<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inflamed linkazoidal tissues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/</link>
	<description>Web design news and insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Zeldman</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Zeldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 02:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5865</guid>
		<description>This tangent begs a post of its own. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/06/freddie-mercury/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Discussion moved&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tangent begs a post of its own. <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/06/freddie-mercury/" rel="nofollow">Discussion moved</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5863</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5863</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s compare this discussion with our next favourite subject: webdesign :)

If a division of a web page has an &lt;code&gt;&lt;/code&gt; heading to describe the division , would that heading have a different semantic than one that would describe the whole page? A heading is a heading, no matter if it is part of a division or not. The same applies to moustaches I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s compare this discussion with our next favourite subject: webdesign :)</p>
<p>If a division of a web page has an <code></code> heading to describe the division , would that heading have a different semantic than one that would describe the whole page? A heading is a heading, no matter if it is part of a division or not. The same applies to moustaches I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Zeldman</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5862</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Zeldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 22:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5862</guid>
		<description>Ah, but a moustache that is part of a beard or goatee has a different &lt;em&gt;semantic&lt;/em&gt; than one that stands alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but a moustache that is part of a beard or goatee has a different <em>semantic</em> than one that stands alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5861</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5861</guid>
		<description>I imagine there&#039;s no agreed definition for this, but still, the moustache remains a moustache, despite any accompanying features. A moustache is a moustache if there is no other facial hair, as you said. But if there is a beard, then the hair above the upper lip is still a moustache. Only now, it is part of the beard. As for goatees, the mustache accompanies the goatee. In all three situations, it&#039;s still a mustache.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;safe=off&amp;rls=GGGL%2CGGGL%3A2006-24%2CGGGL%3Aen&amp;q=define%3A+mustache&amp;btnG=Search&quot; title=&quot;Define Mustache&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mustache&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;safe=off&amp;rls=GGGL%2CGGGL%3A2006-24%2CGGGL%3Aen&amp;q=define%3A+goatee&amp;btnG=Search&quot; title=&quot;Define Goatee&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Goatee&lt;/a&gt;, supports this view.

But as important as the definition of a moustache is, you&#039;re right about the cover. Nicely positioned, with the &quot;Voices That Matter&quot; written over the mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine there&#8217;s no agreed definition for this, but still, the moustache remains a moustache, despite any accompanying features. A moustache is a moustache if there is no other facial hair, as you said. But if there is a beard, then the hair above the upper lip is still a moustache. Only now, it is part of the beard. As for goatees, the mustache accompanies the goatee. In all three situations, it&#8217;s still a mustache.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;safe=off&amp;rls=GGGL%2CGGGL%3A2006-24%2CGGGL%3Aen&amp;q=define%3A+mustache&amp;btnG=Search" title="Define Mustache" rel="nofollow">Mustache</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;safe=off&amp;rls=GGGL%2CGGGL%3A2006-24%2CGGGL%3Aen&amp;q=define%3A+goatee&amp;btnG=Search" title="Define Goatee" rel="nofollow">Goatee</a>, supports this view.</p>
<p>But as important as the definition of a moustache is, you&#8217;re right about the cover. Nicely positioned, with the &#8220;Voices That Matter&#8221; written over the mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Zeldman</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5841</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Zeldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5841</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/groups/12365967@N00/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;moustache&lt;/a&gt; when it&#039;s the only hair on the face. If it&#039;s part of a beard or goatee, then it&#039;s not a &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/groups/12365967@N00/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;moustache&lt;/a&gt;. A cropped photo, obscuring one&#039;s beard, can make it appear that one has a moustache. That&#039;s what happened here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a <a href="http://flickr.com/groups/12365967@N00/" rel="nofollow">moustache</a> when it&#8217;s the only hair on the face. If it&#8217;s part of a beard or goatee, then it&#8217;s not a <a href="http://flickr.com/groups/12365967@N00/" rel="nofollow">moustache</a>. A cropped photo, obscuring one&#8217;s beard, can make it appear that one has a moustache. That&#8217;s what happened here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Redmond</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5840</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Redmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5840</guid>
		<description>The slashdot interview was definitely interesting.
One sentance in it didn&#039;t sit right though
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/04/1456257&amp;from=zeldman&quot;&gt;Those new to web design, however, may want to start with a book that is a little more comprehensive.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unlike his suggestions I feel those new designers should learn WHY designers use standards before they learn HOW we use them (appropriately).

Obviously though I think he likes your book (its on the homepage of his latest &lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost80.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;experiment&quot;&lt;/a&gt;)...or maybe he likes the Amazon bucks it generates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The slashdot interview was definitely interesting.<br />
One sentance in it didn&#8217;t sit right though</p>
<blockquote cite="http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/04/1456257&amp;from=zeldman"><p>Those new to web design, however, may want to start with a book that is a little more comprehensive.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unlike his suggestions I feel those new designers should learn WHY designers use standards before they learn HOW we use them (appropriately).</p>
<p>Obviously though I think he likes your book (its on the homepage of his latest <a href="http://localhost80.com/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;experiment&#8221;</a>)&#8230;or maybe he likes the Amazon bucks it generates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5839</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5839</guid>
		<description>On the book cover.. either it&#039;s a moustache or your nose is casting a very large, odd-shaped shadow..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the book cover.. either it&#8217;s a moustache or your nose is casting a very large, odd-shaped shadow..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5835</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/12/05/linkazoid/#comment-5835</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t have a mustache???

http://www.flickr.com/photos/zeldman/222249586/in/set-72157594244899227/ - Isn&#039;t that you? Or were you just taking random photos of people on the island?? (Feel free to admit it if you were. We all do that occasionally.... ;) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have a mustache???</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zeldman/222249586/in/set-72157594244899227/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/zeldman/222249586/in/set-72157594244899227/</a> &#8211; Isn&#8217;t that you? Or were you just taking random photos of people on the island?? (Feel free to admit it if you were. We all do that occasionally&#8230;. ;) )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
