<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adios, Technorati?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/</link>
	<description>Web design news and insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:24:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sukienki</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-38259</link>
		<dc:creator>Sukienki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-38259</guid>
		<description>A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way and shows the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way and shows the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 404 Blog &#8212; Forms: Definition Lists or Tables?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-37065</link>
		<dc:creator>The 404 Blog &#8212; Forms: Definition Lists or Tables?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-37065</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] would take a considerable amount of work with the table markup you&#8217;ve shown. And achieving Zeldman&#8217;s comment form would be dang near [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] would take a considerable amount of work with the table markup you&#8217;ve shown. And achieving Zeldman&#8217;s comment form would be dang near [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Geniant blog &#8212; Forms: Definition Lists or Tables?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-36669</link>
		<dc:creator>the Geniant blog &#8212; Forms: Definition Lists or Tables?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-36669</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] would take a considerable amount of work with the table markup you&#8217;ve shown. And achieving Zeldman&#8217;s comment form would be dang near [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] would take a considerable amount of work with the table markup you&#8217;ve shown. And achieving Zeldman&#8217;s comment form would be dang near [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oil painting from photo</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-36604</link>
		<dc:creator>oil painting from photo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-36604</guid>
		<description>It’s a good thing that you noticed it.  Only few people notice this scheme of Technorati.  I guess this is one reason why Technorati nowadays isn’t one of the most sought-after Web 2.0 site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a good thing that you noticed it.  Only few people notice this scheme of Technorati.  I guess this is one reason why Technorati nowadays isn’t one of the most sought-after Web 2.0 site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christmas gifts</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-34457</link>
		<dc:creator>christmas gifts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-34457</guid>
		<description>They must have (obviously) been hoping more people would opt to have it on : like a namebrand thing or something. But most people probably prefer it off. So, to combat that, they just made the default &#039;on&#039; and made it difficult for you to switch it off. So that, only people who know what they&#039;re doing, will be able to switch it off while the rest of the public would leave them free advertising. Not good, not good. They really ought to be very clear about these sorts of things, and have a clear policy that they adhere to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They must have (obviously) been hoping more people would opt to have it on : like a namebrand thing or something. But most people probably prefer it off. So, to combat that, they just made the default &#8216;on&#8217; and made it difficult for you to switch it off. So that, only people who know what they&#8217;re doing, will be able to switch it off while the rest of the public would leave them free advertising. Not good, not good. They really ought to be very clear about these sorts of things, and have a clear policy that they adhere to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-28535</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-28535</guid>
		<description>well, that stinks to hear that.  not a very good practice to just implement something without user knowledge or permission!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, that stinks to hear that.  not a very good practice to just implement something without user knowledge or permission!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neurotransmisores</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-26856</link>
		<dc:creator>Neurotransmisores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-26856</guid>
		<description>At the moment there is no better alternative than Technorati.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the moment there is no better alternative than Technorati.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sifry</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25799</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sifry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25799</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that! I know the guys have been working on a bunch of technical scalability upgrades - Are you still experiencing problems? 

If so, please don&#039;t hesitate to drop me a line directly - dsifry AT technorati DOT com...

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that! I know the guys have been working on a bunch of technical scalability upgrades &#8211; Are you still experiencing problems? </p>
<p>If so, please don&#8217;t hesitate to drop me a line directly &#8211; dsifry AT technorati DOT com&#8230;</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W.</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25665</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25665</guid>
		<description>I lost repsect for Technorati along time ago when they had &quot;WTF&quot; listed as an option in their menu. &quot;WTF&quot; just does not look professional. (After reading your post, I revisited their website and noticed that they had removed it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lost repsect for Technorati along time ago when they had &#8220;WTF&#8221; listed as an option in their menu. &#8220;WTF&#8221; just does not look professional. (After reading your post, I revisited their website and noticed that they had removed it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Faulds</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25475</link>
		<dc:creator>John Faulds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25475</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It was only last week when I discovered Wordpress has replaced their default link discovery partner from Technorati to Google Blog Search.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I noticed that a while ago and wasn&#039;t very happy about it. Google Blog Search only shows me about 5% of the blogs that actually link to my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It was only last week when I discovered Wordpress has replaced their default link discovery partner from Technorati to Google Blog Search.</p></blockquote>
<p>I noticed that a while ago and wasn&#8217;t very happy about it. Google Blog Search only shows me about 5% of the blogs that actually link to my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25453</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25453</guid>
		<description>It was only last week when I discovered Wordpress has replaced their default link discovery partner from Technorati to Google Blog Search. If anyone uses Wordpress, log into your Admin area and go to the Dashboard area. You&#039;ll see your incoming links are powered by Google. Personally, I think that was a good move since Technorati really seems to be slacking lately. Nevertheless it was rather inevitable when you&#039;re competing against search Giants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was only last week when I discovered Wordpress has replaced their default link discovery partner from Technorati to Google Blog Search. If anyone uses Wordpress, log into your Admin area and go to the Dashboard area. You&#8217;ll see your incoming links are powered by Google. Personally, I think that was a good move since Technorati really seems to be slacking lately. Nevertheless it was rather inevitable when you&#8217;re competing against search Giants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lampard</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25437</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lampard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25437</guid>
		<description>I have my &quot;widget&quot; set to invisible but occasionally, for no apparent reason, it becomes visible. I just login and reset to invisible. I hate widgets so if they tried to make it display permanently I&#039;d probably remove it also :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my &#8220;widget&#8221; set to invisible but occasionally, for no apparent reason, it becomes visible. I just login and reset to invisible. I hate widgets so if they tried to make it display permanently I&#8217;d probably remove it also :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25421</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25421</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve recently had several issues with Technorati. Technorati is a great service and I&#039;ve been pleased with everything they&#039;ve done up until very recently. I hope this isn&#039;t a trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently had several issues with Technorati. Technorati is a great service and I&#8217;ve been pleased with everything they&#8217;ve done up until very recently. I hope this isn&#8217;t a trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25387</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25387</guid>
		<description>I never even thought of leaving the claim code on the site after seeing that Technorati added the blog to my account. Why would you leave it there in the first place? Every piece of third party embedded content slows your site down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never even thought of leaving the claim code on the site after seeing that Technorati added the blog to my account. Why would you leave it there in the first place? Every piece of third party embedded content slows your site down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25385</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/12/14/adios-technorati/#comment-25385</guid>
		<description>Does that make it widget spam? hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that make it widget spam? hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
