<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari better than Firefox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/</link>
	<description>Web design news and insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3 Rendering Improvements · kbps</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-51241</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3 Rendering Improvements · kbps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-51241</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Some are floo­red by the supe­rio­rity of Web­Kit, and desig­ner Jef­frey Zeld­man makes a solid, objec­tive case for it; others are [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Some are floo­red by the supe­rio­rity of Web­Kit, and desig­ner Jef­frey Zeld­man makes a solid, objec­tive case for it; others are [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Instalar Safari 3.0 en Ubuntu Linux &#124; Manzana Mecánica</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-49748</link>
		<dc:creator>Instalar Safari 3.0 en Ubuntu Linux &#124; Manzana Mecánica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-49748</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] fanaticos de Safari dicen que los fonts se ven mucho mejor en Safari que en Firefox. Esta propiedad se mantiene al correr Safari en Linux en lugar de Mac?   [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] fanaticos de Safari dicen que los fonts se ven mucho mejor en Safari que en Firefox. Esta propiedad se mantiene al correr Safari en Linux en lugar de Mac?   [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamthewalr.us : Firefox on the Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-48890</link>
		<dc:creator>iamthewalr.us : Firefox on the Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 05:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-48890</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] if the font rendering on Firefox was as nice (or more nice than) the font rendering on Safari (see http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/ for a lengthy discussion of what I&#8217;m talking [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] if the font rendering on Firefox was as nice (or more nice than) the font rendering on Safari (see <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/</a> for a lengthy discussion of what I&#8217;m talking [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safari better than Firefox &#8211; Targuman</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-47892</link>
		<dc:creator>Safari better than Firefox &#8211; Targuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-47892</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] is why I found this post titled &#8216;Safari better than Firefox?&#8216; so very interesting. Zeldman spends a good deal of time listing all the things that are [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] is why I found this post titled &#8216;Safari better than Firefox?&#8216; so very interesting. Zeldman spends a good deal of time listing all the things that are [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Font rendering on Windows and Mac &#124; published @ aplus moments</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-47448</link>
		<dc:creator>Font rendering on Windows and Mac &#124; published @ aplus moments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-47448</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Zeldman uses examples to drive his point:  It&#8217;s worth pointing out that these tests were done on Macintosh computers, which are known [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Zeldman uses examples to drive his point:  It&#8217;s worth pointing out that these tests were done on Macintosh computers, which are known [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why use SAFARI over FIREFOX? - Home Theater Forum Community</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-44496</link>
		<dc:creator>Why use SAFARI over FIREFOX? - Home Theater Forum Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-44496</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Why use SAFARI over FIREFOX? Functionality-wise, none really. I just like the way Safari handles font display a little better.     Reply to this Post Quote Multi-Quote Export to Wiki      #3   Rating:&#160;0   3/7/07 at [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Why use SAFARI over FIREFOX? Functionality-wise, none really. I just like the way Safari handles font display a little better.     Reply to this Post Quote Multi-Quote Export to Wiki      #3   Rating:&nbsp;0   3/7/07 at [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boagworld - Mac Anti Aliasing Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-43046</link>
		<dc:creator>Boagworld - Mac Anti Aliasing Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-43046</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] opened up Safari yet (I know, I know), but Firefox is known to have inferior rendering (from Zeldman).I&#039;ve just remembered a 24ways article from the 2006 edition which may have what you&#039;re after, in [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] opened up Safari yet (I know, I know), but Firefox is known to have inferior rendering (from Zeldman).I&#8217;ve just remembered a 24ways article from the 2006 edition which may have what you&#8217;re after, in [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNTpixel</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-37219</link>
