<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent content is the new web app</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/</link>
	<description>Web design news and insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facelifting the Medium &#187; arunerblog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-49400</link>
		<dc:creator>Facelifting the Medium &#187; arunerblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-49400</guid>
		<description>[...] of graphical adroitness to do much writing on it. Now of course, smart designers will tell you that content is still king, and only a bad carpenter blames his tools. Who really cares about ugly fonts and the lack of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of graphical adroitness to do much writing on it. Now of course, smart designers will tell you that content is still king, and only a bad carpenter blames his tools. Who really cares about ugly fonts and the lack of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longboard: Internet Archives</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-48911</link>
		<dc:creator>Longboard: Internet Archives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-48911</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Independent content is the new web app.   Does this mean it&#039;s time to dust off Independents Day? [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Independent content is the new web app.   Does this mean it&#39;s time to dust off Independents Day? [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes for January 22, 2009 &#171; Information Design at Penn</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-40710</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes for January 22, 2009 &#171; Information Design at Penn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-40710</guid>
		<description>[...] in shaping the internet that he is often called the &#8220;king of web standards&#8221;, wrote a very influential article on the fact that no matter how flashy the package is, content is still essential to any graphic or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in shaping the internet that he is often called the &#8220;king of web standards&#8221;, wrote a very influential article on the fact that no matter how flashy the package is, content is still essential to any graphic or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: south by southwest festivals &#43; conferences</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-36961</link>
		<dc:creator>south by southwest festivals &#43; conferences</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-36961</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] &quot;Attending SXSW Interactive not only tunes us in to web trends and ideas we may have missed, it also makes clear where we are in the life cycle of developments with which we are familiar.&quot; - Zeldman.com [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] &#8220;Attending SXSW Interactive not only tunes us in to web trends and ideas we may have missed, it also makes clear where we are in the life cycle of developments with which we are familiar.&#8221; &#8211; Zeldman.com [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjwhite</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-22145</link>
		<dc:creator>rjwhite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-22145</guid>
		<description>I found this post by googling &#039;collaborative fiction weblogs,&#039; because- well, I&#039;ve been feeling rather at sea in describing my site to people and what it is, exactly. It&#039;s kind of a fiction/humor thing, there are several writers and it&#039;s not strictly a weblog.

It&#039;s more of a zine that happens to use weblog software in order to publish online. I mean, is there more of this out there? Is there some sort of organization of it all? None of the major directories have a specific category for it- it&#039;s just broken into whatever genre... It seems like this medium is perfect for something like this- easy to publish, easy to let people know whenever a new &#039;piece&#039; is up, etc. There&#039;s just that odd stigma that the weblog format tacks onto the whole thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this post by googling &#8216;collaborative fiction weblogs,&#8217; because- well, I&#8217;ve been feeling rather at sea in describing my site to people and what it is, exactly. It&#8217;s kind of a fiction/humor thing, there are several writers and it&#8217;s not strictly a weblog.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more of a zine that happens to use weblog software in order to publish online. I mean, is there more of this out there? Is there some sort of organization of it all? None of the major directories have a specific category for it- it&#8217;s just broken into whatever genre&#8230; It seems like this medium is perfect for something like this- easy to publish, easy to let people know whenever a new &#8216;piece&#8217; is up, etc. There&#8217;s just that odd stigma that the weblog format tacks onto the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean.Goodwyn &#187; If Content is King, This is Treason</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-10313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean.Goodwyn &#187; If Content is King, This is Treason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-10313</guid>
		<description>[...] How can that be? There&#8217;s plenty of information about how important content is. How can companies who want to succeed on the web be so disconnected from such a major key to success? Are those of us who build the web just bad educators? Is it a classic case of companies focusing on style over substance? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How can that be? There&#8217;s plenty of information about how important content is. How can companies who want to succeed on the web be so disconnected from such a major key to success? Are those of us who build the web just bad educators? Is it a classic case of companies focusing on style over substance? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I am leaving AOL - The Brian Alvey Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-10036</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I am leaving AOL - The Brian Alvey Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 15:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-10036</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] out the short survey form after the jump.Continue reading Why I am leaving AOLPermalinkEmail thisComments[0] [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] out the short survey form after the jump.Continue reading Why I am leaving AOLPermalinkEmail thisComments[0] [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebSG: Content is King</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9831</link>
		<dc:creator>WebSG: Content is King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9831</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] In line with with his recent article &#8220;Independent content is the new web app&#8221;, Jeffrey Zeldman spoke about the importance of good copy on websites. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] In line with with his recent article &#8220;Independent content is the new web app&#8221;, Jeffrey Zeldman spoke about the importance of good copy on websites. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Near-Mint Heroes</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9824</link>
		<dc:creator>Near-Mint Heroes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9824</guid>
		<description>[...] Independent content is the new web app. Basically bigwigs are going to be looking for talented people who can provide content for corporate blogs and other web 2.0 projects. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Independent content is the new web app. Basically bigwigs are going to be looking for talented people who can provide content for corporate blogs and other web 2.0 projects. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: google - Google Search</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9657</link>
		<dc:creator>google - Google Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9657</guid>
		<description>[...] Independent content is the new web app [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Independent content is the new web app [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9632</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9632</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s in store for the next generation? Are they to sit at their machines all day creating content? How much reading are we all to do? 

