<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments are the lifeblood of the blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/</link>
	<description>Web design news and insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zaproszenia ślubne kartki świąteczne</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-34819</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaproszenia ślubne kartki świąteczne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-34819</guid>
		<description>hehe that is a good question why Wikipedia - but I think that answer is pretty obious - everyone uses it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe that is a good question why Wikipedia &#8211; but I think that answer is pretty obious &#8211; everyone uses it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotts</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11727</link>
		<dc:creator>scotts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 01:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11727</guid>
		<description>Why are you asking Wikipedia how TrackBack is capitalized? Decide and correct the entry, or bring it up on the Talk page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you asking Wikipedia how TrackBack is capitalized? Decide and correct the entry, or bring it up on the Talk page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeeshan</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11263</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeeshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11263</guid>
		<description>we have tried everything, to stop spam but it wont, and i think i found a reason as we throw too much hate to spam , why not we  all start to love spam and respect them and care for them and expect the fact that they are nice little programs who are just doing there job and then maybe we can stop them  ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have tried everything, to stop spam but it wont, and i think i found a reason as we throw too much hate to spam , why not we  all start to love spam and respect them and care for them and expect the fact that they are nice little programs who are just doing there job and then maybe we can stop them  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan B</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11243</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11243</guid>
		<description>I am not sure if &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10772&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tony&#039;s comment&lt;/a&gt; was addressed, but the problem with using CSS to hide it is that screen readers may pick up the hidden element, and visually impaired users would fill it out. Thus making all comments by users who are visually impaired as junk.

My comment I before I read some of the comments was that on my blog that I started in October, I have received nearly 1,500 spam comments. I think it is absurd.

As an aside, Jeffrey, you may want to look at the tabindex ordering of first part of the comment form, it jumps a bit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure if <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10772" rel="nofollow">Tony&#8217;s comment</a> was addressed, but the problem with using CSS to hide it is that screen readers may pick up the hidden element, and visually impaired users would fill it out. Thus making all comments by users who are visually impaired as junk.</p>
<p>My comment I before I read some of the comments was that on my blog that I started in October, I have received nearly 1,500 spam comments. I think it is absurd.</p>
<p>As an aside, Jeffrey, you may want to look at the tabindex ordering of first part of the comment form, it jumps a bit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muskie</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11132</link>
		<dc:creator>Muskie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11132</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad someone else mentioned Spam Karma.  I&#039;ve been using it for years long before Akismet was created and I don&#039;t have too many proplems.  I don&#039;t get that many real comments, but I don&#039;t spend a lot of time moderating spam.  Spam Karma just knows so much of it is pure crap and I don&#039;t even see it.

I don&#039;t double check near as much as I do with email looking for false positives.  I think I finally registered for a WordPress.com account so I could use Akismet, but I seem to stick with Spam Karma.

Plugin comments are popular, I had so many (OpenID, Gravatars, Subscribe To Comments) that I had some cross mojonation so I got rid of a bunch of them.  Has Gravatars 2.0 been launched yet?  I looked in to some alternates to it, such as MyBlogLog but I don&#039;t think these little pictures are worth the headache...  OpenID would be nice but it never seemed to work correctly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad someone else mentioned Spam Karma.  I&#8217;ve been using it for years long before Akismet was created and I don&#8217;t have too many proplems.  I don&#8217;t get that many real comments, but I don&#8217;t spend a lot of time moderating spam.  Spam Karma just knows so much of it is pure crap and I don&#8217;t even see it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t double check near as much as I do with email looking for false positives.  I think I finally registered for a WordPress.com account so I could use Akismet, but I seem to stick with Spam Karma.</p>
<p>Plugin comments are popular, I had so many (OpenID, Gravatars, Subscribe To Comments) that I had some cross mojonation so I got rid of a bunch of them.  Has Gravatars 2.0 been launched yet?  I looked in to some alternates to it, such as MyBlogLog but I don&#8217;t think these little pictures are worth the headache&#8230;  OpenID would be nice but it never seemed to work correctly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry outworlder</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11074</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry outworlder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-11074</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Zeldman,

I come from an Eastern European country which has experienced war at the end of the 20th century. I know what it feels like to run into the basement because of aerial bombardments and what it means to wait for bread under sniper fire. Maybe that&#039;s the reason why I find your posts about hearing police sirens in NYC frightening while your dog is sleeping annoying.