		<dc:creator>TNTpixel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 03:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-37219</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Don’t get me wrong, I love Firefox. It makes my life so much easier. But we have to agree that its rendering engine is less than stellar, especially in its text handling. In that aspect, I can’t dispute the fact that Safari just looks so, so much better. I’m not alone on this. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Don’t get me wrong, I love Firefox. It makes my life so much easier. But we have to agree that its rendering engine is less than stellar, especially in its text handling. In that aspect, I can’t dispute the fact that Safari just looks so, so much better. I’m not alone on this. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Safari better than Firefox? &#124; chilibean</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-37185</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Safari better than Firefox? &#124; chilibean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-37185</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] a related post, I noticed that Jeffrey Zeldman has published a post in which he finds that Safari is the better browser, at least when it comes to how the two browsers handle text on a [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] a related post, I noticed that Jeffrey Zeldman has published a post in which he finds that Safari is the better browser, at least when it comes to how the two browsers handle text on a [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Instalar Safari 3.0 en Ubuntu Linux &#124; Sushi Knights</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-37037</link>
		<dc:creator>Instalar Safari 3.0 en Ubuntu Linux &#124; Sushi Knights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-37037</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] en Linux  Enviado por mleyton el 8 Enero, 2008 - 04:57. Los fanaticos de Safari dicen que los fonts se ven mucho mejor en Safari que en Firefox. Esta propiedad se mantiene al correr Safari en Linux en lugar de [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] en Linux  Enviado por mleyton el 8 Enero, 2008 &#8211; 04:57. Los fanaticos de Safari dicen que los fonts se ven mucho mejor en Safari que en Firefox. Esta propiedad se mantiene al correr Safari en Linux en lugar de [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoothing out the Creases in Web Fonts &#8212; Jon Tan 陳</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-36955</link>
		<dc:creator>Smoothing out the Creases in Web Fonts &#8212; Jon Tan 陳</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-36955</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Jeffery Zeldman&#8217;s article on Firefox and Safari text rendering (including the comments) is interesting. Aronnax&#8217;s comment that the difference in OS X is Firefox using Quickdraw until 3.0 and Safari using Quartz piqued my curiosity, although I can&#8217;t find reference to the current status but will keep looking. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Jeffery Zeldman&#8217;s article on Firefox and Safari text rendering (including the comments) is interesting. Aronnax&#8217;s comment that the difference in OS X is Firefox using Quickdraw until 3.0 and Safari using Quartz piqued my curiosity, although I can&#8217;t find reference to the current status but will keep looking. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Альтернативный взгляд на… - ɐɥsıqɯ - я.ру</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-36825</link>
		<dc:creator>Альтернативный взгляд на… - ɐɥsıqɯ - я.ру</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 06:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-36825</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] реализации такого бывают разные: см. скриншоты тут: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/β-версияПользовательское соглашение© 2007—2008 «Яндекс» [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] реализации такого бывают разные: см. скриншоты тут: http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/β-версияПользовательское соглашение© 2007—2008 «Яндекс» [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Problems with font rendering on Macs &#124; clagnut/blog</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-36666</link>
		<dc:creator>Problems with font rendering on Macs &#124; clagnut/blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-36666</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] recently Jeffrey Zeldman was bemoaning the sub-standard state of text rendering in Firefox on a Mac. And the sad truth is he only skimmed the surface of type rendering problems across [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] recently Jeffrey Zeldman was bemoaning the sub-standard state of text rendering in Firefox on a Mac. And the sad truth is he only skimmed the surface of type rendering problems across [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloguras &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Safari mejor que Firefox?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-36515</link>
		<dc:creator>bloguras &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Safari mejor que Firefox?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-36515</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] zeldman.com nos habla como interpretan Safari y Firefox los tipos de letra Lucida Grande y Lucida [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] zeldman.com nos habla como interpretan Safari y Firefox los tipos de letra Lucida Grande y Lucida [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox on OS X is awful &#171; The Lumber Room</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-35383</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox on OS X is awful &#171; The Lumber Room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/11/27/safari-beats-firefox/#comment-35383</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeffrey Zeldman has noticed it, but his screenshots aren&#8217;t illustrative enough&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeffrey Zeldman has noticed it, but his screenshots aren&#8217;t illustrative enough&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