The rapid evolution of content equally requires sophisticated philtering phor phreeing up time phinding phavorable rather than phony content. The net effect of generating such massive amounts of content is a new Web 2.0 filtering, aggregation, and SEO industry providing jobs to techos and communication creatives while content producers hedge their bets on Affiliation and Adsense as a viable source of income.

Brace! Corporate World 1, for our collective consiousness is already pushing your boundaries for accountability and transparency as we say whatever we like about you and have our friends cast their votes.

Web 2.0 is environmentally friendly. Writing on our wired solar powered machines at home there is no need to commute, saving a ton each of CO2 per year. 

All hail the content re-purpoSirs!, Blogmaniacs, Soshil bookakimaaks, and SEOligists - the net is MUCH more interesting, expanding, filling my mind, connecting me, making me smarter.

When I was a kid whatever my parents told me was gospel. But my own kids will never take anything I say as the truth until they have corroborated with others on the subject matter - online. If I told my kid that Emporer Nasi Goreng built the Great Wall of China to keep the rabbits out, they will quickly identify me as an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s in store for the next generation? Are they to sit at their machines all day creating content? How much reading are we all to do? </p>
<p>The rapid evolution of content equally requires sophisticated philtering phor phreeing up time phinding phavorable rather than phony content. The net effect of generating such massive amounts of content is a new Web 2.0 filtering, aggregation, and SEO industry providing jobs to techos and communication creatives while content producers hedge their bets on Affiliation and Adsense as a viable source of income.</p>
<p>Brace! Corporate World 1, for our collective consiousness is already pushing your boundaries for accountability and transparency as we say whatever we like about you and have our friends cast their votes.</p>
<p>Web 2.0 is environmentally friendly. Writing on our wired solar powered machines at home there is no need to commute, saving a ton each of CO2 per year. </p>
<p>All hail the content re-purpoSirs!, Blogmaniacs, Soshil bookakimaaks, and SEOligists &#8211; the net is MUCH more interesting, expanding, filling my mind, connecting me, making me smarter.</p>
<p>When I was a kid whatever my parents told me was gospel. But my own kids will never take anything I say as the truth until they have corroborated with others on the subject matter &#8211; online. If I told my kid that Emporer Nasi Goreng built the Great Wall of China to keep the rabbits out, they will quickly identify me as an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed Up With Dumb Search Marketing Tactics and Web 2.0 - Blog Post - Cre8asite Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9624</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed Up With Dumb Search Marketing Tactics and Web 2.0 - Blog Post - Cre8asite Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9624</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] I loved Zeldman&#39;s thoughts and observations, related to this:Independent content is the new web appQUOTEWhat is the trend? First, big companies (excluding AOL) ignored the web. Then they hired professionals who didn’t understand the web to design their sites and other professionals who didn’t understand the web to create their content. Last year, or maybe two years ago, these companies began hiring smart, experienced web designers who understand usability and web standards. Now they are hiring smart, experienced web content creators. Web 1.0 is the new Web 2.0. Long live Web 3.0. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Slawski</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9623</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Slawski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9623</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Every SEO company in the world will say to write using keywords strewn throughout the text (how awful is that to read???).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As an internet marketer who helps people with the SEO on their sites, I&#039;d like to respond to that comment, Bill.  

Certainly people should use words that their audience will expect to see, and will search with to find that content in the first place.  There&#039;s nothing wrong with making some intelligent choices about the words that you use when you write something.  

But the practice of writing for people and for search engine optimization is pretty much the same - use a particular phrase to be the subject of a page and then use that phrase naturally within the engaging and thoughtful prose you create for that page.  Chances are good that because it is the subject of the page, you will use it in the title to the page, the main heading, and in the body text of what you write.  You likely will even use it in links to the page, and others will use it to link to you.

