Comments on: Monday breakfast links http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/ Web design news and insights since 1995 Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:11:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Daring Fireball Linked List: October 2006 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-37270 Daring Fireball Linked List: October 2006 Thu, 22 May 2008 20:42:01 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-37270 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Brad Fults’s point-by-point response to Ian Hickson’s “Sending XHTML as text/html Considered Harmful”. (Via Zeldman.) [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Brad Fults’s point-by-point response to Ian Hickson’s “Sending XHTML as text/html Considered Harmful”. (Via Zeldman.) [...]

]]> By: Rush my log » Blog Archive » Neue Hörgewohnheiten http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-5272 Rush my log » Blog Archive » Neue Hörgewohnheiten Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:08:44 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-5272 [...] Noch jede Menge mehr Musik: Thirty-three important Folkways Recordings for download. Louis Bonfa, Mighty Sparrow, Woodie Guthrie, Henry Cowell and more. [via Zeldman] [...] [...] Noch jede Menge mehr Musik: Thirty-three important Folkways Recordings for download. Louis Bonfa, Mighty Sparrow, Woodie Guthrie, Henry Cowell and more. [via Zeldman] [...]

]]> By: Interview: Bruce Lawson » graphic:DESIGN:basics http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-5153 Interview: Bruce Lawson » graphic:DESIGN:basics Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:30:55 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-5153 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Yeah, one of the glasshaus editors, Chris Mills, commissions for friends of ED (who bought many Wrox and glasshaus titles). I’ve just finished a full revamp of an old glasshaus accessibility book, which rocks (Zeldman reviewed it: “Vast and practically all-encompassing, this newly updated classic belongs on every web designer’s shelf). I’m also tech reviewing a beginner’s guide to HTML. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Yeah, one of the glasshaus editors, Chris Mills, commissions for friends of ED (who bought many Wrox and glasshaus titles). I’ve just finished a full revamp of an old glasshaus accessibility book, which rocks (Zeldman reviewed it: “Vast and practically all-encompassing, this newly updated classic belongs on every web designer’s shelf). I’m also tech reviewing a beginner’s guide to HTML. [...]

]]> By: Ben 'Cerbera' Millard http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-5033 Ben 'Cerbera' Millard Tue, 07 Nov 2006 07:06:50 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-5033 I agree with what Jemaleddin says about being "led down the wrong path". I hope readers of this blog don't take the XHTML seriously. Luckily, Jacques Distler has described the details of some problems with <code>text/html</code> documents using XHTML document types in the comments for the article. Using a hand-coded site the author claimed as being perfect XHTML as the example of why <code>text/html</code> xHTML isn't compatible with <code>application/xhtml+xml</code> XHTML was a nice touch. Was your linking to it ironic, like a 'look what the kids are still arguing about' type of thing? :) I agree with what Jemaleddin says about being “led down the wrong path”. I hope readers of this blog don’t take the XHTML seriously.

Luckily, Jacques Distler has described the details of some problems with text/html documents using XHTML document types in the comments for the article. Using a hand-coded site the author claimed as being perfect XHTML as the example of why text/html xHTML isn’t compatible with application/xhtml+xml XHTML was a nice touch.

Was your linking to it ironic, like a ‘look what the kids are still arguing about’ type of thing? :)

]]> By: Bruce Lawson’s personal site  : French knock-knock joke http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4971 Bruce Lawson’s personal site  : French knock-knock joke Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:12:43 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4971 [...] And Zeldman reviewed the accessibility book: Vast and practically all-encompassing, this newly updated classic belongs on every web designer’s shelf. (Better still, open it and read.) [...] [...] And Zeldman reviewed the accessibility book: Vast and practically all-encompassing, this newly updated classic belongs on every web designer’s shelf. (Better still, open it and read.) [...]

]]> By: TextDrive Community Forum / Congrats Ray? http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4893 TextDrive Community Forum / Congrats Ray? Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:29:07 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4893 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Congrats! (If it's YOU, that is.) http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monda … ast-links/ [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Congrats! (If it’s YOU, that is.) http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monda … ast-links/ [...]

