Comments on: Crash Boom Bop http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/ Web design news and insights since 1995 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:54:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Justin Bell http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-4471 Justin Bell Sat, 21 Oct 2006 11:06:28 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-4471 Hmmm. YouTube gets a 6 our of 52, Digg gets 13, and Flickr, just a 4. It is right about some things, though; Flicker isn't in beta, it's in gamma! Hmmm. YouTube gets a 6 our of 52, Digg gets 13, and Flickr, just a 4.

It is right about some things, though; Flicker isn’t in beta, it’s in gamma!

]]> By: Ritz http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3965 Ritz Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:33:22 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3965 Not quite sure that it can be anything other than 2.7183... That's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_%28mathematical_constant%29" rel="nofollow">Euler's constant</a> and "one of the most important numbers in mathematics." If that was to change I don't know how we would go on. Pi wouldn't be Pi and we would have nothing to go with our coffee! Not quite sure that it can be anything other than 2.7183… That’s Euler’s constant and “one of the most important numbers in mathematics.” If that was to change I don’t know how we would go on. Pi wouldn’t be Pi and we would have nothing to go with our coffee!

]]> By: James http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3912 James Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:51:08 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3912 > But it's so much *fun* to taunt the happy fun validator that scores 15/52 on it's own test. ;) Bah! Bah, I say. The Validator is BEYOND Web 2.0. Even past Web 3.0; it may be (Web 3.0) 2.0. I'm not sure. Certainly Web NG, I know that. If we allowed The Validator to recurse over its own Two-ness, the resulting energy field would destroy the Web as we know it! Say, maybe that's not such a bad idea after all ... > But it’s so much *fun* to taunt the happy fun validator that scores 15/52 on it’s own test. ;)

Bah! Bah, I say. The Validator is BEYOND Web 2.0. Even past Web 3.0; it may be (Web 3.0) 2.0. I’m not sure. Certainly Web NG, I know that.

If we allowed The Validator to recurse over its own Two-ness, the resulting energy field would destroy the Web as we know it!

Say, maybe that’s not such a bad idea after all …

]]> By: Sarah http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3887 Sarah Sat, 14 Oct 2006 07:58:51 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3887 But it's so much *fun* to taunt the happy fun validator that scores 15/52 on it's own test. ;) But it’s so much *fun* to taunt the happy fun validator that scores 15/52 on it’s own test. ;)

]]> By: Jeffrey Zeldman http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3878 Jeffrey Zeldman Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:52:51 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3878 <blockquote> try putting http://web2.0validator.com/ into the validator. </blockquote> OMG ROTFL

try putting http://web2.0validator.com/ into the validator.

OMG ROTFL

]]> By: ron http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3877 ron Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:40:10 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3877 try putting http://web2.0validator.com/ into the validator. try putting http://web2.0validator.com/ into the validator.

]]> By: JD on EP: Motion for accessibility http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3859 JD on EP: Motion for accessibility Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:43:02 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3859 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Motion for accessibility: This is a grim example -- New York Times showing the path of Cory Lidle's plane -- but it's a clear demonstration of how time-based graphics convey more information, more accurately, to more people, than either text or still images would. [via Jeffrey Zeldman] [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Motion for accessibility: This is a grim example — New York Times showing the path of Cory Lidle’s plane — but it’s a clear demonstration of how time-based graphics convey more information, more accurately, to more people, than either text or still images would. [via Jeffrey Zeldman] [...]

]]> By: Mau http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3858 Mau Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:39:14 +0000 http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/12/crash-boom-bop/#comment-3858 Re: Airplane. Sad news indeed. Interestingly, I heard that most of the plane's fuselage literally <em>disintegrated</em>. Where have I heard that before?? What do you think about those modern fuselages that disintegrate on impact? Re: Osil8. Do you think those <a href="http://www.0sil8.com/episodes/97/07/26/index.html" rel="nofollow">hidden pleasures</a> are still fashionable?. Wait a second! is that site up to date? Re: Airplane. Sad news indeed. Interestingly, I heard that most of the plane’s fuselage literally disintegrated. Where have I heard that before?? What do you think about those modern fuselages that disintegrate on impact?

Re: Osil8. Do you think those hidden pleasures are still fashionable?. Wait a second! is that site up to date?

]]>