Yet, I bought the first edition of your Web standards book (at a very high price, where I live in) and implemented it in my work. It has paid off, and sometimes, it was a stumbling stone because of managers and marketing (I can bet that the same line of thinking you&#039;re being confronted with even today). I love standards. I love the Web.

Yet, as much as you brag about women being NOT included into Web design business, you NEVER EVER got out of the US frame. There was not a single post about problems web developers and designers are facing in the world outside the US. Everything is so much about content, solidarity and genuine content, yet all of that never gets out of US state borders.

It is a closed world. And I will be completely honest with you: I resent that. I follow your &quot;web-standards evangelism&quot;, yet I am excluded from it, like millions out there are, who don&#039;t happen to own an US passport.

I don&#039;t own a credit card, yet I WILL buy the expensive english-bookstore second edition of your book, although I downloaded a pirated version of it. Because I believe in everything that you have put in the making of this book.

Your bragging about how it is the right thing to publish original content, not being the next Web 2.0 thing is comparable to me bragging about how there are not ANY persons whatsoever on your blog, flickr list etc. that are not outside the US. Sorry Jeff, I respect you VERY much, but I did NOT see any event apart in Europe recently. Picture this: &quot;to gain a deeper understanding of web standards and emerging best practices. Be inspired by fresh ideas and new directions. Join the greatest minds and hottest talents in web design today.&quot;

Well, according to you, an Event Apart REALLY IS an Event Apart. It boils down to Web standards people who happen to have US citizenship. And  the show goes around the US. Well if the Web is supposed to be accessible to everyone (as you tell in your book AND as I tell people around me, believing in a TRULY universal Web), it should include everyone. But it does NOT. Like EVERY Web 2.0 service against which you wrote, against every proprietary browser-rendering technology you wrote, the Web should be accessioble to everyone. Yet every single thing that you write about includes the topics that revolve EXCLUSIVELY around US firms, US Web authors, US conferences and so on.

My point is: Why bother to talk about universality of the Web and promote Web standards if it is just a US thing? You can brag all you want about examples from here and there but the fact is that you are completely unaware of what is happening outside this &quot;so heroic&quot; US web-standards arena.

I am sad. I am disappointed. Yet, I will buy your and a load of other books to learn from. And I won&#039;t just download and print the pirated versions, although the prices for them here are inhuman, although I am excluded from the possiblity of paying with a credit card, although the discussion about these crucial Web subjects is going on, I won&#039;t participate, because no one cares. All the references are geared toward the exclusively US &quot;event apart&quot; events etc.

A 32 KB DSL connection is a problem??!? How about being on a standard modem connection and pushing Web standards in spite of being rejected by a lot of firms who pay well, here, in the non-US?

Dear mr. Zeldman, I respect you, and I thank you for sharing the knowledge, but my disappointment has surpassed my enthusiasm. Pushing out Web standards in a poor, counter-personnel mined country while paying outrageous sums to learn about standards, in spite of being able to download pirated versions (at slower and FAR more costly speeds than your oh-so-poor-me post brags about), but sticking to morale sucks royally.

I will buy your 2nd edition book. But. I will never EVER read your blog again. Or look up if there are some new books by you. I am so bitter. Please don&#039;t write about your fears in NYC while hearing sirens anymore. There are a lot of us who take for granted much more worse than that, and we don&#039;t even brag about DSL connections and such. I would give my right arm to have a connection like yours, so much clients unaware about Web standards etc etc.

Be decent, at least. PLEASE. There in fact IS a world outside your US sphere. Yes, really, there is.