]]> By: Jemaleddin http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4890 Jemaleddin Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:30:01 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4890 I'm not trying to be a troll or anything - it's just that he's wrong. I've been burned by html/xml issues before and hate seeing people led down the wrong path. I’m not trying to be a troll or anything – it’s just that he’s wrong. I’ve been burned by html/xml issues before and hate seeing people led down the wrong path.

]]> By: Jeffrey Zeldman http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4888 Jeffrey Zeldman Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:59:51 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4888 <blockquote> I don’t konw why you “love” Brad’s article about XHTML - he clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about. If he’d ever actually served XHTML as applicatoin/xhtml+xml, he wouldn’t have written such nonsense. </blockquote> Stop, you'll hurt your throat.

I don’t konw why you “love” Brad’s article about XHTML – he clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about. If he’d ever actually served XHTML as applicatoin/xhtml+xml, he wouldn’t have written such nonsense.

Stop, you’ll hurt your throat.

]]> By: Jemaleddin http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4885 Jemaleddin Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:35:16 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4885 I don't konw why you "love" Brad's article about XHTML - he clearly doesn't know what he's talking about. If he'd ever actually served XHTML as applicatoin/xhtml+xml, he wouldn't have written such nonsense. I don’t konw why you “love” Brad’s article about XHTML – he clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about. If he’d ever actually served XHTML as applicatoin/xhtml+xml, he wouldn’t have written such nonsense.

]]> By: Jeffrey Zeldman http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4870 Jeffrey Zeldman Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:02:33 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4870 Have you seen <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/timemachine.html" rel="nofollow">Time Machine's interface</a>? Ugh. Have you seen Time Machine’s interface? Ugh.

]]> By: Tripix.net » Blog Archive » El estandar HTML no ha muerto http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4867 Tripix.net » Blog Archive » El estandar HTML no ha muerto Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:16:46 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4867 [...] [vía 456bereastreet y Jeffrey Zeldman Presents] [...] [...] [vía 456bereastreet y Jeffrey Zeldman Presents] [...]

]]> By: Joe http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4865 Joe Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:19:17 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4865 About the Apple Backup deal. The upcoming version of Mac OS X has a different backup mechanism than the current Backup application that comes with .Mac -- that's that thing called Time Machine. I certainly hope it's better than Backup. Getting more people backing up can only be a good thing, unless your backups don't work. About the Apple Backup deal. The upcoming version of Mac OS X has a different backup mechanism than the current Backup application that comes with .Mac — that’s that thing called Time Machine. I certainly hope it’s better than Backup. Getting more people backing up can only be a good thing, unless your backups don’t work.

]]> By: Chris Kelly http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4861 Chris Kelly Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:05:57 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4861 Re: Backup - I think you are confusing Backup, a piece of the $99/ Yr .Mac package (which everyone is complaining about) with <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/timemachine.html" title="link to Apple - Time Machine Page" rel="nofollow">Time Machine</a>, the selling point of Mac OS X 10.5. Still, God bless SuperDuper... Re: Backup – I think you are confusing Backup, a piece of the $99/ Yr .Mac package (which everyone is complaining about) with Time Machine, the selling point of Mac OS X 10.5. Still, God bless SuperDuper…

]]> By: Richard Flynn http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4859 Richard Flynn Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:27:58 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/30/monday-breakfast-links/#comment-4859 As far as I'm aware, the post about Backup is about Backup 3, which is given to .Mac subscribers. The application is indeed something of a joke, and has been picked up by Gruber as such in recent days. However, this isn't what's being mooted for OS X 10.5 Leopard—'Time Machine', as the forthcoming OS feature is called, has nothing to do with the way Backup.app worked, as far as I know. As far as I’m aware, the post about Backup is about Backup 3, which is given to .Mac subscribers. The application is indeed something of a joke, and has been picked up by Gruber as such in recent days. However, this isn’t what’s being mooted for OS X 10.5 Leopard—’Time Machine’, as the forthcoming OS feature is called, has nothing to do with the way Backup.app worked, as far as I know.

]]>