<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An angry fix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/</link>
	<description>Web design news and insights since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - August, 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-48555</link>
		<dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - August, 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-48555</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] excerpted below  Something went wrong at the W3C? Lets see: To Hell with WCAG 2 Leaving W3C QA Dev. An angry fix SVG12: brief clarification on formal objections SVG Tiny 1.2 in Candidate Wreckommendation stage [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] excerpted below  Something went wrong at the W3C? Lets see: To Hell with WCAG 2 Leaving W3C QA Dev. An angry fix SVG12: brief clarification on formal objections SVG Tiny 1.2 in Candidate Wreckommendation stage [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daring Fireball Linked List: Zeldman on the W3C's Relevancy</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-44219</link>
		<dc:creator>Daring Fireball Linked List: Zeldman on the W3C's Relevancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-44219</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Zeldman on the W3C&#8217;s&#160;Relevancy [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Zeldman on the W3C&#8217;s&#160;Relevancy [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schizma w świecie standardów sieciowych - W3C a WHATWG - Webhosting.pl</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-44055</link>
		<dc:creator>Schizma w świecie standardów sieciowych - W3C a WHATWG - Webhosting.pl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-44055</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/ [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/</a> [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Structure et sens : ne confondons pas les torchons et les serviettes : Ergonomie web, Ruby on Rails et Architecture de l'information</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-43482</link>
		<dc:creator>Structure et sens : ne confondons pas les torchons et les serviettes : Ergonomie web, Ruby on Rails et Architecture de l'information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-43482</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Zeldman brocarde l&#8217;incapacité du W3C à se mettre à l&#8217;écoute des besoins des développeurs et designers Web, et prédit que la communauté finira par se tourner [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Zeldman brocarde l&#8217;incapacité du W3C à se mettre à l&#8217;écoute des besoins des développeurs et designers Web, et prédit que la communauté finira par se tourner [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-40921</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-40921</guid>
		<description>Björn Hörmann has given an &lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Feb/0181&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;update on the issue which was mentionned.&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Björn Hörmann has given an <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Feb/0181" rel="nofollow">update on the issue which was mentionned.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is W3C? Are W3C Errors Relevant to SEO?</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-40734</link>
		<dc:creator>What is W3C? Are W3C Errors Relevant to SEO?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-40734</guid>
		<description>[...] have a tendency to &#8220;stifle creativity&#8220;, never allowing web developers to push the boundaries of what is acceptable in order to see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have a tendency to &#8220;stifle creativity&#8220;, never allowing web developers to push the boundaries of what is acceptable in order to see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billigflüge</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-38295</link>
		<dc:creator>Billigflüge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-38295</guid>
		<description>Truth be told, we and our practical concerns never drove the organization. But after ordinary designers and developers spent nearly a decade selling web standards to browser makers and developing best practices around accessibility and semantics, one hoped the W3C might realize that there was value in occasionally consulting its user base...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth be told, we and our practical concerns never drove the organization. But after ordinary designers and developers spent nearly a decade selling web standards to browser makers and developing best practices around accessibility and semantics, one hoped the W3C might realize that there was value in occasionally consulting its user base&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elsewhere on the 'Net - Standards/W3C</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-37682</link>
		<dc:creator>Elsewhere on the 'Net - Standards/W3C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-37682</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] An angry fix [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] An angry fix [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcast 44: Writing for the web : Boagworld web design podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-37192</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcast 44: Writing for the web : Boagworld web design podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 04:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-37192</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] just Joe Clark speaking out against the W3C. Jeffrey Zeldman (the godfather of web standards) has condemned the W3C in an article on his site, saying:Beholden to its corporate paymasters who alone can afford [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] just Joe Clark speaking out against the W3C. Jeffrey Zeldman (the godfather of web standards) has condemned the W3C in an article on his site, saying:Beholden to its corporate paymasters who alone can afford [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric's Archived Thoughts: 2006 August 14</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-37038</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric's Archived Thoughts: 2006 August 14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-37038</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] my head, at any rate, it was Jeffrey&#8217;s angry post that kicked off the latest round of posts about consortium contretemps, even though Jeffrey&#8217;s [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] my head, at any rate, it was Jeffrey&#8217;s angry post that kicked off the latest round of posts about consortium contretemps, even though Jeffrey&#8217;s [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: portrait oil painting</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-23781</link>
		<dc:creator>portrait oil painting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-23781</guid>
		<description>What’s happening to W3C?  Although I’ve heard a lot of people leaving W3C, I still don’t understand what’s going on with W3C.  Why are they not doing anything to get hold of these important people or clients?  Are they up to something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s happening to W3C?  Although I’ve heard a lot of people leaving W3C, I still don’t understand what’s going on with W3C.  Why are they not doing anything to get hold of these important people or clients?  Are they up to something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Custom web design studio</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-21609</link>
		<dc:creator>Custom web design studio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-21609</guid>
		<description>I think having multiple standards organizations in the same arena dilutes the authority of all of them. Many people setting up alternative standards organizations know this. That they are going ahead anyway may indicate recklessness, but more likely it indicates the severity of the W3C’s problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think having multiple standards organizations in the same arena dilutes the authority of all of them. Many people setting up alternative standards organizations know this. That they are going ahead anyway may indicate recklessness, but more likely it indicates the severity of the W3C’s problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: games</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-17546</link>
		<dc:creator>games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 05:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-17546</guid>
		<description>In addition to the complaints you’ve registered here, I think the process for reviewing and grading websites is also seriously broken.  Too often a page that utilizes tons of code will be downgraded for very minor infractions, and many times this means pages with tons of violations can essentially wind up with the same rating as a complex page with minor violations.  In addition, there have been lots of questions raised lately about whether standards have a tendency to stifle creativity in some programmers, never allowing them to push the boundaries of what is acceptable in order to see what might be accomplished outside the rules.  Generally, I think standards are a good idea, and I have use them and even promote them in the past, but I do think that there are some major issues that need to be addressed if the average programmer is going to continue to support them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the complaints you’ve registered here, I think the process for reviewing and grading websites is also seriously broken.  Too often a page that utilizes tons of code will be downgraded for very minor infractions, and many times this means pages with tons of violations can essentially wind up with the same rating as a complex page with minor violations.  In addition, there have been lots of questions raised lately about whether standards have a tendency to stifle creativity in some programmers, never allowing them to push the boundaries of what is acceptable in order to see what might be accomplished outside the rules.  Generally, I think standards are a good idea, and I have use them and even promote them in the past, but I do think that there are some major issues that need to be addressed if the average programmer is going to continue to support them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Standards Essay</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-7481</link>
		<dc:creator>Standards Essay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-7481</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Zeldman, Jeffrey. (2006). An angry fix. Zeldman.com. http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/ [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Zeldman, Jeffrey. (2006). An angry fix. Zeldman.com. <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/</a> [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An angry fix - Nick Verstappen</title>
		<link>http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-7368</link>
		<dc:creator>An angry fix - Nick Verstappen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeldman.com/2006/07/17/an-angry-fix/#comment-7368</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] An angry fix [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] An angry fix [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