And no, I do NOT hate you, your country or anything for that matter. I just wish to point out that you are no better than people about whom you think that they care about money only and not web standards, quality content etc. You don&#039;t care about any of that outside your narrow life circle anyway.

Sirens, NYC, oh, cruel world.

Flattened houses, minefields, web standards, oh cruel world.

Farewell, Mr. Zeldman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Zeldman,</p>
<p>I come from an Eastern European country which has experienced war at the end of the 20th century. I know what it feels like to run into the basement because of aerial bombardments and what it means to wait for bread under sniper fire. Maybe that&#8217;s the reason why I find your posts about hearing police sirens in NYC frightening while your dog is sleeping annoying.</p>
<p>Yet, I bought the first edition of your Web standards book (at a very high price, where I live in) and implemented it in my work. It has paid off, and sometimes, it was a stumbling stone because of managers and marketing (I can bet that the same line of thinking you&#8217;re being confronted with even today). I love standards. I love the Web.</p>
<p>Yet, as much as you brag about women being NOT included into Web design business, you NEVER EVER got out of the US frame. There was not a single post about problems web developers and designers are facing in the world outside the US. Everything is so much about content, solidarity and genuine content, yet all of that never gets out of US state borders.</p>
<p>It is a closed world. And I will be completely honest with you: I resent that. I follow your &#8220;web-standards evangelism&#8221;, yet I am excluded from it, like millions out there are, who don&#8217;t happen to own an US passport.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t own a credit card, yet I WILL buy the expensive english-bookstore second edition of your book, although I downloaded a pirated version of it. Because I believe in everything that you have put in the making of this book.</p>
<p>Your bragging about how it is the right thing to publish original content, not being the next Web 2.0 thing is comparable to me bragging about how there are not ANY persons whatsoever on your blog, flickr list etc. that are not outside the US. Sorry Jeff, I respect you VERY much, but I did NOT see any event apart in Europe recently. Picture this: &#8220;to gain a deeper understanding of web standards and emerging best practices. Be inspired by fresh ideas and new directions. Join the greatest minds and hottest talents in web design today.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, according to you, an Event Apart REALLY IS an Event Apart. It boils down to Web standards people who happen to have US citizenship. And  the show goes around the US. Well if the Web is supposed to be accessible to everyone (as you tell in your book AND as I tell people around me, believing in a TRULY universal Web), it should include everyone. But it does NOT. Like EVERY Web 2.0 service against which you wrote, against every proprietary browser-rendering technology you wrote, the Web should be accessioble to everyone. Yet every single thing that you write about includes the topics that revolve EXCLUSIVELY around US firms, US Web authors, US conferences and so on.</p>
<p>My point is: Why bother to talk about universality of the Web and promote Web standards if it is just a US thing? You can brag all you want about examples from here and there but the fact is that you are completely unaware of what is happening outside this &#8220;so heroic&#8221; US web-standards arena.</p>
<p>I am sad. I am disappointed. Yet, I will buy your and a load of other books to learn from. And I won&#8217;t just download and print the pirated versions, although the prices for them here are inhuman, although I am excluded from the possiblity of paying with a credit card, although the discussion about these crucial Web subjects is going on, I won&#8217;t participate, because no one cares. All the references are geared toward the exclusively US &#8220;event apart&#8221; events etc.</p>
<p>A 32 KB DSL connection is a problem??!? How about being on a standard modem connection and pushing Web standards in spite of being rejected by a lot of firms who pay well, here, in the non-US?</p>
<p>Dear mr. Zeldman, I respect you, and I thank you for sharing the knowledge, but my disappointment has surpassed my enthusiasm. Pushing out Web standards in a poor, counter-personnel mined country while paying outrageous sums to learn about standards, in spite of being able to download pirated versions (at slower and FAR more costly speeds than your oh-so-poor-me post brags about), but sticking to morale sucks royally.</p>
<p>I will buy your 2nd edition book. But. I will never EVER read your blog again. Or look up if there are some new books by you. I am so bitter. Please don&#8217;t write about your fears in NYC while hearing sirens anymore. There are a lot of us who take for granted much more worse than that, and we don&#8217;t even brag about DSL connections and such. I would give my right arm to have a connection like yours, so much clients unaware about Web standards etc etc.</p>
<p>Be decent, at least. PLEASE. There in fact IS a world outside your US sphere. Yes, really, there is.</p>
<p>And no, I do NOT hate you, your country or anything for that matter. I just wish to point out that you are no better than people about whom you think that they care about money only and not web standards, quality content etc. You don&#8217;t care about any of that outside your narrow life circle anyway.</p>
<p>Sirens, NYC, oh, cruel world.</p>
<p>Flattened houses, minefields, web standards, oh cruel world.</p>
<p>Farewell, Mr. Zeldman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeyinabox</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10937</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeyinabox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10937</guid>
		<description>The only thing worse than comment spam is writting about it and getting more.  It seems like no matter what tools you use, the weasels still get through.   More visitors means more links and more links means more spam.  There&#039;s no way to win unless you set up an ultra secret blog and only post once: &quot;I get no comment spam because I posted only once and I have no comments&quot;.  Of course your site will hit Digg and then you&#039;ll be screwed.  There&#039;s no way to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing worse than comment spam is writting about it and getting more.  It seems like no matter what tools you use, the weasels still get through.   More visitors means more links and more links means more spam.  There&#8217;s no way to win unless you set up an ultra secret blog and only post once: &#8220;I get no comment spam because I posted only once and I have no comments&#8221;.  Of course your site will hit Digg and then you&#8217;ll be screwed.  There&#8217;s no way to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filosof</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10927</link>
		<dc:creator>Filosof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10927</guid>
		<description>This comment is generated automaticly via random brain-fingers-keyboard generator and has no blue pills inside.. :-)