It&#039;s not a question of writing something, and then stuffing it with keywords, but rather using your keyword phrase as the subject of what you write, and then writing naturally.  Take the post at the top of these comments, for example.  The focus of the post is &quot;independent content.&quot;  It appears in the page title, it appears in the post title/main heading, and it could easily and naturally appear once or twice in the body text of the post, without the post being &quot;horrible to read.&quot;  Many links to the post will likely use the post title in the anchor text of the link.    

 Good writing for SEO purposes isn&#039;t a matter of stewing a dictionary of keywords through text, but rather of writing intelligently, with focus.  In a few days or weeks, this page has a chance of ranking well for the phrase &quot;independent content&quot; because of that focus. 

Places to learn about writing quality content?

Any good book on writing fiction or prose will likely help you learn about writing quality content for the web.  Sitting down and writing, and writing some more, and then some more will even bring you further.  Write some fiction, try out some sonnets, haiku, lymericks, satire, letters to friends.  

Read some good books, and think critically about them, and how the writer reaches out to his or her audience, evokes emotions, gets you to care about different characters, gets you to maintain an interest in the story, tells you about the setting.  

Go to places like Poynter online, and read through the many articles about journalism, editing, photo journalism.  There are many blogs from marketers and copy writers who describe what they do when they write to audiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Every SEO company in the world will say to write using keywords strewn throughout the text (how awful is that to read???).</p></blockquote>
<p>As an internet marketer who helps people with the SEO on their sites, I&#8217;d like to respond to that comment, Bill.  </p>
<p>Certainly people should use words that their audience will expect to see, and will search with to find that content in the first place.  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with making some intelligent choices about the words that you use when you write something.  </p>
<p>But the practice of writing for people and for search engine optimization is pretty much the same &#8211; use a particular phrase to be the subject of a page and then use that phrase naturally within the engaging and thoughtful prose you create for that page.  Chances are good that because it is the subject of the page, you will use it in the title to the page, the main heading, and in the body text of what you write.  You likely will even use it in links to the page, and others will use it to link to you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a question of writing something, and then stuffing it with keywords, but rather using your keyword phrase as the subject of what you write, and then writing naturally.  Take the post at the top of these comments, for example.  The focus of the post is &#8220;independent content.&#8221;  It appears in the page title, it appears in the post title/main heading, and it could easily and naturally appear once or twice in the body text of the post, without the post being &#8220;horrible to read.&#8221;  Many links to the post will likely use the post title in the anchor text of the link.    </p>
<p> Good writing for SEO purposes isn&#8217;t a matter of stewing a dictionary of keywords through text, but rather of writing intelligently, with focus.  In a few days or weeks, this page has a chance of ranking well for the phrase &#8220;independent content&#8221; because of that focus. </p>
<p>Places to learn about writing quality content?</p>
<p>Any good book on writing fiction or prose will likely help you learn about writing quality content for the web.  Sitting down and writing, and writing some more, and then some more will even bring you further.  Write some fiction, try out some sonnets, haiku, lymericks, satire, letters to friends.  </p>
<p>Read some good books, and think critically about them, and how the writer reaches out to his or her audience, evokes emotions, gets you to care about different characters, gets you to maintain an interest in the story, tells you about the setting.  </p>
<p>Go to places like Poynter online, and read through the many articles about journalism, editing, photo journalism.  There are many blogs from marketers and copy writers who describe what they do when they write to audiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weblog Discussion: A Look ahead in Web Design Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9619</link>
		<dc:creator>Weblog Discussion: A Look ahead in Web Design Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9619</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Weblog Discussion: A Look ahead in Web Design Trends: Jeffrey Zeldman gives excellent insight in what he believes we can expect in the next year or so in terms of web design based on his attending sxsw 2007. He&#039;s right in saying that sxsw interactive provides hints as to what&#039;s coming and what&#039;s dying. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Weblog Discussion: A Look ahead in Web Design Trends: Jeffrey Zeldman gives excellent insight in what he believes we can expect in the next year or so in terms of web design based on his attending sxsw 2007. He&#8217;s right in saying that sxsw interactive provides hints as to what&#8217;s coming and what&#8217;s dying. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camaban &#187; Blog Archive Web 2.0 jumping the shark? &#187; :The work and pleasure of a mad, fictional, pre-historic monument builder</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9618</link>
		<dc:creator>Camaban &#187; Blog Archive Web 2.0 jumping the shark? &#187; :The work and pleasure of a mad, fictional, pre-historic monument builder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/03/15/web-1-point-0-is-the-new-web-2-point-0/#comment-9618</guid>
		<description>[...] I linked to Zeldman&#039;s Web 1.0 is the new Web 2.0 the other day. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I linked to Zeldman&#8217;s Web 1.0 is the new Web 2.0 the other day. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

