<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Event Apart Seattle 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/</link>
	<description>Web design news and insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jylan Wynne</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-9166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jylan Wynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 01:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-9166</guid>
		<description>@Jeffrey:

I noticed that when I go to the actual &lt;acronym title=&quot;Cascading Style Sheet&quot;&gt;CSS&lt;/acronym&gt; validation home page, It has an option where it is possible to select CSS 3 validation. If they have the option on that page, I reckon the validator should automatically use CSS 3 validation when when it detects CSS 3 propertys.

BTW, I have read both your DWWS books and I think they are great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeffrey:</p>
<p>I noticed that when I go to the actual <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheet">CSS</acronym> validation home page, It has an option where it is possible to select CSS 3 validation. If they have the option on that page, I reckon the validator should automatically use CSS 3 validation when when it detects CSS 3 propertys.</p>
<p>BTW, I have read both your DWWS books and I think they are great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Zeldman</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Zeldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8677</guid>
		<description>@Jylan:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-shadows&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Text-shadow&lt;/a&gt; is a proposed CSS3 property. Apple&#039;s Safari browser supports it, so Safari users (a fair-sized chunk of this site&#039;s readership) get an ever-so-slightly enhanced layout effect when viewing these pages.

Because text-shadow is still just a &lt;em&gt;proposed&lt;/em&gt; property, the W3C CSS validation service does not recognize it. When the W3C CSS validation service does not recognize a property, attribute, or value, it flags it as an error. That&#039;s a reasonable thing for the validator to do. Most such occurrences are indeed errors.

But in this case, I&#039;ve written the text-shadow property and its values correctly per CSS3 specs. If the validation service grokked CSS3, no error would be reported.

I&#039;m not saying that the W3C CSS validation service &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; understand CSS3, I&#039;m just explaining why its &quot;error&quot; message in this case does not worry me, and does not prevent me from using text-shadow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jylan:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-shadows" rel="nofollow">Text-shadow</a> is a proposed CSS3 property. Apple&#8217;s Safari browser supports it, so Safari users (a fair-sized chunk of this site&#8217;s readership) get an ever-so-slightly enhanced layout effect when viewing these pages.</p>
<p>Because text-shadow is still just a <em>proposed</em> property, the W3C CSS validation service does not recognize it. When the W3C CSS validation service does not recognize a property, attribute, or value, it flags it as an error. That&#8217;s a reasonable thing for the validator to do. Most such occurrences are indeed errors.</p>
<p>But in this case, I&#8217;ve written the text-shadow property and its values correctly per CSS3 specs. If the validation service grokked CSS3, no error would be reported.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that the W3C CSS validation service <em>should</em> understand CSS3, I&#8217;m just explaining why its &#8220;error&#8221; message in this case does not worry me, and does not prevent me from using text-shadow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jylan Wynne</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jylan Wynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 05:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8675</guid>
		<description>To Jeffrey:

I noticed that when I use the &lt;acronym title=&quot;Cascading Style Sheets&quot;&gt;CSS&lt;/acronym&gt; validity check link at the bottom of this site&#039;s pages, the &lt;acronym title=&quot;Cascading Style Sheets&quot;&gt;CSS&lt;/acronym&gt; is not valid because of the text-shadow rule.

I thought you might want to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Jeffrey:</p>
<p>I noticed that when I use the <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> validity check link at the bottom of this site&#8217;s pages, the <acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets">CSS</acronym> is not valid because of the text-shadow rule.</p>
<p>I thought you might want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seattle &#124; An Event Apart Seattle 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8590</link>
		<dc:creator>Seattle &#124; An Event Apart Seattle 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8590</guid>
		<description>[...] More:Jeffrey Zeldman      View blog reactions Seattle  Newsvine:Seattle    February 20th,2007+Freshness [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More:Jeffrey Zeldman      View blog reactions Seattle  Newsvine:Seattle    February 20th,2007+Freshness [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Eastham &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AEA Seattle or Gnomedex?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8572</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Eastham &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AEA Seattle or Gnomedex?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8572</guid>
		<description>[...] An Event Apart and Gnomedex are in Seattle this spring and the decision is driving me nuts.  Maybe work will pay for one and I can sell a kidney for the other.   Does anyone know a black-market kidney dealer? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Event Apart and Gnomedex are in Seattle this spring and the decision is driving me nuts.  Maybe work will pay for one and I can sell a kidney for the other.   Does anyone know a black-market kidney dealer? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Code Candies &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Event</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8563</link>
		<dc:creator>Code Candies &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Event</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8563</guid>
		<description>[...] Wenn Mr. Zeldman zum Event l&#228;dt, dann k&#246;nnen einem schon bei der G&#228;steliste die Tr&#228;nen in die Augen treten: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wenn Mr. Zeldman zum Event l&#228;dt, dann k&#246;nnen einem schon bei der G&#228;steliste die Tr&#228;nen in die Augen treten: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wallis</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8557</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2007/02/20/an-event-apart-seattle-2007/#comment-8557</guid>
		<description>Idea: make the podcasts available for those unfortunates who live too far away to even think about attending, maybe through iTunes, could even publish them as audio books and sell them. Just wishing out loud here ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idea: make the podcasts available for those unfortunates who live too far away to even think about attending, maybe through iTunes, could even publish them as audio books and sell them. Just wishing out loud here &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