Have you tried comment preview and submit AFTER preview and not without it? (of course previewed text must be the same as the submitted one).. It worked very very nice for all my friends around Czech IT blogosphere..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment is generated automaticly via random brain-fingers-keyboard generator and has no blue pills inside.. :-)</p>
<p>Have you tried comment preview and submit AFTER preview and not without it? (of course previewed text must be the same as the submitted one).. It worked very very nice for all my friends around Czech IT blogosphere..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peteski</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10861</link>
		<dc:creator>peteski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10861</guid>
		<description>I turned off comments on my mp3.blog long ago. 

Receiving no comments (with &quot;comments on&quot;) was like having a cell phone with no one to call. 

I got rid of my phone in January.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I turned off comments on my mp3.blog long ago. </p>
<p>Receiving no comments (with &#8220;comments on&#8221;) was like having a cell phone with no one to call. </p>
<p>I got rid of my phone in January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10834</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10834</guid>
		<description>Strange. Akismet has been a life saver for myself as well as all the folks I set up with WP blogs. It has rarely been wrong in passing judgment upon comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange. Akismet has been a life saver for myself as well as all the folks I set up with WP blogs. It has rarely been wrong in passing judgment upon comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10826</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10826</guid>
		<description>Is there anything web-related to do in NYC on the 26th or 27th of this month?  I&#039;m want to take the train up for the Neil Gaiman events at the Moth but I need to justify the time off to work.  So far my attempts to find a lecture, class, conference, or discussion group has only turned up a GUI developers meetup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anything web-related to do in NYC on the 26th or 27th of this month?  I&#8217;m want to take the train up for the Neil Gaiman events at the Moth but I need to justify the time off to work.  So far my attempts to find a lecture, class, conference, or discussion group has only turned up a GUI developers meetup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10825</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10825</guid>
		<description>My Textpattern 4.0.4 sites don&#039;t ever get spam, although they don&#039;t get many comments either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Textpattern 4.0.4 sites don&#8217;t ever get spam, although they don&#8217;t get many comments either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testy McTester</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10823</link>
		<dc:creator>Testy McTester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10823</guid>
		<description>This is a test of Blue Anvil&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blue-anvil.com/archives/wordpress-comment-spam-stopper-plugin#download&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WordPress Comment Spam Stopper plug-in&lt;/a&gt;. All comments from unknown visitors go into moderation, and this comment is no exception. Let&#039;s see what happens when bots try to post. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a test of Blue Anvil&#8217;s <a href="http://blue-anvil.com/archives/wordpress-comment-spam-stopper-plugin#download" rel="nofollow">WordPress Comment Spam Stopper plug-in</a>. All comments from unknown visitors go into moderation, and this comment is no exception. Let&#8217;s see what happens when bots try to post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raul</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10822</link>
