/25/ala-266-next-generation-sprites-metaphors/</link>
	<description>Web design news and insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links Tagged With "alistapart" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2008/08/25/ala-266-next-generation-sprites-metaphors/#comment-39437</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "alistapart" - JabberTags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=393#comment-39437</guid>
		<description>[...] public links &gt;&gt; alistapart   ALA 266: next generation sprites, metaphors Saved by footballpro69 on Mon 03-11-2008   A List Apart Survey Saved by fredrmartins on Wed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; alistapart   ALA 266: next generation sprites, metaphors Saved by footballpro69 on Mon 03-11-2008   A List Apart Survey Saved by fredrmartins on Wed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2008/08/25/ala-266-next-generation-sprites-metaphors/#comment-39103</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=393#comment-39103</guid>
		<description>I just redid the sprites2 script as a jQuery plugin.  If you&#039;re interested, a writeup is here:

http://www.newmediacampaigns.com/page/css-sprites2-refactored-building-an-unobtrusive-jquery-plugin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just redid the sprites2 script as a jQuery plugin.  If you&#8217;re interested, a writeup is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newmediacampaigns.com/page/css-sprites2-refactored-building-an-unobtrusive-jquery-plugin" rel="nofollow">http://www.newmediacampaigns.com/page/css-sprites2-refactored-building-an-unobtrusive-jquery-plugin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Stuttaford</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2008/08/25/ala-266-next-generation-sprites-metaphors/#comment-38772</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Stuttaford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=393#comment-38772</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeffrey,

Yes, I find it more and more easy to advocate standards based development to clients. (All thanks to a certain epiphany in 2003 via a certain Orange book I still refer to).

I often lead with your famous statement &quot;99% of websites are obsolete&quot; and then tell the prospective client that I&#039;m not in the business of selling and developing products that are already out of date - that usually gets their attention!

Gone are the days of building sites to suit lazy developers - clients want predictable results and the best longevity they can get for their money. Most of the sites I work on are closely tailored to be search and Google PPC friendly - the results are that in 6 years of working this way has lead to many long-standing friendships with clients and not the typical agency hopping that tends to occur.

Just a quick question, I assume you were referring to Google PageRank and not Alexa?

Kind regards,
Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffrey,</p>
<p>Yes, I find it more and more easy to advocate standards based development to clients. (All thanks to a certain epiphany in 2003 via a certain Orange book I still refer to).</p>
<p>I often lead with your famous statement &#8220;99% of websites are obsolete&#8221; and then tell the prospective client that I&#8217;m not in the business of selling and developing products that are already out of date &#8211; that usually gets their attention!</p>
<p>Gone are the days of building sites to suit lazy developers &#8211; clients want predictable results and the best longevity they can get for their money. Most of the sites I work on are closely tailored to be search and Google PPC friendly &#8211; the results are that in 6 years of working this way has lead to many long-standing friendships with clients and not the typical agency hopping that tends to occur.</p>
<p>Just a quick question, I assume you were referring to Google PageRank and not Alexa?</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Zeldman</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2008/08/25/ala-266-next-generation-sprites-metaphors/#comment-38517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Zeldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=393#comment-38517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
I work as a consulting SEO mostly - and find my role changing more to one of evanglising the semantic web than ever before.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is interesting indeed! We come at the same truth from the other side. That is, we design with standards and get clients excited about it by pointing out the benefits to findability. (One of my favorite examples is of a client whose Alexa ranking rose from 6 to 7 within a week of our redesign of their site.)

Thanks for sharing, and the link to Dave&#039;s article is now working. (I wrote this post while the issue was in preproduction and before the links were live.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I work as a consulting SEO mostly &#8211; and find my role changing more to one of evanglising the semantic web than ever before.
</p></blockquote>
<p>That is interesting indeed! We come at the same truth from the other side. That is, we design with standards and get clients excited about it by pointing out the benefits to findability. (One of my favorite examples is of a client whose Alexa ranking rose from 6 to 7 within a week of our redesign of their site.)</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing, and the link to Dave&#8217;s article is now working. (I wrote this post while the issue was in preproduction and before the links were live.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Stuttaford</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2008/08/25/ala-266-next-generation-sprites-metaphors/#comment-38515</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Stuttaford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=393#comment-38515</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeffrey,

Looking forward to that link being fixed - but in the mean time - what a great unique and refreshing article on web design! We often think we&#039;re doing things and building logical structures in an unprecendented fashion - we are pioneers and are paving the way, etc, etc ... yet that article proves quite the opposite is the case.  

I think a failure to see that there are greater forces at work than just the designer and client is what seems to lead to brand new sites being obsolete out of the box ... I work as a consulting SEO mostly - and find my role changing more to one of evanglising the semantic web than ever before. Not a role I mind at all - just not something I saw coming 2 years ago.

In closing - thanks for linking that article - I might have missed it otherwise - and thanks to Aaron for the thought provoking read!

Regards,
Lee Stuttaford</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffrey,</p>
<p>Looking forward to that link being fixed &#8211; but in the mean time &#8211; what a great unique and refreshing article on web design! We often think we&#8217;re doing things and building logical structures in an unprecendented fashion &#8211; we are pioneers and are paving the way, etc, etc &#8230; yet that article proves quite the opposite is the case.  </p>
<p>I think a failure to see that there are greater forces at work than just the designer and client is what seems to lead to brand new sites being obsolete out of the box &#8230; I work as a consulting SEO mostly &#8211; and find my role changing more to one of evanglising the semantic web than ever before. Not a role I mind at all &#8211; just not something I saw coming 2 years ago.</p>
<p>In closing &#8211; thanks for linking that article &#8211; I might have missed it otherwise &#8211; and thanks to Aaron for the thought provoking read!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Lee Stuttaford</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2008/08/25/ala-266-next-generation-sprites-metaphors/#comment-38514</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/?p=393#comment-38514</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey,  FYI ~ &quot;CSS Sprites2&quot;  link is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey,  FYI ~ &#8220;CSS Sprites2&#8243;  link is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