		<dc:creator>raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10822</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know what cms this blog is built around, but after years of using Askimet alone I found that while it was still capturing thousands of spam comments, it was letting more and more through. My solution was to add a couple of layers of protection... I check for actual keypresses in the input field, I run the results through a plugiin called spam firewall, and then finally they hit askimet... The combination has been so effect I&#039;ve even turned off moderation... which seemed almost scary at first, but ultimately has been liberating... As an added bonus because some of these steps happen before the comment actually hits mysql my server has been much happier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know what cms this blog is built around, but after years of using Askimet alone I found that while it was still capturing thousands of spam comments, it was letting more and more through. My solution was to add a couple of layers of protection&#8230; I check for actual keypresses in the input field, I run the results through a plugiin called spam firewall, and then finally they hit askimet&#8230; The combination has been so effect I&#8217;ve even turned off moderation&#8230; which seemed almost scary at first, but ultimately has been liberating&#8230; As an added bonus because some of these steps happen before the comment actually hits mysql my server has been much happier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cherim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/04/17/lolita/#comment-10821</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#comment-10813&quot;&gt;
I use Bad Behavior in conjunction with Askimet. Without them, I&#039;m sure the situation would be much worse.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No doubt :-/

You might want to try a plugin by Mike Jolley aptly named the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blue-anvil.com/archives/wordpress-comment-spam-stopper-plugin&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Comment Spam Stopper&lt;/a&gt;. I haven&#039;t tried it myself, but it&#039;s based on some of the tech I use in my &lt;a href=&quot;http://green-beast.com/blog/?page_id=136&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;contact form plugin&lt;/a&gt; so I know it&#039;s a solid solution.

I also like the &quot;honeypot&quot; method mentioned by Josh Clark, above, where an input is hidden (by positioning, not input &lt;code&gt;type&lt;/code&gt;), and if populated returns an error. You just need to be sure to provide a descriptive label so users who &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; &quot;see&quot; it understand it&#039;s not to be populated. That&#039;s one I use on my &lt;a href=&quot;http://green-beast.com/contact/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;contact form&lt;/a&gt; as well (turn off styles to see the label and input).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#comment-10813"><p>
I use Bad Behavior in conjunction with Askimet. Without them, I&#8217;m sure the situation would be much worse.
</p></blockquote>
<p>No doubt :-/</p>
<p>You might want to try a plugin by Mike Jolley aptly named the <a href="http://blue-anvil.com/archives/wordpress-comment-spam-stopper-plugin" rel="nofollow">Comment Spam Stopper</a>. I haven&#8217;t tried it myself, but it&#8217;s based on some of the tech I use in my <a href="http://green-beast.com/blog/?page_id=136" rel="nofollow">contact form plugin</a> so I know it&#8217;s a solid solution.</p>
<p>I also like the &#8220;honeypot&#8221; method mentioned by Josh Clark, above, where an input is hidden (by positioning, not input <code>type</code>), and if populated returns an error. You just need to be sure to provide a descriptive label so users who <em>do</em> &#8220;see&#8221; it understand it&#8217;s not to be populated. That&#8217;s one I use on my <a href="http://green-beast.com/contact/" rel="nofollow">contact form</a> as well (turn off styles to see the label and input).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
